Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

Responsibility in Transfer of Workers' Wages Limited Liability Company Bankruptcy Abdullah, Ali; Jum Anggriani; Yongky Putut Angki Anata
Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): October-January
Publisher : Inovasi Pratama Internasional. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/jsh.v3i2.1088

Abstract

The issue of responsibility in the transfer of workers' wages in a limited liability company that is bankrupt is an important issue in employment and bankruptcy law. When a limited liability company (PT) is declared bankrupt, there are significant challenges related to workers' rights, especially regarding unpaid wages. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility in the transfer of workers' wage payment obligations from a bankrupt company to other parties, such as a third party or a replacement company. The methodology of this study uses a qualitative approach with case studies of several companies that are bankrupt. Data were collected through literature reviews, interviews with legal practitioners, and analysis of applicable laws and regulations. The findings of this study indicate that responsibility in the transfer of workers' wages depends not only on existing legal provisions, but also on the agreement between the parties involved in the bankruptcy process. The results of this study reveal that in practice, the transfer of responsibility for workers' wages often creates uncertainty for workers, especially in terms of certainty of payment. Recommendations provided include the need for clearer regulations regarding the transfer of wage obligations, as well as increasing legal protection for workers affected by company bankruptcy.
Problems of Using a Power of Attorney to Sell in the Transfer of Limited Liability Company Assets (Case Study Decision Number: 472/Pid.B/2023/Pn Tjk) Abdullah, Ali; Syahpri Kholik
Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): February-May
Publisher : Inovasi Pratama Internasional. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/jsh.v3i3.1294

Abstract

The role of a Notary as a public official is very important and must be able to provide counseling and take the right steps in making authentic deeds by ensuring the formal truth of a legal act, especially a legal act in this case is the transfer of company assets based on a power of attorney to sell and without the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders. Where the transfer of company assets should refer to the company's articles of association and Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. The problem raised is the validity of the power of attorney to sell in the transfer of company assets and without the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders. The research method used is normative legal research, using secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This study uses a descriptive-analytical data analysis method with a qualitative approach. The results of this study are that if the subjective requirements in making a deed are not met, where the provisions in Article 1320 of the Civil Code must meet the requirements of competence in granting the power of attorney to sell, then the transfer of the asset can be cancelled. A Notary, in carrying out his duties, must be careful, thorough and adhere to the UUJN-UUPJN and KEN.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR SHARE TRANSFERS: THE ROLE OF DERIVATIVE ACTION LAWSUITS IN DEFENDING SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS Asih, Ayu Lestarining; Abdullah, Ali
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i3.7605

Abstract

This research examines the legal complexity of share transfer in Indonesia, focusing on derivative action as an instrument for protecting shareholders' rights. This research is strictly limited to the Indonesian legal framework and does not involve comparative analysis with foreign jurisdictions. The methodological scope is also limited to a normative juridical approach, relying solely on statutory analysis, doctrinal studies, and jurisprudence without conducting empirical data collection or field-based validation. The study aims to analyze the legal construction of share transfer, identify juridical challenges, and evaluate the effectiveness of derivative action in protecting minority shareholders' interests. Utilizing a normative juridical method, the research investigates legislation, legal literature, and relevant jurisprudence. Findings reveal that derivative action is a complex legal mechanism transforming corporate governance, providing space for minority shareholders to protect corporate interests from potential abuse. The research uncovers significant implementation challenges, including evidence complexity and structural resistance. The conclusion emphasizes the need for regulatory framework improvement, strengthening judicial institutions' capacity, and enhancing legal literacy to create an effective and just legal protection system.Keywords: Share Transfer, Derivative Action, Legal Protection
Perlindungan Hukum Atas Publikasi Negatif Identitas Notaris Oleh Media Massa dalam Menghadapi Kasus Hukum Pidana di Pengadilan Esmeralda Aurelia Gracia; Ali Abdullah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.5734

Abstract

Publikasi identitas notaris oleh media massa sebelum putusan pengadilan berkekuatan hukum tetap merupakan permasalahan krusial dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif untuk menganalisis praktik publikasi media, kerangka hukum perlindungan, dan dampak psikososial terhadap profesi notaris. Melalui studi pustaka komprehensif, penelitian mengeksplorasi kompleksitas perlindungan identitas notaris dalam konteks hukum dan media massa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa publikasi prematur melanggar prinsip praduga tak bersalah, merusak integritas profesional, dan menimbulkan stigmatisasi sosial berkepanjangan. Kerangka hukum Indonesia memiliki kelemahan struktural dalam melindungi identitas profesional, ditandai dengan ketidakjelasan mekanisme perlindungan dan lemahnya sanksi hukum. Penelitian merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi, pembentukan tim pengawas lintas lembaga, pengembangan protokol etika media, dan program edukasi berkelanjutan. Pendekatan multidisipliner yang mensinergikan berbagai pemangku kepentingan diperlukan untuk melindungi martabat dan integritas profesi hukum di Indonesia.
Upaya Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pihak Ketiga yang Asetnya Termasuk dalam Harta Pailit Violenza Alif; Ali Abdullah; Dian Purwaningrum
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 12 (2025): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.2378

Abstract

Such actions by the curator could potentially fall under the category of unlawful acts (PMH) as stipulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code. These actions are considered unlawful if they are carried out without a clear legal basis and without adequate verification of ownership. To be declared an unlawful act, the following elements must be fulfilled: the existence of an act, the act is unlawful, there is fault, loss has been incurred, and there is a causal relationship between the act and the loss incurred. This phenomenon indicates a gap between norms and practices in the administration of bankruptcy. The definition of the descriptive analytical method is a method that serves to describe or provide an overview of the object being studied through data or samples that have been collected as they are, without conducting analysis and making conclusions that apply to the general public. The curator's action of including third-party assets in the bankruptcy estate without a valid legal basis constitutes an unlawful act (PMH). This action violates the principles of property rights protection and legality in civil and bankruptcy law. The curator must ensure that the assets included in the bankruptcy estate truly belong to the debtor based on strong and valid legal evidence. Legal protection for third parties whose assets are included in the bankruptcy estate can be sought through commercial court proceedings, such as other lawsuits (Article 217 of the Bankruptcy Law) or third-party opposition (derden verzet). Third parties acting in good faith can submit proof of legal ownership through official documents such as a Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB), Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB), or proof of full payment for the disputed object. Supreme Court Decision Number 311 K/Pdt.Sus–Pailit/2024 shows that the Supreme Court is increasingly consistent in providing protection for the property rights of third parties who have no debt relationship with the bankrupt debtor. This sets an important precedent in bankruptcy practice in Indonesia to prevent curators from exceeding their authority.
Unlawful Acts in Sales and Purchase Agreements and the Protection of Good-Faith Buyers Zahra, Nabilla; Abdullah, Ali; Kesuma, Diani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.431

Abstract

Sales and Purchase Agreements (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli—PPJBs) frequently give rise to disputes when legal defects arise in the transfer of land rights, particularly where such defects prejudice buyers acting in good faith. The tension between legal certainty of land ownership and the protection of good-faith parties remains a legal problem that has yet to be fully resolved in judicial practice. This study examines the application of the doctrine of unlawful acts in PPJBs and evaluates the form and effectiveness of legal protection afforded to landowners and good-faith buyers. Employing a normative legal research method, the study adopts statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, with particular attention to judicial decisions concerning PPJB disputes. The findings demonstrate that unlawful acts in PPJBs predominantly originate from the bad faith of one of the contracting parties or third parties. At the same time, courts tend to provide proportional protection to good-faith buyers without disregarding the rights of the lawful owner. The study concludes that effective legal protection in PPJB disputes can only be achieved through a balanced application of the principles of good faith and legal certainty within the agrarian law framework.
Juridical Study on the Transfer of Shares in a Limited Liability Company That Is Decided to Be Free from All Legal Claims Hendra Setiawan Siburian; Ali Abdullah; Fitra Deni
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i1.449

Abstract

In a limited liability company, the General Meeting of Shareholders serves as the highest corporate organ authorized to determine strategic matters, including the transfer of shares. This study examines the legality of share transfer conducted without fulfilling the quorum requirements, as reflected in Surabaya District Court Decision No. 7/Pid.B/2020/PN.Sby in conjunction with Surabaya High Court Decision No. 1476/Pid/2020/PT.Sby. This research employed a normative juridical method with qualitative analysis based on statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that such transfer is legally defective unless justified through the Circular Resolution of Shareholders mechanism. Notaries play a crucial role in ensuring legal certainty and the validity of the transaction.
IMPLEMENTASI AJARAN DUALISTIS HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN PERKARA PIDANA DI BIDANG KENOTARIATAN Ali Abdullah; Panca Subagyo
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 16, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v16i2.15357

Abstract

Banyaknya permasalahan hukum yang melibatkan Notaris terhadap akta autentik yang dibuatnya menyebabkan Notaris berurusan dengan hukum pidana. Hukum pidana yang seharusnya digunakan sebagai upaya terakhir (ultimum remedium), namun pada praktiknya dijadikan sebagai pilihan utama (primum remedium), sehingga tidak ada perlindungan hukum terhadap Notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya sebagai pejabat umum yang menjalankan sebagian kekuasaan negara di bidang hukum privat yang mempunyai peran penting dalam pembuatan akta autentik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menjawab implementasi ajaran dualistis hukum pidana dalam menyelesaikan perkara pidana di bidang kenotariatan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan bersumber pada studi pustaka/data sekunder. Data sekunder terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa implementasi ajaran dualistis dalam menyelesaikan perkara pidana terhadap Notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya masih minim diterapkan oleh hakim (pengadilan). Hakim masih memandang bahwa Notaris yang melakukan perbuatan sesuai rumusan tindak pidana (actus reus) layak dipidana, tanpa mempertimbangkan keadaan batin (mens rea) sebagai unsur kesalahan Notaris. Sehingga dalam hal ini tidak ada pemisahan antara perbuatan dengan pertanggungjawaban pidananya.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Kuasa Menjual (Studi Putusan MA Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022): Criminal Liability of Notaries for Forgery of Deeds of Power of Attorney for Sale (A Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 1209 K/Pid/2022) Amallia, Ainun; Edi Tarsono; Ali Abdullah
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Media Hukum (JMH)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tompotika Luwuk Banggai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59414/jmh.v14i1.1354

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana notaris terhadap tindak pemalsuan Akta Kuasa Menjual berdasarkan Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022. Notaris sebagai pejabat umum memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna, sehingga setiap tindakan dalam proses pembuatan akta harus dilaksanakan sesuai ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan dan prinsip kehati-hatian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber data yang digunakan berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa notaris dalam perkara tersebut terbukti melakukan pemalsuan terhadap Akta Kuasa Menjual melalui penggunaan tanda tangan yang tidak sah dan pembuatan akta tanpa kehadiran pihak yang berkepentingan. Perbuatan tersebut memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan surat otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam ketentuan KUHP, sehingga notaris dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana. Putusan Mahkamah Agung menegaskan bahwa penyalahgunaan kewenangan oleh notaris tidak hanya menimbulkan konsekuensi administratif dan perdata, tetapi juga berimplikasi pada sanksi pidana demi menjaga kepastian hukum dan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap akta otentik.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Kuasa Menjual: (Studi Putusan MA Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022) amallia, Ainun; Tarsono, Edy; Abdullah, Ali
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v11i4.64086

Abstract

Notaris sebagai pejabat umum memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN). Akta otentik memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna, sehingga setiap proses pembuatannya harus memenuhi ketentuan formal dan material yang ditetapkan peraturan perundang-undangan. Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a dan m UUJN menegaskan kewajiban notaris untuk bertindak jujur, saksama, mandiri, tidak berpihak, serta membacakan dan menandatangani akta di hadapan penghadap dan saksi. Menganalisis pemenuhan unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan akta kuasa menjual dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022. Pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dengan menelaah ketentuan dalam UUJN dan KUHP khususnya Pasal 264 ayat (1) ke-1 jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Pendekatan kasus (case approach), dengan menganalisis pertimbangan hukum dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Notaris Madiyana Herawati, S.H., Sp.N. terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan membuat empat Akta Kuasa Menjual tanpa kehadiran penghadap serta menggunakan tanda tangan palsu atas nama pemberi kuasa (Suratinah). Tindakan tersebut memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan surat otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 264 ayat (1) ke-1 jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa pembuatan akta kuasa menjual tanpa kehadiran penghadap dan dengan tanda tangan palsu telah memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan surat otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 264 ayat (1) ke-1 jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Notaris dalam perkara Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1209 K/Pid/2022 terbukti bertindak dengan kesengajaan (dolus) sehingga dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana dan dijatuhi pidana penjara selama 1 (satu) tahun 6 (enam) bulan.