Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.048
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Konstitusi Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris BINAMULIA HUKUM Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Collegium Studiosum Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Jurnal DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Bacarita Law Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global KAMI MENGABDI Research Horizon Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Binamulia Hukum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Undang-Undang Informasi Teknologi dan Elektronik Sebagai Alat Kontrol dan Payung Hukum bagi Masyarakat dan Pelaku Usaha dalam Menghadapi Bonus Demografi 2030 Advitama, Dave; Christiawan, Rio; Widyaningrum, Tuti; Mangaranap Sirait, Timbo
Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024): Surya kencana Satu
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v15i2.44586

Abstract

Pada tahun 2030 jumlah kelompok usia produktif akan menjadi dua kali lipat, bonus demografi tersebut menjadi peluang bagi Indonesia untuk meningkatkan produktivitas dalam memasuki era transformasi digital. Dalam pelaksanaannya adanya bonus demografi pada era digitalisasi dan teknologi informasi, selain dapat memberikan efek positif bagi produktivitas juga dapat memberikan efek negatif, diantaranya semakin maraknya tindak pidana yang dilakukan dengan memanfaatkan informasi dan teknologi transaksi elektronik, bahkan karena kemudahan dan kecanggihan teknologi yang ada, kejahatan dapat dilakukan melalui lintas batas suatu negara. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, perlu dilakukan upaya penegakan dan penanggulangan khususnya dibidang hukum pidana dengan tetap memperhatikan norma -norma yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Keberadaan Undang-undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik dan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2OO8 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (”UU ITE”) diharapkan dapat menjadi payung hukum bagi masyarakat dan pelaku usaha, sehingga produktivitas bonus demografi menjadi maksimal dan kesejahteraan masyarakat dapat tercapai.
PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP HAK RESTITUSI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN TERKAIT DISPARITAS PENERAPAN RESTITUSI OLEH PENGADILAN Harijanto, Rachmat; Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap
The Juris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v7i2.959

Abstract

There are implementation problems due to the regulation of victim restitution, but some weaknesses can cause implementation problems. The purpose of this research is to examine money laundering restitution agreements and measures to protect and fulfill victims' restitution requests in Decision 1/PID.SUS/2023/PT.BDG. This research was conducted using the normative legal method. This research uses a legal approach based on relevant laws and regulations, a conceptual approach based on recognized legal theories and concepts, and a case study approach on cases relevant to this research. From the study results, it is concluded that there is ambiguity in the law's reimbursement regime which raises doubts about its application among law enforcement officials. This may result in victims failing or claims for damages being rejected. Moreover, in Decision No. 1/PID.SUS/2023/PT.BDG, the role of the judge and prosecutor is very important so that the defendant is willing to pay compensation. Even if the victim is reluctant to ask for restitution, the judge or prosecutor can ask the defendant to pay the victim.
Due Process and the Obligation to Deliver SPDP: Implementation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 130/PUU-XIII/2015 Wijaya, Didit Wijayanto; Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Wibowo, Basuki Rekso
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Research Horizon - October 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.5.2025.844

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 130/PUU-XIII/2015 mandates investigators to deliver the Investigation Commencement Notification to public prosecutors, reported persons, and victims within seven days after the issuance of the investigation order. This obligation aims to guarantee legal certainty and protect the constitutional rights of suspects as stipulated in Article 28D paragraph (1) and Article 28I paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This study examines the legal consequences of procedural violations in delivering Investigation Commencement Notifications on the validity of suspect designation and investigation processes. The research methodology employs a normative juridical approach with analysis of legislation, court decisions, and legal doctrines. The discussion focuses on the ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court Decision, investigator obligations within the integrated criminal justice system, and pretrial mechanisms as juridical controls. The research finds that procedural violations in delivering Investigation Commencement Notifications result in the nullification of investigations and suspect designations due to contradiction with due process of law principles. Administrative and criminal sanctions for investigators who violate the obligation to deliver Investigation Commencement Notifications are necessary to strengthen constitutional rights protection of suspects within Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
BANJIR BANDANG SEBAGAI KONSEKUENSI KERUSAKAN HUTAN: ANALISIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN DI SUMATERA Asep Slamet; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 14 No 1 (2026): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v14i1.1843

Abstract

Massive forest degradation in Sumatra has increased ecological vulnerability and intensified the frequency of flash floods. These disasters are not solely caused by extreme rainfall but are closely linked to the loss of forest functions in upstream watershed areas due to illegal logging and uncontrolled land-use change. This study examines the causal relationship between forest degradation and flash floods and evaluates the effectiveness of environmental law enforcement in addressing such damage. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, using data from legal regulations, court decisions, and institutional reports. The findings show that although Indonesia has a relatively comprehensive environmental legal framework, its enforcement remains suboptimal. Weak supervision, inconsistent sanctions, and the lack of deterrent effects on business actors allow forest degradation to persist. Strengthening firm and consistent environmental law enforcement is therefore essential to prevent ecological disasters and protect the public’s right to a good and healthy environment.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Pajak (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 19 Pk/Pid.Sus/2019) Ririn Nurhidayanti; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 8, No 2 (2025): JURNAL STAATRECHTS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v8i2.8228

Abstract

Sejarah pemungutan pajak dan penerapan sanksinya telah mengalami perubahan yang dinamis, dari bersifat tidak wajib hingga menjadi kewajiban yang diterapkan secara tegas meskipun penegakannya mengikuti prinsip Ultimum Remedium. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Yuridis Normatif melalui Studi Kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pajak yang menyampaikan Surat Pemberitahuan yang tidak benar dan faktur pajak tidak berdasarkan transaksi sebenarnya dilakukan melalui pemeriksaan pajak. Jika ditemukan indikasi tindak pidana, dilakukan Pemeriksaan Bukti Permulaan, dan wajib pajak diberi kesempatan untuk mengungkapkan sendiri pelanggarannya dengan membayar pajak beserta dendanya. Jika tidak dilakukan, kasus berlanjut ke tahap penyidikan. Selain itu, dalam Putusan Nomor 19 PK/PID.SUS/2019, pidana denda yang dijatuhkan sebesar Rp126.389.563.662,00 belum sepenuhnya sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Perpajakan, yang seharusnya menetapkan denda hingga Rp315.973.909.155,00 berdasarkan jumlah kerugian negara dan ketentuan sanksi administratif dalam Pasal 39 dan Pasal 39A. 
Analisis Yuridis Keterlambatan Penegakan Hukum dalam Kasus Robot Trading Ilegal di Indonesia Damun Damun; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JHPIS)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v5i3.6724

Abstract

The phenomenon of illegal robot trading in recent years has caused significant losses to the public. Although numerous reports and complaints have been filed since its inception, law enforcement against illegal robot trading operators is often considered slow and unresponsive. This study aims to analyze the legal factors causing delays in law enforcement, ranging from regulatory and institutional aspects to technical obstacles in the investigation process. Using normative legal research methods combined with an empirical approach to several illegal robot trading cases, this study found that delays in law enforcement action were influenced by overlapping authority between the Financial Services Authority (OJK), the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti), and the Indonesian National Police (Polri), a lack of synchronization in regulations related to digital asset trading and investment services, and limited capacity of law enforcement to understand digital financial instruments. These delays have led to a significant increase in the number of victims and losses. This study recommends the establishment of a rapid enforcement mechanism, regulatory harmonization, and increased capacity of law enforcement officers to address digital economic crimes.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pihak Penyedia Platform Perdagangan Daring terhadap Penjualan Produk yang Dilindungi Hak Merek Berdasarkan Perpektif Hukum Positif Indonesia: Studi Kasus Coty v. Amazon Jerman Okky Rachmadi; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i3.6611

Abstract

This research focuses on the extent to which exclusive intellectual property rights can be enforced against third-party e-commerce platform providers, referring to the dispute between Coty and Amazon Germany. The Selective Distribution System practiced by Coty to maintain its product's luxury image applies to its authorized distributors within a contractual relationship, but does not apply to buyers who resell Coty products or to e-commerce platform providers. Storing and shipping products bound by the Selective Distribution System agreement does not constitute an unlawful act. The approaches used include: Statutory approach: which analyzes legal instruments in the form of related legislation (trademarks, copyright, information, and electronic transactions), including court rulings. Conceptual approach: which examines theoretical concepts regarding criminal offenses against intellectual property rights (trademarks, well-known brands), contractual relationships, and the formal and material classification of legal products. The data used consists of primary legal materials (legislation and court decisions) and secondary legal materials (legal literature, scientific journals). The analysis is conducted qualitatively by interpreting legal principles and their relevance to the legal facts.
Co-Authors Achmad, Helmy Advitama, Dave Asep Slamet Christiawan, Rio Damun Damun Dave Advitama Enna Budiman Fransiska Milenia Cesarianti Halim, Adriasnyah Harijanto, Rachmat Hatta, Ignatius Bambang Sukarno Khalimi M. Yogi Arie Dewanto Muhamad Zarkasih Naiborhu, Mesa Indra Okky Rachmadi Pasaribu, Abas Mei Julita Rachmat Harijanto Ririn Nurhidayanti Samsuto Samsuto Sendias, Nungky Sri G M Hatta Sriwahyuni, Dwi Bali Sudrajat, Maman Tuti Widyaningrum Wagiman Wagiman Wibowo, Basuki Rekso Widjaja, Liza Widyaningrum, Tuti Wijaya, Didit Wijayanto Winas Halim