Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sinkron : Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika Unes Law Review YUME : Journal of Management Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Journal (EMACS) Algor COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi dan Manajemen Jurnal Pengabdian West Science
Andrew Andrew, Andrew
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Unes Law Review

 1 
Implementasi Asas Ne Bis In Idem dalam Putusan Hakim yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap pada Perkara Pidana Andrew, Andrew; Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.996

Abstract

This study aims to determine the application of the ne bis in idem principle in judge decisions that have permanent legal force in criminal cases. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with qualitative methods. The results of the study stated that the principle of nebis in idem in criminal cases aims to provide protection for the accused so that he does not get a decision for the same case repeatedly. It also aims to maintain respect for the human rights of perpetrators. This principle cannot be applied to decisions 1) Decisions declaring the indictment null and void. 2) Decision declaring the Claims Unacceptable. 3) Decision declaring the Court Not Competent. This principle can be applied if the criminal case has the following elements: 1) it has the same legal basis and reasons as the case that has been decided. 2) the parties involved in the case are the same party. Nevertheless, to implement and guarantee justice for every citizen. The state provides leeway for everyone to conduct a review. This is because judges are human beings who sometimes make mistakes.
Co-Authors Abdurrohman, Abdurrohman Akbar, Junaidi Aminnatus Shalihah, Aliffa Anggelisa, Anggelisa Anggy, Anggy Aprikasari, Manda Arisna, Arisna Augustpaosa Nariman Augustpaosa Nariman Bernita, Bernita Chintya, Chintya Clarinda , Marcellina Aurelia Devin, Devin Dika Ardiana, Muhammad Elizabeth Hiu , Jesslyn Juana Figo, Figo Firizqi, Januponsa Dio Frentyo, Frentyo Gunawan, Daniel Elfresh Haris Haris, Haris Hariyanto, Susanto Haryono Haryono Hesniati, Hesniati Ipan, Ipan Jayanti, Annida Rida Jumiati, Nurul Kamisriati, Kamisriati Kartika, I Kadek Laulita, Nasar Buntu Madona, Putri Megawati, Vita Muhammad Afif Muhammad Fajar Mukhlis Mukhlis Muliyasari Kusno, Erlina Novia, Eka Putri Handayani, Nadya Rahaditya, R. Runtulalo, Rio Maichel Santoso, Handri Sembiring , Rachel Sepfanya Setiono, Michael Alvin Sunata , Yuliana Susanto Suri, Puti Andam Timotius, Frenly Tyana, Tyana Winson, Winson Wiryaatmaja , Christopher Louis Yuhefizar Yuhefizar Zai, Immanuel