Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.354
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Kawistara : Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Sosio e-kons JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika) PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Deiksis JPPM (Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) Faktor Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Jurnal Eduscience (JES) Dirasah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Jurnal PkM (Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) Journal of Education Research Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Ilmu Pendidikan Hortatori : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Darma Cendekia Jurnal Kawistara Himpunan: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika
Megawanti, Priarti
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Eduscience (JES)

 1 
ANALYSIS OF CTT AND IRT ON NON-TEST MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: MATHEMATICAL MINDSET SCALE Megawanti, Priarti; Nurimani, Nurimani; Kurniasih, Meyta Dwi
JURNAL EDUSCIENCE Vol 12, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Eduscience (JES), (Authors from Malaysia and Indonesia)
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jes.v12i3.6542

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to determine empirically the appropriate number of items that meet all item selection criteria, from classical test theory to item response theory.Methodology – This study used the Mathematical Mindset Scale (MMS) as an instrument for a non-test. It was conducted on 259 Mathematics Education students in Indonesia to determine the appropriate number of items that meet all item selection criteria, from classical test theory to item response theory. This quantitative research has been analyzed, including sample adequacy tests, construct validity and reliability, the goodness of fit, model suitability to polytomous data, assumption tests (unidimensional, invariance, local independence), characteristic curve graphs, information function graphs, and standard error graphs.Findings – After several trials, 11 items passed the classical tests and item response theory criteria. It is also known from this study that non-test instruments can be less than 20 as long as they meet the analysis criteria at each stage.Contribution – This research contributes to helping increase insight and knowledge for researchers in the fields of education and psychology, especially those interested in non-test measurement tools and IRT and classical analysis.
BREAK THE MYTH, GROW THE MATH MINDSET: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW Megawanti, Priarti; Retnawati, Heri; Basrowi, Ray Wagiu; Rahmadani, Putri
JURNAL EDUSCIENCE Vol 12, No 6 (2025): Jurnal Eduscience (JES), (Authors from Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia)
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jes.v12i6.7351

Abstract

Purpose – This article aims to examine the factors that influence and inhibit a math mindset and how to develop it. Some people still believe in several myths that mathematical intelligence is innate and only suitable for men. This myth not only fosters math anxiety but also hinders the growth of students' mindsets and the achievement of students’ academic goals.Methodology – The method employed is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. After carrying out a search process using Publish or Perish for articles indexed by Scopus, 72 articles were obtained as the final result of several selection stages. These articles were reviewed one by one, allowing us to answer the Research Question (RQ) of this study.Findings – The results indicate that two factors contribute to a math mindset, namely internal and external. Meanwhile, factors inhibiting a math mindset include math anxiety, family, and educators, as well as several other factors. Family and educators play important roles in debunking myths and fostering a growth mindset in math.Contribution – The results of this study contribute to the efforts of the government, teachers, and parents in promoting the development of the mathematical mindset in children and students. By understanding that mathematical intelligence can be mastered by everyone without exception, the government, teachers, and parents can jointly implement a curriculum that emphasizes the importance of the learning process rather than the results.
Co-Authors Aji Nurdiansyah Aldri Frinaldi Alvionita, Cyntia Andayanti, Westri Ari Rivaldi Arif Rahman Hakim Aulia, Zahra Shafa Awaluddin Tjalla Basrowi, Ray Wagiu Cahyani, Cindy Amalia Deni Nasir Ahmad Erna Megawati Firmansyah, Aufadini Bunga Harneni, Lufi Heri Retnawati Huri Suhendri Jan Setiawan Maman Paturahman Meyta Dwi Kurniasih, Meyta Dwi Mitrayudasi, Sangkary Asihta Muhamad Farhan Nur Aini Nurimani, Nurimani Nurkhafifah, siti Nurul Aulia, Shafa Pailokol, Nilam Sari Pradita, Eliza Prana Hevriansyah Putri Rahmadani, Putri Putri, Ika Apriliana Putri, Syifa Kirani Rina Wiji Kartika Sangaji Niken Hapsari Santi Nugraha Santi Nugraha SARI, NONI DWI Septiani, Eka siti Nurkhafifah tri wahyuni Vichaully, Yessi Yeni Yuniarti, Yeni Yetti Supriyati, Yetti Yulianingsih, Yulianingsih