Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.151
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Al-'Adalah Jurnal Media Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) Unes Law Review PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Unri Conference Series: Community Engagement Verstek Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Ipso Jure
Muhammad Rustamaji
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Solo Jalan Ir. Sutami 36A Ken Ɵ ngan Jebres Surakarta
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
ANALISIS ALASAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PERKARA FIDUSIA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 299 K/PID/2023) Marheni, Bela; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i2.98456

Abstract

Abstrak: Artikel ini menganalisis alasan kasasi yang diajukan oleh penuntut umum yang tercantum pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 299 K/PID/2023. Artikel ini disusun dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui apakah alasan kasasi yang diajukan oleh penuntut umum terkait perkara fidusia dalam memori kasasi sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan terkait kasasi pada Pasal 253 ayat (1) KUHAP. Dalam Menyusun artikel ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian berupa penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Penulis menggunakan pendekatan kasus (case study) dengan melakukan analisis isu hukum mengenai kasasi tindak pidana fidusia terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 299 K/PID/2023. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang teknik pengumpulan bahan hukumnya menggunakan Teknik studi kepustakaan. Bahan hukum tersebut dianalisis dengan metode deduksi silogisme yang berpangkal pada premis mayor dan premis minor. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan yang telah dilakukan Penulis, alasan kasasi yang diajukan oleh penuntut umum telah memenuhi Pasal 253 ayat (1) huruf a KUHAP yaitu judex facti tidak menerapkan peraturan hukum sebagaimana mestinya.
TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS BEBAS PT. RUM BERDASARKAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN AHLI Ayu Ramadhany, Panca Rizky; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 13, No 2 (2025): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i2.89047

Abstract

Artikel ini mengidentifikasi hukum acara pidana terkait dengan tinjauan telaah kekuatan pembuktian keterangan ahli dalam mempengaruhi pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana bebas terhadap PT. RUM yang berhadapan dengan hukum pada perkara tindak pidana lingkungan hidup. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk menganalisis pembuktian keterangan ahli dalam mempengaruhi pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana bebas dalam Putusan Nomor 152/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN Skh. Jenis penelitian hukum ini yaitu penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dengan pendekatan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kasus. Jenis bahan hukum yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer dan sekunder dengan teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum tersebut melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana bebas pada Putusan Nomor 152/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN Skh terlalu terpengaruh oleh keterangan yang diberikan oleh ahli.
RATIO DECIDENDI MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMBATALKAN PUTUSAN JUDEX FACTIE DAN MENGADILI SENDIRI DALAM PERKARA NARKOTIKA Ardelia, Ivana Gisela; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71497

Abstract

This research aims to find out the ratio decidendi of the Supreme Court which annulled the Judex Factie’s decision and made judgment on own authority in a narcotics crime case in accordance with Article 256 jo. 255 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is aimed at examining the application of criminal procedural law to the Supreme Court Decision Number 4043K/Pid.Sus/2020 which in its decision annulled the Judex Factie’s decision and made judgment on own authority in a narcotics crime case. This type of research is normative research that is prescriptive and applied with a case approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials, while the technique of collecting primary and secondary legal materials used is literature study. Based on the results of the discussion, that the ratio decidendi in Supreme Court Decision Number 4043K/Pid.Sus/2020 which annullled the Judex Factie’s decision and made judgment on own authority in accordance with the provisions of Article 256 jo. Article 255 KUHAP. This is because the Defendant was not legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a crime as charged in the first or second indictment of the Public Prosecutor.Keywords: Cassation Defendant; Narcotics; Ratio Decidendi
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM PERKARA KEKERASAN TERHADAP ANAK YANG MENYEBABKAN KEMATIAN Rachmayanti, Maya Arum; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i1.98971

Abstract

This article aims to find out whether the consideration of the Supreme Court judges in correcting the decision of the high court in the case of violence against children that causes death is in accordance with Article 253 paragraph (1) of the KUHAPThis legal research uses normative legal research methods that are prescriptive and applied using a case study approach by examining one case of criminal violence against children with the Supreme Court Decision Number 3789/K/Pid.Sus/2023. The collection of legal materials is carried out by means of  literature studies and the legal materials used are primary and  secondary legal materials. The analysis technique that the author uses is to use the deduction method of syllogism, from the submission of major premises and minor premises that are connected to each other so that conclusions can be obtained. Based on the results of research and discussion that has been carried out by the author, the consideration  of  the  Supreme  Court  judge  to  correct  the  High  Court's  decision  is  based  on  the  elements contained in Article 253 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, in this study it can also be concluded that the High Court judge in handing down the verdict was not fully in accordance with the provisions in Article 253 of the KUHAP. 
STRATEGI PEMBUKTIAN YANG DILAKUKAN PENUNTUT UMUM PADA PERKARA NARKOTIKA YANG DIJATUHKAN HUKUMAN MATI Septiansyah, Dwi Wahyu; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 13, No 2 (2025): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i2.88528

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi pembuktian penuntut umum dalam membuktikan unsur-unsur pidana dalam kasus tindak pidana narkotika yang dijatuhi pidana mati pada Putusan Nomor 501/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum doktrinal bersifat preskriptif. Jenis bahan hukum yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan mencakup sumber bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan yaitu studi kepustakaan baik dari buku, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan dokumen-dokumen hukum yang terkait. Analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme deduktif.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, dihasilkan temuan bahwa strategi pembuktian penuntut umum dalam kasus Nomor: 501/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm dilakukan dengan beberapa macam strategi, yaitu strategi pembuktian berdasarkan alat bukti yang diajukan di persidangan, strategi pembuktian berdasarkan pasal-pasal yang digunakan dalam surat dakwaan, dan strategi pembuktian menggunakan splitsing yang menghasilkan putusan maksimal yaitu pidana mati. 
TELAAH KESESUAIAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI KURIR NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 4/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN.SKT) Salsabila, Kharisma; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.82551

Abstract

Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk menelaah kesesuaian pemidanaan atas tindak pidana narkotika terhadap anak sebagai pengedar narkotika berdasarkan putusan no. 4/ Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Skt.. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif preskriptif dan terapan dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim ketika menjatuhkan putusan pidana pada putusan nomor 4/Pid.Sus- Anak/2022//PN Skt telah mencakup pertimbangan yuridis dan non yuridis yang dapat meyakinkan hakim ketika menjatuhkan putusan pidana. dilengkapi dengan alat bukti lain sesuai dengan Pasal 184 KUHAPKata kunci: Pemidanaan; Narkotika; Putusan
ANALISIS PEMBUKTIAN PENUNTUT UMUM PADA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 22/PID.SUS/2022/PN.KRG Al Islami, Silvia Meilani; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71533

Abstract

This research aims to determine the suitability of the Public Prosecutor's evidentiary construction in proving drug abuse for dealers inVerdictNumber 22/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Krg with the evidentiary law. This research is normative or doctrinal legal research. The nature of this research is perscriptive and applied. The approach used in this study is the case approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used in this study is a literature study. The legal material analysis technique used is a syllogism method with a deductive mindset, which is based on a major premise and a minor premise which is then drawn conclusions.Based on this research, the results were obtained that the construction of proof of the Public Prosecutor in proving drug abuse for dealers in VerdictNumber 22/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Krg has been in accordance with the evidentiary law.Keywords: Proof; Narcotics;Verdict
TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA PENGANIAYAAN BERAT DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 209/PID.B/2023/PN.SKT Bahapasca, Danam Isyafara; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.96549

Abstract

This study analyzes to determine the role and power of experts in the evidentiary examination process in the fraud case of decision Number 717/Pid.B/2023/PN.Bdg and to find out the judge's legal considerations in decision Number 717/Pid.B/2023/PN.Bdg. in accordance with the provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This study analyzes is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This research uses a case study approach and a legislative approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials uses library study techniques. Legal material analysis techniques are processed using the deductive syllogism method. Based on the research results, it was found that the evidentiary strength value of expert testimony in Decision Number 717/Pid.B/2023/PN.Bdg is the same as the evidentiary strength value attached to the witness statement evidence. The evidentiary strength value attached to expert testimony evidence has the independent evidentiary strength value. And the judge's considerations were in accordance with the provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA Tambun, Joel Christofel Hinsa; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.75165

Abstract

This study aims to find out how restorative justice as an alternative dispute resolution in Indonesia and the benefits obtained when compared to conventional criminal justice processes. The type of research used is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research approach uses a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is library research. The legal material analysis technique used in writing this paper is the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of research and discussion it can be seen that the settlement with restorative justice as an alternative settlement of criminal cases focuses on restoring the original conditions between victims, perpetrators and society. Besides that, restorative justice settlement is the answer to the accumulation of files in court.Keywords: alternative dispute resolution; crimes; restorative justice
ANALISIS DISPARITAS DALAM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA “MAIN HAKIM SENDIRI” (EIGENRICHTING). Nuriana, Adhinda Ratih; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.73825

Abstract

This study aims to explain the legal considerations of judges in imposing criminal penalties on perpetrators of "eigenrichting" and to analyze the disparities contained in Decision Number 235/Pid.B/2017/PN.Brb and Decision Number 84/Pid.B/2017/PN .snt. This research is a normative legal research with a prescriptive nature of research and uses a case approach. This research shows that the basis of the judge's legal considerations in the two decisions both considered the elements in Article 170 paragraph (2) 3 of the Criminal Code, all of the defendants have been proven to fulfill the elements of the article. However, in legal considerations, the judge considers juridical aspects such as the indictment, elements of the articles charged, charges and pledoi, as well as non-juridical aspects such as the facts found in the trial. Apart from that, based on the judge's legal argument, what gave rise to the disparity in the two decisions was found in the judge's considerations, namely: 1. The aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the defendant; 2. The background of the defendant's actions; 3. As a result of the defendant's actions; and 4. Purpose of sentencing. Apart from that, other factors that cause disparity are the forgiveness of Decision Number 84/Pid.B/2017/PN.Snt and the provision of condolence money to the victim's family.Keywords : Disparity, Legal Considerations
Co-Authors Adkia, Tauba Zaka Al Islami, Silvia Meilani Aldyan, Arsyad Anisa Rahmawati Annisa , Intan Baretta Nur Ardelia, Ivana Gisela Ayu Ramadhany, Panca Rizky Bahapasca, Danam Isyafara Bambang Santoso Darwis, Gusti Putu Astasidi Ahmad Dewi Gunawati Fahmi, Muhammad Nur Fawwaz, Prabu Lingga Wijaya Fernando, Zico Junius Firdaus Arifin, Firdaus Firnanda, Tesalonika Gunawan, Matthew Marcellinno Gusti, Kinanthi Ing Hafiya, Aqila Hapsari, Annisa Nur Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Hertanto, Iwan I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani ITOK DWI KURNIAWAN Jingga, Lintang Antarikza Kasetyaning Putri, Adeline Dyah Kedaton, ⁠Prameswari Bunga Kurniawan, Itok Maghfiroh, Lailil Marheni, Bela Maskyur Alkhuseri, Muchamad Muhammad Abdillah Nuriana, Adhinda Ratih Paramadaru, Rakyan Abhirama Permadi, Muhammad Wildan Dimas Prasetiya, Rio Dwi Priyono, Erwan Adi Putri, Dhestiani Amara Rachmayanti, Maya Arum Rahmawati, Rahmawati Ramadhan, Della Amanda Ramadhani, Safitri Rysca Indreswari Saefudin, Yusuf Safitri, Diana Lutfia Nur Salsabila, Kharisma Septiansyah, Dwi Wahyu Septiningsih, Ismawati Soehartono . Sulistiyanta, Sulistiyanta Suparto, Supanto Tambun, Joel Christofel Hinsa Tarigan, Daniel Milano Tarigan, Fransisco Trengginas, Surya Wardani, Ersya Ananda Kusuma Zakki Adhliyati, Zakki