Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

Persepsi Aparat Penegak Hukum Tentang Implemenasi Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Shinta Agustina Iwan Kurniawan Nani Mulyati
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 41, Nomor 4, Tahun 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3328.779 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.41.4.2012.540-548

Abstract

Abstract Due to the complexity of regulations on criminal law, one single  action  could breach directly two or more criminal acts. In such cases, the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali must be implemented, as stipulated in article 63 (2) of the  Criminal Code. This principle required the two acts should regulate the same object or action, otherwise it could not be implemented although the offender seem has breached two acts arised from a single action. In this time being  the implementation of this principle  often rised an unsatisfaction due to its inconsistency that has rised disparity of sentencing. The different perception of the law enforcement officers on the meaning of particularly criminal law, the cases in which the principle should be implemented, and the model of charging that should be used, are several causes of the inconcistency implementation. Keywords: Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali,  particular criminal law, and perception of law enforcement officer. Abstrak Tindak pidana yang terjadi  dalam masyarakat seringkali melanggar beberapa ketentuan hukum pidana di luar KUHP (hukum pidana khusus) sekaligus. Penegakan hukum terhadap kasus demikian sering tidak memuaskan karena penerapan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali yang inkonsisten, sehingga terjadi disparitas pidana. Pemahaman aparat penegak hukum yang berbeda tentang apa yang dimaksud hukum pdiana khusus, tahapan penerapannya, dan bentuk surat dakwaan yang sesuai bagi penanganan perkara pidana yang demikian menjadi penyebab terjadinya inkonsistensi penegakan hukum tersebut. Kata Kunci: Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, Hukum Pidana Khusus, dan persepsi penegak hukum.
THE ROLE OF GENERAL ATTORNEY IN ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION BY CORPORATION Satya Marta Ruhiyat; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Nani Mulyati
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 4, No 2 (2019): Diponegoro Law Review October 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (591.463 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.4.2.2019.152-166

Abstract

Considerable efforts have been made to fight corruption, however it continues to occur in Indonesia. In the present time, corruptions do not only carry out by individuals but also by corporations. However, the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code do not recognize and regulate corporations as the subject of criminal acts, so that law enforcement officials, especially prosecutors, have difficulty in charging corporations. This paper tries to answer question about the role of prosecutors in the eradication of corruption by corporation based on The General Attorney Regulation Number: PER-028/A/JA/10/2014 on guidelines for prosecuting corporation. The research method employed is normative juridical method, where the data is analyzed with qualitative methodology. The General Attorney Regulation on Corporate Legal Subjects explains more apparent criteria for actions that can be attributed to the corporation. The regulation combines several theories of corporate criminal liability not only heavily rely on vicarious criminal liability theory. It also provides direction about the separation of corporate liability and director’s liability. With this guideline, the public prosecutors have clearer direction to be able to charge the corporation so that it can restore the state finances that have been harmed by the corruption act.
POLITICAL PARTY’S CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN INDONESIA Mulyati, Nani; Santoso, Topo
Indonesia Law Review
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In Indonesia, according to civil law, a political party can be a separate legal personality from its members vested with the same legal rights and duties as a legal citizen. They can participate in the economic, politic, legal, and social relationships. If they violate the law, they can also be held responsible. However, it is still very doubtful whether they can be liable in criminal law since they have critical function in the democratic political process as acknowledge by the constitution. This paper examines the position of a political party in their criminal liability, whether they can be prosecuted, and sanctioned. In order to do that the scientific methodology used for this research is doctrinal legal research, scrutinizing some theories, regulations, and legal cases, and analyzing some legal theories on corporate legal personalities. It examines regulations and cases that describe the conditions when a political party can or cannot be prosecuted as political parties. It is concluded that political parties do have some peculiarities that ordinary private corporations do not, such as the important roles they play in constitutional life as they can contest election results and hold power in the government. Some countries treat political parties differently when it comes to criminal law. This research will provide valuable information for judges, other law enforcement officers, and academia in understanding the position of political parties in criminal liability.
Asset Recovery as a Fundamental Principal in Law Enforcement of Corruption by Corporations Nani Mulyati; Aria Zurnetti
Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (499.143 KB) | DOI: 10.25077/aijosh.v4i1.33

Abstract

Corruption is one of the most widespread and chronic crimes in Indonesia. Therefore, handling corruption is a very important priority for law enforcement. Perpetrators of corruption are not only individuals but also corporations. The crime is done for the benefit of the corporation itself. Today corruption committed by corporations have started to be a concern of law enforcement officials even though the implementation is not yet optimal. This paper discusses the assets recovery as a fundamental principal in criminal punishment against a corrupt corporation. This research is using a dogmatic legal method by analyzing legal materials. From the research conducted it can be concluded that law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption carried out by corporations should be prioritized in the asset recovery principal and not only aiming to punish criminal offenders. So it is recommended to law enforcement officials to use asset recovery approach in handling corruption cases committed by corporations, including in pairing the indictment with money laundering regime.
Law Enforcement Against Criminal Acts Local Elections by Gakkumdu Muslihannisa Muslihannisa; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Nani Mulyati
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i4.803

Abstract

The election of the Regional Head of Padang Pariaman Regency as a form of democracy must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the legislation, but in the process of its implementation it cannot be separated from various actions that can harm a lot of people, and the integrity of the implementation of the Regional Election. In this case, the integrated law enforcement center (Gakkumdu) enforces the law on the crime of regional head elections. The research method used in this study is empirical juridical. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded: Law enforcement against criminal acts of integrated law enforcement centers in handling criminal acts for the election of the head of Padang Pariaman region is ineffective because of the 3 (three) findings of criminal cases handled there are no cases has reached the court level, all cases stop on the second discussion of Sentra Gakkumdu. The obstacles faced in law enforcement of criminal acts are associated with factors that affect law enforcement consisting of 5 (five) namely legal factors, law enforcement, facilities and facilities, society, and culture. To overcome obstacles by the integrated law enforcement center in law enforcement of regional election crimes is to carry out its duties as a law enforcement holder without any internal and external influence of a policy with the aim that the democratic process runs with the creation of justice, safely, and peacefully.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DALAM MENGUNGKAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEADILAN Gerry Jardan; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Nani Mulyati
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.356

Abstract

Justice collaborator sangat berperan penting dalam membantu aparat penegak hukum dalam memberantas kejahatan terorganisir seperti tindak pidana narkotika, Peran justice collaborator dalam upaya pengungkapan kasus tindak pidana narkotika karena dapat menarik dan menjerat bandar atau pelaku lainnya. dengan adanya pemberian perlindungan hukum terhadap justice collaborator ini diharapkan akan membantu dan memaksimalkan penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku kejahatan penyalahgunaan narkotika yang tentunya mempertimbangkan asas keadilan. Rumusan masalah yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini ialah menganalisis (1) pengaturan perlindungan hukum terhadap justice collaborator dalam mengungkap tindak pidana narkotika dan menganalisis (2) tinjauan asas keadilan terhadap justice collaborator dalam mengungkap tindak pidana narkotika dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, maka teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini bersifat studi kepustakaan namun juga didukung dengan data yang bersumber dari wawancara. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian didapatkan kesimpulan (1) Perlindungan hukum terhadap Justice Collaborator diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Jo. Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Peraturan Bersama Menteri Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia, Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia, dan Ketua Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Tahun 2011 tentang Perlindungan bagi Pelapor, Saksi Pelapor, dan Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama dan SEMA Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perlakuan Bagi Pelapor Tindak Pidana (Whistleblower) Dan Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) Di dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Tertentu yang pada intinya mengatur mengenai syarat untuk menjadi justice collaborator, pedoman memperlakukan justice collaborator dan perlindungan yang berupa perlindungan fisik maupun psikologis serta pemberian reward berupa pengurangan hukum hingga remisi dan bebas bersyarat atas jasa yang diberikan dalam membantu mengungkap tindak pidana Narkotika. (2) Dari tiga putusan yang dianalisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa putusan hakim tidak terikat dengan peraturan yang merupakan keadilan prosedural melainkan hakim memberikan pertimbangan berdasarkan keadilan substansial yang diperoleh dari proses berlangsungnya persidangan dengan memperhatikan fakta-fakta yang ada. Tidak satupun tindakan menjadi justice collaborator membebaskan dari pemidanaan karena pada dasarnya tidak menghilangkan kesalahan pelaku melainkan penghargaan pengurangan hukum atas bantuannya dalam mengungkap tindak pidana.
TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH SEKTOR PRIVATE DI NEGARA ASEAN Nani Mulyati
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.373

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi merupakan salah satu tindak pidana yang menjadi permasalahan di hampir semua negara berkembang. Hal ini juga dirasakan oleh negara yang tergabung di dalam Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Beberapa tahun belakangan ini, negara ASEAN mengalami pertumbuhan ekonomi yang cukup pesat karena investasi langsung (direct investment) banyak masuk ke negara-negara tersebut. Pesatnya pertumbuhan investasi telah mengakibatkan meningkatnya peran sektor swasta dalam pembangunan dan ekonomi negara. Namun peluang investasi yang sangat besar juga membawa risiko korupsi yang sangat besar. Dalam banyak laporan yang dibuat oleh lembaga pemerhati korupsi dijelaskan bahwa untuk mendapatkan pelayanan publik dalam berinvestasi, para pelaku usaha kadang kala perlu membayar sejumlah biaya di luar yang ditentukan secara resmi (suap), atau kadang kala perusahaan diharapkan memberikan hadiah untuk mengamankan kontrak publik. Di satu sisi pihak swasta merupakan pelaku tindak pidana korupsi tetapi mereka juga adalah korban dari sistem birokrasi yang masih belum berjalan dengan baik. Tulisan ini membahas upaya-upaya untuk mengatasi tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh sektor swasta di Negara-negara Anggota ASEAN baik dari sisi sektor privat sebagai pelaku maupun sebagai korban dari praktik korupsi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang bersifat deskriptif analitis dengan menganalisis doktrin dan aturan-aturan hukum tentang pemberantasan korupsi yang dilakukan oleh sektor swasta di negara-negara anggota ASEAN khususnya tiga negara yaitu: Indonesia, Singapura dan Thailand. Dari hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan ditemukan bahwa pengaturan mengenai korupsi di negara dengan indeks persepsi korupsi yang tinggi (Singapura) memiliki pengaturan mengenai korupsi di sektor privat yang lebih luas. Korupsi tidak hanya dipahami sebagai tindak pidana yang berkaitan dengan perbuatan curang untuk kepentingan pribadi yang bersentuhan dengan keuangan negara saja tetapi termasuk juga segala macam perbuatan curang yang dilakukan baik di sektor publik maupun di sektor swasta. Sehingga pengaturan mengenai pelarangan suap tidak terbatas hanya dari sektor swasta kepada pejabat publik saja tetapi juga termasuk suap dari sektor swasta kepada swasta yang lainnya. Selanjutnya pengaturan terkait tanggung jawab pidana korporasi juga merupakan kunci penting untuk mengatasi korupsi di sektor private. Di samping itu, sangat penting untuk mendorong korporasi agar memiliki mekanisme yang efektif untuk mencegah korupsi serta perlunya kerja sama lintas batas dalam kasus-kasus korupsi yang kompleks di antara Negara-negara Anggota ASEAN.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Peretasan (Hacking) Berkaitan dengan Pencurian Data Tri Andika Hidayatullah; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Nani Mulyati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.935

Abstract

Hacking is used for other purposes that are detrimental. Legal protection for hacking is regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016. Problem Formulation What is the legal action taken by law enforcers regarding the eradication of criminal acts related to data theft? What is the legal protection for victims of hacking crimes related to data theft? What obstacles do law enforcers encounter in legal protection for victims of hacking crimes related to data theft? Type of research Normative legal research is supported by interviews. Data sources include primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques are document studies and interviews. Data were analyzed descriptive-analytical. Conclusion of the research results: Law enforcement against hacking or hacking still does not reflect effective law enforcement due to a lack of understanding by investigators. Legal protection is divided into two kinds of preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. Obstacles encountered by law enforcers in protection law against victims of criminal acts of hacking related to data theft, consists of several aspects, namely: investigator aspects, aspects of evidence in the investigation process, aspects of facilities, aspects of jurisdiction
Pelaksanaan Pembinaan Terhadap Narapidana dengan Perilaku Seksual Menyimpang di Lapas Perempuan Kelas IIA Pekanbaru Dikaitkan dengan Kepastian Hukum Muhammad Alfikri; Fadillah Sabri; Nani Mulyati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.993

Abstract

Sexual deviance can be interpreted as everything related to sexual deviance, both in terms of orientation, interest, and surveillance to determine sexual attitudes. By not fulfilling the biological needs of female convicts, a lot of deviant sexual behavior occurs in the Class IIA Pekanbaru Women's Penitentiary. In order to fulfill their biological needs, prisoners are no longer ashamed to do things that are not common in prison. So it is necessary to make efforts to prevent deviant behavior in prisons. The formulation of the problem in this study is: 1. How is the implementation of coaching for convicts with deviant sexual behavior at the Class IIA Pekanbaru Women's Prison related to legal certainty? 2. What are the factors that cause deviant sexual behavior in Class IIA Women's Prison Pekanbaru? 3. What are the obstacles in fostering convicts with deviant sexual behavior at the Class IIA Pekanbaru women's prison? This research is a legal research that is descriptive in nature with an empirical juridical approach. The data used are primary data and secondary data. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and literature studies to then be processed and analyzed descriptively. From the results of the research and discussion, the results show that: 1. The development program is religious development, personality development and independence development are coaching programs that prioritize primary prevention strategy models. 2. Factors of same-sex relations in Class IIA Pekanbaru Women's Prison; Weak knowledge of religion, because of consensual feelings, because of the trauma of being hurt by men, because of environmental factors, abnormal sexual orientation naturally. 3. Obstacles in coaching are; There are no regulations governing, a lack of human resources for prison officers, a lack of interest in prisoners in the coaching process, a lack of facilities and infrastructure for Class IIA Pekanbaru Women's Prison.
Investigation of Violent Theft Crimes That Caused the Death of People (Case Study LP/15/K/VII/2018/Sek at the Pariangan Tanah Datar Police) Arief Hidayat; Yoserwan Yoserwan; Nani Mulyati
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), August
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v6i1.1880

Abstract

This article aims to find out and analyze investigations into criminal acts of theft with violence that resulted in the death of people and to find out and analyze the obstacles encountered and the efforts made by investigators in carrying out investigations into criminal acts of theft with violence which Resulted in the death of people at LP/15/K/VII/2018 in the Legal Area of the Pariangan Police, Tanah Datar. The problem focused on how investigators tried to overcome the obstacles encountered during the investigation on LP/15/K/VII/2018 in the Pariangan Tanah Datar Police Legal Area. In this article, what is used as a legal research method is normative-empirical, namely legal research based on legal research that not only examines the normative system of laws and regulations but also observes the reactions and interactions that occur when the normative system works or is implemented in the society under study. This article is descriptive, in which this study aims to clarify and validate the case studied. The data were obtained through document studies and direct interviews with Investigator Ipda Lian Tanjung at the Pariangan Tanah Datar Police who handled the case and were analyzed qualitatively.