Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.525
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Media Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) Unes Law Review Jurnal Yudisial PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Media Iuris Unri Conference Series: Community Engagement Verstek Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Ipso Jure
Muhammad Rustamaji
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Solo Jalan Ir. Sutami 36A Ken Ɵ ngan Jebres Surakarta
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 58 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 58 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Reforming the Role of Judges in Assessing Evidence Authenticity and Legality: A Comparative Study Using the Exclusionary Rule Approach Rustamaji, Muhammad; Sitompul, Shalih Mangara; Khoiruddin, Aldi Rizki
Media Iuris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v9i1.77218

Abstract

The renewal of the role of judges in the authentication and examination of evidence has become crucial in line with the complexity of electronic evidence and the demands for the protection of human rights in criminal proceedings. A comparative study of the legal systems of the US (Miranda Rules), the UK (Judges' Rules), and the Netherlands (Wet Elektronisch Procesdossier) reveals disparities in the mechanisms for excluding illegal evidence. In the Indonesian context, through the Criminal Procedure Code Bill (Articles 222-228), efforts are being made to adopt the exclusionary rule in a limited manner by affirming the authority of judges to assess the authenticity and legality of evidence acquisition (bewijs voering). This normative legal research uses a comparative law approach and deductive syllogistic analysis to construct an enhancement of judges' technical capacity in verifying metadata, digital evidence integrity, and applying digital forensic standards in line with developments in Singapore's Electronic Transactions Act and Malaysia's Electronic Evidence Act. The findings of the study indicate that reform of the evidence system in Indonesia requires synergistic harmonization between the expansion of judicial authority as stipulated in Article 222(4) and (5) of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code and the strengthening of judges' technical digital competencies. These provisions grant judges the authority to actively assess the authenticity and legality of evidence acquisition, including electronic evidence, which requires a deep understanding of technical aspects such as metadata, data integrity, and digital forensic procedures. However, without this technical capacity enhancement, the expansion of judicial authority risks being ineffective and may even lead to wrongful convictions, which contradicts the principles of the due process model. Therefore, this harmonization must not only address normative and legal aspects but also practical implementation through intensive training for judges in information technology and digital forensics, as well as the provision of supporting facilities in courts. This approach aligns with practices in modern jurisdictions such as the United States and Singapore, which integrate the exclusionary rule with high technical standards to ensure procedural justice and optimal protection of defendants' rights. Thus, this reform is expected to strengthen the credibility of the Indonesian judiciary in facing the challenges of the digital age and prevent the misuse of evidence that could undermine substantive justice.
The Essence of The Penalties in The Violation of The Civil War on Drugs in The City of Surakarta Wardani, Ersya Ananda Kusuma; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 7 (2024): Ipso Jure-August
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/3xdt0352

Abstract

This legal research aims to provide a study and analysis of the existence of fines and their role in overcoming narcotics crimes in Indonesia according to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. This study uses a non-doctrinal or empirical legal research method that puts forward the function of direct research in the field with a qualitative descriptive approach. The data used in this study consisted of two types, primary and secondary. The primary data used consisted of observations at the Surakarta District Attorney's Office, while the primary data used were official documents, books, reports, and other literary sources. The results of the study indicate that fines are considered not effective in reducing the rate of narcotics crime in Surakarta City because the nominal amount of fines is very high, and is considered not to fulfill the purpose of punishment because of the lack of implementation that can be replaced by non-perpetrators and the threats that have not been received can not follow the development of currency values in society.
APLIKASI METODE PERSIDANGAN SEMU PADA PEMBELAJARAN HUKUM PERS BAGI PENEGAK HUKUM Rustamaji, Muhammad; Gunawati, Dewi
Yustisia Vol 1, No 3: December 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i3.10088

Abstract

AbstractThe study aims to obtain a method for learning pseudo trial press law for law enforcers. The design of this study is action research (participatory research actions) that combines legal research and studies in the education sector. Normative research methods and sociological studies used appropriate phasing in each year. The types of data used in this study include primary and secondary data. Data collection methods are interviews, questionnaires, and literature. Data processing is carried out through the stages of editing, coding, tabulating. Analysis technique using inductive and deductive thinking .. Observation of actual handling of the case became the foundation for further analysis based on legislation and groove trial. Observations thus further utilized to formulate the appropriate method of fictitious court press law. In the first year of this study produced findings: a) identification of two dominant factors typically by law enforce- ment officials in the press dispute, namely the use of Criminal Code offenses and negation case particulari- ties press, b). finding of distinctiveness criteria law enforcement press located on the right of reply and the role of the Press Council in the settlement release applied to the fictitious trial methods, c) learned of discrepancies in the prototype method fictitious court press law enforcement against actual practice in the field of press due to the design of learning in one direction and instructional issues that are not collabora- tive. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate that a) the dominant factor affecting the typical law enforcement officials in the press dispute actually consists of the application of the dominant offense in the Criminal Code as an affront legal snares for members of the press, and did not understand the uniqueness of dispute settlement in the groove press releases as Act mandated by the press, b) uniqueness lies in the settlement conference where the submission of the right of reply, complaints to the Press Council, until the publication of the Press Council rekomendasai that preceded the litigatif c) discrepancies prototype artifi- cial methods of learning trials with the reality of law enforcement is due to the instructional design of the course and instructional problems that actually can be parsed by the collaborative. AbstrakPenelitian bertujuan untuk memeroleh suatu metode persidangan semu dalam pembelajaran hukum pers bagi penegak hukum. Desain penelitian ini merupakan penelitian aksi (partisipatori actions research) yang memadukan penelitian hukum dan penelitian di sektor pendidikan. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif maupun sosiologis digunakan sesuai pentahapan penelitian di setiap tahunnya Jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini meliputi data primer dan sekunder. Metode pengumpulan data yang ialah wawancara, angket, dan studi pustaka. Pengolahan data dilaksanakan melalui tahap editing, coding, tabulating. Teknik analisis menggunakan metode berpikir induktif dan deduktif. Pengamatan penanganan kasus senyatanya menjadi pijakan untuk selanjutnya dianalisis berdasarkan perundangan dan alur persidangan. Hasil pengamatan demikian selanjutnya dimanfaatkan untuk memformulasikan metode persidangan semu yang sesuai ketentuan hukum pers. Pada tahun pertama penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan: a) teridentifikasinya dua faktor dominan tipikal penegakan hukum oleh aparat dalam sengketa pers, yaitu penggunaan delik KUHP dan penegasian kekhasan perkara pers; b) ditemukannya kriteria kekhasan penegakkan hukum pers yang terletak pada hak jawab dan peran Dewan Pers dalam penyelesaian perkara pers yang diaplikasikan pada metode persidangan semu; c) diketahuinya ketidaksinkronan prototipe metode persidangan semu hukum pers terhadap praktik senyatanya penegakan hukum di bidang pers akibat desain pembelajaran satu arah dan permasalahan instruksional yang tidak kolaboratif. Selanjutnya, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa a) faktor dominan yang memengaruhi tipikal penegakan hukum oleh aparat dalam sengketa pers sejatinya terdiri atas dominannya penerapan delik penghinaan dalam KUHP sebagai jerat hukum bagi insan pers, dan  tidak dipahaminya kekhasan penyelesaian sengketa pers dalam alur penyelesaian perkara pers sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang pers; b) kekhasan penyelesaian perkara pers terletak pada keberadaan pengajuan hak jawab, pengaduan kepada Dewan Pers, hingga terbitnya rekomendasai dari Dewan Pers yang mendahului proses litigatif; c) ketidaksinkronan prototipe metode pembelajaran persidangan semu dengan kenyataan penegakkan hukum lebih disebabkan pada desain pembelajaran satu arah dan permasalahan instruksional yang sejatinya dapat diurai dengan jalan kolaboratif.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA JENIS NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES Wibawa, Aurelia Neyshanda Dascha; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.83633

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pertimbangan hakim dalam penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana narkotika Baru Psikoaktif pada Putusan Nomor 983/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tng ditinjau dari perspektif teori rasio memutuskan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Sifat penelitian ini adalah perskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah metode silogisme dengan pola pikir deduktif, yaitu berpangkal dari premis mayor dan premis minor yang kemudian ditarik kesimpulan. Berdasarkan penelitian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pemidanaan bagi pengedar pada Putusan Nomor 983/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tng sesuai dengan perspektif teori rasio keputusan.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PEMIDANAAN TERDAKWA ANAK DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN Heryadi, Seno Satrio; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.96046

Abstract

This research in legal writing aims to examine the judge's considerations in giving a criminal decision in a criminal case of theft with aggravating circumstances in decision number: 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN SKH. who imposed a prison sentence of 4 (four) months based on Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Code concerning Aggravated Theft and Based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is prescriptive normative legal research. The approach used is the case approach, the case approach is an approach carried out by examining cases that relate to legal issues and have received a decision by a judge that has permanent legal force. Legal materials are obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials in this research is library research. The legal material obtained is then processed using the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on this research, research results were obtained which showed that the judge's consideration in deciding the case was in accordance with Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Procedure Code and based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal Procedure.
KEDUDUKAN VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM MENGUNGKAPKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN Putri, Dhestiani Amara; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.82534

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis mengenai kedudukan Visum et Repertum sebagai alat bukti dalam mengungkapkan tindak pidana penganiayaan. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui kedudukan Visum et Repertum sebagai alat bukti dalam mengungkapkan tindak pidana penganiayaan dalam Putusan Nomor 158/Pid.B/2023/PN Skt. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif dan terapan dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kasus dengan jenis bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik analisis bahan hukum dengan metode silogisme yang bersifat deduksi. Berdasarkan penelitian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa Visum et Repertum telah memenuhi bukti minimum yaitu sekurang-kurangnya dua alat bukti yang sah, maka hal ini telah memenuhi ketentuan bewijs minimmum. Dengan demikian Visum et Repertum telah memenuhi perspektif hukum pembuktian khususnya pada tindak pidana penganiayaan dalam konteks studi kasus Putusan Nomor 158/Pid.B/2023/PN Skt.
KEABSAHAN ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN ISTRI TERDAKWA DALAM PERKARA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL DALAM RUMAH TANGGA Sawitri, Ika; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i1.85863

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis hukum acara pidana terkait dengan alat bukti dalam perkara kekerasan seksual dalam rumah tangga. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengatahui keabsahan alat bukti keterangan istri terdakwa dalam perkara kekerasan seksual dalam rumah tangga pada Putusan Negeri Kasongan Nomor: 43/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Ksn dengan ketentuan Pasal 168 KUHAP. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Cara pengumpulan bahan hukum dengan studi kepustakaan dan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Sedangkan teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah teknik silogisme yang menggunakan pola pikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh hasil bahwa alat bukti keterangan istri terdakwa dalam perkara kekerasan seksual dalam rumah tangga pada Putusan Nomor: 43/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Ksn telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 168 KUHAP. Pasal ini memberikan celah dalam Pasal 169 KUHAP bahwa keterangan istri terdakwa tetap dapat didengar dan sah menjadi alat bukti. Hal karena saksi menghendaki dan penuntut umum menyetujuinya serta saksi telah bersedia untuk disumpah.
AKIBAT HUKUM DALAM PENETAPAN PENGAMPUAN PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI PENGADILAN Fahmi, Muhammad Nur; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76141

Abstract

Every human being according to law has the same rights and obligations, but not all of them are capable of carrying out legal actions. For persons with disabilities in carrying out legal actions they are under the protection of this article. The research method was carried out using a descriptive normative approach. Legal materials in the form of documents from library studies, court decisions. Analysis by examining the legal consequences arising from the judge's decision No. 53/Pdt. P/2020/PN Slw Tegal. The results of the study show that the legal consequence of determining the granting of disability by the court is in the form of giving the guardian authority to take legal action. Persons with disabilities are no longer able to carry out legal actions and in carrying out legal activities are carried out by supervisors. The custodian has the responsibility to carry out the mandate to protect those who are assisted in carrying out legal actions.Keywords: Judge's Consideration; Determination of Amnesty; Disabilities
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DISERTAI PEMBERATAN DENGAN PELAKU ANAK Paramadaru, Rakyan Abhirama; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i1.79533

Abstract

Artikel ini mendeskripsikan dan mengkaji permasalahan mengenai bagaimana pertimbangan hakim terhadap anak pelaku tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan studi putusan perkara Nomor 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Prp. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif serta menggunakan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Jenis bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni studi dokumen (kepustakaan). Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah teknik analisis silogisme dengan pola berpikir deduktif. Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap pelaku anak telah sesuai dengan Pasal 183 KUHAP karena telah mempertimbangkan sekurang-kurangnya 2 (dua) alat bukti yang sah yang telah diajukan penuntut umum serta dengan alat bukti tersebut telah memberikan keyakinan bagi hakim dalam memutus pelaku anak bersalah melakukan tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan.
NILAI DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU Tarigan, Daniel Milano; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73452

Abstract

There has been a lot of research on obscenity, but the discussion on the use of testimonium de auditu in obscenity cases is of interest to the author. This thesis aims to examine the value and strength of the evidence of the testimonium de auditu and the testimony suitability of witnesses from the testimony of de auditu in cases of sexual abuse of children under the provisions of criminal procedural law. The type of this research is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research uses a case approach. The legal materials used on this research consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The collection of legal material used in this research use library research. The legal material analysis technique used in this law research is the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the value and strength of evidence in criminal procedural law are all of free value to the judge, as well as the testimony of the testimonium de auditu. Keywords: Testimonium De Auditu; Value and strength of evidence; Witness testimony
Co-Authors ., Soehartono Adistyputri, Meirizka Orchidiva Adkia, Tauba Zaka Agape, Jelita Kristi Al Islami, Silvia Meilani Aldyan, Arsyad Anggara, Naufal Zharif Anisa Rahmawati Annisa , Intan Baretta Nur Ardelia, Ivana Gisela Assidiqi, Rafli Ayu Ramadhany, Panca Rizky Bahapasca, Danam Isyafara Bambang Santoso Christya, Giovanny Andreana Darwis, Gusti Putu Astasidi Ahmad Dewi Gunawati El Asith, Hilma Syita Fahmi, Muhammad Nur Faisal Faisal Farhan, Mochamad Fathurrahman, Muhammad Aldi Fawwaz, Prabu Lingga Wijaya Firnanda, Tesalonika Gunawan, Matthew Marcellinno Gusti, Kinanthi Ing Hafiya, Aqila Hapsari, Annisa Nur Hapsari, Duwi Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Haryanto, Rinjani Avivah Ayusiwi Herin Saputri, Fani Fadila Hertanto, Iwan Heryadi, Seno Satrio Hidayat, Adimas Wisnu Husodo, Jadmiko Anom ITOK DWI KURNIAWAN Jingga, Lintang Antarikza Kasetyaning Putri, Adeline Dyah Kedaton, ⁠Prameswari Bunga Khoiruddin, Aldi Rizki Kovalaski, Katherine Kuncoroyakti, Damar Aji Kurniawan, Itok Maghfiroh, Lailil Maharani, Mutiara Marheni, Bela Maskyur Alkhuseri, Muchamad Maulana, Rafif Nabil Muhammad Abdillah Mulyani, Dita Nuriana, Adhinda Ratih Paramadaru, Rakyan Abhirama Permadi, Muhammad Wildan Dimas Permana, Mohammad Raif Prasetiya, Rio Dwi Putri, Dhestiani Amara Rachmayanti, Maya Arum Rahmawati, Rahmawati Ramadhan, Della Amanda Ramadhani, Safitri Rysca Indreswari Saefudin, Yusuf Safitri, Diana Lutfia Nur Sagala, Dave Abiel Salsabila, Kharisma Salsabila, Putri Balqis Santos, Jose Gama Sarasvati, Nadhia Ayu Sawitri, Ika Septiansyah, Dwi Wahyu Septiningsih, Ismawati Setiawan, Frendi Sitompul, Shalih Mangara Sulistiyanta, Sulistiyanta Suparto, Supanto Sylviadianti, Alvina Tambun, Joel Christofel Hinsa Tarigan, Daniel Milano Tarigan, Fransisco Trengginas, Surya Wardani, Ersya Ananda Kusuma Wibawa, Aurelia Neyshanda Dascha Wijaya, Hizkia Andhitya Yudho Taruno Muryanto Zakki Adhliyati, Zakki