Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Implementation Of Law Enforcement In Cases Of Child Neglect In The Household According To Child Protection Law (Decision Study Number: 30/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Amb) Loppo Halomoan Hasibuan; Hasdiana Juwita Bintang; Beby Sendy
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.11065

Abstract

Child neglect within the household constitutes one of the forms of violation of children’s rights that still frequently occurs in Indonesia. Although legal instruments are already in place, the enforcement of the law in cases of child neglect has not yet been implemented optimally. The issues examined in this study include: the general provisions concerning child neglect within the household under the Child Protection Law; the obstacles in enforcing cases of child neglect; and the efforts to optimize law enforcement in child neglect cases based on Decision Number 30/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Amb. The research method employed is normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical nature. The data consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research. The analysis was conducted qualitatively by examining statutory regulations, legal doctrines, legal theories, as well as relevant court decision case studies. The results of the study indicate that, normatively, child neglect has been categorized as a violation under Article 76B in conjunction with Article 77B of the Child Protection Law. However, in judicial practice, child neglect is more frequently positioned as grounds for divorce in civil cases without imposing criminal liability on negligent parents. The analysis of the Ambon District Court Decision Number 30/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Amb demonstrates a tendency for judges to focus solely on the aspect of divorce, while the issue of child neglect is not addressed at allThe conclusion of this study emphasizes that the implementation of law enforcement against child neglect within the household remains weak and lacks integration between civil and criminal aspects. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize law enforcement through preventive measures, strengthening the role of state institutions, increasing public legal awareness, and applying the principle of the best interest of the child. It is recommended that courts become more responsive to issues of child neglect, that the government strengthen regulations and inter-agency coordination, and that society take a more active role in preventing and reporting cases of child neglect.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE DIVISION OF JOINT PROPERTY ON LAND OWNED BY ONE PARTY'S PARENTS ACCORDING TO MARRIAGE LAW (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 183/Pdt.G/2025/MS.Sgi) Rizki Ardita; Beby Sendy; Bambang Fitrianto
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v3i4.173

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the division of joint assets and the judge's legal considerations in determining the status of joint assets standing on land owned by one of the parties' parents and the suitability of the decision with the provisions of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. The method used in this study is normative law with a case approach, namely analyzing secondary data in the form of the decision of the Mahkamah Syar’iyah Sigli Number 183 / Pdt.G / 2025 / MS.Sgi as well as laws and legal materials related to joint assets. This study shows that in this case, the object of the dispute is a permanent house unit standing on land owned by the Plaintiff's parents which is recognized as joint assets, while the land where the house stands is the Plaintiff's inherited property, but in its consideration the Panel of Judges did not clearly outline the boundaries between joint assets in the form of a house and land as inherited property, but instead immediately decided that the Defendant should divide 2 houses in kind. So that the decision can give rise to double interpretations as if the land where the house stands is also part of the joint assets. This creates legal uncertainty in the implementation of the decision and could potentially harm one of the parties. Therefore, the division of joint assets should be carried out fairly by clearly separating the house as joint property from the land as acquired property, in order to comply with the provisions of the Marriage Law.