Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.784
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar JUANG: Jurnal Wahana Konseling Al-Aulia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Sewagati: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Journal of Innovative and Creativity Journal of Management Education Social Sciences Information and Religion
Non Syafriafdi
Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Riau
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
INSTRUMENT VALIDITY FOR LEARNING RESOURCES ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL DISASTER FOR COASTAL AREAS: AN ANALYSIS OF AIKEN'S V Eddy Noviana; Intan Kartika Sari; Zufriady; Sri Erlinda; Non Syafriafdi; Putu Eka Suarmika
Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): February
Publisher : Laboratorium Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33578/jpfkip.v12i1.9320

Abstract

This paper describes the instrument validity for digital learning resources for coastal areas based digital in the elementary school by using Aiken's V analysis. The purpose of the research is to develop an instrument that can be seen as the validity for every instrument item to obtain information about the need for digital-based coastal area disaster learning resources in elementary schools. The research approach uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive research method. Instrument design and validation were carried out in three stages; (a) literature review, (b) instrument draft design, and (c) qualitative and quantitative rater review of the instrument. Content validity is validated using the V Aikens coefficient. The content validity coefficient is measured by 8 raters based on the assessment results. It is assessed based on certain scales, which consisted of strongly agree (scale 4), agree (scale 3), disagree (scale 2), and strongly disagree (scale 1). The research results indicate that aspect 1, with four instrument items, is in the high category. For aspect 2, three instruments are in the high category. Aspect 3 with three instruments is in the moderate category. For aspect 4, two instruments are in the moderate category. Aspect 5 with three instruments is in the moderate category. In aspect 5, there are two high-category instrument items and three medium-category instrument items. It is concluded that out of the 22 items of needs analysis, in general, it was valid. Nevertheless, several instrument items needed to be reviewed, namely on the editorial aspect of the statement.
Co-Authors Ade Jumi Sapitri Adrian Pratama Alfa Riyanda Andreal Taqwa Annisa Mukharromah Dera Afri Dina Puspita Donal Donal Eddy Noviana Elni Yakub Elni Yakub Fina Putri Hanny Olivya Intan Kartika Sari Intan Kartika Sari Isnaria Rizki Hayati Khairifo Khairifo Khairiyah Khadijah Lastika Br Silalahi M. Arphin Dita Marisa Marisa Miftahul Jannah Muhammad Azky Munjiatun Munjiatun Natasha Widy Pratiwi Nurma Yuriski Paija Lubis Putri Anggraini Suci Ramadani Putri Cahyani Pernandes Putu Eka Suarmika Putu Eka Suarmika Rangga Hafizh Darmawan Reenad Atiqha Masait Ririn Anggraini Rizky Fadhilah Salpiana Salpiana Shavira Safa Oktaviona Sri Erlinda Suarman Tri Umari Zufriady Zufriady