Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Relevansi Pemikiran Tan Malaka tentang Partai Politik sebagai Kritik terhadap Oligarki dalam Sistem Kepartaian Indonesia Ian Pasaribu
Paradigma POLISTAAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Paradigma POLISTAAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/paradigmapolistaat.v8i2.34893

Abstract

Sistem kepartaian Indonesia pasca-Reformasi kerap ditandai oleh dominasi elite dan praktik oligarki politik yang menegasikan fungsi ideologis partai. Partai politik lebih sering berperan sebagai kendaraan elektoral dan saluran kepentingan ekonomi dibandingkan sebagai alat perjuangan rakyat. Dalam konteks tersebut, pemikiran Tan Malaka menjadi relevan untuk dihadirkan kembali sebagai kritik terhadap kemerosotan nilai ideologis partai politik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis gagasan Tan Malaka tentang partai politik dan menafsirkan relevansinya terhadap kondisi oligarkis dalam sistem kepartaian Indonesia kontemporer. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode studi pustaka, berfokus pada analisis wacana terhadap karya-karya Tan Malaka seperti Massa Aksi (1926), Madilog (1943), dan Naar de Republiek Indonesia (1925). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Tan Malaka memandang partai politik sebagai alat perjuangan kelas dan sarana pendidikan politik rakyat yang berorientasi pada kesadaran kolektif, moralitas perjuangan, serta pembebasan sosial. Pandangan ini menjadi kritik mendasar terhadap realitas oligarki partai di Indonesia yang mengabaikan partisipasi dan ideologi rakyat. Oleh karena itu, pemikiran Tan Malaka relevan untuk membangun kembali basis ideologis dan moralitas politik dalam memperkuat demokrasi substantif di Indonesia.
Assessing the Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN) Solidity in Merangin Regency during the 2024 Regional Elections Agus Dewi Susilo Wati; Dimas Subekti; Ian Pasaribu; Sutri Destemi Elsi
Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jasispol.v6i1.6250

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the level of internal solidity of the Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN) in Merangin Regency in the context of the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Head Election. Methods: This research used qualitative methods with a case study approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with party elites, local party administrators, legislative members, political observers, and academics, complemented by document analysis of party statutes and bylaws, official party decisions, local media coverage, and electoral data provided by the General Election Commission. Results: The findings indicate that PAN Merangin demonstrated functional solidity, reflected in cadre loyalty, short-term organizational stability, and the absence of open internal fragmentation. However, this condition cannot yet be categorized as an institutionalized solidity. Decision-making remains highly centralized, formal conflict resolution mechanisms are weak, and cadre regeneration is not systematically institutionalized. Conclusions: The Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN) in Merangin Regency for the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Elections cannot be categorized as institutionally solid, although cadre loyalty is the cornerstone. Limitations: This study’s limitation is that it focuses only on the dynamics of PAN Merangin's solidity in the context of the 2024 simultaneous regional head elections, thereby limiting the generalizability of the findings to other parties or regions. Contributions: This study contributes to political science and local democracy studies by highlighting the gap between functional solidity and institutional strength within local political parties during regional electoral competitions.
Assessment of the Institutionalization of the Golkar Party in Sungai Penuh City in the 2024 Election Iga May Tandayun; Dimas Subekti; Zakly Ahmad Hanafi; Ian Pasaribu
Parapolitika: Journal of Politics and Democracy Studies Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): PARAPOLITIKA: Journal of Politics and Democracy Studies
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33822/jpds.v7i1.13435

Abstract

This study employs the party institutionalization perspective to examine the increase in the vote share of the Golkar Party in Sungai Penuh City in the 2024 elections. This research uses a qualitative method with a case study approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 12 informants consisting of party elites, legislative candidates, and grassroots cadres, and complemented by document analysis. The findings of this study explain that the increase in the vote of the Sungai Penuh City Golkar party in the 2024 elections was due to good institutionalization factors as shown by three indicators ranging from roots in society ((the party has a mass base and a strong image in the community), level of organization (organizational tools that consistently work for the benefit of the party at every level of management) and coherence (cohesiveness of party members). However, there is a note on the autonomy indicator (independent in decision-making) that, although the Golkar party has internal rules that uphold autonomy and independence, the practice in the field shows that decisions are still dominated by the party's internal elite in a closed manner. Therefore, while institutionalization appears to have contributed to Golkar’s electoral performance in Sungai Penuh City, the findings should be understood as indicative rather than strictly causal, as other contextual and political factors may also have played a role. This study contributes to enriching the literature on party institutionalization at the local level in post-Reformasi Indonesia, particularly in the period leading up to the 2024 elections. Nonetheless, the study has limitations, including its single-case design, the potential bias inherent in elite-based interviews, and the limited generalizability of its findings beyond the specific local context examined.
Assessing the Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN) Solidity in Merangin Regency during the 2024 Regional Elections Agus Dewi Susilo Wati; Dimas Subekti; Ian Pasaribu; Sutri Destemi Elsi
Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jasispol.v6i1.6250

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the level of internal solidity of the Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN) in Merangin Regency in the context of the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Head Election. Methods: This research used qualitative methods with a case study approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with party elites, local party administrators, legislative members, political observers, and academics, complemented by document analysis of party statutes and bylaws, official party decisions, local media coverage, and electoral data provided by the General Election Commission. Results: The findings indicate that PAN Merangin demonstrated functional solidity, reflected in cadre loyalty, short-term organizational stability, and the absence of open internal fragmentation. However, this condition cannot yet be categorized as an institutionalized solidity. Decision-making remains highly centralized, formal conflict resolution mechanisms are weak, and cadre regeneration is not systematically institutionalized. Conclusions: The Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN) in Merangin Regency for the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Elections cannot be categorized as institutionally solid, although cadre loyalty is the cornerstone. Limitations: This study’s limitation is that it focuses only on the dynamics of PAN Merangin's solidity in the context of the 2024 simultaneous regional head elections, thereby limiting the generalizability of the findings to other parties or regions. Contributions: This study contributes to political science and local democracy studies by highlighting the gap between functional solidity and institutional strength within local political parties during regional electoral competitions.
Politik dalam Dunia One Piece: Anarki, Hegemoni, dan Balance of Power Ian Pasaribu
Journal of Social Contemplativa Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Contemplativa
Publisher : Indonesian Democracy Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the politics of power in One Piece through the analytical lenses of anarchy, hegemony, and balance of power. As one of the most influential works of contemporary popular culture, One Piece offers not only an adventurous narrative but also a sophisticated political structure that reflects the dynamics of power, domination, resistance, and competition among political actors. Employing a qualitative approach, this research utilizes narrative analysis and literature review to examine political relations among the World Government, Marines, Yonko, Revolutionary Army, and other actors within the One Piece universe. The findings indicate that the world of One Piece represents an anarchic political order characterized by the absence of an absolute authority capable of exercising full control over all actors. The World Government functions as a hegemonic power that maintains its dominance through ideological legitimacy, information control, and coercive mechanisms. At the same time, the existence of the Yonko and the Revolutionary Army generates a dynamic balance of power that prevents the concentration of authority in a single actor and sustains a competitive political structure. Furthermore, the series portrays the interplay between power, legitimacy, and resistance, revealing how political authority is continuously negotiated and contested. This study argues that One Piece serves not merely as entertainment but also as a political text that reflects contemporary issues of hegemony, power struggles, and political order. The findings contribute to the growing intersection between political science and popular culture studies by demonstrating that fictional narratives can provide valuable insights into the understanding of modern political dynamics.