Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

SENTIMEN ANALISIS ULASAN PENGGUNA GOJEK MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA MACHINE LEARNING SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE Sandiva, Tesa Vausia; Kristiyanto, Arip; Sandi, Leo
TRANSFORMASI Vol 21, No 2 (2025): TRANSFORMASI
Publisher : STMIK BINA PATRIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56357/jt.v21i2.472

Abstract

The development of digital technology has brought significant changes to various sectors of life, including the transportation sector. One popular mode of transportation among the public is online motorcycle taxis, such as Gojek. Gojek continues to innovate to meet customer needs more effectively and expand its service coverage. This study aims to identify the number of positive, neutral, and negative sentiments in a user review dataset, as well as evaluate the performance of the SVM algorithm used. The analysis was conducted on 10,000 customer reviews from the Play Store application, resulting in 2,057 positive sentiments, 1,135 neutral sentiments, and 6,295 negative sentiments. The classification model employed, namely SVM, achieved an accuracy of 89% and an F1-score of 90%.
Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Learning Algorithms in Sentiment Analysis of Gojek User Reviews Sandiva, Tesa Vausia; Kristiyanto, Arip
Jurnal KomtekInfo Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025): Komtekinfo
Publisher : Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35134/komtekinfo.v12i4.669

Abstract

The development of digital technology has brought significant changes across various sectors of life, including transportation. One of the most popular modes of transportation among the public today is online motorcycle taxis, such as Gojek. Gojek continues to innovate to meet customer needs more effectively and to expand its range of services. This study aims to identify the number of positive, neutral, and negative sentiments in a user review dataset, as well as to evaluate the performance of the algorithms used—namely, SVM and Random Forest. The analysis was conducted on 10,000 customer reviews from the Play Store application, resulting in 2,057 positive sentiments, 1,135 neutral sentiments, and 6,295 negative sentiments. The classification model compared the SVM algorithm with the Random Forest algorithm, and the results show that Random Forest achieved better performance, with 91% accuracy compared to SVM’s 89%. These findings demonstrate that Random Forest performs better in handling word distribution within review texts than the SVM method.