Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Yurispruden Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains UNES Journal of Swara Justisia International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Yuridika Trunojoyo Law Review
Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
In Indonesia, Hope For The Omnibus Law Method As A Solution To Hyper Regulation Amirullah Amirullah; Tunggul Anshari SN; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i2.2625

Abstract

This study aims to describe the expectations of the Omnibus Law Method as a solution to regulatory problems in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with statutory and conceptual approaches. Analytical tools based on the SWOT framework are used to examine primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of law. Due to the overwhelming volume of federal and state laws, the government has chosen to implement sweeping "omnibus" legislation. It's true that rules may be streamlined using the Omnibus approach. One of the goals is the organization of rules, which cannot be achieved if the Formation of Legislation using the Omnibus Law approach is not executed correctly. The success and advantages of the enacted Omnibus Law will determine the future of the method's acceptance in Indonesia's legal system. The regulatory framework is inseparable from the legal underpinnings, apparatus, culture, infrastructure, information technology, and funding that sustain it. The concepts of transparency, caution, and promoting public engagement are essential in Indonesia for applying the Omnibus Law.
Urgensi Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik Ditinjau dari Peraturan Presiden Nomor 89 Tahun 2021 Daud, Erita Rosa Larasati; Prasetyo, Ngesti Dwi; Susmayanti, Riana
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um019v10i1p82-91

Abstract

This study aims to identify the urgency of implementing a Public Service Mall in the context of Indonesian bureaucracy and the challenges of implementing it in light of Presidential Regulation Number 89 of 2021. This study used a normative juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach, focusing on the analysis of secondary legal materials such as laws and regulations, official documents, and other legal literature. Data collection techniques in this study were conducted through library research. Data analysis in this study uses qualitative normative techniques to interpret legal provisions and examine their legal implications. The Public Service Mall is a strategic innovation aimed at improving the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of public services. The implementation of the Public Service Mall in practice still faces various challenges, such as inter-agency coordination, infrastructure readiness, and service system integration. The success of the Public Service Mall requires ongoing commitment and synergy from all stakeholders to realize modern, transparent, and adaptive public services.
THE ENFORCEMENT OF FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGMENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND JAPAN David Boy Sumurung Silaban; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3867

Abstract

The principle of fair law enforcement is a manifestation of the state adhering to the conception of the rule of law (rechtsstaat) as the ideal of the nation. This makes the Indonesian judiciary have an important role and the principles of simplicity, quick and low cost as mandated by the 1945 Constitution and Act no 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Enforcement of material law cannot be separated from enforcement of formal law, because both run with the aim of realizing a sense of justice for the community. Likewise, the enforcement of judicial decisions: which is a law that must be implemented by the Parties in dispute in it; must be realized for the sake of justice for the entitled Parties. Statistical data reveals that administrative court decisions are often not implemented by administrative agencies/officials. A comparison of the decision execution system between Indonesia and Japan provides an interesting insight into how the two countries, which have different historical backgrounds and judicial systems, enforce the law and execute decisions. This journal focuses on how the policies of the Administrative Court in Indonesia and the Japanese judiciary in executing Inkracht judgments. This analytical comparative study is expected to be a vehicle for scientific and practical exploration related to the fulfillment of rights and obligations for Parties in court disputes. The method used in this research is normative research method with conceptual approach and statutory approach. Some data and statistics from reliable sources are presented as facts that will be analyzed in this journal article..
Strengthening Dispute Resolution Autonomy Through Acehnese Customary Institutions: Living Law and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Perspectives Siti Rohmah; Moh Fadli; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo; Airin Liemanto; Zainal Arifien
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.33387

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of strengthening the autonomy of legal dispute resolution through customary institutions in Aceh by engaging Eugen Ehrlich’s Living Law theory and Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah framework. Aceh’s distinctive juridical and sociocultural status positions customary institutions as key actors in maintaining social cohesion and delivering justice grounded in local wisdom. However, their role is often marginalized by state legal formalism, creating a gap between statutory law and lived legal realities. This research employs a qualitative juridical-sociological approach, using literature review and document analysis. It conceptualizes customary institutions as expressions of Living Law that operate in alignment with the objectives of Islamic law, particularly the protection of life, intellect, dignity, and property. Auda’s systemic and multidimensional conception of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah provides an analytical lens to understand these institutions as adaptive and participatory legal mechanisms. The findings demonstrate that strengthening the autonomy of customary dispute resolution reflects legal pluralism and contributes to substantive justice rather than legal conservatism. This study offers a methodological contribution by integrating Living Law and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah in rethinking national legal development. It recommends stronger juridical recognition and institutional empowerment of customary institutions within Indonesia’s legal system.
Legal Protection of the Penataran Temple Site in Blitar Regency in the Digital Era Based on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo; Moh Fadli; Edi Susilo; Dhiana Puspitawati; Mustafa Lutfi
Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo Vol 17, No 4: 2024 (Supplementary Issue)
Publisher : Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/pamator.v17i4.26774

Abstract

Penataran Temple, a cultural heritage site in Blitar Regency, stands as a testament to the pinnacle of past Nusantara civilization. Despite its significance, the protection of Penataran Temple requires optimization. This study aims to develop a legal protection strategy for Penataran Temple through the use of Artificial Intelligence. Employing statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches, this empirical juridical research analyzes data using sociological juridical methods. The study underscores the urgent need to enhance legal protection, particularly in rebranding the ecotourism potential of Penataran Temple. This effort seeks to cultivate, reaffirm, and revive the noble values of cultural heritage, establishing it as a distinctive landmark enriched by the unique mosaic of local wisdom. Utilizing innovative design and advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, this approach significantly enhances branding rooted in local wisdom and ancestral heritage. It is crucial for promoting and safeguarding the temple from legal exploitation by parties lacking integrity and historical awareness in the digital age.
Constitutional Reconstruction of Legislative Authority Toward Strong Bicameralism in the Indonesian State System Sheehan Ghazwa Mahardhika; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v7i1.1461

Abstract

This article examines the constitutional politics of Indonesia's post-amendment bicameral legislature, with particular attention to the asymmetric distribution of legislative authority between the People's Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, DPR) and the Regional Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, DPD). Although the 1999-2002 constitutional amendments formally introduced the DPD as a territorial chamber, Articles 20 and 22D of the 1945 Constitution leave the DPR with decisive legislative authority while the DPD remains limited to initiating selected bills, participating in restricted deliberations, and issuing non-binding considerations. Using normative-juridical legal research supported by statutory, historical, conceptual, and comparative constitutional approaches, this article argues that Indonesia's bicameralism is not merely imperfect but structurally weak because regional representation is institutionally present yet legally unable to determine legislative outcomes. Drawing on Sartori's, Lijphart's, and Tsebelis and Money's bicameral theory, Pitkin's theory of substantive representation, Habermas's deliberative democracy, and constitutional theories of limited government, the article proposes the National Plenary Legislative Model as a constitutional reconstruction toward strong bicameralism. The model reconstitutes the People's Consultative Assembly (Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, MPR) as a national deliberative plenary forum in which the DPR acts as the political chamber and the DPD as a territorial chamber with co-decisional authority in matters affecting regional autonomy, intergovernmental fiscal relations, natural resources, and regional formation. The proposed reconstruction preserves Indonesia's unitary state while strengthening intra-legislative checks and balances, substantive regional representation, and Pancasila-based deliberative constitutionalism.
Implementation of Agrarian Reform On Assets And Equitable Access To Reform In Batu City Nurul Salsabila Hadiyanti; Imam Koeswahyono; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i1.343

Abstract

Agrarian reform is a strategic state policy aimed at realizing agrarian justice through the restructuring of land control, ownership, use, and utilization accompanied by community empowerment as the subject of agrarian reform. However, the implementation of agrarian reform at the local level, including in Batu City, faces various challenges, particularly in integrating asset reform and access reform as well as pressures arising from land commercialization driven by tourism and investment development. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the integration between asset reform and access reform in the implementation of agrarian reform policies in Batu City and to examine the impact of land commercialization on the sustainability of agrarian reform. This research uses a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches supported by empirical analysis. The legal materials consist of laws and regulations related to agrarian reform, regional policies, and relevant literature, which are analyzed through qualitative legal analysis. The results of this study indicate that the integration between asset reform and access reform in Batu City has not been implemented optimally. The implementation of agrarian reform still tends to focus on asset legalization, while access reform, including economic empowerment, institutional strengthening, and sustainable land tenure protection, has not been systematically implemented. In addition, the increasing commercialization of land through spatial planning policies and investment permits has limited the space for agrarian reform and increased the vulnerability of agrarian communities. Therefore, strengthening local policy strategies, including the reorientation of spatial planning based on agrarian reform, the strengthening of regional regulations, and the integration of agrarian reform with local economic development, is necessary to achieve sustainable and inclusive agrarian reform.
Spanning Interests of Regional Autonomy within the Axiom of 'Fiscality': A Brief Note on the Ideal Financial Relationship between Central and Regional Governments Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6228

Abstract

The implementation of the Regional Autonomy policy is designed through the pattern and style of its implementation which changes according to the dynamics of the times. The implication is that there are ups and downs in the model of relations between the Center and the Regions within the framework of the Regional Government from time to time. This paper is a small note to see the ideal relationship between the Center and the Regions in the future, especially in terms of fiscal axioms. Through normative juridical research methods and several approaches, the results of this study can be described in 3 (three) points. First, the first stone for the founding fathers to choose the design of the Central-Regional relationship was the Proclamation. This is because there is a linearity between the meeting BPUPKI - Proklamasi - PPKI - UUD NRI 1945, with the Proclamation Text as the first formal form that there is an effort to find the ideal constitutional design in Indonesia, one of which is the accommodation of the phrase "Autonomy." Second, the implementation of the chosen relationship scheme leads to a form of Fiscal Decentralization which always experiences "Spanning Interest" and ends at a meeting point called "Conditio Sine Qua non." due to ecological and conditional factors. Third, the first and second conclusions lead to the ideal form of relationship between the Center and the Regions which is free as long as it overcomes the problem of fiscal disparities between regions and takes into account several legal bases including the legal basis of intergovernmental transfer system, Procedures for establishing and modifying intergovernmental transfers, Conditional and unconditional transfers, and Dispute resolution and adjudication.
Urgensi Konstruksi Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Terhadap Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Indonesia Qothrunnada Uni Fauziyah; Riana Usmayanti; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 10 No 3 (2026): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/92mtw504

Abstract

Perselisihan hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden (PHPU Presiden) merupakan fenomena yang melekat dalam praktik demokrasi elektoral di Indonesia dan menjadi indikator penting bagi stabilitas sistem politik serta legitimasi pemerintahan. Selama dua dekade terakhir, Mahkamah Konstitusi berperan sebagai lembaga yudisial yang berwenang memutus perselisihan hasil pemilu, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 24C ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945. Namun, perkembangan kompleksitas politik, seperti politisasi birokrasi, penyalahgunaan sumber daya negara, dan disinformasi digital, menunjukkan keterbatasan mekanisme yudisial dalam menjangkau seluruh dimensi penyimpangan pemilu. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) melalui hak angket sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 20A ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 berpotensi memainkan peran strategis sebagai instrumen pengawasan politik terhadap integritas proses pemilihan presiden. Akan tetapi, konstruksi hukum hak angket DPR terhadap PHPU Presiden masih bersifat umum dan belum diatur secara komprehensif dalam UU Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang MD3 maupun UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Kekosongan pengaturan tersebut menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan potensi konflik kewenangan antar lembaga negara. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan rekonstruksi normatif dan konseptual terhadap hak angket DPR agar dapat berfungsi secara efektif sebagai mekanisme checks and balances dalam memperkuat akuntabilitas dan legitimasi demokrasi konstitusional di Indonesia.
Legal Protection for Human Rights Defender in Indonesia Daniel Alexander Siagian; Muktiono; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 6 No 2 (2024): International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v6i2.293

Abstract

Legal protection of human rights defenders in Indonesia is crucial for the state to fulfil, promote and develop human rights. This research focuses on the reformulation of legal obscurity in regulations that have not legitimised the protection of human rights defenders. Various forms of vulnerability of human rights defenders in fact lead to human rights violations such as Criminalisation, Victimisation, Anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation), Cyber Attacks and physical attacks intended for human rights defenders which reinforce Impunity. The facts show that the activities of human rights defenders are very vulnerable, it is appropriate to require legal protection in each of their activities. The vulnerability of the activities carried out by human rights defenders, which basically aims to contribute to the quality of State administration in promoting human rights, shows that protection for human rights defenders is important to be reformulated. By considering several important issues that are the focus of the research, the protection of Human Rights Defenders consists of, for instance, legal protection, which is not only related to the establishment of laws and regulations that guarantee the protection of Human Rights Defenders, but also to the elimination of laws that have the potential to threaten, restriction and violate Human Rights Defenders, guarantees and support for the activities of Human Rights Defenders, including the effectiveness of Human Rights Defenders in the process of advocacy, such as the right to information, communication with both government and non-government organisations, and recognition of Human Rights Defenders' advocacy. This also covers the guarantee of defenders' right to immunity for their advocacy activities.
Co-Authors Airin Liemanto Akbar, Muhammad Jihadil Amelia Sri Kusuma Dewi, Amelia Sri Kusuma Amirullah Amirullah Annisa Mayang Tyaningrum Daniel Alexander Siagian Daud, Erita Rosa Larasati David Boy Sumurung Silaban Dhia Al-Uyun Dhiana Puspitawati Edi Susilo FADLI, MOH Fadli, Moh. Fajar Irawan HANUGRAH TITI HABSARI Haq, Cendekiawan Ainul Imam Koeswahyono Imam Koeswahyono Iwan Permadi Jamil Jamil M. Yulis Pratama Moh Fadli Moh Fadli Muchamad Ali Safaat Muktiono Mustafa Lutfi Mustafa Lutfi Nurul Salsabila Hadiyanti Qothrunnada Uni Fauziyah Retno Catur Kusuma Dewi Ria Casmi Arrsa Riana Susmayanti Riana Usmayanti Rifan, Mohamad Sheehan Ghazwa Mahardhika Shinta Hadiyantina Shinta handiyantina Siti Rohmah Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Tunggul Anshari SN Uyun, Dhia Al Wardana, Azna Abrory Zainal Arifien