Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.139
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) At-Taradhi: Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Unes Law Review Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Abdi Implementasi Pancasila: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Tasyri' Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities International Journal Multidisciplinary Science Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum : Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Binamulia Hukum Jurnal Sipakatau
Maslihati Nur Hidayati
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Instrumentalisasi Hukum dan Ketahanan Demokrasi: Analisis Politik Hukum Mahfud MD dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Pamungkas, Ery; Hidayati, Maslihati Nur
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v4i1.420

Abstract

This article discusses the phenomenon of legal instrumentalization in Indonesian constitutional practice and its implications for democratic resilience, by highlighting the political thinking of Mahfud MD. Through the approach  of doctrinal legal research and normative analysis, this study found that the law is often used as an instrument of power by the dominant political configuration, thereby weakening the principles of judicial independence and constitutional supremacy. In this context, Mahfud MD's idea of responsive legal politics becomes relevant to uphold the law as a means of substantive justice, not just a tool of power legitimization. This study then relates this framework to the principles  of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah in Islamic law, especially in the aspects of the maintenance of justice (ḥifẓ al-'adl), reason (ḥifẓ al-'aql), and the public benefit (maṣlaḥah 'āmmah). The integration of the two shows that strengthening democracy requires a political reconstruction of the law based on Islamic ethical values, namely the balance between power, justice, and moral responsibility of state administrators. This study recommends the need for a national legal design that is oriented towards substantive justice and the protection of human rights as a form of application of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah in the democratic legal system in Indonesia.
IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND MARKETPLACE LIABILITY BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY Hidayati, Maslihati Nur; Suartini, Suartini
International Journal Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): October: International Journal Multidisciplinary Science
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Muda Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56127/ijml.v3i3.1618

Abstract

The rapid growth of online transactions aligns with the increasing potential for disputes between consumers and businesses. The problem is the need for national regulations governing ODR, although some marketplaces have implemented internal dispute resolution systems. This research uses John Rawls' theory of distributive justice to analyze marketplace liability in online dispute resolution, focusing on the principle of intermediary liability. The research method involves a literature review and case analysis on several platforms such as Tokopedia, Shopee, AliExpress, and eBay. The results show that although some marketplaces have developed efficient ODR systems, there are still challenges related to transparency, security, and fairness. Marketplaces are expected to create a more comprehensive and equitable system, considering equal access for consumers.
Gaps in the Implementation of Restitution for Victims of Human Trafficking in Indonesia: Normative-Empirical and Comparative Analysis Hidayati, Maslihati Nur; Prasetyo, Claudya Bunga Jovita
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3132

Abstract

: The crime of human trafficking in Indonesia shows an alarming escalation with 1,061 cases and 3,363 victims in 2023, while restitution paid by perpetrators only reached 13 percent of the total calculation by the LPSK in 2024. This study analyzes the legal, institutional, and procedural obstacles causing low restitution; compares restitution regulations and mechanisms in Thailand, Germany, and the United States; and formulates comprehensive recommendations for improvement. The method used is descriptive-analytical qualitative legal research with doctrinal-normative, empirical-sociological, and comparative approaches, using the theoretical framework of legal certainty, legal effectiveness, legal protection, and restorative justice. The results show that the failure of restitution implementation is systemic in all dimensions, and the three comparison countries have structural advantages in the form of mandatory restitution, the active role of prosecutors, state compensation funds, and standardized calculation formulas. The study recommends comprehensive reforms based on five pillars that integrate international best practices with the characteristics of the Indonesian legal system.
Tinjauan Yuridis Afiliasi Perusahaan Manufaktur Dan Jasa Konstruksi Dalam Rangka Kepatuhan Terhadap UU Jasa Konstruksi dan UU Anti Monopoli Anna Nauvina; Maslihati Nur Hidayati
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/nx0jmj50

Abstract

Sektor konstruksi memiliki peranan penting dalam pembangunan infrastruktur di Indonesia, dengan proses lelang atau tender sebagai mekanisme utama dalam pemilihan kontraktor. Namun, munculnya afiliasi antara perusahaan jasa konstruksi dan perusahaan manufaktur dapat menciptakan ketidakadilan dalam persaingan, karena perusahaan dengan afiliasi memiliki keuntungan akses lebih murah terhadap bahan baku dan teknologi. Hal ini berpotensi merusak prinsip persaingan yang sehat dalam proses lelang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi konsistensi antara Pasal 44 UU Industri dengan Pasal 22 UU Antimonopoli dan UU Pencegahan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, serta untuk menganalisis kedudukan perusahaan jasa konstruksi dalam mengikuti lelang, terutama yang memiliki afiliasi dengan perusahaan manufaktur, agar dapat menjaga prinsip persaingan yang adil dan transparansi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan prosedur yuridis normatif, yang menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan terkait dan data sekunder berupa literatur serta regulasi yang relevan. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan kajian dokumen untuk memahami regulasi yang ada dan bagaimana mereka memengaruhi praktik lelang dalam sektor konstruksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya ketidakadilan dalam proses lelang ketika perusahaan jasa konstruksi terafiliasi dengan perusahaan manufaktur, karena akses ke bahan baku dan teknologi yang lebih murah memberikan keuntungan kompetitif yang tidak dapat diakses oleh perusahaan non-afiliasi. Selain itu, regulasi yang ada masih perlu diperkuat untuk mencegah praktik monopoli dan pengaturan tender yang tidak sehat.
Implementation of Forest Area Regulation and Environmental Justice Challenges in Indonesia under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 Surono, Agus; Sadino, Sadino; Abdullah, Zaitun; Iriantoro, Agung; Hamid, Adnan; Hidayati, Maslihati Nur
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Sipakatau
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i1.603

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s forest governance continues to face challenges such as overlapping land claims, agrarian conflicts, and institutional fragmentation. Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 establishes a cross-sectoral Forest Area Order and Enforcement Task Force (PKH Task Force) to accelerate forest recovery and improve legal certainty. However, concerns remain regarding data reliability and social justice in its implementation. Objective: This study examines the implementation of forest area regulation under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025, focusing on governance effectiveness, socio-ecological impacts, and the relationship between enforcement mechanisms and environmental justice. Methods: A qualitative socio-legal approach was employed, combining normative juridical analysis, focus group discussions, field observations, and comparative policy review. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis and cross-case comparison. Results: Findings show that the PKH Task Force recovered approximately 3.3 million hectares of forest land by September 2025. Despite this achievement, structural issues persist, including inconsistent spatial data, overlapping customary land claims (17.6–24.4 million hectares), and unequal enforcement between large-scale actors and smallholders. Limited community participation has contributed to ongoing socio-ecological tensions. In contrast, participatory schemes such as PPTPKH/TORA (3.04 million hectares) and social forestry programs (4.1 million hectares involving over 800,000 households) indicate more inclusive governance outcomes. Conclusion: Forest governance reform demonstrates strong administrative performance but limited social legitimacy. Effective implementation requires integrating distributive, procedural, and restorative justice principles supported by participatory and integrated data governance systems. Limitations: The study is based on secondary data and selected qualitative cases, which may not fully represent regional variations in Indonesia
Co-Authors Adnan Hamid Agung Iriantoro Agus Surono Agus Surono Anna Nauvina Bimawan Domas Hidayat Ferdianida, Djasmine Nabilla Pasha Fokky Fuad Fontian Munzil, Fontian Harry Dewantoro Istiani, Nisa Maryam, Anna Nahda Feby Rahmadhani Puteri Pamungkas, Ery Prasetyo, Claudya Bunga Jovita Putri, Yuminuna Bilghaiby Reda Manthovani Rifa, Fauzi Risfidhiyaa, Aina Sabara, Dzikry Sadino, Sadino Samosir, Tetti Setiawan, Raden Nanda Suartini Suartini, Suartini Wahyu, Andi Yusup Hidayat Yusup Hidayat Zaitun Abdullah