Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.329
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pranata Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Sakai Sambayan JURNAL MAHKAMAH Cepalo Progressive Law Review Pattimura Law Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Dharma Wacana Buguh: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Legalita JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Media Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (JM-PKM) Jurnal Mitrawarga Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian UMKM Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan Jurnal Sumbangsih
Malicia Evendia
Universitas Lampung
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Progressive Law Review

 1 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POST ESTABLISHMENT OF OMNIBUS LAW ON JOB CREATION IN THE PERSECTIVE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY Malicia Evendia; Ade Arif Firmansyah
Progressive Law Review Vol. 5 No. 01 (2023): APRIL
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The dynamics of regulation of environmental protection, with the publication of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, has had an impact on the content contained in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. The existence of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation has changed at least 27 articles, added 4 articles, and 10 articles were deleted in Law Number 32 of 2009. This paper aims to reflect on the legal implications of environmental protection after the Omnibus Law on Job Creation on regional authorities. The results of the study show that the Omnibus Law on Job Creation has reduced the authority of local governments in protecting the environment. There have been several withdrawals of local government affairs to the central government (recentralization), as well as the strengthening of evaluation instruments by the central government. This legal implication can be a challenge and a threat to solving problems and protecting the environment in the region. On the other hand, this can reduce the spirit of environmental decentralization and weaken the spirit of regional autonomy.
Legal Policy on the Flexibility of Establishing State Ministries for the Implementation of Government Martha Riananda; Ahmad Saleh; Malicia Evendia; Ade Arif Firmansyah
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i2.278

Abstract

The amendment to Law Number 39 of 2008 concerning State Ministries has sparked controversy in society, particularly regarding the flexibility of the number of ministries, which is no longer limited. When a legal norm undergoes regulatory changes, there is certainly a background. Law Number 61 of 2024, issued amidst the government's “efficiency” agenda, is an interesting anomaly to study. This study aims to identify and analyze the legal politics of the flexibility of the formation of state ministries in relation to government administration. This research employs a normative, utilizing a statutory, philosophical, conceptual, and case-based approach, framework to examine laws and legal phenomena. The results of this study, namely the legal politics of the flexibility of the formation of state ministries, which was originally limited to a maximum of 34 (thirty-four) ministries, then changed to "unlimited", indicate an attempt to actualize the strengthening of the President's prerogative, which does not require restrictions on ministerial institutional organs. The change in legal norms does not lead to a reduction in the number of ministries, but to an increase in the number of ministries. Law Number 61 of 2024 does not regulate substantive criteria for the formation of the number of ministerial organs, through the clause “needs for the administration of government by the President”, thus giving the President great discretion to determine how many ministerial organs are needed in the administration of government affairs.
Co-Authors Ahmad Saleh Ahmad Saleh Ahmad Saleh Ahmad Saleh Arif Firmansyah, Ade Armen Yasir Arsyah Ferdinand Tampati BUDIYONO Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Candra Perbawati Dewi Nurhalimah Diah Gustiniati Fardiansyah, Ahmad Irzal Firganefi Firganefi Firmansyah, Ade Arif Haery Fajri M. Fakih Marcellino Hariadi Nugroho Martha Riananda Mohammad Reza Khatami Muhtadi Muhtadi Randy Agus Setiawan Saifullah, Ulinnuha Steven Edoward Salasiwa Yhannu Setyawan Yhannu Setyawan Yulia Neta Yulia Neta Yulia Neta . Yusdiyanto Zulkarnain Ridlwan