Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Legal Protection For Consumers Against The Exoneration Clause On The Goods Stated If The Goods Are Broken Or Damaged Is The Same As Buying In The Review Of Law Number 8 Of 1999 On Consumer Protection Simarmata, Judika; Wijaya, Andika; Sanggalang, Rizki Setyobowo
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2070

Abstract

An exoneration clause is a part of a contract that contains a provision that transfers responsibility from a creditor or business actor to another party. the basis for the creation of this clause is the principle of freedom of contract, which gives the parties the right to determine the content of their agreement. legal protection for consumers is very important to create a fair and balanced relationship between consumers and businesses. in indonesia, Law No. 8 of 1999 on consumer protection has been widely recognized, both in practice and in theory. this study aims to examine the legal responsibility in protecting consumers from exoneration clauses that are considered harmful and override the responsibility of business actors and the role of consumer protection agencies in enforcing consumer rights against adverse exoneration clauses. this research uses normative juridical research methods, namely research that focuses on the analysis of legal norms that apply in a legal system. this method aims to explore and evaluate legislation, legal doctrine, and existing legal principles, without involving empirical data or field observations. this study concluded that the legal responsibility to consumers is derived from the consumer protection law1 no. 8 of 1999 provides a legal framework to protect consumer rights, including prohibiting the inclusion of adverse standard clauses and forms the role of consumer protection institutions is that they supervise, provide education, and help resolve disputes, as well as encourage changes to stricter regulations.
Inheritance Distribution under Dayak Ngaju Customary Law in the Kedamangan of Jekan Raya, Palangka Raya City (A Case Study of the Decision of the Kedamangan of Jekan Raya District, Palangka Raya City Number 056/DKA-KJR/V/2022) Marselino, Fernando; Wijaya, Andika; Nugraha, Satriya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2073

Abstract

This article examines the implementation of inheritance distribution based on the Dayak Ngaju customary law through a case study of Decision Number 056/DKA-KJR/V/2022 by the Customary Court of Kedamangan Jekan Raya, Palangka Raya City. The study adopts a juridical-empirical approach by combining normative legal analysis with field observations on how inheritance disputes are resolved within the community. The findings reveal that inheritance settlement among the Dayak Ngaju people is carried out through a customary court forum known as the Kerapatan Mantir Adat, led by Damang and Mantir (customary judges). The dispute in this case arose when the father (Respondent) sold inherited land without sharing the proceeds with his children (Petitioners) as rightful heirs. The resolution process involved stages from pre-conflict negotiation to formal adjudication, emphasizing the principles of deliberation, consensus, harmony, and justice in accordance with Dayak Ngaju customary values. The final decision of the customary court affirmed gender equality in inheritance rights and mandated a fair and equal distribution of the estate. This study underscores the vital role of customary institutions not only in conflict resolution but also in preserving social harmony and sustaining local wisdom within Indonesia’s pluralistic legal system.
Kajian Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perampasan Aset dalam Proses Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Pieresky, Andrea; Wijaya, Andika; Nugraha, Satriya
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perampasan aset merupakan instrumen penting dalam sistem hukum pidana untuk memastikan bahwa kejahatan tidak memberikan keuntungan kepada pelakunya serta memulihkan kerugian negara dan korban. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, serta menganalisis regulasi yang berlaku seperti KUHP, KUHAP, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun pengaturan hukum mengenai perampasan aset telah tersedia, implementasinya masih menghadapi sejumlah kendala, seperti celah hukum yang dapat dimanfaatkan oleh pelaku, inkonsistensi putusan pengadilan, lemahnya koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum, dan keterbatasan kemampuan aparat dalam menelusuri transaksi keuangan yang kompleks. Selain itu, aspek perlindungan terhadap korban belum mendapat perhatian yang memadai. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan penguatan regulasi melalui pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset, peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, serta penguatan kerja sama nasional dan internasional agar perampasan aset dapat lebih efektif menekan ruang gerak tindak pidana pencucian uang sekaligus mewujudkan keadilan substantif.