Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

The Islamic Legal Construction on Global Peace: An Integrative Study of Maqāṣid al-Syarī'ah and the United Nations Charter Razi, Fahrur; Ananda Prayogi
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i1.8192

Abstract

In a world that is constantly being shaped by armed conflicts and geopolitical instability, there is an increasingly urgent need for a legal framework that can support global peace. The United Nations (UN) Charter has long formed the basis of international law, promoting peace and preventing aggression. However, its effectiveness is often hindered by various structural limitations, such as power imbalances and weak enforcement of sanctions. Against this backdrop, maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, the core of Islamic legal theory, can make a significant contribution as both an ethical-religious instrument for Muslims and a universal paradigm to reinforce the spirit and structure of the UN Charter. This article aims to construct an Islamic legal framework for global peace by taking an integrative approach to maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and the principles of international law set out in the UN Charter. It will be compared with classical and contemporary fiqh siyasah. A normative-comparative methodology is employed, analysing primary sources such as the works of Ali Haidar and Yusuf al-Qaradawi, alongside case studies of global conflicts in various regions, including Palestine–Israel, Syria, Ukraine, and Yemen. The results of the study show that maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, with its core values of hifẓ al-nafs (protection of life), al-ʿadl (justice), and al-silm (peace), aligns with the principles of the UN Charter and can provide an ethical and spiritual dimension largely absent from modern international law. Unlike fiqh siyasah, the UN Charter prioritizes formal legality, whereas Islamic law emphasizes moral legitimacy and substantive justice. The article concludes that integrating maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah into global peace law discourse could enrich global civilisation with a more humane, inclusive and transnational approach.
The Islamic Legal Construction on Global Peace: An Integrative Study of Maqāṣid al-Syarī'ah and the United Nations Charter Razi, Fahrur; Ananda Prayogi
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i1.8192

Abstract

In a world that is constantly being shaped by armed conflicts and geopolitical instability, there is an increasingly urgent need for a legal framework that can support global peace. The United Nations (UN) Charter has long formed the basis of international law, promoting peace and preventing aggression. However, its effectiveness is often hindered by various structural limitations, such as power imbalances and weak enforcement of sanctions. Against this backdrop, maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, the core of Islamic legal theory, can make a significant contribution as both an ethical-religious instrument for Muslims and a universal paradigm to reinforce the spirit and structure of the UN Charter. This article aims to construct an Islamic legal framework for global peace by taking an integrative approach to maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and the principles of international law set out in the UN Charter. It will be compared with classical and contemporary fiqh siyasah. A normative-comparative methodology is employed, analysing primary sources such as the works of Ali Haidar and Yusuf al-Qaradawi, alongside case studies of global conflicts in various regions, including Palestine–Israel, Syria, Ukraine, and Yemen. The results of the study show that maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, with its core values of hifẓ al-nafs (protection of life), al-ʿadl (justice), and al-silm (peace), aligns with the principles of the UN Charter and can provide an ethical and spiritual dimension largely absent from modern international law. Unlike fiqh siyasah, the UN Charter prioritizes formal legality, whereas Islamic law emphasizes moral legitimacy and substantive justice. The article concludes that integrating maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah into global peace law discourse could enrich global civilisation with a more humane, inclusive and transnational approach.
The Text–Culture–Living Hadith Model: An Anthropologically Informed Framework for Hadith Contextualization Widad, Nazilatul; Razi, Fahrur
Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jsai.v7i2.10226

Abstract

Hadith contextualization requires a method that preserves textual authority while accounting for the historical, cultural, and social conditions relevant to interpretation. Existing studies have examined contextual criticism, anthropological approaches, and living hadith, but these components are not always organized into an explicit analytical sequence with clearly differentiated evidentiary functions. This article formulates the Text–Culture–Living Hadith model as an anthropologically informed framework for hadith contextualization. It employs qualitative library research, content analysis, and conceptual synthesis of hadith sources, methodological scholarship, anthropological studies of Muslim practice, and living hadith research. The framework comprises seven stages: textual identification, attributed evaluation of hadith status, examination of asbab al-wurud and related reports, sociohistorical and cultural analysis, analysis of normative purpose and cultural form, examination of documented reception, and contemporary contextualization. Its application to the report “Whoever has hair should honor it” identifies the source as Sunan Abi Dawud, hadith 4163, and distinguishes it from the related report concerning disheveled hair in hadith 4062. The analysis shows that textual evidence, historical inference, social reception, and contemporary interpretation must be treated as related but non-equivalent forms of evidence. The model contributes a transparent procedural framework for connecting hadith criticism with cultural and reception analysis. It remains a conceptual proposal whose empirical usefulness requires testing through clearly defined textual corpora and field-based studies of Muslim reception.