Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.713
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Al-'Adl Jurnal Syariah Hukum Islam Harmoni Cepalo Jurnal Abdi Insani NOMOI Law Review Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Administrative and Environmental Law Review Journal of Sharia (JOSH) Journal Publicuho TRIMAS: Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Harmoni Sosial : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Solidaritas Masyarakat Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy TENANG : Teknologi, Edukasi, dan Pengabdian Multidisiplin Nusantara Gemilang Domus Legalis Cogitatio Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Philosophy Legal Advice Jurnal Hukum Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics (GJLAE) Journal of State Democracy Jurnal Hukum Siber dan Regulasi Teknologi
Adhe Ismail Ananda
Universitas Nusa Cendana Kupang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 35 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Deconstruction of the Right to Control the State: An Analysis of Article 33 Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution and Its Implications for the Politics of Indonesian Agrarian Law Umar Ma’ruf; Adhe Ismail Ananda; Cyrilius WT. Lamataro; Mario A. Lawung
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.v8i1.52036

Abstract

The concept of the Right to Control the State (HMN) contained in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution emphasizes the role of the state in controlling the earth, water, and natural resources for the greatest prosperity of the people. However, the interpretation of HMN in constitutional practice often raises constitutional problems, especially when the state acts more as an absolute owner than as a manager who guarantees the distribution of justice. This article aims to critically analyze the concept of HMN through a constitutional deconstruction approach to uncover the shift in meaning between normative texts and the political practice of agrarian law. Using a normative-juridical research method, this paper explores the contradiction between constitutional idealism and the political reality of agrarian law after the 1960 UUPA, especially in land policy, natural resource management, and agrarian reform programs. The results of the analysis show that Indonesia's agrarian law politics tend to be dominated by state interests and capital, thus obscuring the constitutional mandate related to the prosperity of the people. Therefore, a conceptual reconstruction of HMN is needed so that it is not only understood as the legitimacy of state control, but also as a constitutional mechanism to ensure access, equity, and sustainability of agrarian justice.
Power Relations in Local Democracy: An Analysis of the Position of BPD and Village Heads in the Indonesian Constitutional System: Relasi Kekuasaan dalam Demokrasi Lokal: Analisis Kedudukan BPD dan Kepala Desa dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Adhe Ismail Ananda; Fadli Maulana; Muh. Taqwin Tahir; Rahmat Angga Dwi Putra
Journal of State Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Journal of State Democracy 
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/jsd.v1i1.54

Abstract

Village democracy is the embodiment of people's sovereignty guaranteed in Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. BPD is presented as a community representation institution that functions deliberative and supervises the Village Head as an executive. However, in practice, the role of BPD is often ineffective because the election process is often intervened by the Village Head, even the membership is dominated by people close to the village executive. As a result, BPD more often acts as a policy "stamp" rather than carrying out a supervisory function. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the relationship between BPD and Village Head is still uneven, with the dominance of village executives and weak BPD independence. This condition lowers the quality of local democracy and weakens the principle of checks and balances. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the BPD election mechanism, increase institutional capacity, and participatory supervision for a more accountable village democracy.
Urgensi Pengaturan Jabatan Wakil Kepala Daerah Dalam UUD 1945 Untuk Memperkuat Sistem Pemerintahan Daerah Adhe Ismail Ananda; A. Muhammad Hasgar A.S.; Mardiana Hasbullah; Putri M.S. Pa
Journal Kompilasi Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jkh.v10i2.267

Abstract

Ketiadaan pengaturan eksplisit mengenai jabatan wakil kepala daerah dalam UUD 1945 menimbulkan persoalan legitimasi konstitusional yang berdampak pada ketidakseimbangan relasi kekuasaan, rivalitas politik, serta inefektivitas penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Karena hanya diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014, jabatan ini bersifat delegatif sehingga kedudukannya lemah dan rentan mengalami perubahan sesuai dinamika politik. Melalui metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan historis, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa ketiadaan dasar konstitusional telah menciptakan kekosongan struktural dalam desain kelembagaan daerah. Oleh sebab itu, pengaturan konstitusional menjadi sangat mendesak untuk memperjelas kedudukan, fungsi, dan kewenangan wakil kepala daerah, serta mengharmoniskan kembali hubungan kelembagaan antara kepala daerah dan wakilnya. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar UUD 1945 secara tegas mengatur keberadaan jabatan tersebut sekaligus membangun atribusi kewenangan yang tidak bergantung pada pendelegasian kepala daerah serta memperkuat mekanisme pengisian jabatan guna menjamin kesinambungan pemerintahan. Melalui penguatan konstitusional tersebut, diharapkan tercipta sistem pemerintahan daerah yang lebih stabil, akuntabel, dan efektif.
State Digital Sovereignty in the Regulation of Global Social Media Platforms Adhe Ismail Ananda; Ayun Hapsari
Jurnal Hukum Siber dan Regulasi Teknologi Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Sah Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The globalization of digital space and the dominance of global social media platforms have created new challenges for states in maintaining sovereignty in cyberspace. Communication activities, information distribution, and the management of citizens’ data now largely take place on cross-border platforms controlled by global corporations. This situation raises questions regarding the limits of state authority in regulating social media platforms and its implications for freedom of expression, data protection, and national interests. This study employs a normative juridical approach by examining Indonesian legislation, principles of international law, and the doctrine of digital sovereignty. The findings show that state digital sovereignty represents an adaptation of the classical concept of sovereignty, emphasizing the state’s authority to regulate digital activities that affect its citizens and the public interest. The regulation of global social media platforms has a dual implication: it strengthens the protection of national interests while at the same time potentially restricting freedom of expression if not implemented proportionally. In addition, the strengthening of digital sovereignty poses the risk of internet fragmentation if it is not accompanied by a harmonious approach aligned with the principles of global openness. Therefore, a model of digital sovereignty regulation is required that balances state authority, the protection of human rights, and the need for international cooperation in order to build a fair and sustainable digital governance framework.
Legalitas Pemungutan Parkir Tepi Jalan Umum di Kota Kupang: Telaah Konstitusional terhadap Praktik Pemerintahan Daerah Jenny Ermalinda; Chatryen M Dju Bire; Adhe Ismail Ananda; Daud Yaferson Dollu; Cyrilius Wilton Taran Lamataro
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2385

Abstract

This study examines the legality of on-street parking levy practices in Kupang City from a constitutional law perspective, with a primary focus on the application of the legality principle. The background of this research stems from a significant discrepancy between the legal norms established in statutory regulations and the empirical administrative practices occurring in the field. Identified issues include the collection of levies without official tickets, the lack of clarity regarding the identity and legal status of collection officers, and the inconsistent and non-transparent application of parking tariffs. This research employs a normative-empirical legal method by applying statutory, conceptual, and empirical approaches through limited field observations. The findings indicate that although the Kupang City Government formally possesses the attribution of authority to collect parking levies, the implementation frequently deviates from the established legal procedures. Such deviant practices potentially constitute ultra vires actions and violate the principle of due process of law in government administration. This study concludes that the substantive legality of parking levies in Kupang City has not been fully realized, thereby undermining legal certainty and public trust in the legitimacy of local governance. The implications of this research emphasize the imperative for comprehensive reform of the supervision system and stricter enforcement of administrative procedures to ensure the rule of law at the local level.
A CONSTITUTIONAL-ETHICAL STUDY OF THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 62/PUU-XXII/2024 ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY REVIEW OF THE PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD Cyrilius W.T. Lamataro; Vergilius Septyanto Lamabelawa; Jenny Ermalinda; Chatryen Megawati Dju Bire; Adhe Ismail Ananda
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21736827

Abstract

The Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024 was not the first attempt by petitioners to challenge the constitutionality of the presidential threshold. From 2004 to 2023, the Court had examined at least 46 cases concerning the presidential threshold, most of which were declared inadmissible, rejected, partially granted, or withdrawn by the petitioners. This raises an important question: what considerations led the Court to change its constitutional stance on the presidential threshold? This study aims to examine the ratio decidendi of Constitutional Court Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024 and to analyze its ethical-constitutional dimensions. This research employs normative legal research methods using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The findings show, first, that the ratio decidendi of the decision rests on the protection of the constitutional rights of political parties participating in elections, the guarantee of citizens’ political rights to vote and to be elected, and the purification of presidentialism through the strengthening of the checks and balances system in Indonesia. Second, the Court reconstructed its constitutional reasoning on the presidential threshold by taking into account the moral principles embedded in the Constitution. Its considerations regarding the political rights of citizens and political parties, as well as the logical fallacies underlying the presidential threshold, indicate that eliminating the threshold may strengthen rather than weaken Indonesia’s presidential system.
BEYOND PUNISHMENT: STRATEGI INKLUSIF DAN PEMBERDAYAAN SOSIAL DALAM PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI Rahmat Angga Dwi Putra; Adhe Ismail Ananda; Tomi Agi Fratama
JOSH: Journal of Sharia Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Vol. 05 No. 02 Juni 2026
Publisher : Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/josh.v5i02.2975

Abstract

Corruption eradication in Indonesia remains strongly shaped by a repressive approach centered on investigation, prosecution, imprisonment, fines, and asset recovery. Although this approach is essential for criminal accountability, recent empirical indicators show that intensive law enforcement has not fully produced a sustainable integrity system. KPK enforcement statistics, Indonesia’s 2024 Corruption Perception Index score of 37/100, and ICW’s 2024 corruption monitoring report indicate that corruption persists as a structural, institutional, and cultural problem. This article examines the limitations of a punishment-oriented approach and proposes an integrity ecosystem approach based on social empowerment, public participation, and cross-sector collaboration. This research uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The comparative scope is limited to Georgia and Finland. Georgia is analyzed through bureaucratic reform, public service transparency, digital monitoring, and civil society participation, while Finland is examined through integrity education, public trust, institutional accountability, and legal culture. The article argues that corruption eradication should not weaken criminal punishment, but should place punishment within a broader policy architecture. Social reintegration and restorative sanctions are positioned as complementary mechanisms, not substitutes for criminal liability. They include asset recovery, restitution of state losses, restrictions on public office, mandatory integrity education, anti-corruption social work, and post-sentencing monitoring. The article concludes that sustainable anti-corruption policy requires a shift from mere punishment to an integrity ecosystem involving the state, civil society, academia, media, and the private sector
Maqāṣid as Evaluative Rationality for the Incorporation of International Norms into the Constitutional Structure Arie E Baskoro; Adhe Ismail Ananda; Lidya Potts; La Ode Dedihasriadi
Al-'Adl Vol. 19 No. 02 (2026): Al-'Adl
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal globalisation has led to increasingly complex relations between international law and national constitutional systems, particularly in the context of countries with plural legal systems and religious value foundations. This study highlights the urgency of developing a conceptual model capable of integrating international legal norms into the national legal structure without negating constitutional principles and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah values. The main objective of this study is to examine maqāṣid as an evaluative paradigm in assessing the legitimacy of international norms within a constitutional framework. Using a normative-doctrinal method enriched by a comparative approach to legal systems and maqāṣid-based interpretation, this study formulates a triadic model of harmony between international legality, constitutional principles, and maqāṣid values. The findings show that the maqāṣid approach is not only relevant as Islamic normative ethics, but can also function as a conceptual instrument in constitutional testing of global norms. The proposed triadic harmonisation model consists of three layers of evaluation: legality, constitutional legitimacy, and public interest. Through a maqāṣid value structure that encompasses the protection of religion, life, intellect, property, and lineage, international norms can be filtered rationally and contextually. Theoretically, this research broadens the horizons of Islamic constitutionalism in responding to global legal dynamics. Practically, this model can be used by policymakers and judicial institutions in assessing the compatibility of global norms with national legal identities rooted in substantive justice.
PREVENTING MAJORITARIAN VETO IN HOUSE OF WORSHIP LICENSING: A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED DUE PROCESS MODEL Adhe Ismail Ananda; La Ode Dedihasriadi; Pery Rehendra Sucipta; Yeni Haerani; Arie Ekawie Baskhoro
Harmoni Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Research and Development Center for Guidance for Religious Societies and Religious Services, the Research and Development and Education and Training Agency of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia (MORA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32488/harmoni.v25i1.1075

Abstract

This article examines majoritarian veto in house-of-worship licensing in Indonesia, defined as a condition in which majority pressure or preferences de facto replace administrative legal standards in permit decisions. The problem arises from the gap between constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and worship, technical licensing rules under the 2006 Joint Ministerial Regulation, and local discretion, which is not always subject to measurable procedural safeguards. This study aims to formulate a human rights-based due process model that prevents licensing mechanisms from becoming instruments of exclusion against religious minorities. It employs normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, drawing on constitutional provisions, PBM 2006, academic literature, and contextual case materials, including a 2026 licensing dispute in Kupang City. Legal materials and academic literature were collected through document study and analyzed through normative harmonization, human rights testing, and procedural due process assessment. The findings identify three main vulnerabilities: community support requirements and religious harmony forum recommendations that may function as social vetoes; fragmented local procedures that may produce delay-as-denial; and public order arguments used without objective indicators. The article contributes to religious freedom and diversity governance scholarship by conceptualizing majoritarian veto as a form of procedural discrimination and proposing national minimum procedural standards, public consultation as impact mapping, documented step-by-step procedures, mandatory reason-giving, and time-bound administrative remedies. Local discretion is legitimate only when used for evidence-based technical assessment, while religious harmony must be built through procedural justice, accountability, and equal protection of constitutional rights. Abstrak Artikel ini mengkaji veto mayoritas dalam perizinan rumah ibadah di Indonesia, yang didefinisikan sebagai kondisi ketika tekanan atau preferensi mayoritas secara de facto menggantikan standar hukum administratif dalam pengambilan keputusan perizinan. Masalah ini muncul dari kesenjangan antara jaminan konstitusional atas kebebasan beragama dan beribadah, aturan perizinan teknis berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Bersama 2006, dan diskresi lokal, yang tidak selalu tunduk pada perlindungan prosedural yang terukur. Studi ini bertujuan untuk merumuskan model proses hukum berbasis hak asasi manusia yang mencegah agar mekanisme perizinan tidak menjadi instrumen eksklusi terhadap minoritas agama. Studi ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan hukum, konseptual, dan kasus, yang mengacu pada ketentuan konstitusional, PBM 2006, literatur akademis, dan materi kasus kontekstual, termasuk sengketa perizinan tahun 2026 di Kota Kupang. Materi hukum dan literatur akademis dikumpulkan melalui studi dokumen dan dianalisis melalui harmonisasi normatif, pengujian hak asasi manusia, serta penilaian terhadap proses hukum secara prosedural. Temuan mengidentifikasi tiga kerentanan utama: persyaratan dukungan masyarakat dan rekomendasi forum harmoni beragama yang dapat berfungsi sebagai veto sosial; Prosedur lokal yang terfragmentasi dapat menghasilkan penundaan sebagai penolakan; dan argumen ketertiban umum yang digunakan tanpa indikator objektif. Artikel ini berkontribusi pada kajian kebebasan beragama dan tata kelola keragaman dengan mengonseptualisasikan veto mayoritas sebagai bentuk diskriminasi prosedural serta mengusulkan standar prosedural minimum nasional, konsultasi publik untuk memetakan dampaknya, prosedur langkah demi langkah yang terdokumentasi, pemberian alasan yang wajib, dan upaya hukum administratif yang terikat waktu. Diskresi lokal hanya sah bila digunakan untuk penilaian teknis berbasis bukti, sementara harmoni beragama harus dibangun melalui keadilan prosedural, akuntabilitas, dan perlindungan yang sama terhadap hak-hak konstitusional.
Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Bawaslu sebagai Lembaga Pengawas dan Lembaga Pemutus Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Juhardin, Juhardin; Ismail Ananda, Adhe
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Februari, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the authority of the Bawaslu as an election supervisory institution and election process dispute resolution. This research is a normative legal research by examining all laws and regulations related to the legal issues being studied. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, namely legal materials that are authoritative in nature, which consist of statutory regulations, official records, or treatises in making statutory regulations as well as secondary legal materials (materials that provide explanations regarding primary legal materials, including , documents, books, magazines, legal journals and research reports related to this research). The conclusion of this research has been obtained that First, Bawaslu as an election supervisory institution performs the function of preventing violations. Second, the Authority to Resolve Election Process Disputes of the Bawaslu is an attributive authority based on Law no. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections in Article 94 paragraph (3) point d and Bawaslu Members have met the criteria as judges at the Bawaslu Adjudication Session because they have gone through such a strict selection process in accordance with the stages they have carried out and the Selection Team has conducted an assessment based on the criteria contained in article 117 of the Election Law. Third, Article 469 which states that the Bawaslu decision is final and binding is a sentence that gives position or power to the Bawaslu adjudication decision which is final. However, this power is immediately removed in the next phrase which gives exceptions to certain circumstances.
Co-Authors A. Muhammad Hasgar A.S A. Muhammad Hasgar A.S. A. Muhammad Hasgar A.S. Amirullah AR, Sulkifli Arie E Baskoro Arie Ekawie Baskhoro Ayun Hapsari Basrawi Chatryen M Dju Bire Chatryen Megawati Dju Bire Cyrilius W.T. Lamataro Cyrilius Wilton Taran Lamataro Cyrilius Wilton Taran Lamataro Cyrilius WT. Lamataro Daud Yaferson Dollu Dedihasriadi, La Ode Dedihasriadi, La ode Dewi Kania Sugiharti Fadli Maulana Fatmawati Fatmawati Heril Mujahidin Hernimus Ratu Udju Jenny Ermalinda Jenny Ermalinda Jenny Ermalinda Juhardin Juhardin Juhardin, Juhardin La Ode Aris La Ode Dedihasriadi La ode Dedihasriadi Laxmi Lidya Potts Mahfud Heru Fatoni Mamdukh Budiman Mardiana Hasbullah Mardiana Hasbullah Mario A. Lawung Ma’ruf, Umar Mirnawati Mirnawati Muh Shabnuary Askari Muh. Kisman Adrianto Muh. Risal Muh. Taqwin Tahir Muh. Taqwin Tahir Muhamad Hanif Fuadi Muhammad Yusuf Natsir Muspira Nurfadhillah Syam Pery Rehendra Sucipta Putri M.S. Pa Putri Mega Silvia Pa Rahmat Angga Dwi Putra Rahmat Angga Dwi Putra Siti Hermina Sri Kusriyah Subandrio Sulkifli. Ar Syamsul Rijal Tomi Agi Fratama Umar Ma’ruf Vergilius Septyanto Lamabelawa Yeni Haerani Yonas Benu Yusril Gupran Madolangan