Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TRANSAKSI PERBANKAN MELALUI INTERNET BANKING DI INDONESIA Pudyastiwi, Elisabeth
Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): September, Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpss.v3i2.5979

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, menganalisis, transaksi perbankan melalui internet banking di Indonesia. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian bersifat yuridis normatif. Dalam pengumpulan data penelitian, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku, jurnal, artikel, dan karya tulis lainnya, baik yang berasal dari media cetak maupun internet yang berhubungan dengan penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Internet banking merupakan salah satu pelayanan jasa bank yang memungkinkan nasabah untuk memperoleh informasi, melakukan komunikasi dan melakukan transaksi perbankan melalui jaringan internet. Transaksi perbankan melalui internet banking sampai saat ini belum diatur secara khusus dalam sistem perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Pengaturan mengenai transaksi perbankan melalui internet banking di Indonesia yang ada saat ini belum dapat menjamin kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi para pihak, baik pihak bank maupun nasabah. Upaya perlindungan hukum telah dilakukan oleh pemerintah, namun substansi-substansi dari peraturan- peraturan yang ada belum menunjukkan adanya upaya perlindungan hukum yang optimal bagi para pihak.
EIGEDOM RIGHTS AS A PERFECT GUARANTEE OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS TO OWNERSHIP Mauliana, Awanda Luthfia Dwi; Handoyo, Dede Sidiq; Zahra, Syifa Amalia; Erowati, Eti Mul; Pudyastiwi, Elisabeth
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 01 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i01.1174

Abstract

Eigendom, derived from Dutch, means "ownership" and refers to the right to control and manage both tangible and intangible assets. In Western legal systems, eigendom is regulated by civil law, granting absolute ownership. In Indonesia, the Civil Code recognizes eigendom as the highest form of ownership, giving owners full freedom to enjoy and manage their assets while adhering to regulations. A clear understanding of eigendom is crucial for legal certainty in property transactions and maintaining economic and social stability. This study employs a normative legal approach to analyze eigendom regulations in Indonesia and compare them with ownership concepts in other countries. An empirical approach is also used through literature studies and interviews with legal practitioners, notaries, and land officials. The data were analyzed using content analysis and presented in comparative tables and diagrams. The study found that eigendom rights in the Civil Code provide strong ownership guarantees but face challenges, particularly in verifying and validating ownership documents, influenced by colonial-era legacies. Comparisons with legal systems in other countries highlight interpretative differences, indicating the need for stricter verification to prevent misuse of rights and illegitimate claims. Although eigendom ensures strong legal protection for property ownership, the study concludes that regulatory improvements are necessary to promote fairness and transparency. The combination of normative and empirical approaches offers a comprehensive view of eigendom rights and emphasizes the urgency of legal reforms for justice in modern property law in Indonesia
Civil Responsibility Model of Coastal State to Oil Pollution in the Sea as the Impact from the Stipulation of Dumping Area by Tanker Ship Elly Kristiani Purwendah; Agoes Djatmiko; Elisabeth Pudyastiwi
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): March
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/iccle.v1i1.36331

Abstract

The research findings reveal a pluralistic understanding of dumping within the Indonesian Legal System, evident in various laws, including Law No. 17 of 1985 on the Ratification of UNCLOS, Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, Government Regulation No. 29 of 2014 on the Prevention of Environmental Pollution, Ministerial Regulation No. 136 of 2015 on the Second Amendment to Ministerial Regulation No. 52 of 2011 on Dredging and Reclamation, and Ministerial Decree No. 4 of 2005 on the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. Dumping countermeasures are primarily perceived as acts related to dredging and reclamation, identified as contributors to the silting of shipping channels. Notably, Indonesia has not ratified the London Dumping Convention, and there is a lack of a definitive list specifying wastes requiring special arrangements and absolute prohibition within the coastal states' territories. Consequently, compensation has not been prioritized as a state-led measure for marine environmental protection. The state's responsibility, enforced through the State Attorney, necessitates procedural formalities, including a special power of attorney. Collaborative efforts with relevant institutions, particularly the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, are deemed essential. The current landscape in Indonesia reveals overlapping authorities among agencies, leading to conflicting interpretations of civil lawsuit issues related to environmental damages. The proposed model advocates for centralizing environmental priorities within the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, coordinated through the State Attorney, as a strategic step towards addressing these complex issues.