Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Yurispruden Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains UNES Journal of Swara Justisia International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Yuridika Trunojoyo Law Review
Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Legal Construction of Land Rights as a Result of the Village Cash Land Exchange Process Conducted by the Village Government M. Yulis Pratama; Ngesti dwi Prasetyo; Shinta handiyantina
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 6 No 3 (2024): International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v6i3.381

Abstract

The focus of this legal research is to discuss the legal construction in the process of exchanging village treasury land carried out by the village government together with the village community based on statutory regulations and several scientific references in order to support the validity of the research conducted. On the island of Java, village treasury land or what is usually known as bengkok land should be productive land so that it can provide added value and become a source of income for the village head and his apparatus, but in reality, not all village-owned land is productive land so that it makes the village government experience a decrease in production due to less productive land. The problem also arises when the village treasury land in the form of a yard is occupied by the village community, because it has been settled for a long time, the community wants legal status to the land they occupy by buying the village treasury land through the exchange process, the sale-purchase agreement occurs between the surrounding community and the village government As a form of follow-up to the sale-purchase process that has been carried out between the village government and the community, there is a release of the status of land rights. in this case there is legal uncertainty where people who have paid off the land have not been able to get a certificate for the land they have paid for. The research method used is Normative Juridical research based on laws and regulations which are then reviewed using applicable legal theories, concepts and principles so that it is expected to know and find the facts and data needed. Then briefly the research results show that 1. The status of land rights on village treasury land is included in the status of the right of use, this refers to the definition of the right of use stipulated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles Article 41 which states that the right of use is the right to use and/or collect products from land directly controlled by the State or land owned by others, which gives the authority and obligations specified in the decision to grant it by the official authorized to grant it or in the agreement with the owner of the land, which is not a lease agreement or land processing agreement, everything as long as it does not conflict with the spirit and provisions of this Law.
The Existence of Amicus Curiae in Constitutional Court Decisions: A Participation Theory Perspective Annisa Mayang Tyaningrum; Muchamad Ali Safa’at; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i1.429

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis peran dan dampak amicus curiae dalam mendorong proses peradilan yang partisipatif di Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui teori partisipasi. Sebagai mekanisme non-litigasi, amicus curiae memperkaya perspektif peradilan, khususnya dalam kasus-kasus kepentingan publik, dengan memberikan pandangan hukum yang imparsial. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa amicus curiae meningkatkan kualitas putusan, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas, sehingga memperkuat peran Mahkamah dalam mempromosikan sistem hukum yang demokratis dan inklusif. Penelitian ini menyoroti bagaimana amicus curiae mendukung proses peradilan yang partisipatif di Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan menggunakan teori partisipasi. Awalnya berkembang dalam perencanaan kota, teori ini menekankan pada inklusivitas dan akuntabilitas dalam pengambilan keputusan. Diakui dalam Pasal 5 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009, amicus curiae memberikan pandangan imparsial yang berbeda dari Para Pihak Terkait, sehingga memastikan keterwakilan masyarakat yang beragam dalam proses hukum. Kehadiran amicus curiae meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan kualitas putusan peradilan. Teori partisipasi selaras dengan perannya dalam mendorong masukan publik yang beragam untuk mencapai hasil hukum yang seimbang. Kasus-kasus penting, seperti persidangan Soeharto, menunjukkan nilai praktisnya dalam memastikan keadilan peradilan. Institusionalisasi amicus curiae memperkuat nilai-nilai demokrasi dan partisipasi publik dalam peradilan. Amicus curiae memainkan peran strategis dalam meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan inklusivitas peradilan di Mahkamah Konstitusi.Kata kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Amicus curiae, Partisipasi Publik, Transparansi, Akuntabilitas This study analyzes the role and impact of amicus curiae in fostering participatory judicial processes within the Constitutional Court through participation theory. As a non-litigation mechanism, amicus curiae enrich judicial perspectives, particularly in cases of public interest, by providing impartial legal insights. Findings reveal that amicus curiae enhances decision quality, transparency, and accountability, reinforcing the Court’s role in promoting a democratic and inclusive legal system. This study highlights how amicus curiae support participatory judicial processes within the Constitutional Court, using participation theory. Initially rooted in urban planning, this theory emphasizes inclusivity and accountability in decision-making. Recognized under Article 5 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009, amicus curiae provide impartial insights distinct from Related Parties, ensuring diverse societal representation in legal processes. The inclusion of amicus curiae enhances judicial transparency, accountability, and decision quality. Participation theory aligns with its role in fostering diverse public input for balanced legal outcomes. Notable cases, such as the Soeharto trial, demonstrate its practical value in ensuring judicial fairness. Institutionalizing amicus curiae strengthens democratic values and public participation in the judiciary. Amicus curiae plays a strategic role in enhancing judicial transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in the Constitutional Court. Its alignment with participation theory underscores its importance in promoting constitutional justice and addressing public interest cases.Keywords: Constitutional Court; Amicus curiae; Public Participation, Transparency, Accountability
Co-Authors Airin Liemanto Akbar, Muhammad Jihadil Amelia Sri Kusuma Dewi, Amelia Sri Kusuma Amirullah Amirullah Annisa Mayang Tyaningrum Daniel Alexander Siagian Daud, Erita Rosa Larasati David Boy Sumurung Silaban Dhia Al-Uyun Dhiana Puspitawati Edi Susilo FADLI, MOH Fadli, Moh. Fajar Irawan HANUGRAH TITI HABSARI Haq, Cendekiawan Ainul Imam Koeswahyono Imam Koeswahyono Iwan Permadi Jamil Jamil M. Yulis Pratama Moh Fadli Moh Fadli Muchamad Ali Safaat Muktiono Mustafa Lutfi Mustafa Lutfi Nurul Salsabila Hadiyanti Qothrunnada Uni Fauziyah Retno Catur Kusuma Dewi Ria Casmi Arrsa Riana Susmayanti Riana Usmayanti Rifan, Mohamad Sheehan Ghazwa Mahardhika Shinta Hadiyantina Shinta handiyantina Siti Rohmah Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Tunggul Anshari SN Uyun, Dhia Al Wardana, Azna Abrory Zainal Arifien