Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.589
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Justitia et Pax Jurnal Simbur Cahaya LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Jurnal Hukum Legalita 'Asabiyah: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum SASI Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia ABDIMAS NUSANTARA
Slamet Riyanto
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Justitia et Pax

 1 
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NO. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 CONCERNING AGE LIMITS FOR PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES M. Faqih Firdaus; Slamet Riyanto
Justitia et Pax Vol. 41 No. 1 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v41i1.9553

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is an organization of legal power which, in view of the constitution, has a legal capability to maintain regulation and equity. Regulation Number 24 of 2003 makes sense of that the obligations and elements of the Constitutional Court are to deal with established matters in regards to specific protected matters to shield the constitution so it is carried out dependably as per the desire of individuals and majority rule beliefs. In protecting the constitution, obviously, sacred appointed authorities are required who have information and skill in state organization as well as a promise to executing and managing state life as per the passages of the constitution, so every choice gave by the Constitutional Court is a legitimate item that doesn't go external the passageways of the constitution, so the actual constitution is naturally kept up with. This examination is spurred by the significant job of the Constitutional Court in giving over choices since it is as per Article 10 of Regulation No. 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court, the choice of the Constitutional Court is conclusive and has restricting legitimate power. The overall population, state directors, and all parts of the country trust that the Constitutional Court judges will really complete their capabilities, obligations and commands as per the Constitution, so through Constitutional Appointed authorities who have a statesmanlike soul, the Constitutional Court can create choices that can give a feeling of equity. in the midst of society. Keywords: Equity, Judge's Choice, Constitutional Court.
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NO. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 CONCERNING AGE LIMITS FOR PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES M. Faqih Firdaus; Slamet Riyanto
Justitia et Pax Vol. 41 No. 1 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v41i1.9553

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is an organization of legal power which, in view of the constitution, has a legal capability to maintain regulation and equity. Regulation Number 24 of 2003 makes sense of that the obligations and elements of the Constitutional Court are to deal with established matters in regards to specific protected matters to shield the constitution so it is carried out dependably as per the desire of individuals and majority rule beliefs. In protecting the constitution, obviously, sacred appointed authorities are required who have information and skill in state organization as well as a promise to executing and managing state life as per the passages of the constitution, so every choice gave by the Constitutional Court is a legitimate item that doesn't go external the passageways of the constitution, so the actual constitution is naturally kept up with. This examination is spurred by the significant job of the Constitutional Court in giving over choices since it is as per Article 10 of Regulation No. 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court, the choice of the Constitutional Court is conclusive and has restricting legitimate power. The overall population, state directors, and all parts of the country trust that the Constitutional Court judges will really complete their capabilities, obligations and commands as per the Constitution, so through Constitutional Appointed authorities who have a statesmanlike soul, the Constitutional Court can create choices that can give a feeling of equity. in the midst of society. Keywords: Equity, Judge's Choice, Constitutional Court.
CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND THE DUTIES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN SAFEGUARDING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Srikandi; Riyanto, Slamet
Justitia et Pax Vol. 41 No. 2 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v41i2.9533

Abstract

The constitution serves as the highest legal norm and foundational framework for the governance of a sovereign state. Within the framework of constitutionalism, the constitution is understood not merely as a collection of written or unwritten rules, but as the embodiment of a normative hierarchy that guides state authority and ensures the protection of citizens’ rights. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia plays a central role in upholding constitutional supremacy and safeguarding constitutional rights. Its powers include judicial review of legislation, constitutional interpretation, settlement of electoral disputes, adjudication of constitutional complaints, and—through specific legal procedures—issuing decisions on the dismissal of the President and/or Vice President. This article employs a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach, based on secondary data drawn from constitutional texts, legal literature, and decisions of the Constitutional Court. Through doctrinal analysis, the study reveals that the Constitutional Court functions not only as the guardian of the Constitution but also as a protector of democratic values and fundamental human rights. The findings underscore the importance of a theoretically grounded and constitutionally consistent role of the Court in reinforcing the rule of law and preventing the abuse of state power.
Co-Authors Adi Wibowo Ag. Bambang Setiyadi Agung Prasetyo Agung Prasetyo Budi Kadaryanto Celvin Prananta Ekawati Marlina, Ekawati Endah Pramusanti Fachry Abda El Rahman Fikma, Ibrahim Frizsa Dias Puspitasari Ibrahim Fikma Ilham Abimanyu, Muhammad Indrajaya, Indrajaya Khusnul Khotimah M. Faqih Firdaus M. Tohirin Monasari, Septiani Novekawati, Novekawati Nur Luthfi Azis, Muh Slamet Haryadi Srikandi Susanti Susanti Tohirin, M Triasih, Hermin Zanibar, Zen - Zen Zanibar