Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.633
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM Islam Futura KARSA: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture) Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah ALQALAM Ulumuna Tebuireng: Journal of Islamic Studies and Society Didaktika Religia Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam
Ahmad Fathan Aniq
IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Islamism Denounced: Madura Kiais’ Perspective of Nationalism A'la, Abd; Muktafi, Muktafi; Bakar, Abu; Zamzami, Mukhammad; Aniq, Ahmad Fathan
KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture Vol. 29 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/karsa.v29i2.4876

Abstract

The transmission of Islamism among the kiais and their students in Madura has become more critical to examine in the last decade. However, some kiais of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) in Bangkalan Madura see that Islamism or political Islam will gradually erode their national commitment. This article intends to reinterpret the nationalism vision of several kiais of NU and measure the extent of their views on the ideology of Islamism discoursed by the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI). By interviewing several kiais, this study finds that the propagation of Islamism in Bangkalan has not been as massive as occurred in Pamekasan, another sub-districts in Madura. The FPI-style Islamism in Bangkalan has been propagated only by a small group though they are vigorously active on social media. The majority of the NU community remains devoted to nationalism, committing that the NKRI is the final state. Islamic moderation promulgated by the kiais has been widely accepted and deeply rooted among the NU community. They believe nationalism and religion should not be separated from the spirit of their struggle (khittah). These two elements have united within their fighting spirit and become the primary trigger in devoting themselves to the nation and state to preserve national sovereignty and the integrity of Indonesia.
Regulating Halal Tourism: The Role of Islamic Organisational Fatwas in the Shariatization of Indonesia Dzukroni, Arisy Abror; Aniq, Ahmad Fathan
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 57 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v57i2.1344

Abstract

This article explores the regulation of halal tourism in Indonesia, focusing on the roles of the main Islamic organizations in Indonesia, namely the Indonesian Ulema Council (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI), Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), and Muhammadiyah. Prompted by the ongoing debates surrounding the relationship between modernity and Islam in the context of halal tourism, this research analyses fatwas issued by these organizations and various local regulations in Indonesia. The study finds that the three organizations respond to halal tourism issues with differing approaches, with MUI dominating the discourse. MUI and NU tend to adopt exclusive stances, while Muhammadiyah demonstrates a more inclusive and flexible approach. The dominance of MUI fatwas is reflected in their frequent citation and integration into various local regulations related to halal tourism, indicating significant influence in shaping regional policies. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s theory of power/knowledge, this article concludes that the dominance of MUI fatwas in shaping the discourse of halal tourism regulation leads to a more exclusive society through the process of shariatization. This phenomenon reflects the influence of knowledge and policy control by Islamic institutions, directly or indirectly impacting the landscape of halal tourism regulation in Indonesia. Artikel ini mengeksplorasi regulasi pariwisata halal di Indonesia dengan memfokuskan pada peran organisasi Islam utama di Indonesia, yakni Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI), Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), dan Muhammadiyah. Penelitian ini dipicu oleh kompleksitas perdebatan terkini seputar hubungan antara modernitas dan Islam dalam konteks pariwisata halal. Melalui analisis fatwa dari ketiga organisasi Islam dan sejumlah peraturan daerah di Indonesia, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa ketiga organisasi tersebut merespons isu pariwisata halal dengan pendekatan yang berbeda, di mana MUI mendominasi diskursus tersebut. MUI dan NU cenderung mengadopsi sikap eksklusif, sementara Muhammadiyah menunjukkan pendekatan yang lebih inklusif dan fleksibel. Dominasi fatwa MUI tercermin dalam seringnya fatwa tersebut dirujuk dan diintegrasikan ke dalam berbagai peraturan daerah terkait pariwisata halal. Hal itu menandakan pengaruh yang signifikan dalam pembentukan kebijakan daerah. Dengan merujuk pada teori kuasa pengetahuan Michel Foucault, artikel ini berkesimpulan bahwa dominasi fatwa MUI dalam membentuk diskursus regulasi pariwisata halal mengarah pada masyarakat yang lebih eksklusif melalui proses syariatisasi. Fenomena ini mencerminkan pengaruh kontrol pengetahuan dan kebijakan oleh lembaga-lembaga Islam, yang secara langsung atau tidak langsung memengaruhi lanskap regulasi pariwisata halal di Indonesia.
An Interpretation of the East Java MUI Fatwa on “Sound Horeg”: Bayānī, ‘Irfānī, and Burhānī Perspectives Ach Badri Amien; M. Sa’ad Alfanny; Achmad Sholakhuddin Al Af Ghoni; Aniq, Ahmad Fathan
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i2.2879

Abstract

Abstract: The phenomenon of “sound horeg” audio systems with bass pressure reaching 95–135 dB has caused social, health, and environmental problems in various regions of East Java. Responding to this condition, the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) of East Java issued Fatwa Number 1 of 2025, which stipulates that the use of “sound horeg” with excessive intensity and accompanied by practices that lead to harm is declared harām (forbidden), while reasonable use for positive activities is permitted. This study aims to explain the normative basis of the fatwa through the epistemological perspective of Muḥammad ‘Ābid al-Jābirī, covering three models of reasoning: bayānī, ‘irfānī, and burhānī. Data were collected through a literature study by examining official fatwa documents, fiqh literature, al-Jābirī’s works, and scientific articles related to the “sound horeg” phenomenon. The analysis was carried out using a qualitative-analytical approach, namely, reading the fatwa as a legal text as well as a social phenomenon to see how the three models of reasoning work. The study's findings demonstrate that the MUI combines the legitimacy of sharia texts (bayānī), ethical-spiritual considerations of society (ʿirfānī), and empirical evidence regarding the dangers of noise and social damage (burhānī). Thus, this fatwa is not merely normative but also constitutes a comprehensive epistemological response to changes in modern entertainment culture.   Keywords: Fatwa, Majelis Ulama Indonesia, Sound Horeg, Bayānī–‘Irfānī–Burhānī.   Abstrak: Fenomena “sound horeg” sistem audio dengan tekanan bass mencapai 95–135 dB menimbulkan persoalan sosial, kesehatan, serta gangguan lingkungan di berbagai daerah Jawa Timur. Merespons kondisi tersebut, Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) Jawa Timur menerbitkan Fatwa Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 yang menetapkan bahwa penggunaan “sound horeg” dengan intensitas berlebihan dan disertai praktik yang mengarah pada kemudaratan dinyatakan haram, sedangkan penggunaan wajar untuk kegiatan positif diperbolehkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menjelaskan dasar normatif fatwa tersebut melalui perspektif epistemologi Muḥammad ‘Ābid al-Jābirī, meliputi tiga model nalar: bayānī, ‘irfānī, dan burhānī. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dengan menelaah dokumen resmi fatwa, literatur fikih, karya al-Jābirī, serta artikel ilmiah terkait fenomena “sound horeg”. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif-analitis, yaitu membaca fatwa sebagai teks hukum sekaligus fenomena sosial untuk melihat bagaimana ketiga model nalar tersebut bekerja. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa MUI menggabungkan legitimasi teks syariat (bayānī), pertimbangan etika-spiritual masyarakat (ʿirfānī), serta bukti empiris mengenai bahaya kebisingan dan kerusakan sosial (burhānī). Dengan demikian, fatwa ini tidak hanya bersifat normatif, tetapi merupakan respon epistemologis yang komprehensif terhadap perubahan budaya hiburan modern. Kata Kunci: Fatwa, Majelis Ulama Indonesia, Sound Horeg, Bayānī–‘Irfānī–Burhānī.
Co-Authors A'la, Abd Abd A`la Abu Bakar Ach Badri Amien Achmad Sholakhuddin Al Af Ghoni ARDIANSYAH ARDIANSYAH Asman Taeali Dzukroni, Arisy Abror Heri Firmansyah Jauhari, Moh. Ahsanuddin Jubaedah, Dedah M. Sa’ad Alfanny Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor Mukhammad Zamzami Muktafi Muktafi Putra, Haris Maiza Udin, Nur Hidayat Wakhid