Muhammad Ishar Helmi, Muhammad Ishar
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Published : 44 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Penggantian Antar Waktu Calon Anggota Legislatif Terpilih Meninggal Dunia Ahmad Zain; Ismail Hasani; Muhammad Ishar Helmi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i3.17938

Abstract

This paper examines the Judges' Considerations in the Supreme Court's Decision Number 57/P/HUM/2019 regarding the replacement between the time the elected candidate dies based on the General Election Commission and the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle. As well as analyzing the contents of the Supreme Court's Decision Related to the Interim Replacement Polemic. The method used is a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that there are implications regarding Decision Number 57/P/HUM/2019 due to the confusion of meaning in the Supreme Court's Decision so that there are multiple interpretations for the applicant and the respondent. Then, regarding the interim replacement mechanism, which basically has the right to nominate a replacement candidate from time to time, political parties have been ruled out by the general election commission because the proposal is against the law. Then the interim replacement candidate is based on the determination of the general election commission based on the provisions in the UUMD3. 
Pemidanaan Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dalam Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Analisis Putusan Nomor 833/Pid/B/2018/PN.JKT.Sel Lisannul Abror, Farahdiba Bagiawan; Burhanudin; Helmi, Muhammad Ishar
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v7i1.27849

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of law in the sentencing of perpetrators of sexual harassment and the judicial considerations in deciding such cases, particularly when the criminal sanctions imposed are inconsistent with the prevailing legal provisions. The research aims to understand the implementation of criminal law in punishing offenders and the reasoning of judges in adjudicating sexual harassment cases, with specific reference to the South Jakarta District Court Decision No. 833/Pid/B/2018/PN.JKT.Sel. The study adopts both the case approach and the statute approach, employing a normative legal research method that examines the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and the relevant court decision as primary sources of analysis. The findings reveal that in the referenced case, the public prosecutor formulated an alternative indictment under Article 290(1) or Article 281(2) of the Criminal Code. The panel of judges ultimately applied Article 281(2) and sentenced the defendant to ten months of imprisonment. The judgment was based on three primary considerations: the testimony of witnesses, the visum et repertum (medical report), and the defendant’s own statement during the trial.