Muhammad Rustamaji
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Solo Jalan Ir. Sutami 36A Ken Ɵ ngan Jebres Surakarta

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

Mewaspadai jebakan reifikasi dalam wajah industrialisasi niretika lingkungan dan kebakaran hutan Santoso, Bambang; Rustamaji, Muhammad
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 13 No 2 (2019): PROGRESIF:Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v13i2.1439

Abstract

Human being and living quality of their global community very depends on environmental condition. Then, various policies, regulation managements, law enforcement and technical supervision are conducted in attempts of biological environment conservation. However, a single market of such the global industrialization style gives a complex homework in ecological sector. On the Markplus Conference 2015, Hermawan Kartajaya reminded that the global industrialization, like the single market initiated by the AEC is potentially more dangerous than the AFTA (ASEAN Free Trade Area) and CAFTA (China-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement). He stated that if AFTA and CAFTA are concerned only with flow of goods, but MEA covers free flow of goods, people, services and money (capital and investment). Purpose of the writing is actually to show challenges that should be addressed when MEA establishes a single ASEAN market, especially be related to forest fire’s phenomenon. Results of the study showed that forest fire and the single ASEAN market has, consciously or not, created a new myth called rationality of commodity efficiency. Horkheimer and Adorno in their ' enlightenment dialectic' explained that efficiency, in economic, is a principle of market surpassing all kinds of feudal and religious restrictions. Thus, rationality is equated with efficiency. When efficiency is applied in dynamics of capitalist economy, then the entire field of human life is considered a commodity. Consequently, reification is in effect, namely when everything is a commodity so people is no longer enjoying but consuming and consuming without building any social relationships in a real sense. At such nadir, ecological damage is inevitable or it is even considered a reasonable price worth paying. The Law which is essentially an ethical conversation of human beings to produce justice is easily forgotten because of greed. However, all such excesses of reification can be avoided when the law is still pursued progressively, so the law must arrive at radicalism in order to demolish assumptions of law. Thus, it can be concluded that forest should not only be explored for its resources solely according to the reification trap of global industrialization market, but it must be preserved for future human posterity because of considering the deep ecology.
THE WESTERN LEGAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW REFORM: A GLOBALIZATION AND LEGAL POLITICS PERSPECTIVE Santoso, Bambang; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 11, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v11i2.30488

Abstract

In the field of law, the influence of globalization is reflected in the legal politics of procedural law reform, which is currently still in the form of legislation draft. This study aims to analyze the influence of globalization on the reform of Indonesian criminal procedural law in relation to national legal politics. This research is normative legal research, which focuses on studying library materials. Based on the results of a comprehensive study is known, the Draft Criminal Procedure Code includes a new system originating from the western legal system such as adversary system in court trial. Adopting the adversary system into the Draft Criminal Procedure Code is a very revolutionary legal political reform of the criminal procedural law. Various challenges will be faced along with the adoption of the new legal system.  Changes in the legal culture of law bearers is also a key variable in the success or failure of a western legal system implementation. Although the concept of the Criminal Procedure Code is colored by the western legal system, it does not conflict with national legal politics because it reflects universal legal principles, namely equality.
Disparitas Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Pada Anak Rahmawati, Rahmawati; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Rustamaji, Muhammad; Sulistiyanta, Sulistiyanta; Abdillah, Muhammad
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 8 No 2 November (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v8i2.7379

Abstract

This research aims to elucidate how criminal law disparities against perpetrators of sexual violence against children manifest based on Islamic law in Indonesia. The legal disparities indicate that child victims of sexual violence have not received comprehensive legal justice. This study adopts a qualitative descriptive approach, collecting data through exploration and reading online media with the keywords 'sexual violence against children in Indonesia' on the Google search engine. This paper reveals that legal imbalances have undermined the value of justice for child victims of sexual crimes, affecting them both psychologically and physically, and leading to other consequences such as dropping out of school, forced marriage to the perpetrator, and suicide. This study is crucial to bring about justice based on Islamic law for child victims of sexual crimes, juxtaposed with Pancasila justice. It highlights that the criminal legal disparities in cases of sexual violence consistently place children as the disadvantaged objects of legal justice. True legal inequality would not occur if the application of the law is based on Islamic Law grounded in divine values, as the punishment for perpetrators of sexual violence in Islam can be judged as hudud crimes, qhisas crimes, and ta'zir crimes.
Memungkasi Polemik Aspek Keperdataan dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi (Studi Perbandingan Optimasi NCB Asset Forfeiture) Rustamaji, Muhammad; Santoso, Bambang; Kurniawan, Itok
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2249

Abstract

Kajian pemberantasan korupsi melalui hukum pidana sudah banyak dilakukan, tetapi uraian tentang peran aspek keperdataan masih menyisakan pertanyaan besar. Pada konteks pemberantasan korupsi, aspek keprdataan berwujud Non-Conviction Based (NCB) Asset Forfeiture memungkinkan Jaksa Pengacara Negara untuk membekukan, menyita, atau mengambil alih aset yang diduga berasal dari tindakan korupsi tanpa harus menunggu proses hukum pidana selesai dan pemilik aset dinyatakan bersalah oleh pengadilan. Telaah yang menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum (doktrinal), dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perbandingan hukum ini memanfaatkan bahan hukum primer maupun bahan hukum sekunder yang dianalisis dengan silogisme deduktif. Penelitian menghasilkan dua temuan penting, yaitu diperolehnya ragam masukan konseptual menegnai NCB Asset Forfeiture berbasis perbandingan hukum guna menjawab metode yang dipandang kontroversial karena menimbulkan beberapa masalah hukum dan etika. Kritik bahwa terdapat potensi pelanggaran hak asasi manusia, keadilan, dan penggunaan wewenang yang berlebihan, memang ditemukan. Namun berdasarkan perbandingan konseptual dari UNCAC, USA, Australia yang dipilih sebagai konsep yang mendasari optimasi NCB Asset Forfeiture sebagai alat untuk mencegah pemilik aset mengalihkan atau menyembunyikan harta hasil korupsi sebelum proses pengadilan selesai, potensial diadopsi di Indonesia. Pada konteks Indonesia, optimasi aspek keperdataan dalam NCB Asset Forfeiture penting untuk memastikan bahwa hak-hak individu dan prinsip-prinsip keadilan tetap dihormati, meskipun proses ini berbeda dari proses pidana yang umumnya memerlukan vonis bersalah. Berdasarkan analisis yang dilakukan dihasilkan beberapa cara agar aspek keperdataan dapat dioptimalkan dalam implementasi NCB Asset Forfeiture, yaitu 1).Pemisahan Beban Pembuktian, 2).Standar pembuktian yang Jelas, 3).Pemenuhan hak untuk mengajukan Pembelaan, 4).Otoritas Pengadilan yang Independen, 5).Transparansi dan Publikasi, 6).Upaya hukum yang korektif.
The Essence of The Penalties in The Violation of The Civil War on Drugs in The City of Surakarta Wardani, Ersya Ananda Kusuma; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 7 (2024): Ipso Jure-August
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/3xdt0352

Abstract

This legal research aims to provide a study and analysis of the existence of fines and their role in overcoming narcotics crimes in Indonesia according to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. This study uses a non-doctrinal or empirical legal research method that puts forward the function of direct research in the field with a qualitative descriptive approach. The data used in this study consisted of two types, primary and secondary. The primary data used consisted of observations at the Surakarta District Attorney's Office, while the primary data used were official documents, books, reports, and other literary sources. The results of the study indicate that fines are considered not effective in reducing the rate of narcotics crime in Surakarta City because the nominal amount of fines is very high, and is considered not to fulfill the purpose of punishment because of the lack of implementation that can be replaced by non-perpetrators and the threats that have not been received can not follow the development of currency values in society.
APLIKASI METODE PERSIDANGAN SEMU PADA PEMBELAJARAN HUKUM PERS BAGI PENEGAK HUKUM Rustamaji, Muhammad; Gunawati, Dewi
Yustisia Vol 1, No 3: December 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i3.10088

Abstract

AbstractThe study aims to obtain a method for learning pseudo trial press law for law enforcers. The design of this study is action research (participatory research actions) that combines legal research and studies in the education sector. Normative research methods and sociological studies used appropriate phasing in each year. The types of data used in this study include primary and secondary data. Data collection methods are interviews, questionnaires, and literature. Data processing is carried out through the stages of editing, coding, tabulating. Analysis technique using inductive and deductive thinking .. Observation of actual handling of the case became the foundation for further analysis based on legislation and groove trial. Observations thus further utilized to formulate the appropriate method of fictitious court press law. In the first year of this study produced findings: a) identification of two dominant factors typically by law enforce- ment officials in the press dispute, namely the use of Criminal Code offenses and negation case particulari- ties press, b). finding of distinctiveness criteria law enforcement press located on the right of reply and the role of the Press Council in the settlement release applied to the fictitious trial methods, c) learned of discrepancies in the prototype method fictitious court press law enforcement against actual practice in the field of press due to the design of learning in one direction and instructional issues that are not collabora- tive. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate that a) the dominant factor affecting the typical law enforcement officials in the press dispute actually consists of the application of the dominant offense in the Criminal Code as an affront legal snares for members of the press, and did not understand the uniqueness of dispute settlement in the groove press releases as Act mandated by the press, b) uniqueness lies in the settlement conference where the submission of the right of reply, complaints to the Press Council, until the publication of the Press Council rekomendasai that preceded the litigatif c) discrepancies prototype artifi- cial methods of learning trials with the reality of law enforcement is due to the instructional design of the course and instructional problems that actually can be parsed by the collaborative. AbstrakPenelitian bertujuan untuk memeroleh suatu metode persidangan semu dalam pembelajaran hukum pers bagi penegak hukum. Desain penelitian ini merupakan penelitian aksi (partisipatori actions research) yang memadukan penelitian hukum dan penelitian di sektor pendidikan. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif maupun sosiologis digunakan sesuai pentahapan penelitian di setiap tahunnya Jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini meliputi data primer dan sekunder. Metode pengumpulan data yang ialah wawancara, angket, dan studi pustaka. Pengolahan data dilaksanakan melalui tahap editing, coding, tabulating. Teknik analisis menggunakan metode berpikir induktif dan deduktif. Pengamatan penanganan kasus senyatanya menjadi pijakan untuk selanjutnya dianalisis berdasarkan perundangan dan alur persidangan. Hasil pengamatan demikian selanjutnya dimanfaatkan untuk memformulasikan metode persidangan semu yang sesuai ketentuan hukum pers. Pada tahun pertama penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan: a) teridentifikasinya dua faktor dominan tipikal penegakan hukum oleh aparat dalam sengketa pers, yaitu penggunaan delik KUHP dan penegasian kekhasan perkara pers; b) ditemukannya kriteria kekhasan penegakkan hukum pers yang terletak pada hak jawab dan peran Dewan Pers dalam penyelesaian perkara pers yang diaplikasikan pada metode persidangan semu; c) diketahuinya ketidaksinkronan prototipe metode persidangan semu hukum pers terhadap praktik senyatanya penegakan hukum di bidang pers akibat desain pembelajaran satu arah dan permasalahan instruksional yang tidak kolaboratif. Selanjutnya, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa a) faktor dominan yang memengaruhi tipikal penegakan hukum oleh aparat dalam sengketa pers sejatinya terdiri atas dominannya penerapan delik penghinaan dalam KUHP sebagai jerat hukum bagi insan pers, dan  tidak dipahaminya kekhasan penyelesaian sengketa pers dalam alur penyelesaian perkara pers sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang pers; b) kekhasan penyelesaian perkara pers terletak pada keberadaan pengajuan hak jawab, pengaduan kepada Dewan Pers, hingga terbitnya rekomendasai dari Dewan Pers yang mendahului proses litigatif; c) ketidaksinkronan prototipe metode pembelajaran persidangan semu dengan kenyataan penegakkan hukum lebih disebabkan pada desain pembelajaran satu arah dan permasalahan instruksional yang sejatinya dapat diurai dengan jalan kolaboratif.
KEDUDUKAN VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM MENGUNGKAPKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN Putri, Dhestiani Amara; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.82534

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis mengenai kedudukan Visum et Repertum sebagai alat bukti dalam mengungkapkan tindak pidana penganiayaan. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui kedudukan Visum et Repertum sebagai alat bukti dalam mengungkapkan tindak pidana penganiayaan dalam Putusan Nomor 158/Pid.B/2023/PN Skt. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif dan terapan dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kasus dengan jenis bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik analisis bahan hukum dengan metode silogisme yang bersifat deduksi. Berdasarkan penelitian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa Visum et Repertum telah memenuhi bukti minimum yaitu sekurang-kurangnya dua alat bukti yang sah, maka hal ini telah memenuhi ketentuan bewijs minimmum. Dengan demikian Visum et Repertum telah memenuhi perspektif hukum pembuktian khususnya pada tindak pidana penganiayaan dalam konteks studi kasus Putusan Nomor 158/Pid.B/2023/PN Skt.
AKIBAT HUKUM DALAM PENETAPAN PENGAMPUAN PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI PENGADILAN Fahmi, Muhammad Nur; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76141

Abstract

Every human being according to law has the same rights and obligations, but not all of them are capable of carrying out legal actions. For persons with disabilities in carrying out legal actions they are under the protection of this article. The research method was carried out using a descriptive normative approach. Legal materials in the form of documents from library studies, court decisions. Analysis by examining the legal consequences arising from the judge's decision No. 53/Pdt. P/2020/PN Slw Tegal. The results of the study show that the legal consequence of determining the granting of disability by the court is in the form of giving the guardian authority to take legal action. Persons with disabilities are no longer able to carry out legal actions and in carrying out legal activities are carried out by supervisors. The custodian has the responsibility to carry out the mandate to protect those who are assisted in carrying out legal actions.Keywords: Judge's Consideration; Determination of Amnesty; Disabilities
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DISERTAI PEMBERATAN DENGAN PELAKU ANAK Paramadaru, Rakyan Abhirama; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i1.79533

Abstract

Artikel ini mendeskripsikan dan mengkaji permasalahan mengenai bagaimana pertimbangan hakim terhadap anak pelaku tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan studi putusan perkara Nomor 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Prp. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif serta menggunakan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Jenis bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni studi dokumen (kepustakaan). Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah teknik analisis silogisme dengan pola berpikir deduktif. Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap pelaku anak telah sesuai dengan Pasal 183 KUHAP karena telah mempertimbangkan sekurang-kurangnya 2 (dua) alat bukti yang sah yang telah diajukan penuntut umum serta dengan alat bukti tersebut telah memberikan keyakinan bagi hakim dalam memutus pelaku anak bersalah melakukan tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan.
NILAI DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU Tarigan, Daniel Milano; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73452

Abstract

There has been a lot of research on obscenity, but the discussion on the use of testimonium de auditu in obscenity cases is of interest to the author. This thesis aims to examine the value and strength of the evidence of the testimonium de auditu and the testimony suitability of witnesses from the testimony of de auditu in cases of sexual abuse of children under the provisions of criminal procedural law. The type of this research is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research uses a case approach. The legal materials used on this research consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The collection of legal material used in this research use library research. The legal material analysis technique used in this law research is the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the value and strength of evidence in criminal procedural law are all of free value to the judge, as well as the testimony of the testimonium de auditu. Keywords: Testimonium De Auditu; Value and strength of evidence; Witness testimony