Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.195
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jambe Law Journal WAJAH HUKUM ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Adithiya Diar
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Money Politics in Indonesian Regional Election Disputes: Constitutional Court Reasoning and Electoral Integrity Diar, Adithiya; Zarkasi, A; Sayuti, Sayuti; Abd Aziz, Saidatul Nadia; Antasari, Rr. Rina
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): (In progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/1e65hh11

Abstract

This article examines how the Constitutional Court assesses and interprets money politics in dispute cases over regional head election results in Indonesia and what this court settlement means for electoral integrity. It addresses three dispute cases concerning vote-buying allegations in regional elections, corruption of voter choice, violations of constitutionally mandated electoral processes, and examines the effect of money politics on the legitimacy of revoting. As normative legal research, this article analyses how the Court formulates its legal reasoning, applies standards of proof, and evaluates the relationship between electoral violations and final results. It is learnt that the Court has developed a relatively consistent reasoning model. The Court initially determines whether sufficiently convincing facts support a finding of vote buying, examines whether the violation has tainted the purity of voter choice, and subsequently assesses whether the violation has had a significant effect on the election outcome. This article further demonstrates that money politics is no longer viewed merely as an electoral crime, but as a constitutional issue when it undermines democratic legitimacy and distorts the authenticity of electoral results. Unlike earlier studies that mainly discuss money politics in terms of its forms, causes, or general consequences for local democracy, this article frames jurisprudential consistency as the central analytical problem. It offers a more systematic account of how the Court connects proof, voter autonomy, and electoral impact. It argues that clearer more predictable standards are needed to strengthen legal certainty, improve the adjudication of election disputes, and reinforce protections for electoral integrity in Indonesia
Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Majelis Rakyat Papua (MRP) dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Papua Loho, Thomfi; Zarkasi, A.; Arfai, Arfai; Diar, Adithiya
Wajah Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v10i1.2091

Abstract

The Papuan People's Assembly (MPR) is a cultural representation institution established within the framework of Papua's special autonomy to protect the rights of indigenous Papuans and uphold customary, religious, and women's values in regional governance. This study aims to analyze the legal standing of the MRP, the implementation of its authority, and the challenges of strengthening its role in the Papuan government system. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and analytical approach. Legal materials were obtained through a literature review of relevant laws and regulations, scientific literature, and legal documents, then analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and juridical argumentation. The results of the study indicate that normatively, the MRP has a strategic position as a special institution that functions to provide consideration, approval, and protection for the rights of indigenous Papuans. However, in practice, the implementation of its authority has not been optimal due to its consultative nature, overlapping institutional relations, limited capacity, and the influence of politics and regional expansion policies. This study concludes that strengthening the role of the MRP requires regulatory refinement, increased institutional capacity, strengthened independence, and the establishment of more effective coordination so that the goals of special autonomy in Papua can be realized in a just and democratic manner.
Efektivitas Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2011 Tentang Mata Uang Terhadap Pembayaran Non Tunai: Studi Kasus: Roti’O Halte Transjakarta Monas Dimas Tri Wicaksono; Rahman; Friyandi Prasetya; Niken Putri Lestari; Adithiya Diar
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.4822

Abstract

Perkembangan sistem pembayaran non-tunai di Indonesia menunjukkan pertumbuhan yang signifikan seiring dengan digitalisasi sektor keuangan dan meningkatnya penggunaan uang elektronik serta Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). Kondisi ini menimbulkan tantangan hukum terhadap keberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2011 tentang Mata Uang yang menetapkan rupiah sebagai alat pembayaran yang sah dan wajib diterima dalam setiap transaksi di wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2011 dalam mengatur praktik pembayaran non-tunai serta implikasinya terhadap perlindungan konsumen, dengan studi kasus pada gerai Roti’O di Halte Transjakarta Monas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, melalui analisis peraturan perundang-undangan, jurnal ilmiah, dan publikasi resmi Bank Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang- Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2011 secara normatif masih relevan, namun implementasinya belum sepenuhnya efektif dalam menghadapi praktik cashless society, terutama ketika pelaku usaha menerapkan kebijakan pembayaran non-tunai secara eksklusif. Praktik tersebut berpotensi mengurangi hak konsumen untuk memilih alat pembayaran dan menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi antara ketentuan mata uang, sistem pembayaran digital, dan perlindungan konsumen guna menciptakan kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi seluruh pihak.
Co-Authors A Zarkasi Abd Aziz, Saidatul Nadia Alifri, Aqshal Habibillah Amanda Dea Lestari Arfai, Arfai Billy Bintang, Muhammad Dimas Tri Wicaksono Febrian Chandra Fitri Handayani Friyandi Prasetya Harmaini HARTATI Hartati Hartati Helmi Loho, Thomfi Niken Putri Lestari Qurochman, Taufik Raga Rahman Rr. Rina Antasari Saidatul Nadia Abd Aziz SAPUTRA, BENY Sayuti Sayuti Tri Imam Munandar