Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

PENERAPAN STRICT LIABILITY OLEH PERUSAHAAN DALAM RANGKA KONSERVASI LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al Fikri; Fatma Ulfatun Najicha; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Indonesian State Law Review, 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v3i2.23001

Abstract

Strict liability is absolute responsibility imposed on perpetrators of environmental violations that result in losses to both the environment and the community around the environment. The research used in this paper is juridical normative and uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The development of strict liability in positive law in Indonesia has experienced development and refinement over time, indicated by the application made in several cases concerning environmental violations by several irresponsible parties. Basically, the implementation of strict liability really helps the aggrieved parties, especially the common people, in enforcing environmental laws in Indonesia.
PENERAPAN STRICT LIABILITY OLEH PERUSAHAAN DALAM RANGKA KONSERVASI LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al Fikri; Fatma Ulfatun Najicha; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Indonesian State Law Review, 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v5i1.23122

Abstract

Strict liability is absolute responsibility imposed on perpetrators of environmental violations that result in losses to both the environment and the community around the environment. The research used in this paper is juridical normative and uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The development of strict liability in positive law in Indonesia has experienced development and refinement over time, indicated by the application made in several cases concerning environmental violations by several irresponsible parties. Basically, the implementation of strict liability really helps the aggrieved parties, especially the common people, in enforcing environmental laws in Indonesia.
Kajian Normatif Pertanggungjawaban Perusahaan atas Pelaksanaan dan Pelaporan CSR Berdasarkan PP Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 Endang Retno Suryowati; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum,
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v2i2.75

Abstract

TJSL/CSR in Indonesia is regulated as a legal obligation (mandatory) for companies engaged in the natural resources sector. Its success depends on the principle of accountability, which requires transparency and responsibility. This normative-juridical study evaluates the application of accountability principles in the mining sector. Normatively, PP 47/2012 requires CSR to be listed as an expense and focused on sustainable development (PPM). However, this regulation is not robust because it does not set a minimum fund allocation or clear program boundaries, allowing for multiple interpretations. Empirically (Sekotong case study), accountability is implemented in a formalistic manner, consisting only of one-way administrative reports without meaningful participation from the affected communities. A significant weakness is apparent when dealing with the increase in illegal gold mining (PETI) in legal concession areas. This situation results in a vacuum of responsibility. Companies can claim environmental damage caused by PETI, so that responsibility does not successfully ensnare corporate negligence in prevention efforts. The CSR accountability structure in Indonesia is weak because it only emphasizes activities that are carried out, not negligence that is overlooked. Regulatory reform is needed so that accountability includes passive responsibility to ensure that TJSL functions as a significant instrument of sustainable development.
Reform of the Land Registration System in Indonesia: A Max Weberian Rational-Legal Bureaucracy Approach Abdul Wahid; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Lego Karjoko
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025): December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v20i2.13666

Abstract

Social transformation and the increasing economic value of land in Indonesia have intensified the demand for legal certainty in land rights. Although Law Number 5 of 1960 introduced land registration to provide legal protection through certification, the prevailing negative publication system with positive elements remains problematic. It fails to ensure state responsibility for certificate accuracy, even when acquired in good faith, thus posing risks of legal uncertainty and agrarian conflict. This study analyzes the rationale for transitioning to a pure positive publication system using Max Weber’s rational-legal bureaucracy theory, emphasizing formal procedures, predictability, and administrative accountability. Employing normative legal research with conceptual, statutory, comparative, and historical approaches, this study draws from secondary legal materials analyzed through legal interpretation and the Weberian framework. The findings reveal that a positive publication system better aligns with Weberian principles and supports legal certainty. This reform is essential for enhancing land administration legitimacy and promoting inclusive, accountable agrarian governance in Indonesia.