Articles
526 Documents
<![CDATA[PELAKSANAAN ITIKAD BAIK MEMORY OF UNDERSTANDINGDALAM PERJANJIAN JOINT VENTUREPERUSAHAAN MODAL ASING ]]>
<![CDATA[Heru Guntoro]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 26, No 2 (2014) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (361.231 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16045
<![CDATA[This paper examines the perspective of law in implementation good conviction memory of understanding in joint venture agreement and the result from law implementation memory of understanding in join venture agreement in the supreme court decision. This research is a literary research, the legal matters are analyzed qualitatively using normatif and juridical approach. From research can concludes, implementation from good conviction Memory of Understanding in the joint venture agreement are command of regulation with there are measure and explisit sanction to they who break a promise. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perspektif hukum perdata terhadap pelaksanaan itikad baik dan akibat hukum pelaksanaan Memory of Understandingdalam perjanjian joint venturePerusahaan Modal Asing dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung. Penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian kepustakaan, bahanbahan hukum yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan komparatif. Dari penelitian yang dilakukan dapat disimpulkan bahwa: pelaksanaan itikad baik Memory of Understandingdalam perjanjian joint venturePerusahaan Modal Asing merupakan perintah Undang-Undang serta ada tindakan dan sanksi tegas bagi mereka yang telah melakukan wanprestasi (beritikad tidak baik).]]>
<![CDATA[PELANGGARAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KERJA PEREMPUAN DI KABUPATEN MALANG ]]>
<![CDATA[Umu Hilmy]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 23, No 3 (2011) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (363.705 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16177
<![CDATA[The number of Indonesian workers who encounter problem abroad continues to increase as the amount of migrant workers shows an exponential growth. The majority group, which is female workers, suffer from economic, psychological, and physical violence. Every effort shall be made to end this condition. Jumlah TKI yang mengalami masalah secara kuantitas dan kualitas meningkat seiring dengan meningkatnya jumlah tenaga kerja yang bekerja di luar negeri. Bentuk pelanggarannya adalah kekerasan ekonomi, psikologi dan fisik. Mayoritas tenaga kerja perempuan yang mengalami masalah menyelesaikannya sendiri dengan berbagai cara.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK PEMULIA TANAMAN ATAS PRODUK TANAMAN HIBRIDA SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI HAK KEBENDAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Mr. Hariyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 20, No 3 (2008) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (357.299 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16291
<![CDATA[The law protection towards plant breeder upon plant hybird product aims to shove the spirit and creativity in plant breeder field, with the result that the society needs of high yielding variety can be fulfilled. IPR related to the right of goods which its proprietary can be shifted. IPR as the incorporeal moving things which immaterially or intangible refers that this right of goods gives pleasure or can be a guarantee, either in a pawning regulates in Civil Law book or fiduciary regulates in Law Number 42 Year 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security. According to Law Number 29 Year 2000 concerning The Law Varity Protection, there are 3 (three) form of law protection that can be achieved by the plant hybrid breeder. First, the temporary law protection is given until the right has given since the plea submission is completed and accepted by the Head Office of Plant Variety Protection. Second, if the inquiry result of that variety is appropriate to the law regulation, the right would be given through the approval of the Plant Variety Protection conferral. It is given in the form of certificate. Third, having the certificate of Plant Variety Protection right shows that the protection of plant variety includes in Intellectual Property Right. IPR is incorporeal moving things related to the property rights adhered to its proprietor. The consequence is the proprietor of the plant variety protection has the right to make use of the production of its plants or to give an agreement to other party or corporation to make use of it. The research result also shows that the obstacle in the implementation of the plant breeder protection comprises normative, political, economical, and psychological obstacles. IPR as incorporeal moving things contain substantive characteristic which can be in care of material guarantee. Therefore, the material guarantee can be in care of IPR is fiduciary guarantee and pawning.]]>
<![CDATA[LAW ENFORCEMENT PREPAREDNESS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INDONESIA’S LAW ON JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ]]>
<![CDATA[Dani Krisnawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 25, No 3 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (476.77 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16081
<![CDATA[Paradigmatic changes stipulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 on Juvenile Justice System, including regulations concerning restorative justice and diversion require the competency and skills of the law enforcement officers. This research identifies measures that have been taken and the existing barriers in preparing for the implementation of this Law. The research demonstrates that the readiness of the investigators and child prosecutors are merely limited to the outreach of Law Number 11 of 2012, whilst knowledge of the court judges only covers the draft Law. The number of officers receiving outreach is limited and should be increased. Negative perception on the officers due to the risk of a bribery accusation is feared to hamper the implementation of diversion regulation based on a restorative justice. Perubahan paradigmatik yang termuat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, termasuk diantaranya ketentuan mengenai keadilan restoratif dan diversi, memerlukan kompetensi dan keahlian aparat penegak hukum. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi langkah yang telah dilakukan dan kendala persiapan implementasi Undang-Undang tersebut. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa kesiapan penyidik dan penuntut umum anak masih terbatas pada partisipasi sosialisasi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, sedangkan hakim anak memiliki pengetahuan hanya pada Rancangan Undang-Undang. Jumlah aparat yang menerima sosialisasi Undang-Undangmasih terbatas dan perlu ditingkatkan jumlahnya. Pandangan negatif terhadap aparat karena bisa menimbulkan dugaan suap dikhawatirkan menjadi penghambat diterapkannya ketentuan diversi dengan pendekatan keadilan restoratif.]]>
<![CDATA[KONSEP HAK SESEORANG ATAS TUBUH DALAM TRANSPLANTASI ORGAN BERDASARKAN NILAI KEMANUSIAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Hwian Christianto]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 23, No 1 (2011) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (399.614 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16195
<![CDATA[The idea of right to body autonomy grows more important as people are able to donate their organs. However, the two conceptions of rights currently applicable, i.e. ‘ownership’ and ‘possession’, are highly inappropriate to be applied to this case because human body is not a property. In this light, humanity purposes constitute stronger concept of bodyautonomy. Pemahaman akan hak atas tubuh menjadi semakin penting ketika seseorang dapat mendonorkan organ tubuhnya. Kedua konsep hak yang selama ini berlaku, yaitu konsep “ownership” dan “possession” ternyata jika diterapkan ke hak atas tubuh sangat tidak sesuai karena tubuh manusia bukanlah barang. Dalam kondisi inilah konsep hak dengan tujuan kemanusiaan memberikan dasar yang kuat tentang hak atas tubuh.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGATURAN DOKTRIN DILUSI MEREK SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM MEREK TERKENAL DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Inge Dwisvimiar]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 28, No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (168.448 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16720
<![CDATA[AbstractThis research aims at 1) digging and analyzing the regulation of Trademark Dilution as a means of giving protection for those who hold wellknown trademark which is stated in Indonesia Law; and 2) analyzing and fnding whether it is necessary or not to do the regulation of trademark dilution in Indonesia. The result of research shows that: 1) regulation of trademark dilution is a way to protect the owner of wellknown trademark which is stated in Law of Indonesia chapter 6 article (2) of the Law of trademark 2001. It is based on chapter 16 article (3) TRIPs; 2. for the recommendation of Trademark Dilution, it is put in the revision of trademark in future Law by strengthening Article 6 (2) 2001 in Law of trademark 2001.IntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan: 1. Untuk menggali dan menganalisis pengaturan Dilusi Merek sebagai cara pemberian perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang Merek Terkenal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia dan negara lain serta Konvensi Internasional; 2. Untuk menganalisis dan menemukan perlu atau tidaknya dilakukan pengaturan dilusi merek di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: 1. Pengaturan Dilusi Merek sebagai cara pemberian perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang Merek Terkenal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia dengan menggunakan penyesuaian Pasal 6 ayat (2) UUM 2001 berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (3) TRIPs. 2. Dalam prospek perbaikan pengaturan dilusi merek di Indonesia perlu dipertimbangkan dengan memperkuat Pasal 6 ayat (2) UUM 2001.]]>
<![CDATA[TRADITIONAL RULE AS 'MODERN GOVERNANCE': RECOGNISING THE AMMATOA KAJANG ADAT LAW COMMUNITY ]]>
<![CDATA[Willem van der Muur]]>;
<![CDATA[Adriaan Bedner]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 28, No 1 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (609.884 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.15871
<![CDATA[This article discusses governance as it appears in the making of a regional bylaw that grants legal recognition to an indigenous adat community in South-Sulawesi. This process represents a move away from a traditional government approach. The coalition of legal drafters, which included state officials, community members and civil society, engaged in a joint effort of participatory law making. An analysis of this process addresses questions on how the decision-making process developed, what this meant for the outcomes and to what extent this new form of governance served the interests of all parties involved. Penulisan ini membahas proses pembuatan peraturan daerah yang memberikan pengakuan hukum atas sebuah komunitas adat di Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia. Proses tersebut merupakan sebuah gagasan baru tentang pendekatan partisipatif oleh pemerintah yang menjauh dari pendekatan pada umumnya. Gabungan tim perancang peraturan, turut menyertakan pejabat pemerintahan, anggota masyarakat dan organisasi masyarakat. Analisis yang ada menjawab bagaimana perkembangan suatu proses pengambilan keputusan, serta tujuan dari hasil yang ada dan sejauh mana bentuk tata kelola pemerintahan yang baru dapat melayani semua pihak yang terlibat.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Prinsip Lisensi dalam Pemberian Izin Penyelenggaraan Layanan Publik ]]>
<![CDATA[Ms. Sulistiowati]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 24, No 3 (2012) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (395.6 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16113
<![CDATA[Good public service may be achieved by allowing the government to issue license for public service delivery. The government must establish a licensing mechanism that can select the appropriate provider of public service who can satisfy the minimum standard of service. This licensing régime is expected to guarantee the reliability and quality of public service provider. While permit system is a unilateral legal action, licensing is a mutual contractual action between parties. Hence, licensing would function as a controlling norm to warrant good public service in accordance with the minimum standard. The government must be consistent with its role as a patron, and it must entrust the delivery of public service to business establishments appointed as public service provider. Semangat menyediakan layanan publik yang berkualitas diwujudkan melalui pemberian izin penyelenggaraan sektor layanan publik. Penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik pada sektor yang dapat dikerjasamakan perlu menerapkan mekanisme lisensi untuk memilih penyelenggara layanan umum yang sesuai dan mampu memenuhi standar pelayanan minimum. Rezim lisensi ini diharapkan mampu memberikan jaminan atas ketersediaan dan kualitas penyelenggara layanan umum. Berbeda dengan pemberian izin yang merupakan perbuatan hukum bersegi satu, lisensi ini bersifat kontraktual. Lisensi berfungsi sebagai norma pengendali untuk menjamin terselenggaranya layanan publik yang sesuai dengan standar pelayanan minimum. Pemerintah perlu menekankan pada peran sebagai pembina dan menyerahkan fungsi penyelenggaraan layanan publik kepada badan usaha yang menyelenggarakan layanan publik.]]>
<![CDATA[Tanggung Jawab Pengangkut Udara terhadap Penumpang ]]>
<![CDATA[Annalisa Yahanan Norsuhaida Che Musa]]>;
<![CDATA[Kamal Halili Hassan]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 22, No 2 (2010) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (372.711 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16227
<![CDATA[This research analyses the concepts of air carrier legal liability for losses suffered by the passengers. The results show how the rights of the passengers, particularly on the matter of compensation settlement, are still in a weak position because of the absence of implementing regulations. Penelitian ini menganalisis konsep tanggung jawab hukum pengangkut udara atas kerugian yang diderita oleh penumpang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hak penumpang, terutama atas penyelesaian ganti rugi, masih berada di posisi yang lemah akibat ketiadaan peraturan pelaksanaan.]]>
