Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PERKEMBANGAN ILMU HUKUM PIDANA KORPORASI DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PENDIDIKAN HUKUM BERKELANJUTAN BAGI ADVOKAT sirait, timbo mangaranap
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v3i2.2684

The growing sociological development of corporations that engage in criminal acts has led to various jurisdictions of the State designing policies on how to prevent and repress crime and protect the public. The implication of corporation criminal law is growing. This research conducted with normative juridical method, and concluded that The Advocate profession organizations needs to conduct continuous legal education on (candidate) advocate in cooperation with faculty of law, so that advocate as profession “Officium Nobile” can always awake his dignity because it can play a high role in law enforcement and justice in the latest.

Urgensi Perluasan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Manifestasi Pengejawantahan Konstitusi Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The acknowledgement of Indonesia as a state of Law as mandated by Article 1 paragraph (3) of 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is the fundamental objective of the Constitution where one of its dimensions is to create and promote fair and prosperous community, in pursuing this, with the spirit of developmentalism, the state allows the participation of corporations in the development with the hope that Indonesia will be able to compete in the globalization era. However, it is apparent that their participation has adverse impact, some of them have even been involved in bribery and corruption. According to criminal law of Indonesia, briber and receiver (gratification) will be held criminally liable. The method applied in this research is juridical normative which analyzes secondary data including secondary law materials in Criminal Code and Law No. 31/1999 in conjunction with Law 20/2001 on Corruption Eradication and United States of America of Anti-bribery Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Based on the analysis conducted, it was found that Indonesia can only prosecute receiver of bribery (gratification) whilst the bribing corporation is prosecuted in the United States, it is also concluded that it is urgent to expand and amend the criminal law on responsibility for corporate crime as the manifestation of constitution in the Indonesian criminal law in order to counterbalance USA Anti-bribery Foreign Corrupt Practies Act (FCPA)

Menilik Akseptabilitas Perkawinan Sesama Jenis di dalam Konstitusi Indonesia Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Diskursus hubungan antara hukum dengan “moral” dan “fakta” selalu saja menarik untuk dibahas di kalangan sarjana hukum. Hukum kodrat irrasional adalah teori hukum besar yang pertama yang cara pandangnya theocentris mengakui bahwa hukum bersumber dari “moralitas” Tuhan YME. Derivasi nilai moral universal ternyata semakin bermetamorfosa dalam berbagai fenomena kehidupan kemudian dituntut agar diperlakukan setara di hadapan hukum. Di berbagai belahan dunia, Gerakan LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Biseksual, dan Transgender) dengan perjuangan perkawinan sesama jenis berkembang semakin luas dan telah memfalsifikasi dominasi perkawinan kodrati heteroseksual. Untuk itu, perlu ditilik secara reflektif filosofis akseptabilitas Konstitusi Indonesia atas perkawinan sesama jenis ini. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif melalui cara berpikir deduktif dengan kriterium kebenaran koheren. Sehingga disimpulkan: pertama, kritikan hukum kodrat irrasional yang teosentris terhadap perkawinan sesama jenis, menganggap bahwa sumber hukum adalah “moral” bukan “fakta”, oleh karenanya aturan perundang-undangan dipositifkan dari/dan tidak boleh bertentangan dengan moral Ketuhanan. Oleh karena itu, menurut hukum kodrat irrasional perkawinan sesama jenis tidak mungkin dapat diterima dalam hukum karena bertentangan dengan moralitas Ketuhanan Y.M.E. Kedua, bahwa Konstitusi Indonesia menempatkan Pancasila sebagai grundnorm dengan sila Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa menjadi fondasi dan bintang pemandu pada Undang-undang Perkawinan Indonesia, yang intinya perkawinan harus antara pria dan wanita (heteroseksual) dengan tujuan membentuk keluarga (rumah tangga). Perkawinan sesama jenis juga tidak dapat diterima karena ketidakmampuan bentuk perkawinan ini untuk memenuhi unsur-unsur utama perkawinan, untuk terjaminnya keberlangsungan kemanusiaan secara berkelanjutan (sustainable).The discourse of relationships between law, moral and facts are always interesting to be discussed among legal scholars. Irrational natural law is the first major legal theory that which theocentris worldview admit that the law derived from the “morality” of the God. The derivation of universal moral values appear increasingly metamorphosed into various life phenomena then are required to be treated equally before the law. In different parts of the world the movement LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) struggle for same-sex marriage has grown falsified domination of heterosexual marriage. Therefore it is necessary be a reflective philosophical divine the acceptability of the Constitution of Indonesia on same-sex marriage. This research was conducted by the method of normative juridical approach, in the frame of a coherent deductive acknowledgement. Concluded, Firstly, criticism Irrational natural law against same-sex marriage, assume that the source of the law is a “moral” rather than “facts”, therefore the rules of law are made of / and should not contradict with the morals of God. Therefore, according to irrational natural law that same-sex marriage may not be accepted in law as contrary to morality God. Secondly, That the Constitution of Indonesia puts Pancasila as the basic norms to please Almighty God be the foundation and a guiding star in the Indonesian Marriage Law, which is essentially a marriage should be between a man and a woman (heterosexual) with purpose of forming a family. Same-sex marriage is not acceptable also because of the inability to fulfill marriage form of the major elements of marriage, ensuring the sustainability of humanity in a sustainable manner.

Urgensi Perluasan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Manifestasi Pengejawantahan Konstitusi Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The acknowledgement of Indonesia as a state of Law as mandated by Article 1 paragraph (3) of 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is the fundamental objective of the Constitution where one of its dimensions is to create and promote fair and prosperous community, in pursuing this, with the spirit of developmentalism, the state allows the participation of corporations in the development with the hope that Indonesia will be able to compete in the globalization era. However, it is apparent that their participation has adverse impact, some of them have even been involved in bribery and corruption. According to criminal law of Indonesia, briber and receiver (gratification) will be held criminally liable. The method applied in this research is juridical normative which analyzes secondary data including secondary law materials in Criminal Code and Law No. 31/1999 in conjunction with Law 20/2001 on Corruption Eradication and United States of America of Anti-bribery Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Based on the analysis conducted, it was found that Indonesia can only prosecute receiver of bribery (gratification) whilst the bribing corporation is prosecuted in the United States, it is also concluded that it is urgent to expand and amend the criminal law on responsibility for corporate crime as the manifestation of constitution in the Indonesian criminal law in order to counterbalance USA Anti-bribery Foreign Corrupt Practies Act (FCPA)

Menilik Akseptabilitas Perkawinan Sesama Jenis di dalam Konstitusi Indonesia Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Diskursus hubungan antara hukum dengan “moral” dan “fakta” selalu saja menarik untuk dibahas di kalangan sarjana hukum. Hukum kodrat irrasional adalah teori hukum besar yang pertama yang cara pandangnya theocentris mengakui bahwa hukum bersumber dari “moralitas” Tuhan YME. Derivasi nilai moral universal ternyata semakin bermetamorfosa dalam berbagai fenomena kehidupan kemudian dituntut agar diperlakukan setara di hadapan hukum. Di berbagai belahan dunia, Gerakan LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Biseksual, dan Transgender) dengan perjuangan perkawinan sesama jenis berkembang semakin luas dan telah memfalsifikasi dominasi perkawinan kodrati heteroseksual. Untuk itu, perlu ditilik secara reflektif filosofis akseptabilitas Konstitusi Indonesia atas perkawinan sesama jenis ini. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif melalui cara berpikir deduktif dengan kriterium kebenaran koheren. Sehingga disimpulkan: pertama, kritikan hukum kodrat irrasional yang teosentris terhadap perkawinan sesama jenis, menganggap bahwa sumber hukum adalah “moral” bukan “fakta”, oleh karenanya aturan perundang-undangan dipositifkan dari/dan tidak boleh bertentangan dengan moral Ketuhanan. Oleh karena itu, menurut hukum kodrat irrasional perkawinan sesama jenis tidak mungkin dapat diterima dalam hukum karena bertentangan dengan moralitas Ketuhanan Y.M.E. Kedua, bahwa Konstitusi Indonesia menempatkan Pancasila sebagai grundnorm dengan sila Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa menjadi fondasi dan bintang pemandu pada Undang-undang Perkawinan Indonesia, yang intinya perkawinan harus antara pria dan wanita (heteroseksual) dengan tujuan membentuk keluarga (rumah tangga). Perkawinan sesama jenis juga tidak dapat diterima karena ketidakmampuan bentuk perkawinan ini untuk memenuhi unsur-unsur utama perkawinan, untuk terjaminnya keberlangsungan kemanusiaan secara berkelanjutan (sustainable).The discourse of relationships between law, moral and facts are always interesting to be discussed among legal scholars. Irrational natural law is the first major legal theory that which theocentris worldview admit that the law derived from the “morality” of the God. The derivation of universal moral values appear increasingly metamorphosed into various life phenomena then are required to be treated equally before the law. In different parts of the world the movement LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) struggle for same-sex marriage has grown falsified domination of heterosexual marriage. Therefore it is necessary be a reflective philosophical divine the acceptability of the Constitution of Indonesia on same-sex marriage. This research was conducted by the method of normative juridical approach, in the frame of a coherent deductive acknowledgement. Concluded, Firstly, criticism Irrational natural law against same-sex marriage, assume that the source of the law is a “moral” rather than “facts”, therefore the rules of law are made of / and should not contradict with the morals of God. Therefore, according to irrational natural law that same-sex marriage may not be accepted in law as contrary to morality God. Secondly, That the Constitution of Indonesia puts Pancasila as the basic norms to please Almighty God be the foundation and a guiding star in the Indonesian Marriage Law, which is essentially a marriage should be between a man and a woman (heterosexual) with purpose of forming a family. Same-sex marriage is not acceptable also because of the inability to fulfill marriage form of the major elements of marriage, ensuring the sustainability of humanity in a sustainable manner.

Proses Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi: Problematika dan Model Ke Depan Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The disparity in the selection mechanism of the Constitutional Court Judge has led to a trifurcation to the selection of constitutional judges carried out by the President, the House of Representatives, and the Supreme Court. The trifurcation of the Constitutional Court judge selection can not be separated from the construction of norms in the Constitutional Court Law which regulates the constitutional judge selection that have a high degree of flexibility so that they can be interpreted freely and suit the tastes of each regime by the institutions that have the constitutional authority to propose constitutional judge. The problem in this research is show to implementation of the selectionsystem of constitutional judgesin Indonesiais currently and how the model of selection of constitutional judges will be the future. The analysis will be carried out normatively using a statutory, historical and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the redesign of the constitutional Court Judge selection is an urgent matter to establish the standards of the Constitutional Court judge selection valuation in a transparent, participatory, objective, and accountable manner. The recruitment and selection model for Constitutional Court judges that using a selection panel either by the respective Constitutional Judges Proposing institutions or by the form of an agreement of the respective constitutional judge proposing institutions is a legal reform that have a main goal which is to produce the constitutional court judges who have ideal integrity as a true statesman. The recruitment process using a clear and standard selection panel is a fulfillment of the main principles of the constitutional judge position filling mandated by the Constitutional Court Law.

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCEDURAL LAW OF RESPONSIBILITY ENFORCEMENT OF CORPORATE CRIME IN INTEGRATED CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 17, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.3.769

Privatization of business in various countries greatly affects on economic growth and development that corporate’s activities increasingly dominate legal subjects of Person and State. It also tends to trigger corporate crime. The issues of this research are causes of ineffective criminal procedural law implementation, how to anticipate those causes to create impartial judiciary, and how to reform corporate criminal procedural law “ius constituendum” that is holistic in order to create equal formulation between Person and Corporation. Then, it can be concluded that, First, corporate criminal procedural law “Ius Constitutum” is still centralized and fragmented, Second, a systematic and integrated corporate criminal procedural law is required, Third holistic reformation policy of corporate criminal procedural law “ius constituendum” which hierarchically equals to Law must be immediately formulated. Therefore, it is recommended to be discussed and legalized in Prolegnas 2018. Keywords: Corporation, Enforcement, Criminal Procedural Law, Integrated

THE DEBATE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NE BIS IN IDEM PRINCIPLE IN HANDLING THE CORPORATE CRIME IN INDONESIA Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 29, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

AbstractSince the issuance of Temporary People’s Consultative Assembly Decree - TAP MPRS No. XXIII/66 until the Reformation era, the participation of strategic multinational corporations is needed for the development. However, in doing their activities, there was a corporation who committed bribery whose criminal law jurisdiction is related to Anti-Bribery FCPA of America. Although the bribery beneficiaries were sentenced in Indonesia because of the locus and tempus delicti of the crime was in Indonesia, since such corporation was convicted first in the US, the corporation is no longer able to be prosecuted in Indonesia because of Ne Bis In Idem.IntisariSejak terbitnya TAP MPRS No. XXIII/66 hingga era Reformasi, partisipasi korporasi multinasional dalam pembangunan sangat strategis diperlukan. Akan tetapi dalam kegiatannya ada korporasi melakukan tindak penyuapan yang yurisdiksi hukum pidananya ada titik-taut dengan Anti-Bribery FCPA Amerika. Walaupun penerima suap sudah divonis di Indonesia karena locus dan tempus delicti adalah Indonesia, tetapi karena korporasi penyuap mendadak lebih dahulu diputus bersalah di Amerika, telah berimplikasi korporasi tersebut tidak dapat lagi diadili di Indonesia karena Ne Bis In Idem.

Perseroan Perorangan yang Melakukan Merger Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja M. Yogi Arie Dewanto; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
BINAMULIA HUKUM Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Binamulia Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jbh.v11i1.602

Menyongsong disrupsi ekonomi dan Revolusi Industri 4.0 pemerintah mengantisipasi dengan lahirnya bentuk badan hukum baru Perseroan Perorangan melalui Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja yang dapat dimiliki oleh satu orang pemegang saham. Tujuan penelitian mencari jawaban di mana dengan kepemilikan satu orang, bagaimana jika Perseroan Perorangan melakukan merger setelah terbitnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 yang menyatakan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja sebagai unconstitutionally condition. Metode penelitian dilakukan dengan yuridis normatif, terdapat hasil pembahasan dan disimpulkan bahwa badan usaha yang dikenal dalam ketentuan sebelumnya adalah Perseroan Terbatas (sebagai badan usaha yang didirikan minimal 2 orang) karena itu Perseroan Perorangan merupakan bentuk badan usaha yang sangat baru di Indonesia, namun karena pemerintah ingin memberikan kemudahan berusaha sehingga dimungkinkan dibentuk PT Perorangan terutama bagi sektor Usaha Mikro dan Kecil (UMK) dengan kriteria tertentu yang harus dipenuhi termasuk ketika merger tetap berlaku walau telah terbit Putusan MK dengan syarat pemerintah sesegera mungkin melalukan perbaikan substansi materiil dan syarat formil pembentukan perundang-undangan atas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja tersebut.

Urgensi Perluasan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Manifestasi Pengejawantahan Konstitusi Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The acknowledgement of Indonesia as a state of Law as mandated by Article 1 paragraph (3) of 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is the fundamental objective of the Constitution where one of its dimensions is to create and promote fair and prosperous community, in pursuing this, with the spirit of developmentalism, the state allows the participation of corporations in the development with the hope that Indonesia will be able to compete in the globalization era. However, it is apparent that their participation has adverse impact, some of them have even been involved in bribery and corruption. According to criminal law of Indonesia, briber and receiver (gratification) will be held criminally liable. The method applied in this research is juridical normative which analyzes secondary data including secondary law materials in Criminal Code and Law No. 31/1999 in conjunction with Law 20/2001 on Corruption Eradication and United States of America of Anti-bribery Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Based on the analysis conducted, it was found that Indonesia can only prosecute receiver of bribery (gratification) whilst the bribing corporation is prosecuted in the United States, it is also concluded that it is urgent to expand and amend the criminal law on responsibility for corporate crime as the manifestation of constitution in the Indonesian criminal law in order to counterbalance USA Anti-bribery Foreign Corrupt Practies Act (FCPA)

Title

Found 33 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 33 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 33 Documents
Search