Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.349
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penyuluhan Unram Law Review Jurnal Akta Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Widya Yuridika Jurnal Ius Constituendum Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora WAJAH HUKUM JURNAL MERCATORIA Awang Long Law Review Jurnal Suara Keadilan Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora ACTA DIURNAL : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI JUSTISI Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vyavahara Duta JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Paulus Law Journal CITRA JUSTICIA : Majalah Hukum dan Dinamika Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) Sanskara Hukum dan HAM Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Journal of Sharia and Legal Science Journal of Innovative and Creativity Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada) Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) COSMOS Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Ilmu Sosial dan Ekonomi Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Solusi Bersama : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Sudaryat
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 75 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 75 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
ASPEK HUKUM PENJUALAN MINERAL IKUTAN BERUPA PASIR KUARSA OLEH PERUSAHAAN PEMEGANG IUP OP TAMBANG KAULINE Sudaryat
Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik) Vol 8 No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/selisik.v8i2.4484

Abstract

Mineral mining activities, both metallic and non-metallic minerals, generally produce main minerals and associated minerals. The amount of the main mineral with associated minerals varies depending on the mineral itself. For nonmetallic minerals in the form of kauline as the main mineral and quartz sand as an accompanying mineral, the percentage is 30 percent compared to 70 percent. The amount of associated minerals of quartz sand is more than that of kauline as the main mineral. Due to this fact, miscommunication often occurs which leads to disputes regarding the rights of mining companies to certain types of non-metallic minerals, namely kauline with a mineral as a by-product in the form of quartz sand, between mining companies and communities around the mine represented by local NGOs and their solutions. The results of the study were analyzed using a qualitative juridical method. The results showed that the holder of the IUP OP of the Kauline Commodity has the right to sell quartz sand as a byproduct after conducting a feasibility study and paying a production fee as stated in Article 59 of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 7 of 2020. If there is a difference of opinion regarding the sale of quartz sand as a co-mineral between the NGOs around the mine representing the voices of the community around the mine and the company holding the IUP OP, efforts should be made to resolve the dispute outside the court in the form of consultations with the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, negotiations between the companies holding the IUP OP and NGOs and if not achieved, proceed with mediation involving the local government as a mediato
Konten Video Parodi pada Platform Digital dalam Perspektif Pelindungan Hak Cipta dan Doktrin Fair Use Shafira Shava Rahmanissa; Sudjana Sudjana; Sudaryat Sudaryat
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 15, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v15i1.9351

Abstract

Parody video content on digital platforms is generally made by imitating previous works, but in it, there are also characteristics of parody makers that are different from the original work. The purpose of this study was to determine the application of the fair use doctrine, namely the doctrine that allows the use of copyrighted material without the creator's permission concerning parody video content on digital platforms and to describe the copyright protection of parody video content reviewed under Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. This research is normative legal research by examining library materials or secondary data. The approach method used is a conceptual approach (conceptual approach), statutory approach (statute approach), and comparative approach (comparative approach). The data were obtained through a literature study using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. These data were processed and analyzed, then presented in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results of the study show that the application of the fair use doctrine to parody video content on digital platforms is limited in some instances. Parody video content can be considered fair use if it meets the indicators required in the provisions of Article 43 letter d or Article 44 paragraph (1) letter a UUHC. These indicators include being non-commercial, benefiting the creator or copyright holder of the original work, or he expresses no objection, or as long as the parody video content mentions and includes the full name of the creator or copyright holder of the original work, aims to criticize an issue, and does not harm the interests of the original work. From the creator or the copyright holder of the original work. Copyright protection can apply to parody video content on digital platforms made with the permission of the creator or copyright holder of the original work and are original, namely as derivative works. However, parody video content does not meet the requirements as a derivative work or is even proven to violate Copyright. In that case, it cannot be protected unless it is considered fair use.
NOTIFIKASI PENGAMBILAN SAHAM OLEH KPPU DALAM UPAYA MENJALANKAN FUNGSI PENGAWASAN BERDASARKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA Ridha Hitalalla Hayuningtyas Soetomo; Nyulistiowati Suryanti; Sudaryat
Paulus Law Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2023): Maret 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Univesitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51342/plj.v4i2.567

Abstract

Based on Law Number 5 the Year 1999, KPPU has the function of supervising business competition in Indonesia. The supervision is carried out, among others, on the acquisition of shares through the notification system. The purpose of this study is to find out, determine, and formulate the practice of implementing the notification system in share takeovers (acquisitions) concerning KPPU's supervisory efforts in the context of preventing monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. This research uses descriptive-analytical specifications by examining a matter that has a relationship with the existing problems. The approach method used is juridical-normative which is a research approach that focuses on literature study. The results of this study concluded that the supervisory function by KPPU on the acquisition of shares is carried out using two systems, namely Pre-Notification and Post-Notification, so there is legal dualism.
Customer List Protection in Avoiding Unfair Business Competition Based on Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets and Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition David Ronaldo; Sudaryat Sudaryat
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 4 No. 03 (2023): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v4i03.793

Abstract

Trade secrets are part of intellectual property, because the information contains economic value, however, the Trade Secret Act does not specifically state what can be classified as information with economic value, such as customer lists. Customer lists can be classified as information that can be protected by trade secret laws in Indonesia. Therefore, legal efforts are needed to protect this confidential information from acts of violation that can lead to unfair business competition
Tinjauan Yuridis Pelindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Merek Dikaitkan Dengan Implementasi Asas Contante Justitie Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Merek di Indonesia Elsa Benia; Rika Ratna Permata; Sudaryat
Sanskara Hukum dan HAM Vol. 1 No. 03 (2023): Sanskara Hukum dan HAM (SHH)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/shh.v1i03.91

Abstract

The process of resolving brand criminal cases in court still refers to the principles of good justice, including the principle of contante justitie (simple, fast, and low cost). In practice, brand criminal cases were found that did not perfectly implement the principle of contante justitie for example the case of counterfeiting the Cressida and Damor brands which was decided by way of Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 1778/Pid.B/2011/PN.JKT.Pst. The implementation of the contante justitie principle in the process of resolving trademark criminal cases is not optimal so that legal protection for brand owners who experience violations of trademark rights is difficult to obtain legal certainty. This condition occurs because there are obstacles both in terms of positive law which have not optimally regulated the settlement of criminal cases, especially brands and parties who are less cooperative in carrying out the case settlement process and trial agenda.
Copyright Protection of Podcast-Based Audiobooks Adapted by Third Party Without Permission on Digital Platform Based on Indonesian Positive Law Salma Alifya Khairunnisa; Rika Ratna Permata; Sudaryat Sudaryat
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4451

Abstract

Podcasts are basically digital audio content that is much loved by the public and audiobooks become one of the contents that have recently been incorporated into podcast content on a digital platform. The presence of this podcast-based audiobook raises a new problem in copyright related to its adaptation. This study aims to examine legal protection regarding podcast-based audiobooks from the perspective of copyright based on Indonesian Copyright Law and ITE Law. Furthermore, this study was also conducted to analyze the act of adapting books into podcast-based audiobooks on a digital platform carried out by content creators without the permission of the creators or copyright holders. This study uses normative juridical approach with descriptive specifications. The normative juridical approach is carried out by exploring legal theories and principles as well as applicable laws and regulations. This study describes legal problems that occur in society and is analyzed based on the applicable laws and regulations. The result of the study shows that copyright protection for podcast-based audiobook content has been regulated in several articles in the Copyright Law, including Article 40 paragraph (1) and Article 9 paragraph (1) regarding the right to adapt a creation. In addition, the act of adapting and uploading without permits made by content creators on a digital platform is considered to have violated the provisions of Article 9 of the Copyright Law and Article 25 of the ITE Law. 
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Asuransi yang Disebabkan Oleh Pihak ke Tiga Elisatris Gultom; Sudaryat Sudaryat; Risya Ainun
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (204.322 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i10.12513

Abstract

Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis empiris. Adapun permasalahan yang dibahas adalah bagaimana tanggung jawab hukum yang diberikan oleh penanggung dan apa upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga dalam perjanjian asuransi apabila terjadi resiko. Hasil dan kesimpulan yang diperoleh yakni apabila ada kejadian yang melibatkan pihak ketiga yang disebabkan oleh tertanggung dalam perjanjian asuransi kendaraan bermotor, maka ganti kerugian terhadap pihak ketiga diberikan oleh penanggung. Pihak penanggung akan mengganti kerugian yang diderita pihak ketiga atau pihak yang berkepentingan dengan berdasarkan isi dari polis asuransi. Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan pihak ketiga apabila terjadi resiko adalah dengan tiga cara, yaitu musyawarah langsung, mengundang pihak ketiga dari instansi perusahaan asuransi, dan jalur arbitrase.
Perlindungan Konsumen Pemilik Barang Atas Kerugian yang Dialami Akibat Terbakarnya Gudang Ekspedisi JNE Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Nailla Rahma; Sudaryat Sudaryat; Deviana Yuanitasari
Hakim Vol 1 No 4 (2023): November : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v1i4.1423

Abstract

The case of the burning of the JNE Cimanggis storage branch warehouse, Depok is the focus of this research. After the fire incident, JNE issued a statement of commitment to carry out a compensation process for affected customer goods, which also included damage to property in the surrounding community. This research identifies that consumers who experience losses have the option to file a lawsuit, either through litigation or non-litigation. The litigation process involves filing a lawsuit in civil court, while non-litigation includes an out-of-court approach with the aim of reaching a mutually beneficial agreement. Legal norms in consumer protection function as a legal framework for assessing violations of consumer rights. Although it is hoped to provide a solution, in practice, there are gaps and confusion regarding the implementation of the law, especially when the courts are involved in examining cases that challenge the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK), due to aspects of the Civil Procedure Law. Apart from completing non-litigation settlements, consumers can also file a Class Action lawsuit with the court. Class Action is a legal development in Indonesia that allows people to submit or defend their rights collectively through representatives. The results of this research reflect the complexity in guaranteeing the rights of consumers who own goods who suffered losses due to the fire in the shipping warehouse, by emphasizing resistance in the implementation of consumer protection laws and the importance of alternative solutions, including Class Action lawsuits.
Studi Kasus Putusan Pn Saumlaki Nomor 6/Pid.Sus/2020/Pn.Sml Mengenai Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Depot Air Minum Yang Tidak Berizin Sasya Rida Amanda; Sudaryat Sudaryat; Agus Suwandono
COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 06 (2023): COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/comserva.v3i06.1025

Abstract

Pendirian usaha depot air minum yang tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku dalam Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 492/Menkes/PER/V/2010 merupakan pelanggaran hak terhadap konsumen yang termuat dalam pasal 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Penelitian ini beberapa permasalahan yaitu bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim Pengadilan Negeri Saumlaki dalam Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Sml pada kasus depot air minum isi ulang yang tidak memiliki izin ditinjau dari perspektif Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Bagaimana bentuk pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha depot air minum isi ulang tanpa izin ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan oleh hakim dalam Pengadilan Negeri Saumlaki dalam kasus Depot Air Minum (DAM) yang tidak memiliki izin.  Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis. Tahap penulisan ini dilakukan dengan tahap penelitian studi kepustakaan dengan menggunakan data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat ketidaksesuaian pada pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim dalam putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Sml mengenai pengertian pelaku usaha. Pelaku usaha dalam kasus ini telah melanggar Pasal 4 Huruf a dan c Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen sedangkan bentuk pertanggungjawaban yang dibebani pada pelaku usaha dalam putusan merupakan pertanggungjawaban pidana dan apabila ditinjau dari UUPK bentuk pertanggungjawaban yang dapat diterapkan pada pelaku usaha depot air minum isi ulang adalah tanggung jawab secara keperdataan, pidana dan administrasi. 
Studi Komparasi Perbandingan Pengaturan Komersialisasi Paten Dalam Negeri Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia dan Hukum Positif Korea Selatan Alfriza Juntiana Buay Pemaca; Sudaryat Sudaryat; Ranti Fauza Mayana
COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 07 (2023): COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/comserva.v3i07.1050

Abstract

Seorang inventor menciptakan sebuah invensi melalui proses penuangan kreativitas yang tentunya panjang. Pendaftaran invensi yang dilakukan oleh inventor dilakukan untuk memeroleh pelindungan paten untuk melindungi invensi yang telah diciptakannya. Setelah terdaftar dalam paten, seorang inventor memiliki hak eksklusif yaitu hak ekonomi dan hak moral yang melekat dalam dirinya. Salah satu tahap yang sangat penting untuk memaksimalkan perolehan hak eksklusif khususnya hak ekonomi yang dimiliki oleh seorang inventor adalah tahap komersialisasi. Komersialisasi paten dalam negeri dapat memberikan dampak yang cukup besar baik untuk inventor itu sendiri maupun untuk negara. Keberhasilan tahap komersialisasi paten dalam negeri dapat membantu meningkatkan rasa kesadaran akan paten. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana perbandingan kepastian hukum pengaturan komersialisasi paten dalam negeri yang berlaku di Indonesia dan Korea Selatan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dimana analisis dalam penelitian akan dilakukan berdasarkan bahan pustaka berupa peraturan hukum di Indonesia dan Korea Selatan, jurnal ilmiah, dan buku. Korea Selatan secara spesifik sangat mengatur mengenai komersialisasi paten dalam negeri dibandingkan dengan di Indonesia, sehingga kepastian hukum yang ada di Korea Selatan tentunya lebih bersifat kuat. Pengaturan komersialisasi paten dalam negeri merupakan salah satu upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh pemerintah untuk memberikan dukungan bagi para inventor dan pemegang paten untuk dapat memeroleh hak ekonominya secara optimal.
Co-Authors AA Agustia Sinta Dewi Aam Suryamah Aam Suryamah Aditya Rachman, Aditya Agus Suwandono Agustus Sani Nugroho & Ema Rahmawati Heryaman, Agustus Sani Nugroho & Ahmad Aulia Ahmad M Ramli Alexander Samosir, Tony Richard Alfriza Juntiana Buay Pemaca Alya Sabila Rusyana Amelia Cahyadini Amri Jahi Ana Rusmardiana Anggawira Anggawira Anisa Putri Anita Afriana Ardiansyah, Erpan Aria Wirajuna Asep Hakim Zakiran Ayu, Miranda Risang Bainal Munthaha, Alif Basyra, Tiara Putri Bernadetta Lakshita Pradipta Utomo Christina Marintan, Gabriella Cindi Elvina Azarine Dadang Epi Sukarsa Damos Wiratua Tampubolon david ronaldo Deviana Yuanitasari Devina Monic Ritonga Eddy Damian Eddy Damian Elisatris Gultom Elsa Benia Eryani, Susi Ester Gurning, Teresia Gabriella Christina Marintan Hania Arvalia Hanif, Muhammad Fauzan Helitha Novianty Muchtar Helza Nova Lita Ikhwan Nul Yusuf Maulana Ikhwan Nul Yusuf Maulana Ina Heliany Indra Perwira Indra Perwira, Indra Josephine Josephine, Josephine Jozu Kenjiro Samudra Kartika Eka Pertiwi Laina Rafianti Lastuti Abubakar Maharani, Anindita Marla Satika Qurratu’aini Maulana, Ikhwan Nul Yusuf Mikhdar, Nabila Syifa Mirza Marali Mochamad Arya Gunawan Muhamad Amirulloh, Muhamad Nadya Hanifah Nailla Rahma Nasruddin Khalil Harahap Nicholas Napitupulu Nyulistiowati Suryanti Prabowo Tjitropranoto Rai Mantili Ranti Fauza Mayana Renny Supriyatni Bachro Ricoriady Simamora Ridha Hitalalla Hayuningtyas Soetomo Rika Ratna Permata Rika Ratna Permata Risya Ainun Rivelino, Reyhan RM Hasbi Pratama Arya Agung Ronaldo, David Sabila Rusyana, Alya Salma Alifya Khairunnisa Salsabil Qodrunnada Salsabila, Raddine Samosir, Tony Richard Alexander Sasya Rida Amanda Shafira Shava Rahmanissa Simamora, Ricoriady Sinta Dewi Sudjana Sudjana Tasya safiranita Teresia Ester Gurning Tony Richard Alexander Samosir U. Sudjana, Sudjana Ulkhaq, M Rifqy Dhiya Veronica Dwi Widianti