Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.726
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum NOTARIUS LAW REFORM Diponegoro Law Journal Yustisia Lentera Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Jurnal Hukum Novelty Tadulako Law Review Jurisprudence Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Hasanuddin Law Review Etika Demokrasi Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Kholis Roisah
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 52 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Open Access Institutional Repository in the Digital Era: Preventing or Increasing Plagiarism? Puspita, Dela; Roisah, Kholis; Lestari, Sartika Nanda
Yustisia Vol 13, No 2: August 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v13i2.85098

Abstract

The open access controversy related to the increased risk of plagiarism of scientific works at institutional repositories is the primary motivation for this research, with the aim of the study being to understand and analyze the phenomenon of open access at institutional repositories copyright infringement. This research uses a normative juridical approach or doctrinal legal research method. Implementing an open-access institutional repository system policy basically cannot eliminate the practice of plagiarism in writing scientific works in the world of education. Still, the open-access institutional repository movement can improve the ability of the general public to assess, review, differentiate, compare, and refer to scientific works. Universities in various countries implement diverse strategies to prevent plagiarism in open access institutional repositories (OAIR), such as use of plagiarism detection software, strict police and guidelines, training and education, review and evaluation process, enforcement of rules and sanctions. These approaches aim to uphold academic integrity and ensure that all publications in open repositories meet high global standards.
Pembagian Royalti Hak Cipta Sebagai Harta Bersama Dalam Perceraian Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1622/PDT.G/2023PA.JB Arsya Yustisia Zahra; Kholis Roisah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.8933

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the distribution of joint property in decision number No. 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB, marking the first case of its kind in Indonesia involving royalties as an asset for joint property division. Divorce leads to the division of joint property. This study will center on discussing joint property derived from copyright, where the royalties from creative works owned by the creator are considered joint property and are requested by the spouse for division. The primary aim of this research is to explain that intangible movable property, in the form of copyright royalties, can be divided if it becomes joint property. This study uses A normative legal approach with a descriptive-analytical specification. It provides an analysis of the decision that serves as the basis for both parties in dividing copyright royalties as joint property under any applicable marriage law, whether it is customary law, Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, the Civil Code, or the Compilation of Islamic Law. All legal frameworks will yield the same result, which is that each party receives half of the joint property, showing consistency across all regulations concerning joint property. The results of this study show that, in the event of divorce, copyright royalties can be divided as joint property. However, this is not an absolute requirement of such a division, as seen in Decision No. 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) acquired during marriage, obtained and created or registered by one spouse during marriage are regarded as joint property. This is because even though the spouse may not be the holder of the rights, they have played a role in the creation of the IPR and are entitled to a share of this property in the event of divorce. Copyright; Joint Property; Royalties Tujuan penelitian ini mengupas pembagian pada sengketa perceraian kekayaan bersama pada putusan dengan nomor 1622/Pdt.G/2023PA.JB merupakan kasus pertama di Indonesia dengan royalti sebagai objek pembagian harta kekayaan bersama. Putusnya perkawinan berakibat pembagian harta gono-gini. Hal yang dibahas pada penelitian kali ini hendak diperkecil ruang lingkupnya mengenai kekayaan bersama yang diperolah dari hak cipta yang dimana royalti hasil dari karya cipta milik pencipta yang menjadi kekayaan bersama diinginkan oleh pasangan kawinnya untuk dilakukan pembagian. Urgensi penelitian ini yakni menjelaskan bahwa benda bergerak tidak berwujud berupa royalti hasil karya cipta dapat dilakukan pembagian apabila menjadi sebuah kekayaan bersama. Metode yang diterapkan yakni yuridis normatif serta deskriptif analitis sebagai spesifikasi penelitian. Penelitian ini menjelaskan mengenai analisis putusan yang menjadi landasan bagi pihak terkait dalam melakukan pembagian royalti hak cipta sebagai kekayaan bersama menggunakan hukum perkawinan apapun, baik berupa Hukum Adat, Undang-Undang Perkawinan, KUHPerdata, dan KHI akan mendapatkan hasil yang sama yakni masing-masing memperoleh separuh dari kekayaan bersama, terdapat konsistensi dalam seluruh pengaturan mengenai kekayaan bersama. Hasil riset ini memperlihatkan bahwa pembagian royalti hasil karya cipta sebagai kekayaan bersama akibat adanya perceraian secara eksplisit tidak diatur dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, walaupun demikian tidak menutup kemungkinan pembagian royalti dapat terjadi seperti dalam Putusan Nomor 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB Hak Kekayaan Intelektual yang didaftarkan serta didapat dari salah seorang sepanjang perkawinan menjadi kekayaan bersama, karena suami atau istri meskipun bukan pemegang hak akan tetapi turut bersumbangsih terwujudnya HKI tersebut, dan berhak mendapatkan harta tersebut apabila menemui perceraian. Hak Cipta; Kekayaan bersama; Royalti.
Co-Authors Adya Paramita Prabandari Aldaba, Rilisa Aritenesa, Dwiputra Arnanda Yusliwidaka Arsya Yustisia Zahra Aulia, Ichsan Auliani, Intan Rifka Ayu Wulansari Raharningtyas M Bagus Prasetyo Kurniawan Bobi Aswandi Buditama, Ajar Damaiyanti, Alifia Disemadi, Hari Sutra Farida Nur Hidayah Handoko, Windy Fariskya Hudsaha, Annisa Indira Hondhe Joko Setiyono Joko Setiyono Kusumadewi, Puan Maharani Ladju Kusmawardi Makka, Zulvia Manitra, Ramalina Ranaivo Mikea Marpaung, Mirza Pasha Mitskaya, Elena Moch Alfi Muzakki Mohd Zahir, Mohd Zamre Mudofi, Luthfi Nurul Hidayah Muhammad Rifqi Paramita Prananingtyas Peni Susetyorini Prananda, Rahandy Rizki Prasetyo, Mujiono Hafidh Priska Maulidina Ayu Ananta puspita, dela Rachma, Hanum Asyiffa Rahayu Rahayu Ramadhani, Astrid Puspita Rinaldi, Kevin Rindia Fanny Kusumaningtyas Ryan Adhyatma Cakrawibawa Sakti, Misbahul Awang Salsabila, Nisrina Zulfa Sartika Nanda Lestari, Sartika Nanda Sarykulov, Kurmangaly Srisena, Anindya Zahra Sulistyaningsih, Dewi Tandian, Jennifer Vrilda, Teresa Wardana, Khansadhia Afifah Zain Sumawang, Hanisa Zaki Mubarok, Zaki Zaman, Muhamad Nafi Uz Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol Zulva, Amalia