Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Comparative Analysis of Optimizer Effectiveness in GRU and CNN-GRU Models for Airport Traffic Prediction Willy Riyadi; Jasmir Jasmir
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jiteki.v10i3.29659

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to airport traffic management, necessitating accurate predictive models. This research evaluates the effectiveness of various optimizers in enhancing airport traffic prediction using Deep Learning models, specifically Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) and Convolutional Neural Network-Gated Recurrent Units (CNN-GRU). We compare the performance of optimizers including RMSprop, Adam, Nadam, AdamW, Adamax, and Lion, and analyze the impact of their parameter tuning on model accuracy. Time series data from airports in the United States, Canada, Chile, and Australia were used, with preprocessing steps like filtering, cleaning, and applying a MinMax Scaler. The data was split into 80% for training and 20% for testing. Our findings reveal that the Adam optimizer paired with the GRU model achieved the lowest Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) in the USA. The study underscores the importance of selecting and tuning optimizers, with ReduceLROnPlateau used to adjust the learning rate dynamically, preventing overfitting and improving model convergence. However, limitations include dataset imbalance and region-specific results, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Future research should address these limitations by developing balanced datasets and exploring optimizer performance across a broader range of regions and conditions. This study lays the groundwork for further investigating sustainable and accurate airport traffic prediction models.
Perbandingan Algoritma Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) dengan Random Forest Untuk Klasifikasi Penyakit Ginjal Kronis (PGK) Caterina Paras Dewi; Jasmir Jasmir; Willy Riyadi; Alya Rafina
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Teknik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Desember: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Teknik
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Teknik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/prosemnasproit.v2i2.72

Abstract

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a heterogeneous disorder that gradually affects the structure and function of the kidneys, is difficult to recover, and causes the body to be unable to maintain metabolism and fail to maintain fluid and electrolyte balance, leading to increased urea levels. Chronic kidney disease data was obtained from Kaggle, in this study a comparison was made between two classification algorithms, namely Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Random Forest because it is not yet known what algorithm is best in classifying chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both algorithms are evaluated based on performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and confusion matrix. The results of the evaluation showed that in a dataset of 400 samples, the performance  of the Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) algorithm obtained an accuracy of 94%, while Random Forest had an accuracy of 93%. Then in the small dataset (158 data), Random Forest got a better accuracy score with 87% compared to the Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) of 78%. Based on the results of the evaluation, Random Forest has a more stable performance on small datasets, while Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) provides higher performance on larger datasets in the context of chronic kidney disease classification.