Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.573
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Efisiensi : Kajian Ilmu Administrasi The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Jurnal Repertorium PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) JHCLS JURNAL DISCRETIE MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 29 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 29 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
TEORI ECOLOGICAL JUSTICE DALAM PENGATURAN PENGELOLAAN AIR MINUM DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Rulla Paundryanagari Sahid; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Lego Karjoko
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v11i3.11822

Abstract

Pengaturan pengelolaan air minum adalah kebijakan yang ditetapkan untuk memastikan ketersediaan, kualitas, dan distribusi air minum yang aman dan layak bagi masyarakat, serta melibatkan perlindungan sumber daya alam untuk keberlanjutan sumber daya air. Namun, dalam pengelolaan air minum terdapat permasalahan mengenai aspek keberlanjutan. Hal tersebut dikarenakan pengaturan pengelolaan air minum belum sepenuhnya mengatur secara rinci pengelolaan air minum yang berbasis keberlanjutan. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui apakah pengaturan pengelolaan air minum di Kabupaten Karanganyar telah mencantumkan teori ecological justice. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut, analisa dilakukan dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangandan dan pendekatan konseptual yang bersumber dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Diperoleh hasil penelitian bahwasanya Kabupaten Karanganyar belum sepenuhnya mencantumkan ecological justice dalam peraturan tentang pengelolaan air minum.
Analisis Kebijakan Pemanfaatan Hutan Konservasi untuk Wisata Alam Berbasis Asas Manfaat dan Lestari (Studi Kasus TAHURA Mangkunagoro I Karanganyar) Muhammad Restu Putra Pratama; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Lego Karjoko
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni: Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v2i2.2031

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the policy regarding the utilization of conservation forest areas in the Grand Forest Park (Tahura) K.G.P.A.A. Mangkunagoro I Karanganyar, particularly in the context of developing nature-based tourism grounded in the principles of benefit and sustainability. The background of this research lies in the urgency of managing conservation areas not only to preserve the environment but also to contribute to the sustainable social and economic development of surrounding communities. This research employs normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were obtained through literature study, document analysis, and direct field observation. The data analysis was conducted deductively by linking normative legal provisions with the principles of benefit and sustainability. The results indicate that the management policy of Tahura K.G.P.A.A. Mangkunagoro I has accommodated the fundamental principles of conservation as stipulated in the applicable legislation, particularly Regional Regulation of Central Java Province Number 3 of 2011. However, in practice, several potential inconsistencies remain. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the implementing regulations, technical governance, and supervision systems to ensure that the policy implementation genuinely reflects the substantive and equitable application of the principles of benefit and sustainability
Analisis Kebijakan Ekspor Pasir Laut Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Ekologi Nurul Ernawati; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Rosita Candrakirana
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Mei : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i2.620

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the compatibility of the sea sand export policy, as outlined in Government Regulation No. 26 of 2023 and its implementing regulations in Minister of Trade Regulations No. 20 and 21, with the principles of ecological justice. The research is driven by concerns over the ecological impacts of sea sand exploitation and the potential conflict between economic interests and environmental protection. Using a normative juridical approach and analysis of prevailing laws and regulations, the study finds that the current regulatory framework does not fully reflect the principles of ecological justice. The policy fails to ensure equitable protection for coastal communities and the marine environment. Government Regulation No. 26/2023 does not explicitly mandate Environmental Impact Assessments (AMDAL), does not emphasize conservation as a fundamental principle, and allows room for exploitation in vulnerable coastal and small island areas. Moreover, historical data reveals that similar policies in the past have led to coastal erosion, the loss of outermost islands, and state losses due to illegal practices. Therefore, without proper reassessment and alignment with environmental justice principles, this policy risks exacerbating ecological inequalities.
Disfungsi Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum Kota Surakarta dalam Penyediaan Air Bersih Abidana Mazida; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Lego Karjoko
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Agustus : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i3.950

Abstract

The existence of clean water is very important because clean water is a basic need for human life and the environment. The availability of abundant clean water is certainly an indicator of welfare, public health, and environmental sustainability. The Surakarta City Regional Drinking Water Company as a provider of clean water services to the community is carried out in accordance with applicable regulations in order to realize clean water services that are decent, equitable, and sustainable. This study aims to determine the role of the Surakarta City Regional Drinking Water Company in implementing the provision of clean water to meet the needs of the community. This research method uses an empirical legal research method. Based on the results of the study, it shows that the implementation of drinking water provision by the Surakarta City Regional Drinking Water Company is not entirely fair and equitable to the community. This is influenced by several obstacles faced, including unstable water quality, less than optimal water continuity, damage to water pumps, and leaks in the pipe network.
Rethinking Subsidiary in Corruption Cases: Indonesian Experiences Nugroho, Fendi; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.714

Abstract

The imposition of additional penalties in the form of restitution in corruption cases in Indonesia continues to reveal significant conceptual and practical weaknesses. A primary issue is the tendency of convicted individuals to opt for subsidiary imprisonment rather than paying restitution, which undermines the effective recovery of state financial losses. Furthermore, inconsistencies in interpretation between prosecutors and judges, weak asset tracing mechanisms, and ambiguities in existing regulations exacerbate the problem. This study examines the legal significance of restitution in corruption cases, identifies the shortcomings in its current implementation, and proposes a ius constituendum model to reconstruct the restitution system to enhance substantive justice and improve state financial recovery. The research employs a normative juridical method, combining statutory analysis, doctrinal review, and case studies, complemented by a comparative study of legal frameworks in the United States and the United Kingdom to highlight gaps in Indonesia’s asset recovery mechanisms. The findings indicate that first, current regulations fail to provide adequate deterrence; second, there is insufficient alignment between state interests and the rights of convicts; and third, existing mechanisms for asset tracing and execution are ineffective. Accordingly, this study recommends legal reconstruction through strengthening the prosecutorial role in execution, ensuring consistency between prosecution demands and judicial decisions, and incorporating the time value of money in determining restitution amounts.
Reconstructing Wage Law in the Contemporary Era: A Pancasila Justice and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Perspective Widiatama; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Lego Karjoko
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11293

Abstract

The wage system in Indonesia, particularly in East Java Province, reveals a significant gap between normative regulations and practical realities. Current wage practices, which inadequately protect informal workers and casual laborers, highlight weak safeguards for basic economic rights and the lack of distributive justice as mandated by Pancasila and the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. This study seeks to reconstruct the legal concept of wages not only in a formal–legal sense but also substantively, by integrating the principles of justice embodied in Pancasila and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as ethical and normative frameworks. Employing a juridical–normative and sociological approach, the research involved a review of labour legislation, an analysis of judicial decisions related to wage disputes, and in-depth interviews with workers, labour unions, employers, and officials from the Manpower Office (Disnaker) in three major industrial cities of East Java: Surabaya, Sidoarjo, and Gresik. The main findings indicate that: (1) the wage system in East Java remains dominated by the minimum wage approach, which fails to reflect contextual justice and balanced labour relations; (2) employers often resist implementing wage structures and scales due to weak law enforcement; (3) the values of ḥifẓ al-māl (protection of wealth) and ḥifẓ al-nafs (protection of life) in maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah align with the welfare principles of Pancasila but have yet to be adopted as a legal paradigm in wage policy formulation; and (4) there is an urgent need to reformulate wage law with justice as its foundational principle rather than focusing solely on the technocratic aspects of minimum wage regulation. This study contributes a conceptual model of wage law grounded in the integration of Pancasila’s justice philosophy and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, offering a framework for a more equitable, adaptive, and culturally responsive wage policy in Indonesia.
PENERAPAN STRICT LIABILITY OLEH PERUSAHAAN DALAM RANGKA KONSERVASI LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al Fikri; Fatma Ulfatun Najicha; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Indonesian State Law Review, 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v3i2.23001

Abstract

Strict liability is absolute responsibility imposed on perpetrators of environmental violations that result in losses to both the environment and the community around the environment. The research used in this paper is juridical normative and uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The development of strict liability in positive law in Indonesia has experienced development and refinement over time, indicated by the application made in several cases concerning environmental violations by several irresponsible parties. Basically, the implementation of strict liability really helps the aggrieved parties, especially the common people, in enforcing environmental laws in Indonesia.
PENERAPAN STRICT LIABILITY OLEH PERUSAHAAN DALAM RANGKA KONSERVASI LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al Fikri; Fatma Ulfatun Najicha; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Indonesian State Law Review, 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v5i1.23122

Abstract

Strict liability is absolute responsibility imposed on perpetrators of environmental violations that result in losses to both the environment and the community around the environment. The research used in this paper is juridical normative and uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The development of strict liability in positive law in Indonesia has experienced development and refinement over time, indicated by the application made in several cases concerning environmental violations by several irresponsible parties. Basically, the implementation of strict liability really helps the aggrieved parties, especially the common people, in enforcing environmental laws in Indonesia.
Kajian Normatif Pertanggungjawaban Perusahaan atas Pelaksanaan dan Pelaporan CSR Berdasarkan PP Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 Endang Retno Suryowati; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum,
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v2i2.75

Abstract

TJSL/CSR in Indonesia is regulated as a legal obligation (mandatory) for companies engaged in the natural resources sector. Its success depends on the principle of accountability, which requires transparency and responsibility. This normative-juridical study evaluates the application of accountability principles in the mining sector. Normatively, PP 47/2012 requires CSR to be listed as an expense and focused on sustainable development (PPM). However, this regulation is not robust because it does not set a minimum fund allocation or clear program boundaries, allowing for multiple interpretations. Empirically (Sekotong case study), accountability is implemented in a formalistic manner, consisting only of one-way administrative reports without meaningful participation from the affected communities. A significant weakness is apparent when dealing with the increase in illegal gold mining (PETI) in legal concession areas. This situation results in a vacuum of responsibility. Companies can claim environmental damage caused by PETI, so that responsibility does not successfully ensnare corporate negligence in prevention efforts. The CSR accountability structure in Indonesia is weak because it only emphasizes activities that are carried out, not negligence that is overlooked. Regulatory reform is needed so that accountability includes passive responsibility to ensure that TJSL functions as a significant instrument of sustainable development.
Co-Authors Abidana Mazida AGUS RIYANTO Al Sentot Sudarwanto Al. Sentot Sudarwanto Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto Arif Wibowo Dwi Sersio Nugraheni Pangastuti W.P Endang Retno Suryowati Ervina Yulianti Mohamad Fandi Satria Fatma Ulfatun Najicha Fatmawati . Fendi Nugroho Fine Ennandrianita Gemarani Harsari Hari Purwadi Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Hermita Ambar Sari Isharyanto , Ismiyanto Ismiyanto Lego Karjoko M. Hudi Asrori Mita Ardianti Mohammad Zamroni Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al Fikri Muhammad Restu Putra Pratama Nathania Olga Br Nababan Nurul Ernawati Oloan Sitorus Prima Suhardi Putra Rafiq Adi Wardana Rofiq laksamana Rosita Candrakirana Rulla Paundryanagari Sahid Setiono Setiono Silvananda Adping Sinung Bagas Pramuaji Widiatama Yuli Isnandar