Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.225
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Syariah Hukum Islam Cepalo NOMOI Law Review Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Administrative and Environmental Law Review Journal of Sharia (JOSH) Journal Publicuho TRIMAS: Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Harmoni Sosial : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Solidaritas Masyarakat Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik TENANG : Teknologi, Edukasi, dan Pengabdian Multidisiplin Nusantara Gemilang Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Philosophy Legal Advice Jurnal Hukum
Adhe Ismail Ananda
Universitas Nusa Cendana Kupang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Interreligious Environmental Ethics: A Comparative Philosophical Analysis of Religious Teachings and Ecological Responsibility Mahfud Heru Fatoni; Muhamad Hanif Fuadi; Adhe Ismail Ananda; Mamdukh Budiman
Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Philosophy Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): July: Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Philos
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greenphilosophy.v1i3.256

Abstract

This study explores the role of interreligious environmental ethics in shaping global cooperation to address the ongoing ecological crisis. By analyzing and comparing the teachings of Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism, the study identifies key environmental ethics principles that are shared across these religious traditions, such as non-violence, the sacredness of nature, and the principle of moderation in resource use. Despite theological and doctrinal differences, these shared values provide a strong philosophical and moral foundation for fostering cooperation among religious communities in addressing global environmental challenges. The study also examines the philosophical divergences within religious teachings, such as the varying interpretations of human dominion over nature and the role of humans as stewards or caretakers of the Earth. These theological differences present challenges in creating a unified environmental ethical framework, yet they also highlight the richness and diversity of religious perspectives on ecological responsibility. The practical applications of these teachings are discussed, focusing on how religious values have been integrated into real-world environmental movements, such as faith-based environmentalism and interfaith collaborations. The findings underscore the potential for interfaith dialogue to catalyze global environmental action and the creation of a unified global ethical system. Such a system, grounded in shared religious values, could provide a framework for sustainable practices and ecological justice, offering a moral guide for individuals, communities, and nations in their efforts to mitigate environmental degradation and promote sustainability.
Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Bawaslu sebagai Lembaga Pengawas dan Lembaga Pemutus Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Juhardin, Juhardin; Ismail Ananda, Adhe
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Februari, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the authority of the Bawaslu as an election supervisory institution and election process dispute resolution. This research is a normative legal research by examining all laws and regulations related to the legal issues being studied. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, namely legal materials that are authoritative in nature, which consist of statutory regulations, official records, or treatises in making statutory regulations as well as secondary legal materials (materials that provide explanations regarding primary legal materials, including , documents, books, magazines, legal journals and research reports related to this research). The conclusion of this research has been obtained that First, Bawaslu as an election supervisory institution performs the function of preventing violations. Second, the Authority to Resolve Election Process Disputes of the Bawaslu is an attributive authority based on Law no. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections in Article 94 paragraph (3) point d and Bawaslu Members have met the criteria as judges at the Bawaslu Adjudication Session because they have gone through such a strict selection process in accordance with the stages they have carried out and the Selection Team has conducted an assessment based on the criteria contained in article 117 of the Election Law. Third, Article 469 which states that the Bawaslu decision is final and binding is a sentence that gives position or power to the Bawaslu adjudication decision which is final. However, this power is immediately removed in the next phrase which gives exceptions to certain circumstances.
TATA KELOLA DAN EFISIENSI LAYANAN PELABUHAN LAUT: IMPLIKASI HUKUM PEMBAGIAN KEWENANGAN BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA Syamsul Rijal; Adhe Ismail Ananda
Journal Publicuho Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): August - October - Journal Publicuho
Publisher : Halu Oleo University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35817/publicuho.v8i3.939

Abstract

Seaports play a strategic role as logistics hubs and drivers of national economic growth. However, port governance in Indonesia continues to face structural challenges, particularly regarding the distribution of authority between Port Authorities (OP) and Port Business Entities (BUP). Regulatory reform through Law No. 6 of 2023 on Job Creation amended key provisions of Law No. 17 of 2008 on Shipping by explicitly separating the functions of regulator and operator. This study aims to analyse the legal implications of such authority distribution on the efficiency of seaport services in Indonesia. A normative-juridical approach is employed by examining Article 110A and related provisions in the Job Creation Law. The findings indicate that while the legal reform intends to enhance efficiency and attract investment, its implementation is hindered by regulatory disharmony, overlapping authority, and weak institutional coordination. Therefore, regulatory harmonisation and institutional governance strengthening are essential to achieving sustainable port service effectiveness.
Deconstruction of the Right to Control the State: An Analysis of Article 33 Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution and Its Implications for the Politics of Indonesian Agrarian Law Ma’ruf, Umar; Ismail Ananda, Adhe; WT. Lamataro, Cyrilius; A. Lawung, Mario
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.v8i1.52036

Abstract

The concept of the Right to Control the State (HMN) contained in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution emphasizes the role of the state in controlling the earth, water, and natural resources for the greatest prosperity of the people. However, the interpretation of HMN in constitutional practice often raises constitutional problems, especially when the state acts more as an absolute owner than as a manager who guarantees the distribution of justice. This article aims to critically analyze the concept of HMN through a constitutional deconstruction approach to uncover the shift in meaning between normative texts and the political practice of agrarian law. Using a normative-juridical research method, this paper explores the contradiction between constitutional idealism and the political reality of agrarian law after the 1960 UUPA, especially in land policy, natural resource management, and agrarian reform programs. The results of the analysis show that Indonesia's agrarian law politics tend to be dominated by state interests and capital, thus obscuring the constitutional mandate related to the prosperity of the people. Therefore, a conceptual reconstruction of HMN is needed so that it is not only understood as the legitimacy of state control, but also as a constitutional mechanism to ensure access, equity, and sustainability of agrarian justice.
Co-Authors A. Lawung, Mario AR, Sulkifli Baskhoro, Arie Ekawie Basrawi Dedihasriadi, La Ode Dewi Kania Sugiharti Fatmawati Fatmawati Hasbullah, Mardiana Hasgar A.S, A. Muhammad Hasgar A.S., A. Muhammad Heril Mujahidin Juhardin Juhardin Juhardin, Juhardin La Ode Aris Laxmi M.S. Pa, Putri Mahfud Heru Fatoni Mamdukh Budiman Ma’ruf, Umar Mirnawati Mirnawati Muh Shabnuary Askari Muh. Kisman Adrianto Muh. Risal Muhamad Hanif Fuadi Muhammad Yusuf Natsir Muspira Nurfadhillah Syam Siti Hermina Sri Kusriyah Subandrio Sulkifli. Ar Syamsul Rijal WT. Lamataro, Cyrilius Yeni Haerani Yusril Gupran Madolangan