Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pengawas Lingkungan Hidup Bidang Pengawasan Kegiatan Usaha Lingkungan Hidup Mohammad Solekhan
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 21, No 2 (2023): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v21i2.4445

Abstract

Pemerintah diberi kewenangan untuk melakukan pengawasan terhadap ketaatan penanggung jawab kegiatan usaha dalam masalah perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup. Berdasarkan pendegelasian tersebut pemerintah mengangkat pejabat pengawas lingkungan hidup untuk mengawasi kegiatan usaha agar tidak menimbulkan pencemaran dan kerusakan. Permasalahan yang timbul dalam pengawasan tersebut adalah bagaimana tanggungjawab pejabat pengawas lingkungan hidup menjalankan tugasnya? Tanggungjawab pejabat pengawas lingkungan hidup dalam menjalankan tugasnya dengan melakukan pemantauan kegiata usaha yang dilakukan oleh penanggungjawab kegitan usaha baik yang berpotensi menimbulkan terjadinya pencemaran maupun kerusakan lingkungan hidup atau tidak. Pejabat pengawas lingkungan hidup juga melakukan pengawasan baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung terhadap tingkat ketaatan penanggungjawab kegiatan usaha dalam menjalankan izin yang telah diberikan kepadanya. Hasil pemantauan tersebut akan dibuat suatu lapora yang nantinya akan dilaporakan kepada pejabat yang berwenang mengangkatnya.
The Problem Of The Neutrality Of The Civil Service In Local Head Elections: A Constitutional Law Perspective Christina Bagenda; Mohammad Solekhan; Muchamad Taufiq; Ernesta Arita Ari; Jusuf Luturmas
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) (Special Issue) - International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) January 2
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v8i1.10014

Abstract

The neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus in local democratic contests, particularly Regional Head Elections, constitutes a fundamental principle for the realization of a clean, professional, and democratic system of governance. As an integral component of the state apparatus, ASN plays a strategic role in public administration and service delivery, thereby requiring impartiality and freedom from practical political interests. Nevertheless, empirical realities indicate that violations of ASN neutrality during Pilkada remain prevalent, manifesting in both direct and indirect political involvement, misuse of state resources, and administrative actions that favor certain candidate pairs. This condition reflects a persistent gap between normative legal frameworks and their practical implementation. This article aims to examine the challenges surrounding ASN neutrality in Pilkada by analyzing regulatory arrangements, implementation practices, and supervisory mechanisms from a constitutional law perspective. Employing a normative juridical approach, this study reviews statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and findings from relevant national scholarly journals. The analysis reveals that although the legal framework governing ASN neutrality is relatively comprehensive, the effectiveness of law enforcement and oversight mechanisms continues to face significant obstacles. These include weak inter-institutional coordination among supervisory bodies, political pressures exerted on the bureaucracy, and a limited level of legal awareness among certain segments of ASN. From the standpoint of constitutional law, breaches of ASN neutrality have serious implications for the quality of democracy, the realization of good governance principles, and the legitimacy of local governments produced through Pilkada. Therefore, strengthening legal policies, enhancing supervisory capacity, and reinforcing bureaucratic ethics development are essential measures to ensure the consistent enforcement of ASN neutrality in every local democratic process.
EDUKASI HUKUM WARIS ISLAM SEBAGAI UPAYA PENCEGAHAN SENGKETA KELUARGA DI MASYARAKAT Habibah Zulaiha; Mohammad Solekhan; Taupiq; Siti Mahmudah
Marsialapari: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Yayasan Baitul Hikmah al-Zain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63424/marsialapari.v3i2.671

Abstract

Inheritance disputes within families often arise from limited public understanding of Islamic inheritance law, weak communication among heirs, and the persistence of local inheritance practices that are not always aligned with the principles of justice in Islamic law. This community service program aims to enhance public literacy on Islamic inheritance law as a preventive effort to reduce family disputes in society. The program was implemented through participatory legal education, legal counseling, case discussions, and simple simulations of inheritance distribution based on the principles of farā’iḍ. The participants consisted of community members, religious leaders, local figures, and families potentially facing inheritance-related issues. The educational materials covered the basic concepts of Islamic inheritance law, the pillars and requirements of inheritance, causes and impediments to inheritance, classifications of heirs, principles of justice in inheritance distribution, and the importance of family deliberation in resolving inheritance matters. The results indicate that education on Islamic inheritance law improved participants’ understanding of the rights and obligations of heirs, reduced misconceptions regarding inheritance distribution, and strengthened public awareness of resolving inheritance issues fairly, peacefully, and in accordance with Islamic legal principles. This program affirms that Islamic inheritance law literacy plays an important preventive role in minimizing family conflict, strengthening social harmony, and fostering a more orderly legal culture within society. Therefore, education on Islamic inheritance law should be conducted continuously through collaboration among academics, religious leaders, village authorities, and community-based religious institutions.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata dalam Kasus Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum : Civil Liability in Cases of Default and Unlawful Acts Markus Suryoutomo; Mohammad Solekhan; Sri Murni; Hamdani; Saryana
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 4: April 2025 - Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains (JKS)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i4.7261

Abstract

Tanggung jawab perdata adalah konsep yang sangat penting dalam hukum yang berhubungan dengan kewajiban seseorang untuk memberikan ganti rugi akibat perbuatannya yang merugikan pihak lain. Dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum adalah dua sumber utama yang dapat menyebabkan timbulnya tanggung jawab perdata. Wanprestasi merujuk pada kegagalan dalam memenuhi kewajiban yang terdapat dalam suatu perjanjian, sedangkan perbuatan melawan hukum mencakup tindakan yang melanggar norma hukum yang berlaku dan menyebabkan kerugian bagi pihak lain. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membahas berbagai aspek tanggung jawab perdata dalam konteks wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum, serta dampaknya dalam hukum perdata Indonesia. Dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, artikel ini memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam mengenai bagaimana kedua hal tersebut berkontribusi terhadap timbulnya tanggung jawab perdata dan bagaimana hukum memberikan perlindungan kepada pihak yang dirugikan dalam hal ini.
Implementation of the Principle of Constitutional Supremacy in Law Enforcement in Indonesia Kevin Mario Immanuel; Andri Rahmat Isnaini; Mohammad Solekhan; Yusuf
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) (Special Issue) - International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i3.8189

Abstract

The principle of constitutional supremacy serves as a foundational cornerstone within Indonesia’s legal and governmental framework, positioning the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) as the highest authority in the hierarchy of legislation. This supremacy is not merely symbolic; it acts as a fundamental norm (grundnorm) that should guide both the legislative process and the execution of state power. This article explores how the principle of constitutional supremacy is applied in the enforcement of law in Indonesia, while also highlighting the normative and structural challenges that hinder consistent constitutional adherence. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes statutory regulations, Constitutional Court rulings, and observes state practices. The findings reveal that despite the Constitutional Court’s significant role in safeguarding constitutional integrity through judicial review, implementation at the practical level often suffers from regulatory inconsistencies, non-compliance with constitutional rulings, and limited constitutional understanding among law enforcers and lawmakers. To address these issues, institutional strengthening, legislative reform, and widespread constitutional education are imperative to ensure all state actions and policies are in harmony with the principle of constitutional supremacy.
Legal Implications of Minimum Education Requirements for DPR Candidates in the Perspective of the 1945 Constitution and Constitutional Court Decisions Budi Handayani; Muchamad Taufiq; Yusuf; Fatma Faisal; Mohammad Solekhan
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) (Special Issue) - International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) October 2
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i4.8941

Abstract

The establishment of a minimum education requirement for candidates of the House of Representatives (DPR) has become a complex legal issue, sparking debates between the principles of meritocracy and the fulfillment of citizens’ constitutional rights. On one hand, educational qualifications are considered essential to ensure the intellectual capacity, rationality, and legislative competence of parliamentary members in performing their lawmaking and supervisory functions. On the other hand, such provisions may lead to discrimination against citizens who lack access to adequate formal education, thereby restricting their constitutional right to be elected as guaranteed under the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article aims to thoroughly examine the legal implications of establishing a minimum education requirement for DPR candidates from the perspective of the 1945 Constitution and the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes the compatibility of educational restrictions with the principles of equality before the law, political rights, and constitutional democracy. The findings reveal that educational qualifications should not be perceived as discriminatory limitations but rather as instruments to ensure competence and integrity within the legislative body as part of a democratic rule-of-law system. Nevertheless, such restrictions must be formulated proportionally, clearly, and in accordance with constitutional objectives so as not to violate the principle of equality before the law or the fundamental right of citizens to participate in governance. Therefore, any regulation regarding educational requirements for DPR candidates must strike a balance between the need for legislative professionalism and the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights.