Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.33
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ius Constituendum Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Harmoni Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Academy of Education Journal Jurnal Muhakkamah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram Administrative and Environmental Law Review Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat : Pemberdayaan, Inovasi dan Perubahan COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Batanghari Academia Journal (BAJ)
Yeni Haerani
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Southest Sulawesi Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Legal Protection for Patients in Online Health Service Agreements: A Normative Analysis of Structural Gaps and Reform Imperatives in Indonesia’s Telemedicine Regulatory Framework Sari, Patma; Rosnida; Irabiah; Beni Suswanto; Yeni haerani
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v10i2.8279

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the adequacy of Indonesia’s regulatory framework in protecting patients within online health service agreements and to identify structural normative gaps that require legislative reform. Methods: Employing a normative legal research methodology combining statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes primary legal sources including Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, and Minister of Health Regulation No. 20 of 2019 on Inter-Facility Telemedicine Services (which primarily governs telemedicine between health facilities rather than direct doctor-patient teleconsultation through third-party applications), alongside consumer protection legislation and civil law principles, as well as secondary sources including academic literature and judicial decisions. Results: The findings reveal that the existing regulatory framework remains fragmented and contains structural gaps that undermine substantive legal protection for patients, particularly in determining professional liability when medical errors occur through digital platforms, ensuring the validity of electronic informed consent, and providing accessible remedies for aggrieved patients. The regulatory oversight body for personal data protection is still being strengthened, further limiting enforcement effectiveness. Conclusions: Indonesia urgently requires a comprehensive and integrated telemedicine statute that explicitly addresses the unique contractual and liability dimensions of digital health services, establishes clear data governance standards, defines platform operator responsibilities, and creates a dedicated dispute resolution mechanism suited to the online health environment. This study contributes to the field by offering a systematic normative mapping of existing gaps and proposing a concrete legislative reform agenda distinct from prior scholarship that addressed only general physician-patient relationships.
Keterbatasan Modal dan keberlangsungan UMKM Kuliner: (Studi Kasus Usaha Perseorangan di Kabupaten Kolaka) Yeni Haerani; Ana Ana; Thisyah Sadika Ramadhani Anwar; Dwi Reski Alifia Zumrach; Adel Zainuddin; Joko Prianto; Fatma Kitabi; Ilham Ilham; Muh. Saipul; Abel Aprianti; Apriani Apriani
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2584

Abstract

Culinary MSMEs play a crucial role in supporting the regional economy, including in Kolaka Regency, Southeast Sulawesi. However, sole proprietorships in this sector still face significant challenges, particularly related to limited access to capital. This study aims to explore the relationship between limited capital and the sustainability of sole proprietorships in the culinary sector in Kolaka Regency, considering influencing factors such as family support, local government policies, and local market dynamics. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation. Informants were purposively selected from sole proprietorships in the culinary sector who had been operating their businesses for at least two years. The results show that limited capital is not only a simple financial barrier but also directly impacts the business's ability to innovate, maintain product quality, expand market reach, and survive competition. Most entrepreneurs rely on personal capital and informal loans from family, while access to formal financial institutions remains very limited due to complicated administrative procedures and low financial literacy. Business sustainability is heavily influenced by personal adaptation strategies, community support, and the gradual building of customer trust. This study recommends strengthening financial literacy, simplifying credit access procedures, and enhancing local government involvement in building a more environmentally friendly business ecosystem for local culinary MSMEs.
PREVENTING MAJORITARIAN VETO IN HOUSE OF WORSHIP LICENSING: A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED DUE PROCESS MODEL Adhe Ismail Ananda; La Ode Dedihasriadi; Pery Rehendra Sucipta; Yeni Haerani; Arie Ekawie Baskhoro
Harmoni Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Research and Development Center for Guidance for Religious Societies and Religious Services, the Research and Development and Education and Training Agency of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia (MORA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32488/harmoni.v25i1.1075

Abstract

This article examines majoritarian veto in house-of-worship licensing in Indonesia, defined as a condition in which majority pressure or preferences de facto replace administrative legal standards in permit decisions. The problem arises from the gap between constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and worship, technical licensing rules under the 2006 Joint Ministerial Regulation, and local discretion, which is not always subject to measurable procedural safeguards. This study aims to formulate a human rights-based due process model that prevents licensing mechanisms from becoming instruments of exclusion against religious minorities. It employs normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, drawing on constitutional provisions, PBM 2006, academic literature, and contextual case materials, including a 2026 licensing dispute in Kupang City. Legal materials and academic literature were collected through document study and analyzed through normative harmonization, human rights testing, and procedural due process assessment. The findings identify three main vulnerabilities: community support requirements and religious harmony forum recommendations that may function as social vetoes; fragmented local procedures that may produce delay-as-denial; and public order arguments used without objective indicators. The article contributes to religious freedom and diversity governance scholarship by conceptualizing majoritarian veto as a form of procedural discrimination and proposing national minimum procedural standards, public consultation as impact mapping, documented step-by-step procedures, mandatory reason-giving, and time-bound administrative remedies. Local discretion is legitimate only when used for evidence-based technical assessment, while religious harmony must be built through procedural justice, accountability, and equal protection of constitutional rights. Abstrak Artikel ini mengkaji veto mayoritas dalam perizinan rumah ibadah di Indonesia, yang didefinisikan sebagai kondisi ketika tekanan atau preferensi mayoritas secara de facto menggantikan standar hukum administratif dalam pengambilan keputusan perizinan. Masalah ini muncul dari kesenjangan antara jaminan konstitusional atas kebebasan beragama dan beribadah, aturan perizinan teknis berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Bersama 2006, dan diskresi lokal, yang tidak selalu tunduk pada perlindungan prosedural yang terukur. Studi ini bertujuan untuk merumuskan model proses hukum berbasis hak asasi manusia yang mencegah agar mekanisme perizinan tidak menjadi instrumen eksklusi terhadap minoritas agama. Studi ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan hukum, konseptual, dan kasus, yang mengacu pada ketentuan konstitusional, PBM 2006, literatur akademis, dan materi kasus kontekstual, termasuk sengketa perizinan tahun 2026 di Kota Kupang. Materi hukum dan literatur akademis dikumpulkan melalui studi dokumen dan dianalisis melalui harmonisasi normatif, pengujian hak asasi manusia, serta penilaian terhadap proses hukum secara prosedural. Temuan mengidentifikasi tiga kerentanan utama: persyaratan dukungan masyarakat dan rekomendasi forum harmoni beragama yang dapat berfungsi sebagai veto sosial; Prosedur lokal yang terfragmentasi dapat menghasilkan penundaan sebagai penolakan; dan argumen ketertiban umum yang digunakan tanpa indikator objektif. Artikel ini berkontribusi pada kajian kebebasan beragama dan tata kelola keragaman dengan mengonseptualisasikan veto mayoritas sebagai bentuk diskriminasi prosedural serta mengusulkan standar prosedural minimum nasional, konsultasi publik untuk memetakan dampaknya, prosedur langkah demi langkah yang terdokumentasi, pemberian alasan yang wajib, dan upaya hukum administratif yang terikat waktu. Diskresi lokal hanya sah bila digunakan untuk penilaian teknis berbasis bukti, sementara harmoni beragama harus dibangun melalui keadilan prosedural, akuntabilitas, dan perlindungan yang sama terhadap hak-hak konstitusional.
The State’s Right to Control and Local Government Authority in the Mining Sector: A Legal-Policy Research Adhe Ismail Ananda; La Ode Dedihasriadi; Yeni Haerani
Administrative and Environtmental Law Review Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/aelr.v6i1.4079

Abstract

The management the mining sector is under the state’s authority as mandated by the Indonesian Constitution. The principle of Hak Menguasai Negara (State’s Right to Control) grants the state comprehensive authority over mining activities, including policy-making, licensing, and supervision. However, decentralization policies have shifted the balance of power between central and regional governments. This paper analyzes the legal and policy frameworks governing this division of authority, focusing on the role of local governments. Employing normative legal research through the examination of statutes and legal principles, the research finds that the centralization of mining permits under Law No. 3 of 2020 has significantly diminished local governments’ authority, resulting in governance inefficiencies and economic imbalances. The paper further explores asymmetric decentralization as a potential approach to harmonize state control with meaningful local government participation.
Legal Protection of Health Workers in Emergency Medical Procedures: An Analysis of Legal Certainty in Indonesia and Thailand Rosnida Rosnida; Muhamad Aksan Akbar; Muhammad As Ari. AM; Irabiah Irabiah; Yeni Haerani; Patma Sari
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i1.12818

Abstract

This study examines the legal certainty afforded to healthcare workers in performing emergency medical procedures in Indonesia and compares it with the legal protection framework implemented in Thailand. The urgency of this research arises from the increasing criminalization and malpractice claims faced by healthcare workers acting in good faith under high-risk and time-sensitive emergency conditions. Using a normative juridical method that incorporates statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health in conjunction with Thailand’s Emergency Medical Act and the application of the Good Samaritan principle. The findings reveal that although Indonesian law normatively recognizes legal protection for healthcare workers, its implementation remains weak due to the absence of technical guidelines, inconsistent law enforcement practices, and the limited role of professional medical institutions in the early stages of legal proceedings. In contrast, Thailand provides more effective legal certainty through explicit statutory immunity, integrated institutional support, and a restorative legal approach toward emergency medical practice. The novelty of this study lies in its comparative analysis, demonstrating that Thailand’s qualified immunity model may serve as a normative and institutional reference for strengthening legal protection for healthcare workers in Indonesia, particularly in emergency medical contexts. This study contributes to the development of health law by offering policy-oriented recommendations to enhance legal certainty, professional security, and patient safety.
EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM MERIT DALAM BIROKRASI PEMERINTAHAN DI KABUPATEN KOLAKA Rafi Ahmad; faldi Muh. Rifaldi; Yeni Haerani
Batanghari Academia Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): BAJ Mei-Agustus 2026
Publisher : CV. Batanghari Academia Indonesia Kolaka (BAIK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the merit system in the government bureaucracy in Kolaka Regency, starting from regional agencies to the village government level. Although the State Administrative Law regulations have mandated the governance of the apparatus based on qualifications and competencies, empirical reality shows that there is a significant disparity. Implementation on the ground is hampered by strong political intervention and the persistence of a patronage culture. At the regional elite level, the open selection stage for the Primary High Leadership Position (JPTP) is vulnerable to being reduced to a procedural formality to accommodate candidates who have been affiliated. This degradation of governance has hierarchical implications to the village government structure. The weak monitoring instrument in the Village Head Election (Pilkades) opens up space for the dominance of local elites, which ultimately leads to the recruitment of village officials outside the competency standards. This phenomenon directly degrades the operational efficiency and overall performance of the apparatus. Therefore, this study recommends the reconstruction of administrative governance through strengthening the executive power of supervisory institutions, increasing the objectivity of the selection mechanism, and enforcing strict administrative sanctions in order to realize a bureaucracy of Kolaka Regency with integrity and accountability.
Co-Authors Abel Aprianti Adam, Ade Caesar Premadani Adel Zainuddin Adhe Ismail Ananda Ahmad Rosidi, Ahmad Ana Ana Apriani Apriani Arie Ekawie Baskhoro Basrawi Basrawi Beni Suswanto Chasanah, Rosda Dedihasriadi Dedihasriadi Dedihasriadi, La ode Dwi Reski Alifia Zumrach Edy Nurcahyo Faisal Herisetiawan Faisal Herisetiawan Jafar faldi Muh. Rifaldi Fatma Kitabi Femas Aditya Ilham Ilham Irabiah Irabiah Irabiah Irsan Rahman, Irsan Joko Prianto Juliandarine, Andi Rizki La Ode Awal Sakti La Ode Dedihasriadi Mahrani Mahrani Mayasari, Riezka Eka Muh. Saipul Muhamad Aksan Akbar Muhamad Aksan Akbar Muhammad As Ari. AM Muhammad As Ari. AM Nurazizah Nurazizah Nurcahyo, Edy Nurul Adha Patma Sari Patma Sari Pery Rehendra Sucipta Rafi Ahmad Rosnida Rosnida Rosnida Rosnida, Rosnida RR. Ella Evrita Hestiandari Ruhul Amin Sakti, La Ode Awal Saputra, Ari irawan Wawan sari, Patma Thisyah Sadika Ramadhani Anwar Yahyanto Yahyanto