Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.551
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Transparansi Hukum SIASAT Journal Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Waraqat : Jurnal Ilmu_Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies ALWAQFU Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi dan Wakaf Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law
Muhammad Faisal Hamdani
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Relationship of Interfaith in Tunisia (Critical Study of Ibn ‘Ashur Tafsir W.1973) Amiur Nuruddin; Ahmad Qarib; Azwani Lubis; Muhammad Faisal Hamdani
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute February
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v2i1.208

Abstract

Relations between Muslims and non-Muslims will often experience disruption / friction if not addressed wisely, especially in terms of social politics, the order of social life. In Islam, Religion and Politics two things are difficult to separate. This often becomes a polemic to produce many interpretations and frictions in various regions and majority Muslim countries. Interpretation of the Qur'anic verses relating to religious and political relations also has a variety of colors and patterns which in the end can also produce identity theory in the practice of life. This paper aims to look at the opinion of Ibn Atsur in terms of the relationship / relationship between Islam and non-Islam, in what way and practice how Muslims and non-Muslims can work together and coexist and in terms of what and how they should be separated. Writing that uses this character qualitative method tries to look at the data based on Ibn Atsur's interpretation in his book "al-Tahr r wa al-Tanwir" and is combined with his political attitude described in his books and scientific books which tell him about him in facing the political situation in Tunisia. In interpreting the verses relating to interfaith relations, Ibn Atsur looks more broadly giving freedom to non-Muslims. For example in interpreting Qs. Al-Mumtahanah verse 8-9 he said the reason for the prohibition of doing good to non-Muslims was hostility and in conditions of war "Religion" not other than that. Reasons other than religion cannot be justified in not doing good to non-Muslims and may do good to non-Muslims in all forms of goodness that are related to muamalah and relations between people. Even in terms of this flexibility politics also caused Ibn Atsur to face mass slander by being considered a supporter of the invaders for supporting dual citizenship in Tunisia and not at all suspicious of the French-Catholic colonialism when he appointed him Shaykh al-Isla Christian development in Tunisa. In other cases, Ibn ‘Ashur also displays a different attitude with other interpreters. In an interpretation of QS. Al-Maidah: [54], he said that it was not permissible to appoint Christian and Jewish leaders because of their religious differences. He added that making Jews and Christians as leaders could cause someone to get out of Islam (apostasy). Even in his political stance, Ibn Atsur once said that non-Muslims should not be made members of Shura or Majilis (Parliament, a type of DPR-MPR) on the grounds that they would never think of the religious interests of Muslims. Thus Ibn Atsur has an ambiguous attitude and changes in interpretation and progressive attitude by some scientists call him seeing the situation and the condition of the people he faces (dialectic).
Co-Authors Adilla Putri Putri Ahmad Qarib Akmaluddin Syahputra Amiur Nuruddin Ansari Ansari Asmuni Asmuni Asmuni Azuratun Nasuha Azwani Lubis Darmawan Darmawan Faisar Ananda Faisar Ananda Arfa Fauziyah Syaputri Batubara Harry Permana Hidayat, Rahmat Imam Yazid Kinanti Erdisyah Yusuf Luri Resti Fauzia M Iqbal Irham M. Ridho Agustian Siagian Marataon Ritonga Mhd. Hasbi Mhd. Syahnan Muhibbussabry Nur Aqilah Pohan Nurul Hidayah Ramadhan Al-Fitrah Rao Saroman Tamba Suaib Lubis Zainal Abidin