Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis

ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 78/PUU-XXI/2023 TENTANG PENGHAPUSAN LARANGAN PENYEBARAN BERITA HOAKS PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH Rio Surya Darmawan; Mustofa; Lutfi Fahrul Rizal
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Tema Hukum Islam
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Freedom of expression and opinion is one of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution, but this freedom is increasingly threatened by articles in the ITE Law and the Criminal Code that regulate the prohibition of spreading hoaxes. These articles are considered to be open to multiple interpretations and lack clear boundaries. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 78/PUU-XXI/2023 has become a breath of fresh air for the democratic climate in Indonesia by annulling these articles. This research aims to analyze the Constitutional Court Decision 78/PUU-XXI/2023 from the perspective of siyasah dusturiyah. This research method uses a normative juridical approach, with literature sources from books, journals, as well as laws or rulings. In the Constitutional Court Decision 78/PUU-XXI/2023, which was tested by Fathia and Haris, it was based on the legal uncertainty regarding the spread of hoax news that they had previously experienced. From that court ruling, it has fostered a better democratic climate and is in line with the paradigm of siyasah dusturiyah. Providing substantial certainty and capable of meeting the needs and desires of the community.
Politik Hukum tentang Pembatasan Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali terhadap Pejabat/Badan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 24/PUU-XII/2024: Perspektif Siyasah Qadhaiyyah Mochamad Suwanda Hadiansyah; Bobang Noorisnan Pelita; Lutfi Fahrul Rizal
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Tema Hukum Islam
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i2.743

Abstract

This research seeks to analyze the legal politics and principles of Siyasah Qadhaiyah regarding the Restrictions on Judicial Review of Officials or State Administrative Bodies since the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number 24/PUU-XII/2024. MK Aquo's decision has significantly changed the legal framework regarding the right of state administrative bodies or officials to submit a judicial review (PK). To answer this question, this research uses a normative juridical approach, by reviewing legal documents, jurisprudence, and scientific works to explore legal ratios, legal consequences and siyasa qadhaiyah views on this decision. The results of the research show that, firstly, giving the right/authority to the TUN Agency/Official to submit a judicial review of a decision that has already been made is counterproductive and has the potential to cause legal uncertainty, so that MK Aquo's decision is a progressive decision that can protect the public seeking justice and legal certainty. Second, even though the Constitutional Court Aquo Decision is a binding and final decision (final and binding), there is a need for follow-up by the decision address because the Constitutional Court Aquo decision is non-self implementing, the three contents of the Constitutional Court Aquo Decision are relevant to the concept of siyāsah qaḍhā'iyyah, especially values. which is adhered to by the Islamic judiciary of al-maẓhālim region
Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat pada Pemungutan Suara Ulang Pilkada Serentak 2024 Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 132/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025 di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah Muhammad Fauzan; Bobang Noorisnan Pelita; Lutfi Fahrul Rizal
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Tema Hukum Islam
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i2.1476

Abstract

This study examines community political participation in the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Election Re-Vote (PSU) in Tasikmalaya Regency, based on the Constitutional Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number 132/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025, from the perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah. As a manifestation of popular sovereignty, regional elections must ensure the active participation of the public. The Tasikmalaya Regency General Election Commission (KPU) has attempted to implement a responsive legal approach through outreach activities and stakeholder engagement, in accordance with Article 26 of KPU Regulation Number 9 of 2022. However, voter turnout in the re-vote was only 63.4%, a decline of 4.5% from the previous election. This low level of participation was due to several field implementation challenges, including the re-vote period coinciding with the post-Eid al-Fitr return flow and high urban mobility; the very short KPU socialization period (60 days) with minimal intensity in remote areas; declining public trust following previous election violations; and issues with the accuracy of the Final Voter List (DPT), such as unupdated records of deceased voters. From the Siyasah Dusturiyah perspective, this phenomenon indicates the suboptimal application of the principles of shura (consultation), ‘adl (justice), and ijma’ al-ummah (public consensus), suggesting the presence of a "pseudo-responsive legal system." As an agent of maslahah ‘ammah (public interest), the KPU bears a moral responsibility to ensure inclusive participation as a foundation for substantive democratic legitimacy.
ANALISIS PEMBUBARAN ORGANISASI KEMASYRAKATAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2017 PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH Alfin Maqbul Fauzi; Idzam Fautanu; Lutfi Fahrul Rizal
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the mechanism for disbanding community organizations based on Law Number 16 of 2017. The dissolution regulated in the mass organization law also contradicts the theory of the rule of law and justice in the civil service. The implementation of just law is fundamental to creating a peaceful cycle of society and maintaining the rights of freedom of the community, especially in association and assembly. This study uses a normative legal method. The results of this study indicate that the government should continue to pay attention to the rights of the community in freedom of assembly and association and continue to implement due process of law as a representation of efforts to create a just government to present a more peaceful democratic climate in addition to the state's anticipation of organizations that conflict with Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.