Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

PPAT Responsibilities That Do Not Issue the Deed of Grant of Guarantee Rights and Position of Creditors in Bankruptcy MAHAWIRA, Made Dananjaya; ARJAYA, I Made; DHARSANA, I Made Pria
Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty (April – June 2023)
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/jpls.v1i2.58

Abstract

Purpose: The action taken is that lending and borrowing are not accompanied by the existence of an item that the debtor guarantees. However, in reality, in banking, there is a provision of a facility from the bank for its customers who do not lend to the debtor without including a guarantee.Methodology: The research method conducted by the author is normative research. The formulation of the problems that will be discussed includes 1. What is the responsibility of the PPAT towards the cover note stating that the Mortgage will be installed? 2. What is the creditor's position in bankruptcy because the mortgage right is not installed by the PPAT? The responsibility of a PPAT for a cover note that has stated the installation of mortgage rights is a criminal responsibility in which the right leads to individual responsibility.Findings: There is an imposition of sanctions either dishonorably dismissed or imposition of an institution for an action carried out by the PPAT and the existence of civil responsibility that provides direction in compensating creditors with the loss of the certificate of ownership.Implication: Judging from the position of a creditor in bankruptcy because the mortgage right is not installed by the PPAT, it is a creditor's position in the event of bankruptcy if it is based on the position of creditors with an equal or equal position. The granting of equal rights from the results of a bankrupt boedel execution has been adjusted to the amount of each bill.
Arrangements for Notary Leave in Urgent Circumstances According to the Notary Office Act UTAMI, I Dewa Ayu Listari; DHARSANA, I Made Pria; SUKANDIA, I Nyoman
Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty (April – June 2023)
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/jpls.v1i2.65

Abstract

Purpose:What is the mechanism for arranging the Notary's leave by the Notary's family in an urgent situation? 2. What are the legal consequences of a Notary's leave in an urgent situation on the performance of the position of a Notary based on the Notary Office Law?Methodology:The method chosen for this research is Notary Concept, Substitute Notary Concept, Supervisory Board Concept, Urgent Concept, and Legal Consequences Concept.Findings:The results of the study show that Article 28 of the Law on the Position of a Notary Public shows a blurring of the norms of urgent criteria and only provides a limited and brief explanation, that is, a husband/wife or a straight line from a Notary can submit a request for leave to the Supervisory Board as stated in Article 27 paragraph ( 2), and an urgent situation there are many thoughts of multiple interpretations giving rise to a lack of legal certainty, there is a need for more detailed guidelines or rules regarding Notary leave in urgent circumstances so that it can be carried out following the policy of the Notary Supervisory Board.Implication:The government needs to pay attention to the causes and effects that occur in the regulations that apply at this time so that requests for leave can be implemented in urgent situations so that legal institutions can carry out their duties according to existing law.
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP KELALAIAN ATAS PEMBUATAN DAN PENDAFTARAN WASIAT Fajar, Fajar; Dharsana, I Made Pria
JURNAL DARMA AGUNG Vol 32 No 4 (2024): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Darma Agung (LPPM_UDA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/ojsuda.v32i4.4510

Abstract

Notaris, sebagai pejabat umum yang membuat akta otentik, memiliki kewajiban-kewajiban tertentu sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN). Hal ini termasuk kewajiban yang diatur dalam Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf i dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf j UUJN. Kewajiban tersebut melibatkan pembuatan daftar akta yang berkaitan dengan wasiat, diurutkan berdasarkan waktu pembuatan setiap bulan. Selain itu, notaris juga diwajibkan mengirimkan daftar akta wasiat atau daftar nihil terkait wasiat ke Daftar Pusat Wasiat Departemen. Pengiriman ini harus dilakukan dalam waktu lima hari pada minggu pertama setiap bulan berikutnya. Selanjutnya, notaris harus mencatat tanggal pengiriman daftar wasiat dalam repertorium pada akhir setiap bulan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, dan hasilnya menunjukkan pentingnya tanggung jawab notaris dalam menjalankan tugasnya, terutama terkait pendaftaran akta wasiat. Hal ini bertujuan untuk menghindari potensi kerugian bagi ahli waris. Penulisan ini dianalisis dengan menggunakan teori tanggung jawab hukum.
NOTARY EMERITUS' LIABILITY FOR DEEDS MADE AFTER THE TERM OF OFFICE ENDS Setiawan, Eileen Gani; Dharsana, I Made Pria
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR)
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v4i6.796

Abstract

The notary emeritus is a member of the Notary Commission on Discipline, Protection of the Constitution, and the Ministry of Public Works and Public Works. This study aims to examine the legal principles and written legal sources. The study contributes to the understanding of the continuity of notarial duties and the potential legal ramifications for such activities. In this study, it will be systematically explained about the regulations that regulate certain legal categories, analyze the relationship between these regulations, and correlate them with existing problems. In addition, this study discusses the validity of deeds made by or before his term of office ends and the responsibility of the notary for the deedas he makes after his terms of office end.
The Substitute Notary's Responsibility for the Deed He Made PUTRA, Gede Bagus Andika; DHARSANA, I Made Pria; WESNA, Putu Ayu Sriasih
Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty (April – June)
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/jpls.v2i2.193

Abstract

Purpose: A Substitute Notary is temporarily appointed as a Notary to replace a Notary who is on leave or sick. In Article 65 of the UUJNP, there is no explanation regarding the limits of the Substitute Notary's liability after his/her term ends. It is illogical because the limits of the Substitute Notary's authority end when the limits stated in his/her decision letter have expired, and he/she must still be responsible until his/her last breath.Methodology:The author uses a normative legal research method, legislative approach, legal concept analysis, case approach and comparative approach. The author's legal sources use primary and secondary law and tertiary legal materials. The legal collection technique uses document study techniques and recording.Findings: The responsibilities of a substitute notary can be divided into 4, namely: (1) Civil Liability of a Substitute Notary, (2) Criminal Liability of a Substitute Notary, and (3) Administrative Liability of a Substitute Notary. Legal protection for a substitute notary can be divided into 2: preventive legal protection and repressive protection.Implication:The responsibility of the Substitute Notary is only in the formal form of the authentic deed as stipulated in the law, so the Notary is not responsible for the contents of the deed. When carrying out their duties, a substitute notary will receive legal protection, including preventive legal protection to prevent disputes from occurring and repressive protection to resolve disputes that have already occurred. It is outlined in Article 66 of the UUJNP as a form of settlement effort if the notary is questioned.
Authorities Of The National Land Agency In Settling Land Cases As A Form Of Legal Protection For Land Right Holders Whose Transfer Is Canceled (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number: 3542 K/Pdt/2021) DHARSANA, I Made Pria; BUDIARTA, I Putu Nyoman; WAHYUNINGSIH, Dewa Ayu Trisna
Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law. (March – June 2023)
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/pjlel.v1i3.707

Abstract

Disputes over the transfer of ownership rights to land through the sale and purchase of land that often occur in society are caused by the Indonesian land registration system, which adheres to a hostile system. Certificates of land rights that have been registered have many possibilities for legal defects to arise, and the consequences will cause problems that lead to requests for Cancellation. The problems of this research are, first, what is the authority of the Office of the National Land Agency in resolving land cases, and second, what is the form of legal protection for holders of land rights whose transfers are canceled. This research is a normative law-type research using a statutory and case approach. This study concludes that first, the authority of the National Land Agency Office in settlement of land cases has been regulated in Ministerial Regulation IATR/BPN No. 21I of 2020; IBPN has two alternative land dispute settlements, namely, the first is settlement through the judiciary to obtain a court decision. Second, dispute settlement through mediation seeks a win-win solution, and a peace agreement is drawn up. The second type of legal protection for holders of land rights whose transfer has been canceled, particularly for third parties as holders of ownership rights, can be given to parties whose certificates of ownership are repressively canceled. The aim is to achieve legal clarity, providing legal protection to all parties.
Nominee Arrangement in the Practice of Land Sale and Purchase in Indonesia KRESNADJAJA, Indrasari; DHARSANA, I Made Pria
Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law. (November – February 2024)
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/pjlel.v2i2.1204

Abstract

The practice of nominee agreements has occurred in Indonesia repeatedly; the agreement uses the power of attorney where the agreement uses the name of an Indonesian citizen to transfer power of attorney to a foreign citizen. A Nominee Agreement made by two parties, namely between an Indonesian citizen and a foreign citizen as the attorney (Nominee), is made through an agreement package to provide all authority that may arise in the legal relationship between a person and his land to a foreign party as a person who is given the power to act as the actual owner. The agreement borrows the name of an Indonesian citizen as the Nominee, and this is a legal smuggling because its substance is contrary to Article 21 paragraph (1) and Article 26 paragraph (2) of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the UUPA. In addition, the existence of a loan agreement in the name must be based on the terms and principles of freedom of contract as stipulated in Article 1320 and Article 1338 Paragraph (1) of the Civil Code. For this reason, an objective and comprehensive attitude and understanding are needed from the NotaryNotary in assessing the contents of the land sale and purchase agreement, primarily related to the one-sided agreement. In reality, in the author's opinion, nominee agreements do not comply with the positive law in force in Indonesia because the purpose of this agreement contains elements of bad ethics.
Power Construction in the Practice of Buying and Selling Land Nurnaningsih Nurnaningsih; I Made Pria Dharsana
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): March : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i1.534

Abstract

Delegating power in land transactions plays a crucial role in ensuring legal certainty and protection in Indonesia. This study examines the legal implications of granting power of attorney in land sales, focusing on the prohibition of absolute power as regulated under the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 14 of 1982 and Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997. The research identifies issues arising from the misuse of power of attorney, which is often used to disguise unlawful land ownership transfers. Using a normative legal research method, this study analyzes legislative provisions, judicial interpretations, and case law to evaluate the legality of power of attorney in land transactions. The findings reveal that despite legal prohibitions, loopholes allow misuse, creating risks of legal uncertainty. The study concludes that stricter enforcement and regulatory refinements are needed to prevent such misuse and enhance legal protection for all parties involved.
Legal Implications of the Notary Honour Council's Approval on the Summoning of Notaries by Law Enforcers ARDANARI, Ni Made Novia Surya; SENASTRI, Ni Made Jaya; I Made Pria Dharsana
Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty (April – June 2025)-In Press
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/jpls.v3i2.330

Abstract

Purpose:The approval of the Notary Honour Council (MKN) has legal implications in the summoning of notaries. However, several cases have raised legal debates regarding the authority of MKN, as well as the potential for conflicts of interest.  Therefore, it is necessary to investigate: how is the legal regulation of MKN approval when summoning a notary by law enforcement and what are the legal implications of MKN approval on the status of notaries in the process of investigation and investigation. The objectives of this research are general and specific.Methodology:This research is also classified as a type of normative legal research. This research uses a statutory approach, concept approach, and case approach. The data used in this research is secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and supported by interview data from sources.Findings:Based on the results of the research, it is known that: there are regulations that become the juridical basis for summoning notaries by law enforcers, namely Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position which was last amended in Law Number 2 of 2014 and Permenkumham Number 17 of 2021. Based on these regulations, the procedures and mechanisms in requesting/requesting MKN approval are: First, submission of a request by law enforcement officials to MKN regarding the collection of photocopies of the Minute of Deed and summoning Notaries. Second, examination and decision making by MKN.Implication:In addition, the results also show that approval or rejection from MKN has legal implications in the law enforcement process. If the Examining Council gives approval, then the notary is obliged to: provide a photocopy of the deed minutes and/or the required letter to law enforcement accompanied by the minutes of delivery and must fulfil the summons. However, if MKN refuses, then law enforcement cannot make efforts to take a photocopy of the Minute of Deed and cannot make efforts to summon the notary.
Efektivitas Penggunaan Sertipikat Elektronik dalam Mencegah Pemalsuan Dokumen Tanah Azhar, Najwa Nashifa; I Made Pria Dharsana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3323

Abstract

Pemalsuan dokumen tanah merupakan masalah serius yang dapat merugikan pemilik tanah serta mengganggu keamanan dan kepastian hukum atas hak milik. Sertipikat elektronik, sebagai inovasi digital dalam pengelolaan dokumen hukum, menawarkan solusi yang lebih aman dengan menerapkan teknologi kriptografi serta sistem verifikasi yang ketat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas pembaharuan teknologi sertipikat tanah konvensional menjadi elektronik dalam mencegah pemalsuan dokumen tanah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan berupa pendekatan doktrinal dengan studi bahan hukum yang sudah ada seperti undang-undang, peraturan dibawahnya, yurisprudensi, dan konsep hukum yang telah ada. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sertipikat elektronik mampu meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan efektivitas dalam pengelolaan dokumen tanah, serta mengurangi peluang terjadinya pemalsuan. Meskipun demikian, tantangan dalam pengadopsian teknologi dan perlunya sosialisasi yang lebih luas kepada masyarakat menjadi hal yang perlu diperhatikan. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan sumbangan penulisan dalam pengembangan kebijakan perlindungan hak atas tanah serta kepastian hukum dalam era digital.