Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.978
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JPM: JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT Jurnal Penelitian Rumpun Ilmu Teknik Jurnal Kabar Masyarakat Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Umum Journal of Management and Social Sciences Pusat Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen Mengabdi: Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Bersama Masyarakat Ardhi: Jurnal Pengabdian dalam Negri INCIDENTAL : JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AND EMPOWERMENT Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society
Rafadi Khan Khayru
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Comparative Analysis of Visum et Repertum Psikiatrikum and Expert Testimony as Evidence in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System Ach. Syaiful Anam; Novritsar Hasitongan Pakpahan; Rafadi Khan Khayru
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society (May)
Publisher : Metromedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research discusses the status of Visum et Repertum Psikiatrikum and expert testimony as evidence within the Indonesian criminal procedural law system. The main focus of the research is to analyze the position of Visum et Repertum Psikiatrikum as documentary evidence, the role and status of expert testimony in the evidentiary system, the comparison between the two types of evidence, and the legal implications of psychiatric visum examination results on criminal liability. This normative legal research uses statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches with primary and secondary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. The results show that Visum et Repertum Psikiatrikum holds the position of documentary evidence with a dual nature because it contains elements of expert assessment. Expert testimony has a broader and more flexible scope, whereas psychiatric visum is more objective and specific to mental health examinations. The results of the psychiatric visum examination are classified into three categories that carry different legal consequences for criminal liability. This research recommends the formulation of technical guidelines and the strengthening of synergy between the legal and forensic psychiatry professions to enhance legal certainty in the use of such evidence.
Co-Authors Ach. Syaiful Anam Adi Herisasono Agung Satryo Wibowo Alfa Thoyibah Amir Bandar Abdul Majid Arif Rachman Putra Aulia Ainindia Wanti Citra Oktavina Eka Lidyawati Dessi Fitria Ningsih Dewi Sekar Arum Didit Darmawan Didit Darrmawan Eli Masnawati Ersa Dina Fitaloka Fayola Issalillah Febrian Dirgantara Febriarsitas Eka Sasmita Hariani, Mila Jahroni jahroni Laila Fitriyatus Sholihah Miftakhul Jannah Misbachul Munir Mochammad Rojalul Amin A.Z Muhammad Putra Alaikassalam Nelud Darajaatul Aliyah Novritsar Hasitongan Pakpahan Nunik Hidayati Raden Mohamad Herdian Bhakti Radjawane, Louise Elizabeth Rahayu Mardikaningsih Retnowati, Eli Rommy Hardyansah samsul arifin Sinambela, Ella Anastasya Siti Ma’rifatul Mahbubah Siti Nur Halizah Solchan Ghozali Sudja'i Sudja'i Yeni Vitrianingsih Zhunnun Qothrunnada Annisa Salam Al-Madury