Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Power Construction in the Practice of Buying and Selling Land Nurnaningsih Nurnaningsih; I Made Pria Dharsana
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): March : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i1.534

Abstract

Delegating power in land transactions plays a crucial role in ensuring legal certainty and protection in Indonesia. This study examines the legal implications of granting power of attorney in land sales, focusing on the prohibition of absolute power as regulated under the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 14 of 1982 and Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997. The research identifies issues arising from the misuse of power of attorney, which is often used to disguise unlawful land ownership transfers. Using a normative legal research method, this study analyzes legislative provisions, judicial interpretations, and case law to evaluate the legality of power of attorney in land transactions. The findings reveal that despite legal prohibitions, loopholes allow misuse, creating risks of legal uncertainty. The study concludes that stricter enforcement and regulatory refinements are needed to prevent such misuse and enhance legal protection for all parties involved.
Legal Implications of the Notary Honour Council's Approval on the Summoning of Notaries by Law Enforcers ARDANARI, Ni Made Novia Surya; SENASTRI, Ni Made Jaya; I Made Pria Dharsana
Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty (April – June 2025)-In Press
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/jpls.v3i2.330

Abstract

Purpose:The approval of the Notary Honour Council (MKN) has legal implications in the summoning of notaries. However, several cases have raised legal debates regarding the authority of MKN, as well as the potential for conflicts of interest.  Therefore, it is necessary to investigate: how is the legal regulation of MKN approval when summoning a notary by law enforcement and what are the legal implications of MKN approval on the status of notaries in the process of investigation and investigation. The objectives of this research are general and specific.Methodology:This research is also classified as a type of normative legal research. This research uses a statutory approach, concept approach, and case approach. The data used in this research is secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and supported by interview data from sources.Findings:Based on the results of the research, it is known that: there are regulations that become the juridical basis for summoning notaries by law enforcers, namely Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position which was last amended in Law Number 2 of 2014 and Permenkumham Number 17 of 2021. Based on these regulations, the procedures and mechanisms in requesting/requesting MKN approval are: First, submission of a request by law enforcement officials to MKN regarding the collection of photocopies of the Minute of Deed and summoning Notaries. Second, examination and decision making by MKN.Implication:In addition, the results also show that approval or rejection from MKN has legal implications in the law enforcement process. If the Examining Council gives approval, then the notary is obliged to: provide a photocopy of the deed minutes and/or the required letter to law enforcement accompanied by the minutes of delivery and must fulfil the summons. However, if MKN refuses, then law enforcement cannot make efforts to take a photocopy of the Minute of Deed and cannot make efforts to summon the notary.
Efektivitas Penggunaan Sertipikat Elektronik dalam Mencegah Pemalsuan Dokumen Tanah Azhar, Najwa Nashifa; I Made Pria Dharsana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3323

Abstract

Pemalsuan dokumen tanah merupakan masalah serius yang dapat merugikan pemilik tanah serta mengganggu keamanan dan kepastian hukum atas hak milik. Sertipikat elektronik, sebagai inovasi digital dalam pengelolaan dokumen hukum, menawarkan solusi yang lebih aman dengan menerapkan teknologi kriptografi serta sistem verifikasi yang ketat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas pembaharuan teknologi sertipikat tanah konvensional menjadi elektronik dalam mencegah pemalsuan dokumen tanah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan berupa pendekatan doktrinal dengan studi bahan hukum yang sudah ada seperti undang-undang, peraturan dibawahnya, yurisprudensi, dan konsep hukum yang telah ada. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sertipikat elektronik mampu meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan efektivitas dalam pengelolaan dokumen tanah, serta mengurangi peluang terjadinya pemalsuan. Meskipun demikian, tantangan dalam pengadopsian teknologi dan perlunya sosialisasi yang lebih luas kepada masyarakat menjadi hal yang perlu diperhatikan. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan sumbangan penulisan dalam pengembangan kebijakan perlindungan hak atas tanah serta kepastian hukum dalam era digital.
Pembatalan Rencana Perkawinan Oleh Satu Pihak Yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Jasmine, safira Yuvika; Dharsana, I Made Pria
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2603

Abstract

The annulment of a marriage plan can be filed as the basis for a tort lawsuit if there is an action by one of the parties that cause losses, both materially and immaterially. The party that causes the loss is given the obligation to make payments to the injured party. The research method in this writing uses Normative Juridical research or legal material collection techniques with library research. The legal sources used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The qualitative research on unlawful acts of the cancellation of the marriage plan and the provision of compensation by the bride who cancelled plan. to compensate the prospective groom in actual compensation and compensation related to mental stress. The act of annulment of the marriage fulfils the elements of Article 1365 of the Civil Code, where the act is a tort contrary to written law and can also be unwritten law which violates the subjective rights of others so that the prospective bride violates the norms of decency and propriety in society and the losses incurred in real terms by the prospective groom for the preparation of the marriage must be replaced by the prospective bride who annuls the marriage.
Perbedaan Tanggung Jawab antara Cyber Notary dan Notaris Atas Pembuatan Akta yang Didasari Identitas Palsu Thioris, Tamara Ratnasari; Dharsana, I Made Pria
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.561 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i4.11662

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa perbedaan tanggung jawab Cyber Notary dan Notaris berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) terhadap perbuatan akta yang didasari oleh pemalsuan identitas dalam proses pembuatan akta otentik yang dibuatnya serta dampak hukum apa yang akan terjadi atas keabsahan akta yang dibuatnya tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam analisa perbandingan ini adalah metode pendekatan yuridis normatif yang dimana mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan dan teori-teori hukum yang berkaitan dengan pembahasan dalam analisis ini. Penelitian hukum normatif adalah penelitian yang menggunakan dan menganalisis norma-norma hukum tertulis yang berupa undang-undang, buku-buku, tesis, jurnal, serta literatur perpustakaan yang berkaitan dengan kewenangan dan tanggung jawab Notaris untuk membuat akta otentik berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas UUJN, Pasal 15. Dalam melaksanakan kewenangannya, Notaris dilarang melanggar kewajiban yang diatur di dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Nomor 2 Tahun 2014. Terutama apabila akta yang dibuat Notaris merugikan pihak yang memiliki kepentingan atas akta yang dibuat oleh Notaris itu sendiri, sehingga dapat diketahui pertanggungjawaban Notaris.
Preparation and Obstacle of Notary in Making Notarial Deed in Facing Society 5.0 Era Urbanus, Yotia Jericho; Dharsana, I Made Pria
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i1.2186

Abstract

This writing discusses the preparation and obstacle of Notary in making Notarial deed in facing. Notary Deed is an authentic deed made by or before a Notary according to the form and procedure stipulated in Undang-Undang Number 2/2014. According to Article 1868 of the Civil Code, an authentic deed is a deed made in a form determined by law by or before a public official authorized for that purpose at the place where the deed was made. This gives an indication that a deed made by a Notary as a public official can be said to be an authentic deed if it meets the requirements as described in the article. The entry of society 5.0 era in Indonesian society causes the need for an adaptation for Notaries in Indonesia in terms of meeting the needs of people who are affiliated with technology, especially in making authentic deeds. Initially, the use of technology such as the use of video conferences, electronic signatures, electronic ID verification tools and the liveliness test system was considered the answer for Notaries in terms of meeting the community's need for authentic deeds, especially in dealing with technological developments that entered all aspects of human life. However, Indonesia as a legal state that has the spirit to always ensure justice and legal certainty, causes all actions taken by a legal subject to be guided by the law that governs it. In this case, there are obstacles in the use of video conferencing, electronic signatures, electronic ID verification tools and the liveliness test system due to the absence of a legal basis that serves as a legal umbrella for their use in making a notarial deed. Furthermore the concept of facing using technological developments cannot be equated with being physically present as described in Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.
Notary Role in The Development of Tourism Industry: An Analysis of Business Licensing Policies Anditya, Alfian; Dharsana, I Made Pria
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i2.2261

Abstract

The issuance of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation with its implementing regulations has marked a new era in the business licensing process in Indonesia since the introduction of the Online Single Submission system in 2018. These new licensing policies offer a more simplified licensing process and requirements that are designated to be applicable for every business sector in its establishment process, including the tourism sector as one of the nation’s biggest economic contributors. To obtain such benefits, tourism business players shall provide clear business information during the process of business registration in the licensing system and such information shall be provided under authentic corporate deeds that are made by a notary. This paper uses desk study research with a normative approach in analyzing the laws on licensing process, tourism sector, corporate matters, and notarial works that are prevails in Indonesia. This paper is not only elaborating on the business licensing process since the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation but it also analyses the relationship between the business licensing process and the notary’s responsibility as a public officer who is authorized by the law to draw authentic deeds. By understanding that relation, the correlation between the notary’s role and the development of the national tourism business, especially at the regional level could be identified. Thus, one of the efforts in developing tourism business across Indonesia is realized through notaries’ capability in understanding tourism business and its relevant legal knowledge together with an equal notary distribution in tourism destination areas.
The Role Of A Notary In Preventing Money Laundering Dharsana, I Made Pria; Kresnadjaja, Indrasari; Dhananjaya, I Putu Lingga; Rini, Rizky Mustika
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.3089

Abstract

The Notary's participation in preventing money laundering is to report to PPATK when they know of suspicious financial transactions related to the deed they made. The Notary's position as a whistleblower in the event of suspected suspicious financial transactions as an effort to prevent money laundering has not violated the principle of confidentiality of position. Instead, the Notary must apply the precautionary principle. Notary as the reporting party is an implementation of its obligations stipulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) point an of UUJN, namely acting trustfully and honestly. The State appoints notaries to serve the public in civil Law. Therefore Notaries must also take care not to let the State be harmed by attempts to disguise money from criminal acts. Notaries with this submit to higher interests. This is so that Notaries do not get involved in money laundering cases because they are considered to help carry out a criminal act
Implementation of the Principle of Business Judgement Rule Doctrine to State-Owned Companies as an Effort to Protect Directors in Good Faith Dharsana, I Made Pria; Kresnadjaja, Indrasari; Dhananjaya, I Putu Lingga
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i2.3090

Abstract

The Business Judgement Rule is a doctrine that protects Directors in good faith for the Company's losses. The point is that as long as the Board of Directors acts in good faith and solely for the Company's benefit. However, it turns out that the Company still suffers losses. It does not necessarily become the burden of the Board of Directors personal responsibility. Therefore, the Board of Directors cannot be held responsible for the Company's losses if the Board of Directors, in carrying out actions, has fulfilled all its obligations with the principles of good corporate Governance (GCG). If all GCG obligations and principles have been fulfilled, the Board of Directors is categorized as having good faith and cannot be declared wrong. The results of the author's study, in the context of the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine, the losses incurred are normal or reasonable business losses, and therefore the Company is responsible. And no one can be punished if there is no mistake. With the background of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 01/PHPUPres/XVII/2019 (Constitutional Court Decision 01) and two Supreme Court Decisions, the author tries to examine in more detail related to Decision No. 3849/K/Pid.Sus/2019 dated December 2, 2019, on behalf of Defendant Frederick ST Siahaan (former Finance Director of Pertamina) / (Supreme Court Decision 3849) and Decision No. 121K/Pid.Sus/2020 dated March 9, 2020, on behalf of Defendant Karen Agustiawan (former President Director of Pertamina).
Settlement of land disputes over ownership in Indonesia land Registration System Dharsana, I Made Pria; Asriwijaya, Desak Rai Kutha; Kresnadjaja, Indrasari
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4134

Abstract

The Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) is Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations aimed at resolving the dualism conflict of agrarian law in Indonesia at that time, where previously most of the Indonesian people still applied agrarian law based on Western law colonial and a small part based on customary law. The purpose of writing this journal is to analyze and understand the occurrence of legal disputes against dual certificate holders and to analyze and understand the obstacles and solutions to the resolution of dual certificate legal disputes. The research method used in this paper is a qualitative research method with a normative juridical approach. Based on the results of the study, show that the occurrence of multiple certificates is caused by several factors, namely the existence of bad faith from the certificate applicant, an error on the part of the Land Office, namely in terms of collecting and processing physical data and land juridical data, the unavailability of a comprehensive land registration map, and because the domicile of the interested party is outside the city. Settlement of land disputes can be resolved by way of deliberation by the parties and through the judiciary. On the other hand, there is a need for special procedural law provisions either through deliberation or mediation at the BPN and the courts in the event of a dispute resolution through litigation