Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology (IHERT) Mutiara: Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Lasma Sinambela
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
A Comparative Study of Corporate Criminal Liability Systems in Indonesia and the United States Ismaidar Ismaidar; Azhar AR; Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Rudi Salam Tarigan; Ansori Maulana; Restika Ndruru; Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Lasma Sinambela; Haris Putra Utama Limbong; Elisabeth Saragih; Robby Yusuf S Sembiring; Mus Mulyadi; Zahrana Syavica; Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan; Muhammad Faiz Hadi; Ibrahim Ibrahim; Erwin Efendi Rangkuti; T. Ikhsan Ansyari Husny; Netty br Siahaan; Andi Gultom; Yoldy Israq; Putriani Nduru; Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Christine Natalia Pangaribuan
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i3.2268

Abstract

Corporate criminal liability has become a pivotal issue in modern criminal law, particularly in response to the increasing prevalence of crimes committed by legal entities. This article provides a comparative analysis of the corporate criminal liability systems in Indonesia and the United States, focusing on the legal foundations, models of liability, and enforcement practices. The United States adopts the principle of vicarious liability, allowing corporations to be held accountable for the acts of their employees performed within the scope of employment. In contrast, Indonesia employs a more fragmented approach through sectoral laws, without a unified criminal liability doctrine for corporations. The study reveals that while Indonesia has begun to recognize corporate liability, it still faces significant challenges in legal harmonization and effective enforcement. This comparison aims to contribute to the development of a more comprehensive and adaptive corporate criminal liability system in Indonesia, in line with international best practices.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF NARCOTICS USE ON THE HEALTH OF PRISONERS IN WOMEN'S PRISONS TANJUNG GUSTA BASED ON REGULATIONS LEGISLATION Lasma Sinambela; Ismaidar; Suci Ramadani
International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): 9th IHERT (2025): IHERT (2025) FIRST ISSUE: International Conference on Health
Publisher : Universitas Efarina

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ihert.v7i1.503

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal impact of drug use on the health of inmates at the Tanjung Kusta Women's Detention Center and to examine the handling efforts based on applicable laws and regulations. Drug abuse in detention centers not only violates the law but also has serious impacts on the physical, mental, and social health of inmates, as well as hindering the goals of social development and reintegration. The research method used is empirical legal with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a sociological approach. Primary data were obtained through interviews with prison officers, medical personnel, and inmates, while secondary data were obtained from laws and regulations, legal literature, and official reports. The research results show that legal regulations regarding the prohibition of narcotics use in detention centers are regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections (as amended by Law Number 22 of 2022), and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 6 of 2013 concerning Correctional Institutions/Detention Centers. The resulting impacts include organ damage, the risk of infectious diseases, mental disorders, decreased quality of guidance, and increased recidivism. Handling efforts are carried out through repressive, preventive, and rehabilitative measures, but their implementation is still hampered by limited supervision, facilities, and coordination between institutions. This study concludes that normatively, the existing legal framework is adequate, but its implementation in the field is not optimal. Strengthening the monitoring system, improving rehabilitation facilities, and synergy between relevant agencies are needed to ensure the protection of the health rights of drug-using inmates at the Tanjung Kusta Women's Detention Center.
Urgensi Reformasi Peradilan Militer dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Terorisme oleh Aparat: Perspektif Integrasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Lasma Sinambela; Fairuz Ula, Rifqi; Muhamad ilham; Maisyan Rizaldi Mendrofa, Kevin
Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Ilmiah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59086/jkip.v4i2.911

Abstract

Keterlibatan oknum aparat militer dalam tindak pidana terorisme menimbulkan permasalahan serius dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Dualisme yurisdiksi antara peradilan umum dan peradilan militer menyebabkan ketidaktertiban hukum, khususnya dalam menangani kejahatan luar biasa yang memerlukan transparansi dan akuntabilitas tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewenangan peradilan militer dalam menangani tindak pidana terorisme oleh prajurit TNI, serta mengevaluasi urgensi reformasi sistem hukum melalui pendekatan integratif sistem peradilan pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis kualitatif. Data diperoleh melalui studi pustaka terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, literatur hukum, dan dokumen relevan lainnya. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah deskriptif-analitis untuk mengkaji kesenjangan normatif serta implikasinya terhadap prinsip equality before the law. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa yurisdiksi peradilan militer atas tindak pidana terorisme tidak sesuai dengan prinsip negara hukum dan hak asasi manusia. Peradilan militer yang tertutup dan minim akuntabilitas berpotensi menciptakan impunitas. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan model reformasi terbatas yang membatasi yurisdiksi militer hanya pada pelanggaran kedinasan, serta mendorong integrasi sistem peradilan pidana nasional untuk menjamin keadilan substantif. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi penting dalam wacana reformasi hukum pidana dan sistem peradilan di Indonesia, khususnya dalam memperkuat supremasi hukum dalam penanganan kejahatan luar biasa oleh aparat negara. The involvement of military personnel in acts of terrorism has caused serious problems in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The dualism that occurs between general justice and military justice causes legal disorder, especially in handling extraordinary crimes that require high transparency and accountability. This study aims to analyze the authority of military prosecution in handling acts of terrorism by TNI soldiers, and to trigger the urgency of legal system reform through an integrative approach to the criminal system. This study uses a normative legal approach with qualitative analysis. Data were obtained through a literature review of laws and regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, legal literature, and other relevant documents. The analysis technique used is descriptive-analytical to examine the normative picture and convince it of the principle of equality before the law. The results of the study show that military prosecution for acts of terrorism is not in accordance with the principles of the rule of law and human rights. Closed military justice with minimal accountability has the potential to create impunity. This study provides a limited reform model that limits military restrictions to official violations, and encourages a national criminal integration system to ensure substantive justice. This finding provides an important contribution to the discourse on criminal law reform and the justice system in Indonesia, particularly in strengthening the supremacy of law in handling extraordinary crimes committed by state officials.
Co-Authors Andi Gultom Ansori Maulana Azhar AR Christine Natalia Pangaribuan Elisabeth Saragih Erwin Efendi Rangkuti Fairuz Ula, Rifqi Haris Putra Utama Limbong Ibrahim Ibrahim Ismaidar I, Ismaidar Maisyan Rizaldi Mendrofa, Kevin Muhamad ilham Muhammad Faiz Hadi Mus Mulyadi Netty br Siahaan Putriani Nduru Ramadani, Suci Restika Ndruru Robby Yusuf S Sembiring Rudi Salam Tarigan Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua T. Ikhsan Ansyari Husny Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih Yoldy Israq Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan Zahrana Syavica Zeno Eronu Zalukhu