Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.168
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Konstitusi Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris BINAMULIA HUKUM Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Collegium Studiosum Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Jurnal DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Bacarita Law Journal Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global KAMI MENGABDI Research Horizon Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Binamulia Hukum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 39 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Undang-Undang Informasi Teknologi dan Elektronik Sebagai Alat Kontrol dan Payung Hukum bagi Masyarakat dan Pelaku Usaha dalam Menghadapi Bonus Demografi 2030 Advitama, Dave; Christiawan, Rio; Widyaningrum, Tuti; Mangaranap Sirait, Timbo
Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024): Surya kencana Satu
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v15i2.44586

Abstract

Pada tahun 2030 jumlah kelompok usia produktif akan menjadi dua kali lipat, bonus demografi tersebut menjadi peluang bagi Indonesia untuk meningkatkan produktivitas dalam memasuki era transformasi digital. Dalam pelaksanaannya adanya bonus demografi pada era digitalisasi dan teknologi informasi, selain dapat memberikan efek positif bagi produktivitas juga dapat memberikan efek negatif, diantaranya semakin maraknya tindak pidana yang dilakukan dengan memanfaatkan informasi dan teknologi transaksi elektronik, bahkan karena kemudahan dan kecanggihan teknologi yang ada, kejahatan dapat dilakukan melalui lintas batas suatu negara. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, perlu dilakukan upaya penegakan dan penanggulangan khususnya dibidang hukum pidana dengan tetap memperhatikan norma -norma yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Keberadaan Undang-undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik dan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2OO8 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (”UU ITE”) diharapkan dapat menjadi payung hukum bagi masyarakat dan pelaku usaha, sehingga produktivitas bonus demografi menjadi maksimal dan kesejahteraan masyarakat dapat tercapai.
PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP HAK RESTITUSI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN TERKAIT DISPARITAS PENERAPAN RESTITUSI OLEH PENGADILAN Harijanto, Rachmat; Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap
The Juris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v7i2.959

Abstract

There are implementation problems due to the regulation of victim restitution, but some weaknesses can cause implementation problems. The purpose of this research is to examine money laundering restitution agreements and measures to protect and fulfill victims' restitution requests in Decision 1/PID.SUS/2023/PT.BDG. This research was conducted using the normative legal method. This research uses a legal approach based on relevant laws and regulations, a conceptual approach based on recognized legal theories and concepts, and a case study approach on cases relevant to this research. From the study results, it is concluded that there is ambiguity in the law's reimbursement regime which raises doubts about its application among law enforcement officials. This may result in victims failing or claims for damages being rejected. Moreover, in Decision No. 1/PID.SUS/2023/PT.BDG, the role of the judge and prosecutor is very important so that the defendant is willing to pay compensation. Even if the victim is reluctant to ask for restitution, the judge or prosecutor can ask the defendant to pay the victim.
Due Process and the Obligation to Deliver SPDP: Implementation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 130/PUU-XIII/2015 Wijaya, Didit Wijayanto; Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Wibowo, Basuki Rekso
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Research Horizon - October 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.5.2025.844

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 130/PUU-XIII/2015 mandates investigators to deliver the Investigation Commencement Notification to public prosecutors, reported persons, and victims within seven days after the issuance of the investigation order. This obligation aims to guarantee legal certainty and protect the constitutional rights of suspects as stipulated in Article 28D paragraph (1) and Article 28I paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This study examines the legal consequences of procedural violations in delivering Investigation Commencement Notifications on the validity of suspect designation and investigation processes. The research methodology employs a normative juridical approach with analysis of legislation, court decisions, and legal doctrines. The discussion focuses on the ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court Decision, investigator obligations within the integrated criminal justice system, and pretrial mechanisms as juridical controls. The research finds that procedural violations in delivering Investigation Commencement Notifications result in the nullification of investigations and suspect designations due to contradiction with due process of law principles. Administrative and criminal sanctions for investigators who violate the obligation to deliver Investigation Commencement Notifications are necessary to strengthen constitutional rights protection of suspects within Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
TINJAUAN KONSTITUSIONAL PASAL 27A UU ITE TERKAIT KRITIK PUBLIK: PROBLEMATIKA FRASA 'ORANG LAIN' DAN PERLINDUNGAN KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT DI RUANG DIGITAL Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Sendias, Nungky
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i2.2029

Abstract

Law continually evolves in response to social developments within society; as a result, its norms often become counterproductive in their enforcement. This study employs a normative legal research method through a literature review to examine and conclude the following: this review synthesizes constitutional law research analyzing Article 27A of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), with a particular focus on the phrase “another person” (orang lain) and its implications for freedom of expression in the digital sphere. The analysis seeks to address legal ambiguity and its impact on digital rights in Indonesia. Accordingly, the provision is evaluated through relevant Constitutional Court decisions concerning the phrase “another person,” assessing judicial and doctrinal responses to restrictions on freedom of expression, examining compliance with human rights standards, analyzing the consistency of law enforcement, and exploring prospects for legal reform. The findings reveal persistent ambiguity in the phrase “another person,” resulting in multiple interpretations and legal uncertainty, despite judicial efforts to narrow the scope of defamation to individuals. While these efforts enhance legal clarity and reduce arbitrary enforcement, the provision is deemed conditionally unconstitutional and lacking binding legal force insofar as it is not interpreted to mean “excluding government institutions, groups of persons with specific or identifiable identities, institutions, corporations, professions, or public offices.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Pajak (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 19 Pk/Pid.Sus/2019) Nurhidayanti, Ririn; Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 8, No 2 (2025): JURNAL STAATRECHTS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v8i2.8228

Abstract

Sejarah pemungutan pajak dan penerapan sanksinya telah mengalami perubahan yang dinamis, dari bersifat tidak wajib hingga menjadi kewajiban yang diterapkan secara tegas meskipun penegakannya mengikuti prinsip Ultimum Remedium. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Yuridis Normatif melalui Studi Kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pajak yang menyampaikan Surat Pemberitahuan yang tidak benar dan faktur pajak tidak berdasarkan transaksi sebenarnya dilakukan melalui pemeriksaan pajak. Jika ditemukan indikasi tindak pidana, dilakukan Pemeriksaan Bukti Permulaan, dan wajib pajak diberi kesempatan untuk mengungkapkan sendiri pelanggarannya dengan membayar pajak beserta dendanya. Jika tidak dilakukan, kasus berlanjut ke tahap penyidikan. Selain itu, dalam Putusan Nomor 19 PK/PID.SUS/2019, pidana denda yang dijatuhkan sebesar Rp126.389.563.662,00 belum sepenuhnya sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Perpajakan, yang seharusnya menetapkan denda hingga Rp315.973.909.155,00 berdasarkan jumlah kerugian negara dan ketentuan sanksi administratif dalam Pasal 39 dan Pasal 39A. 
Legal Analysis of Enforcement of the Criminal Action of Defamation Through Social Media as Reviewed From the ITE Law and the KUHP: (Case Study of Decision Number: 415/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tar) Timbo Mangaranap Sirait; Adriansyah Halim
Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 24 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu sosial
Publisher : Pengurus Pusat Perkumpulan Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara Indonesia (PIANI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63309/dialektika.v24i1.935

Abstract

The crime of defamation can be divided into two forms: conventional and verbal. Conventional methods are usually implemented through direct statements or written media. This study aims to answer questions related to the Legal Review of Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Defamation Through Social Media. First, the criminal liability of perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation through social media is based on Decision Number 415/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tar. This study uses two types of data: primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials include basic norms, basic rules, laws and regulations, and official documents or records. Secondary legal materials are obtained from literature such as books, legal journals, research results, and various other scientific works. The results of the study indicate, first, that criminal liability for perpetrators of defamation through social media in Decision Number 415/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tar results in a two-month prison sentence with a six-month probation period, based on evidence and testimony presented at trial. Second, in issuing the verdict, the judge considered the Public Prosecutor's indictment, assessing both aggravating and mitigating factors for the defendant.
MENILIK KEDUDUKAN PTUN SEBAGAI GARDA KEADILAN ADMINISTRATIF DALAM MENJAGA KUALITAS DEMOKRASI INDONESIA Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Setiawan, Lisno
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i2.1725

Abstract

The Administrative Court (PTUN) plays a crucial role as the last resort for justice seekers after exhausting avenues of Objection and Administrative Appeal, particularly in safeguarding the quality of democracy in Indonesia. As an institution that oversees state administrative actions, the PTUN has the authority to adjudicate disputes between citizens and the government. In recent years, the PTUN has issued various rulings that reinforce democratic principles such as freedom of expression and broader political access. This analysis employs a normative juridical method through literature review and case studies of PTUN decisions, aiming to identify and evaluate the PTUN’s contribution in administratively maintaining and supervising the quality of democracy in Indonesia. The research addresses the following issues: (a) How does the PTUN contribute to maintaining the quality of democracy in Indonesia? and (b) How does the PTUN ensure transparency and accountability in government? In conclusion, first, based on the analysis of several decisions, the PTUN plays a significant role and serves as a front-line guardian in maintaining and overseeing the quality of democracy in Indonesia through its rulings. Second, the PTUN has upheld judicial neutrality, the integrity of electoral processes, and has ensured transparency and accountability in the administration of government.
Criminal Responsibility for Phishing and Carding Offenders under ITE Law and Criminal Code Enna Budiman; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of information technology in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 is like a double-edged sword: while it brings positive impacts, it also gives rise to various forms of cybercrime, such as phishing and carding, which require law enforcement measures through the imposition of criminal liability on the offenders. This research applies a normative juridical method through library-based legal research. The findings conclude as follows: First, although Indonesian laws provide a clear legal basis for addressing information and electronic transaction (ITE) crimes, particularly phishing and carding, law enforcement implementation remains superficial and highly dependent on the capacity of law enforcement officers, with a tendency to focus only on apprehended offenders without further tracing the supporting actors behind them. Second, the effectiveness of the existing legal framework in handling ITE crimes committed by individuals who are exploited by cybercrime organizations has not been optimal, as international cooperation mechanisms have not been effective. Third, the concepts of criminal liability and sentencing applied in judicial decisions regarding phishing and carding cases are normatively appropriate; however, substantively, the sentencing in these decisions has not fully reflected the concept of criminal liability, which requires a broader assessment of the offender’s conduct. As a result, criminal responsibility and sentencing become disproportionate.
BANJIR BANDANG SEBAGAI KONSEKUENSI KERUSAKAN HUTAN: ANALISIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN DI SUMATERA Slamet, Asep; Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 14 No 1 (2026): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (On Progress)
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v14i1.1843

Abstract

Massive forest degradation in Sumatra has increased ecological vulnerability and intensified the frequency of flash floods. These disasters are not solely caused by extreme rainfall but are closely linked to the loss of forest functions in upstream watershed areas due to illegal logging and uncontrolled land-use change. This study examines the causal relationship between forest degradation and flash floods and evaluates the effectiveness of environmental law enforcement in addressing such damage. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, using data from legal regulations, court decisions, and institutional reports. The findings show that although Indonesia has a relatively comprehensive environmental legal framework, its enforcement remains suboptimal. Weak supervision, inconsistent sanctions, and the lack of deterrent effects on business actors allow forest degradation to persist. Strengthening firm and consistent environmental law enforcement is therefore essential to prevent ecological disasters and protect the public’s right to a good and healthy environment.
Co-Authors Achmad, Helmy Adriansyah Halim Advitama, Dave Christiawan, Rio Dave Advitama Enna Budiman Fransiska Milenia Cesarianti Halim, Adriasnyah Harijanto, Rachmat Hatta, Ignatius Bambang Sukarno Khalimi M. Yogi Arie Dewanto Muhamad Zarkasih Naiborhu, Mesa Indra Nurhidayanti, Ririn Pasaribu, Abas Mei Julita Rachmat Harijanto Ririn Nurhidayanti Samsuto Samsuto Sendias, Nungky Setiawan, Lisno Slamet, Asep Sri G M Hatta Sriwahyuni, Dwi Bali Sudrajat, Maman Tuti Widyaningrum Wagiman Wagiman Wibowo, Basuki Rekso Widjaja, Liza Widyaningrum, Tuti Wijaya, Didit Wijayanto Winas Halim