Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.409
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Jurnal Hukum Progresif Diponegoro Law Journal Pandecta Diponegoro Law Review Lex Scientia Law Review JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Agro Dedikasi Masyarakat (JADM) Yuridika Journal Of Sustainability Perspectives Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Journal of Sustainability Perspectives
Yos Johan Utama
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Juridical Interpretation of Non-Fully Executable Judgments in The Administrative Court Kusman; Hambali; Utama, Yos Johan; Alw, Lita Tyesta
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.14.1.2025.221-250

Abstract

Judgments that cannot be fully executed are frequently encountered in civil service disputes. Rehabilitation obligations are often hindered by changes in circumstances, which have consequently given rise to the notion of compensation. Determining compensation amounts also faces challenges, particularly due to tensions between legal norms and practical realities. This study pursues two main objectives: first, to examine the criteria that characterize judgments that cannot be fully executed, and second, to describe the implementation of compensation as a substitute mechanism in such cases. The research adopts a normative legal methodology utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings lead to two primary conclusions: first, judgments that cannot be fully executed are identified in cases where rehabilitation obligations in civil service disputes face specific obstacles, including (1) the plaintiff’s legal status no longer qualifying them to return to their former position; (2) the plaintiff’s position having been filled by another person; and (3) changes in the organizational structure. Second, the implementation of compensation is based on actual losses suffered by the plaintiff resulting from a State Administrative Decision that was declared invalid by the court. The amount of compensation is determined through an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant. If such an agreement cannot be reached, the chief judge of the administrative court is authorized to determine a fair amount of compensation in accordance with the principles of propriety and reasonableness. The study highlights the need for procedural reform to address the gap between legal provisions and their practical application in executing administrative court judgments.
Co-Authors Abduh, Setya Budi M Aju Putrijanti Aju Putrijanti Aju Putrijanti Albaari, Ahmad N Ambariyanto , Antonius Hintono ary yunanto Brata Yoga Lumbanraja Denny Nugroho Sugianto Dessy Ariyanti Eko Suprihanto Garunja, Evis Hambali Handayani, Elinna Putri Hanum, Willy Naresta Hapsari, Farida Diyah Hastono, Broto Hermin Werdiningsih Irma Cahyaningtyas Kusman Lismanto Lismanto Lita Tyesta ALW Lumbanraja, Brata Yoga Maharani, Arnetta D Pratama Herry Herlambang Pratama Herry Herlambang Prayogo, Silvan Susanto Ristyawati, Aprista Setia Untung Arimuladi Sri Mulyani Teddy Asmara Wardhani, Lita Tyesta Addy Listya Yoyok Budi Pramono Yulius Yulius