Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and Head-of-State Immunity: Sovereignty and the Use of Force in the Fragmentation of International Law Purwati, Ani
International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : CV. Inara in Colaboration with www.stie-sampit.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijse.v6i1.330

Abstract

The exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction against a foreign head of state raises fundamental problems in international law because it directly implicates the principles of state sovereignty, head-of-state immunity, and the prohibition of the use of force. Normatively, international law recognizes that an incumbent head of state enjoys personal immunity (immunity ratione personae) from the criminal jurisdiction of other states, grounded in customary international law and international jurisprudence. This principle is reinforced by the Charter of the United Nations, particularly Article 2(4) on the prohibition of the threat or use of force and Article 2(7) on the principle of non-intervention (UN Charter, 1945). However, the practice of some states applies extraterritorial jurisdiction unilaterally under the rationale of global law enforcement or national security, while in practice disregarding head-of-state immunity and the limits of territorial sovereignty. This condition reflects normative fragmentation and the politicization of the application of international law. Regulatory weaknesses are evident in the absence of a comprehensive international instrument governing the limits of extraterritorial jurisdiction over senior state officials, weak enforcement mechanisms for violations of the non-intervention principle, and the lack of effective sanctions outside international judicial fora. This research employs a normative legal method, using approaches grounded in international legal instruments, conceptual analysis, and jurisprudential review, including the Arrest Warrant decision (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium, 2002). The findings confirm that cross-border law enforcement through coercive measures without the consent of the territorial state or a mandate from the UN Security Council is inconsistent with state sovereignty and the prohibition of the use of force. Therefore, international legal norms should be strengthened through multilateral instruments and lawful accountability mechanisms to safeguard the supremacy of international law.
Perlindungan Hukum Pelaku Usaha terhadap Ulasan Digital Menyesatkan: Rekonstruksi Tanggung Jawab Platform di Indonesia Andriana, Andriana; Marina, Liza; Purwati, Ani
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Februari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i2.5861

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital platform economy has transformed consumer decision-making patterns through online reviews as a primary source of information. However, the increasing prevalence of misleading digital reviews, including fake reviews facilitated by automation technologies and generative artificial intelligence, raises significant legal concerns, particularly regarding the protection of business actors. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the protection of business actors against misleading digital reviews and to evaluate the legal responsibility of digital platforms within Indonesia’s digital economic ecosystem. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches through the analysis of regulations related to electronic transactions, consumer protection, and platform liability, complemented by comparative international practices. The findings indicate that the existing national regulatory framework has not comprehensively regulated platform responsibility in moderating digital reviews and has not provided effective legal remedies for business actors. This condition creates an imbalance in legal relations among users, business actors, and platform providers. The study concludes that regulatory reconstruction is necessary through strengthening content moderation obligations, review verification mechanisms, and proportional platform liability to establish a fair and equitable digital economic ecosystem.
Inovasi Media dan Alat Permainan Edukatif Islami untuk Pengembangan Motorik Anak Usia Dini Zukhairina, Zukhairina; Yani, Lilis Putri; Purwati, Ani; Khoni’ah, Nurul; Yanti, Nur; Marlina, Leni
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher : CV Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jip.v2i3.1995

Abstract

Early childhood motor development is a fundamental aspect that influences future physical, cognitive, and social abilities. This study examines innovations in educational media and games (EGA) based on Islamic values ​​to optimize early childhood motor development. Using a literature review method, this study analyzed journal articles, books, and research reports published between 2018 and 2024. The results indicate that the integration of Islamic values ​​in EGA not only improves children's gross and fine motor skills but also strengthens religious identity and Islamic character from an early age. The innovations developed include hijaiyah letter puzzles, mosque blocks, prayer games, and interactive digital media based on applications. The findings indicate that Islamic EGA designed with developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) principles can improve eye-hand coordination by 78%, body balance by 82%, and fine motor skills by 75%. This study recommends the development of more varied Islamic EGA, the integration of learning technology, and training of early childhood teachers in the use of Islamic-based educational media.
Optimalisasi Peradilan Perdata dalam Menjawab Sengketa Bisnis Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Zebua, Elbryan Alfandi Damai Sonifati; Purwati, Ani
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of information technology has fundamentally changed business transaction patterns through the use of electronic contracts, digital platforms, and online transaction systems. This transformation has not only increased the efficiency of business activities but also created new complexities in business dispute resolution, which civil courts must address. This research is motivated by the suboptimal performance of civil courts in handling IT-based business disputes, particularly regarding procedural law, electronic evidence, and institutional readiness. The purpose of this research is to analyze how civil courts can optimize their handling of IT-based business disputes. The method used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, case-based, comparative, and historical approaches. The results show that although national regulations have recognized the validity of electronic transactions and evidence, judicial practice still faces normative and technical obstacles. This research concludes that optimizing civil justice requires procedural law reform, increased judicial capacity, and the integration of information technology to ensure legal certainty, justice, and the effectiveness of digital business dispute resolution.
Kejahatan ekonomi transnasional dalam skema pencucian uang korporasi: analisis hukum dan upaya penaggulangan internasional Andriana, Andriana; Purwati, Ani
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/cessie.v4i3.1703

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis peran Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK) sebagai Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) Indonesia dalam menghadapi kejahatan ekonomi transnasional yang diwujudkan melalui skema pencucian uang korporasi. Kajian ini berangkat dari meningkatnya kompleksitas modus pencucian uang lintas yurisdiksi yang memanfaatkan struktur korporasi dan lemahnya transparansi kepemilikan manfaat. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode normatif-empiris melalui analisis peraturan perundang-undangan, standar internasional Anti-Money Laundering (AML), serta evaluasi implementasi kebijakan dan praktik kelembagaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PPATK memiliki posisi strategis dalam mendeteksi transaksi mencurigakan, menyusun analisis intelijen keuangan, serta mendukung proses penegakan hukum dan pemulihan aset. Namun, efektivitas peran tersebut masih menghadapi tantangan berupa keterbatasan kapasitas sumber daya, infrastruktur teknologi, kompleksitas pembuktian korporasi, dan hambatan koordinasi internasional dalam pelacakan dana lintas negara. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya penguatan kapasitas institusional, peningkatan interoperabilitas sistem pertukaran informasi global, serta harmonisasi regulasi nasional dengan standar internasional guna memperkuat efektivitas rezim AML Indonesia dalam konteks tanggung jawab hukum korporasi transnasional.