Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.428
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Konstitusi Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris BINAMULIA HUKUM Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Collegium Studiosum Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Jurnal DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Bacarita Law Journal Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global KAMI MENGABDI Research Horizon Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Binamulia Hukum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Undang-Undang Informasi Teknologi dan Elektronik Sebagai Alat Kontrol dan Payung Hukum bagi Masyarakat dan Pelaku Usaha dalam Menghadapi Bonus Demografi 2030 Advitama, Dave; Christiawan, Rio; Widyaningrum, Tuti; Mangaranap Sirait, Timbo
Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024): Surya kencana Satu
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v15i2.44586

Abstract

Pada tahun 2030 jumlah kelompok usia produktif akan menjadi dua kali lipat, bonus demografi tersebut menjadi peluang bagi Indonesia untuk meningkatkan produktivitas dalam memasuki era transformasi digital. Dalam pelaksanaannya adanya bonus demografi pada era digitalisasi dan teknologi informasi, selain dapat memberikan efek positif bagi produktivitas juga dapat memberikan efek negatif, diantaranya semakin maraknya tindak pidana yang dilakukan dengan memanfaatkan informasi dan teknologi transaksi elektronik, bahkan karena kemudahan dan kecanggihan teknologi yang ada, kejahatan dapat dilakukan melalui lintas batas suatu negara. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, perlu dilakukan upaya penegakan dan penanggulangan khususnya dibidang hukum pidana dengan tetap memperhatikan norma -norma yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Keberadaan Undang-undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik dan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2OO8 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (”UU ITE”) diharapkan dapat menjadi payung hukum bagi masyarakat dan pelaku usaha, sehingga produktivitas bonus demografi menjadi maksimal dan kesejahteraan masyarakat dapat tercapai.
PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP HAK RESTITUSI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN TERKAIT DISPARITAS PENERAPAN RESTITUSI OLEH PENGADILAN Harijanto, Rachmat; Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap
The Juris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v7i2.959

Abstract

There are implementation problems due to the regulation of victim restitution, but some weaknesses can cause implementation problems. The purpose of this research is to examine money laundering restitution agreements and measures to protect and fulfill victims' restitution requests in Decision 1/PID.SUS/2023/PT.BDG. This research was conducted using the normative legal method. This research uses a legal approach based on relevant laws and regulations, a conceptual approach based on recognized legal theories and concepts, and a case study approach on cases relevant to this research. From the study results, it is concluded that there is ambiguity in the law's reimbursement regime which raises doubts about its application among law enforcement officials. This may result in victims failing or claims for damages being rejected. Moreover, in Decision No. 1/PID.SUS/2023/PT.BDG, the role of the judge and prosecutor is very important so that the defendant is willing to pay compensation. Even if the victim is reluctant to ask for restitution, the judge or prosecutor can ask the defendant to pay the victim.
Implementation of Constitutional Court Decision Number 130/PUU-XIII/2015 in Safeguarding Suspects’ Rights through Investigation Notification Wijaya, Didit Wijayanto; Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Wibowo, Basuki Rekso
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Research Horizon - October 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 130/PUU-XIII/2015 mandates investigators to deliver the Investigation Commencement Notification to public prosecutors, reported persons, and victims within seven days after the issuance of the investigation order. This obligation aims to guarantee legal certainty and protect the constitutional rights of suspects as stipulated in Article 28D paragraph (1) and Article 28I paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This study examines the legal consequences of procedural violations in delivering Investigation Commencement Notifications on the validity of suspect designation and investigation processes. The research methodology employs a normative juridical approach with analysis of legislation, court decisions, and legal doctrines. The discussion focuses on the ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court Decision, investigator obligations within the integrated criminal justice system, and pretrial mechanisms as juridical controls. The research finds that procedural violations in delivering Investigation Commencement Notifications result in the nullification of investigations and suspect designations due to contradiction with due process of law principles. Administrative and criminal sanctions for investigators who violate the obligation to deliver Investigation Commencement Notifications are necessary to strengthen constitutional rights protection of suspects within Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Achmad, Helmy Advitama, Dave Christiawan, Rio Dave Advitama Enna Budiman Fransiska Milenia Cesarianti Halim, Adriasnyah Harijanto, Rachmat Hatta, Ignatius Bambang Sukarno Khalimi M. Yogi Arie Dewanto Muhamad Zarkasih Naiborhu, Mesa Indra Pasaribu, Abas Mei Julita Rachmat Harijanto Ririn Nurhidayanti Samsuto Samsuto Sendias, Nungky Sri G M Hatta Sriwahyuni, Dwi Bali Sudrajat, Maman Tuti Widyaningrum Wagiman Wagiman Wibowo, Basuki Rekso Widjaja, Liza Widyaningrum, Tuti Wijaya, Didit Wijayanto Winas Halim