Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.979
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MONOGRAF Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Konstitusi JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT JURNAL UNIZAR LAW REVIEW Jurnal Jatiswara Sosio Dialektika Indonesia Berdaya Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Mataram Journal of International Law
Muh. Risnain
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 45 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 45 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
PEMBATASAN KASASI PERKARA TATA USAHA NEGARA MENGENAI KEPUTUSAN PEJABAT DAERAH DALAM KERANGKA KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA Harun, Andi; Asmara, M. Galang; Risnain, Muh.
JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Vol 13 No 1 (2025): Vol 13 No 2 Mei 2025
Publisher : Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/ed.v13i1.7478

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas pembatasan kasasi dalam perkara Tata Usaha Negara (TUN) terkait keputusan pejabat daerah dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif atau doktrinal dengan fokus pada analisis peraturan perundang-undangan dan doktrin hukum. Pembatasan kasasi sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 45A ayat (2) huruf c Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2004 bertujuan untuk mengurangi penumpukan perkara di Mahkamah Agung. Namun, norma tersebut dianggap kabur (vague norm) karena tidak memberikan kejelasan mengenai keputusan pejabat daerah yang dapat dikasasi. Hal ini bertentangan dengan prinsip bahwa semua kewenangan pejabat daerah diberikan berdasarkan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Untuk mengatasi ketidakjelasan ini, Mahkamah Agung mengeluarkan SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2018 yang menetapkan bahwa keputusan yang berkaitan erat dengan dekonsentrasi, tugas pembantuan, serta keputusan strategis dan berdampak luas dapat dikecualikan dari pembatasan kasasi. Namun, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kriteria strategis dan berdampak luas dalam SEMA tersebut tidak memiliki dasar dalam Pasal 45A ayat (2) huruf c UU No. 5 Tahun 2004. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan revisi terhadap aturan tersebut. DPR dan Presiden diharapkan memberikan definisi yang lebih jelas dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Selain itu, Mahkamah Agung sebaiknya menyederhanakan pengecualian pembatasan kasasi hanya pada keputusan yang berkaitan erat dengan dekonsentrasi dan tugas pembantuan.
EKSISTENSI LEMBAGA QUASI JUDISIAL DALAM SISTEM KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA : KAJIAN TERHADAP KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA Risnain, Muh
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3 No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.49-58

Abstract

Based on Indonesian Constitution 1945 the existence of quasi-judicial institution as a part of judicial power.Article 24 subsection (3 ) of the constitution of the republic of indonesia 1945 and the law number 48 / 2009 about judicial power admitting quasi-yudicial institutionshas judicial powers. For maximalize exercising of the quasi-judicial institutions are needed legal policy for supporting functional-constitusional relations between Commison for Supervion of Bussiness Competition and Supreme Court as top judicial power organization. Besides that needs to be done an effort to control the behavior commissioner of Commison For Supervion of Business Competition in avoiding abuse of power and moral hazard. These controlling must as part of power of Judicial Commission and Supreme Court. Keywords: Judicial Power, quasi-Judicial, Functional-constitutional and supervision
KRIMINALISASI HAKIM DAN EKSISTENSI PRINSIP JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE DALAM BINGKAI NEGARA HUKUM Risnain, Muh
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 2 No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.2.3.2013.325-336

Abstract

Legal policy throught criminalization of judge by the law are abuse of judicial indpence and threat of rule of law principle while regulate by the constitution. And it is shown that quo vadis of criminalization policy when drafting the law. To solve this problem, there are two step, firstly, House of representative and President as state organs who have authority to arrange the law must pay attention principle of judicial indepence and rule of law, second, reorientation of criminal policy. Keywords: Criminalization, Judicial Independence and Rule of Law.
IDEAS FOR STRENGTHENING SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW AUTHORITY IN REVIEW OF REGIONAL REGULATIONS Risnain, Muh
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9 No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.505-522

Abstract

AbstractThe problem of judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court is a serious academic and practical issue that needs to be resolved after the issuance of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015. There are two problems in this paper, first, the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on institutional and legal procedures for judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court, secondly, how is the concept of the Supreme Court judicial review carried out through renewal of procedural law Trial Judicial Review in the Supreme Court? Based on the discussion above, we can conclude two things, first, the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on the institutional and legal procedures for judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court are the stronger and increasing authority of judicial review in Supreme Court. This decision ended the dualism of review of local regulations from judicial review by the Supreme Court and executive review of regional regulations by the Ministry of Home Affairs to only a judicial review by the Supreme Court, also potentially increasing the number of cases of judicial review in the Supreme Court. Second, the concept of the implementation of a judicial review by the Supreme Court is carried out through legal renewal of the judicial review proceedings in the Supreme Court by including several important substances, related to hearings that are open to the public, the existence of a preliminary examination, hearing, verdict and decision making that are more open and fair.Keywords: Regional Regulation, Judicial Review, and Reformation  ABSTRAKProblem judicial review Perda di Mahkamah Agung menjadi persoalan akademik dan praktikal serius yang perlu dipecahkan pascakeluarnya putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015. Terdapat dua masalah dalam tulisan ini, pertama, implikasi hukum Putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap kelembagaan dan hukum acara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung, kedua, bagaimanakah konsep pelaksanaan judicial review perda oleh mahkamah agung dilakukan melalui pembaharuan hukum acara persidangan judicial review di mahkamah agung?. Berdasarkan pembahasan di atas maka dapat disimpulkan dua hal , pertama, implikasi hukum Putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap kelembagaan dan hukum acara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung adalah semakin kuat dan meningkatnya kewenangan judicial review di mahakamah agung. Putusan ini mengakhiri dualisme review perda dari judicial review oleh MA dan executive review perda oleh kemendagri menjadi hanya judicial review oleh Mahkamah Agung, juga berpotensi meningkatkan jumlah perkara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung. Kedua, konsep pelaksanaan judicial review perda oleh mahkamah agung dilakukan melalui pembaharuan hukum acara persidangan judicial review di mahkamah agung dengan memasukan beberapa substansi penting, terkait sidang yang terbuka untuk umum, adanya proses pemeriksaan pendahuluan, pemeriksaan persidangan, pembuktian dan pengambilan putusan yang lebih terbuka dan fair.Kata Kunci : Peaturan Daerah, JudicialReview, dan Pembaharuan.
Penerapan Prinsip Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Dalam Memerangi Tindak Pidana Siber Rusdianto, Rusdianto; Risnain, Muh.
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2532

Abstract

This research aims to determine the development of the regulation of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles in combating cybercrime and the application of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles. The research method used is normative research. The approach used is statutory, historical, and conceptual. The sources of legal material used are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The legal material collection technique used is in the form of library data. The analysis of legal materials used is a qualitative analysis method. The study result shows that the development of the principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction regulation began with the birth of rules in background paper documents, then the emergence of the 1996 European Council regulations. Applying the principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction is urgently needed in combating criminal acts when cases intersect with state jurisdiction. So that a country can choose jurisdictional principles that can apply in resolving cases, such as the example of the case conducted by Abraham Ben Moses in the United States. Namely, law enforcement can be carried out in Indonesia based on active national principles and protection principles following the ITE Law and the Criminal Code.
Analisis Perjanjian Pengelolaan Wilayah Udara (Flight Information Region) Antara Indonesia dan Singapura Menurut Hukum Internasional Mithalina, Fatona Mithalina; Risnain, Muh.; Zunnuraeni
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2579

Abstract

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis 1) Apakah perjanjian FIR tahun 2022 antara Indonesia dan Singapura telah sesuai dengan hukum internasional, dan 2) Apakah perjanjian bilateral tahun 2022 yang disahkan melalui Perpres Nomor 109 Tahun 2022 telah sesuai dengan hukum nasional Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah perundang-undangan, historis, dan konseptual. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang diperoleh melalui telaah studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Perjanjian Bilateral FIR antara Indonesia dan Singapura tahun 2022 tidak mereflesikan aturan yang sesuai dalam Konvensi Chicago 1944 dan Annex 11. Indonesia sebagai negara pemilik kedaulatan memiliki hak untuk menolak mendelegasikan pengelolaan FIR kepada Singapura. Selain itu, Peraturan Presiden Nomor 109 Tahun 2022 tidak sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbangan . Undang-undang Nomor 1 tahun 2009 mengharuskan Indonesia mengambilalih FIR kepulauan Riau dan Natuna yang nyatanya masih dikelola sebagian besar oleh Singapura dalam jangka waktu 25 tahun mendatang. Dalam hal ini pendelegasian kewenangan kepada Singapura tersebut telah melanggar kedaulatan Indonesia yang bersifat penuh dan eksklusif. Aturan nasional Indonesia juga tidak memberikan kepastian hukum dalam penegakkan kedaulatan dan keamanan wilayah udara Kepulauan Riau dan Natuna. Hal ini ditandai dengan disahkannya Perpres Nomor 109 Tahun 2022 oleh Pemerintah yang harusnya menggunakan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagaimana yang telah ditentukan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2000. Oleh karena itu pemerintah Indonesia melalui Kementrian Perhubungan dan TNI AU mestinya mengkaji ulang perjanjian bilateral tahun 2022 dengan pemerintah Singapura. Masalah FIR kemudian dapat dijadikan bahan acuan bagi kalangan akademisi dan generasi mendatang untuk mempersiapkan diri menjadi orang yang profesional di bidangnya agar suatu hari dapat membela bangsa Indonesia dari segala bentuk masalah, termasuk problematika yang sedang kita hadapi saat ini mengenai ruang udara kepulauan Riau dan Natuna. Kata Kunci: Perjanjian Bilateral; Flight Information Region; Kepulauan Riau; dan Natuna. ABSTRACT This study aims to analyze 1). Is the 2022 FIR agreement between Indonesia and Singapore following international law? 2). Is the 2022 bilateral agreement ratified through Presidential Decree Number 109 of 2022 following Indonesia national law? The research method used is normative legal research. The approach used is statutory, historical, and conceptual. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary data obtained through a literature study. The study results show that the Bilateral FIR Agreement between Indonesia and Singapore in 2022 does not reflect the rules in the 1944 Chicago Convention and Annex 11. Indonesia is a sovereign country and has the right to refuse to delegate the management of FIR to Singapore. In addition, Presidential Regulation Number 109 of 2022 is not following the mandate of Law Number 1 0f 2009 concerning Aviation. Law No.1 of 2009 requires Indonesia to take over the FIR of the Riau and Natuna islands. Singapore still managed the FIR of these regions in the next 25 years. Therefore, the delegation of authority to Singapore has violated the exclusive and full soveregnty of Indonesia. National regulations do not provide legal certainty in upholding the sovereignty and security of the airspace above the Riau islands and Natuna. The legal uncertainty is marked by the ratification of the FIR Agreement year 2022 using Presidential Regulation Number 109 of 2022, instead, it should be ratified by statutory regulations as stipulated in Law Number 24 of 2000. Therefore, the Indonesian government through the Ministry of Transportation and the Indonesian Air Force should review the bilateral agreement year 2022 with the Singapore government. The FIR issue can then be used as reference material for academics and future generations to prepare themselves to become profesionals in their fields so that one day they can defend the Indonesian nation from all kinds of problems, including the problems we are currently facing regarding the Riau and Natuna airspace. Keywords: Bilateral Agreement, Flight Information Region, Riau Islands and Natuna.
Implementation of The Provincial Government’s Authority to Carry Out Sister Province Cooperation In The Perspective of International and National Law Case Study: Sister Province Cooperationbetween Province of NTB And Northern Province of Australia Tyanto, Amar; Risnain, Muh; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2846

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the position and strength of the LoI between the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government regarding sister province cooperation from the perspective of international law and national law. Furthermore, this research also examines the implementation of government authority and dispute resolution mechanisms stipulated in the Letter of Interest in the context of Sister Province agreements according to international law. The research method used is normative empirical. The Letter of Intent (LoI) between the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government regarding sister province cooperation has limited power and does not have binding legal force in the perspective of international law and national law. However, in the implementation of the authority exercised, the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government have gone through the stages of exploration, formulation of texts, and negotiations. The mechanism for resolving differences as stipulated in Article 10 requires an amicable settlement of any differences arising from the interpretation or implementation of the contents of the agreement.
Studi Kasus Putusan Permanent Court Arbitration (PCA) Tentang Sengketa Kepemilikan Zina Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE) Laut Cina Selatan Antara Republik Rakyat Cina (RRC) And Philipina Wahyudi, Indra; Risnain, Muh.; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2974

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan Permanent Court Arbitration (PCA) dalam memutus perkara konflik Laut Cina Selatan antara Philipina dan Republik Rakyat Cina (RRC) serta untuk menganalisis dampak dari putusan tersebut terhadap perkembangan hukum laut internasional khusunya yang berkaitan dengan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif . Jenis penelitian dalam penulisan skripsi ini yaitu penelitian hukum normatif, dengan metode Pendekatan kasus (Case Approach ). Pendekatan Perjanjian Internasioanl, Pendekatan Historis, Pendekatan Konseptual ( Conseptual Approach). Adapun hasil dan kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yakni, Permanent Court Arbitration dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangannya terhadap putusan(Award) menyatakan bahwa, pengajuan pertama ini mencerminkan suatu keluhan tentang sumber hak maritim di Laut Cina Selatan dan tentang klaim RRC atas hak bersejarah. Bahwa Hak maritim RRC di Laut China Selatan, tidak dapat melampaui yang secara tegas diizinkan oleh Konvensi PBB tentang Hukum Laut. Apa yang disebut “ Nine Dash Line ” bertentangan dengan Konvensi dan tanpa efek hukum sejauh melebihi batas-batas geografis dan substantif hak maritim China yang secara tegas diizinkan oleh UNCLOS. Pasca putusan ( Penghargaan), perkembangan hukum laut internasional tidak mengalami perubahaan yang signifikan, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE). Dalam putusannya PCA memberikan penegasan bahwa, Klaim Historis tidak serta merta dapat memberikan suatu Negara hak terhadap Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE).
The Legal Force of the International Court of Justice Decision on the Appeals Dispute: (Case Study: ICJ Decision No. 173 on the Appeals Dispute between Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE versus Qatar) Hafina Haula Arsy; Risnain, Muh; Guna Nugraha, Lalu
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i2.3663

Abstract

The Statute of the International Court of Justice does not include provisions regarding the authority or jurisdiction of the International Court to handle appellate cases. However, in practice, the International Court of Justice has issued judgments on appeals related to the ICAO Council's jurisdiction in disputes over flight restrictions in Qatar imposed by Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study aims to analyze the nature of decisions related to these appellate disputes. The research methodology employed is normative research with a legislative, conceptual, and case study approach. The findings of this research indicate that decisions on appellate cases are deemed final and binding as stipulated in Article 60 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice and Article 86 of the Chicago Convention, and the obligation of UN member states to comply with the judgments of the International Court of Justice is regulated in Article 94 of the United Nations Charter.
THE AUTHORITY OF THE COUNCIL OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA (DPR RI) IN RATING INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS POST THE RULING OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT (MK) NUMBER 13/PUU-16/2018 Bah Jatun Nadrati; Risnain, Muh; Zunnuraeni
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i1.3862

Abstract

This research aims to find out and understand the meaning of the DPR RI's authority to ratify international agreements based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018 and to understand and analyze the direction of regulating the authority of the DPR RI in ratifying international agreements after Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018. This research method uses a type of normative legal research. The meaning of the DPR RI's authority to ratify international agreements based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018 expands the definition of DPR approval, which is not limited to the provisions of Article 10 of Law no. 24 of 2000 concerning international agreements, but in all international agreements which have the nature of having broad and fundamental consequences for people's lives related to the financial burden on the state, and requiring changes or formation of laws. The Constitutional Court's decision pertaining to the DPR's authority in ratifying international agreements, the Constitutional Court expanded the meaning of Article 10 by cancelling the Article and returning to the norms contained in article 11 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Constitutional Court interpreted it extensively. The direction of regulating the authority of the DPR RI in ratifying international agreements after the Constitutional Court decision no. 13/PUU-16/2018 is by changing or replacing the existing norms in article 10 of Law No. 24 of 2000 concerning International Agreements by regulating the substance of international agreements as intended in article 11 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and following the pattern of article 84 of Law no. 7 of 2014.
Co-Authors Abuzar . Annisa Raudlatul Rahmah Asmara, M. Galang Bah Jatun Nadrati Djumardin, Djumardin Dwi Putro, Widodo Erwin, Yulias Fani Shania Putri Farhan Farhan, Muhammad Ammar Galang Asmara Galang Asmara, Galang Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, Gatot Dwi Hendro Guna Nugraha, Lalu Hafina Haula Arsy Harun, Andi Ihdal Umam Ilham Ilham Imran Imran Indra Wahyudi, Indra Irawan Kusumahadi Kaharudin Kaharudin M. Galang Asmara Maya, Lailatil Mithalina, Fatona Mithalina Muhammad Sood, Muhammad Muhammad, Teguh Ernaldi Nata Legawa, Baiq Hemas Nugraha, Lalu Guna Parman, Lalu Pitaloka, Diva Rajab Fadli, Muhamad Rusdianto Rusdianto, Rusdianto Sekarningrum, Elvira Alya Sembiring, Rinawati Suadi, Amran Sukma W, Pebriana Putri Tyanto, Amar Wahyudi, Ikhsan Wardhana, Yunanto Estika Widodo Dwi Putro Yunanto Estika Wardhana Zampara Mernissi Zunnuraeni Zunnuraeni, Zunnuraeni