cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,862 Documents
 364   365   366   367   368 
The Urgency of Legal Reform for the Legality of Digital Currency in Indonesia Agus Joko Lelono; Mohamad Tohari; Hono Sejati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2156

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the understanding and analyze the legal updates regarding the validity of money as a transaction tool in Indonesia and to understand and analyze the validity of electronic money used as an intermediary for electronic transactions. The method used in this study is normative legal research with a focus on legislation, applying qualitative descriptive data analysis techniques. The research results indicate that money serves several functions, including as a medium of exchange, store of value, unit of account, and deferred payment measure. The use of Indonesian Rupiah is regulated by several laws, including Emergency Law No. 20 of 1951, Currency Law, and Bank Indonesia Law. The validity of electronic money is regulated by Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 11/12/PBI/2009 concerning Electronic Money or Non-Cash Money (E-money). The purpose of this regulation is to encourage society to transition from using cash to non-cash or E-money. Electronic money is one type of non-cash payment instrument, along with paper-based payment instruments such as checks and promissory notes, as well as paperless payment instruments such as electronic fund transfers and card payments such as ATMs, credit cards, debit cards, and prepaid cards. These non-cash payments do not use physical money as a payment instrument but rely on innovations in electronic payments.
Penerapan Hukum Humaniter oleh Mahkamah Pidana Internasional Terhadap Konflik Kemanusiaan Israel-Palestina Berdasarkan Statuta Roma 1998 Fajar Ibrahim; Putrijanti, Aju
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2157

Abstract

-
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Terkait Penempatan Transpuan dalam Sel Tahanan Alfi Syahrin Rahazade, Raden Roro Hanny; Yunanto, Yunanto
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2158

Abstract

Every human being has human rights which are inherent from birth, including transwomen. Human rights are considered as fundamental rights whose protection is guaranteed by the state. The aim of this study is to know and study the position of transwomen according to law in Indonesia and the legal protection of human rights in terms of prison placement for transwomen prisoners. Furthermore, the study used normative juridical methods by analyzing library materials obtained through library research. The results of the research show that transwomen as a group of society are vulnerable to discrimination due to inappropriate prison placement. The absence of regulations governing the placement of transwomen in appropriate prison taking into account their dignity and worth has given rise to doubts among law enforcement officials in imposing sentences. In addition, placing transwomen prisoners in special detention cells is the right step in order to provide a fair and correct legal solution for transwomen.
Implementation of Road Traffic Observation with ETLE as a Form of Legal Development in the Digital Era Loeky Kristanto; Wieke Dewi Suryandari; Hono Sejati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2159

Abstract

Legal development in the digital era, the implementation of road traffic monitoring with ETLE (Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement) is a new thing in Indonesia. As an innovation, the electronic traffic monitoring system (ETLE) continues to experience continuous development and improvement. It is relevant because the development of ETLE is conducted within an existing legal framework related to traffic regulations, which will most likely interact with other legal aspects in the context of road traffic law enforcement. The research aims to examine the existence of ETLE in the context of the development of traffic law in Indonesia in the digital era, as well as the extent to which traffic law in force in Indonesia is appropriate in responding to the use of ETLE as a new tool in enforcing road traffic law. The method used is a normative juridical method by reviewing existing regulations and literature related to the application of ETLE and traffic law in Indonesia. The research results show that ETLE is a lineup with the direction of the development of Indonesian national law, especially in the context of the current digital era. Apart from that, traffic law in Indonesia also tends to be in line with the use of ETLE as a new tool in enforcing traffic law, although several legal aspects need special attention.
Legal Construction of the Use of Big Data to Support Sustainable Innovation in the Digital Era Sua Fauzan; Tri Susilowati; Lamijan, Lamijan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2160

Abstract

The legal framework governing the use of big data has become a crucial issue in this digital era. One notable advantage of Big Data and Computational Technology is the enhanced ease of storing and retrieving records. With platforms such as social media, individuals are storing a greater volume of data than ever before. The likelihood of having physical copies of old photographs has diminished or they have been discarded, yet numerous individuals have already shared them on social media platforms. This research employs qualitative methods with data collection techniques using library research. In Indonesia, there are currently no specific regulations governing the use of Big Data. However, the Principles of the Indonesian Digital Economy have recognized the need for data protection as a crucial asset. It indicates that the legal construction regarding Big Data usage is an urgent issue. In the case of Big Data, platforms or infrastructures that store, manage, and provide access to large data can be considered Essential Facilities. The main challenge in regulating Big Data lies in the technical complexity and cross-border nature of the data. Limitations of national jurisdiction and the lack of a comprehensive international framework make it difficult to regulate data ownership and access effectively.
Legal Protection for Consumers for Personal Data in the Use of Financial Technology Alexander Salim; Hono Sejati; Tri Susilowati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2161

Abstract

Financial technology is a term that refers to the use of technology to improve and simplify financial services. Fintech includes a variety of applications, services, and products that use technology to provide more efficient, faster, and more accessible financial services for consumers and businesses. Although the Fintech business offers many benefits, its enactment also carries potential risks. The two major risks faced are consumer data security and transaction errors. The risk of data privacy security is that Fintech often relies on digital data, so cyber security and data privacy risks are a big concern, cases of hacking, identity theft, and data leaks can have a significant impact on consumers, while what is meant by the risk of transaction errors is that the majority of Fintech transactions are digitally conducted, technical errors or system failures can result in transaction errors, which can be detrimental to consumers or companies. These two risks can cause losses for all parties involved in the Fintech business. The emergence of online crimes, such as data interception, hacking, and cybercrime in financial transactions, has made people skeptical of online transactions. Legal protection for consumers' personal data is essential because personal data includes sensitive information to identify, track, or exploit individuals. Forms of legal protection related to fintech personal data are regulated in Minister of Communication and Information Regulation Number 20 of 2016 concerning the Protection of Personal Data in Electronic Systems, Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 13/POJK.02/2018 concerning Digital Financial Innovation, and Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK. 07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector
The Validity of Illegal Investments In The Digital Era On Positive Legal Arrangements In Indonesia Taufik Noor Isya; Lamijan, Lamijan; Mohamad Tohari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2162

Abstract

The rapid advancement of technology has transformed human behavior in numerous ways, including the widespread use of the internet, which has become an indispensable part of modern life. The internet has revolutionized various industries such as communication, trade, finance, education, and business, making it easier than ever for people to engage in online activities and even digital investments. Yet, unfortunately, many fraudulent investment opportunities have emerged, preying on unsuspecting victims and causing significant financial losses. As a result, the Indonesian government has taken measures to combat illegal investments and protect the public. Such practices are considered criminal offenses under the Criminal Code's Article 378, which criminalizes deceitful and fraudulent schemes. Additionally, fundraising without proper authorization is punishable under Article 46 of Law Number 10 of 1998 jo. Law Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking. Sharia-based investments without a business permit from Bank Indonesia can also face legal repercussions under Article 59 of Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking. These regulations aim to safeguard individuals from illegal investment activities.
Validity of Digital Signature Evidence as Valid Evidence in Civil Procedure Law Neilpon Yulinar Marquez; Hono Sejati; Mohamad Tohari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2163

Abstract

Indonesia is entering a globalization era that drives technological advancements and business activities towards greater efficiency, particularly in the form of e-commerce. The use of Digital Signatures in its development is starting to shift the dominance of conventional signatures in agreements typically made on paper. Based on civil procedural law systems, judges are bound by valid evidence, implying that judicial decisions are limited by the evidence regulated by the law (HIR/RGB). This study adopts a doctrinal approach, examining law based on legislative regulations and legal concepts, and utilizing various data sources such as primary, secondary, and tertiary legal documents. Data collection methods include legal literature, legislative regulations, scientific literature, and relevant internet information on the discussed topic. The research findings indicate that a digital signature is not a replica of a conventional signature scanned using a scanner, but rather utilizes cryptographic techniques. The principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali states that the use of digital signatures in Civil Procedural Law holds a legal equivalence to authentic deeds.
Upaya Penindakan Terhadap Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata oleh Korps Brigade Mobile untuk Menciptakan Keamanan dan Ketertiban di Papua Vian, Polce Loei; Saleh, Moh.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2164

Abstract

Upaya Penindakan Terhadap Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata Oleh Korps Brigade Mobile Untuk Menciptakan Keamanan dan Ketertiban di Papua. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah Bagaimana Korps Brigade Mobil menciptakan Kemanan dan Ketertiban di Papua. Hasil penelitian ini adalah : Penindakan terhadap KKB yang dilakukan anggota Brimob dengan melakukan kontak senjata juga dilakukan penegakan hukum terhadap anggota yang tertangkap. Penegakan hukum terhadap kelompok pemberontak berdasarkan ketentuan KUHP terletak pada pasal 106 dan pasal 107 yang menjelaskan bahwa makar (aanalag) yang dilakukan dengan niat hendak menaklukan daerah negara sama sekali atau sebagaimananya kebawah pemerintah asing atau dengan maksud hendak memisahkan diri daerah tersebut maka dihukum penjara seumur hidup atau penjara sementara selama-lamanya dua puluh tahun. Salah satu hambatan utama (hambatan pertama) terletak pada lingkup yurisdiksi dan kontrol pemerintah terhadap daerah-daerah yang sering kali menjadi basis operasi KKB, letak geografis, daerah-daerah terpencil seringkali menjadi basis operasi KKB karena faktor geografis yang sulit dijangkau, kurangnya infrastruktur yang memadai, kemampuan anggota Brimob mengenai pengetahuan dan keterampilan tertentu yang mutlak diperlukan untuk menindak anggota KKB yang mereka sudah paham kondisi dan situasi serta mereka sering berbaur dengan masyarakat sehingga sulit untuk membedakannya. Solusi dalam mengatasi hambatan utama yaitu sebagai berikut : Pemerintah harus membuat aturan hukum sebagai dasar anggota Brimob dalam melakukan penindakan anggota KKB yang melakukan kejahatan, Pemerintah harus sering melakukan kontrol pemerintah terhadap daerah-daerah yang sering kali menjadi basis operasi KKB dengan melakukan patroli yang dilakukan anggota Brimob, melakukan koordinasi antara anggota Brimob, masyarakat dan TNI dalam melakukan pengamanan wilayah yang menjadi basis-basis anggota KKB, Meningkatkan kemampuan anggota Brimob dengan mengikutkan dikjur-dikjur dalam rangka peningkatan SDM anggota Brimob.
Analisis Efektivitas Prosedur Penyelesaian Kepailitan dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata: Studi Putusan Nomor 47/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Sby dan Nomor 48/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Sby Piter, Ryanto; Moh. Yuda Sudawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2165

Abstract

Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations are crucial legal mechanisms in the Indonesian civil law system for dealing with insolvency and debt restructuring of debtors. This study analyzes two Commercial Court decisions at the Surabaya District Court, namely Decision Number 47/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Sby and Decision Number 48/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Sby, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of bankruptcy procedures. civil law perspective. This analysis includes a review of regulations, theory and implementation of bankruptcy procedures and their implications for creditors and debtors. The research method used is normative juridical analysis based on court decisions and relevant literature. The research results show that, in a legal context, Articles 21 to 64 of the UUK-PKPU regulate the consequences of bankruptcy using two implementation methods, namely by law and rule of reason. An evaluation of two Commercial Court decisions in Surabaya shows the importance of protecting creditor rights in the bankruptcy process. The curator plays a key role in ensuring creditors receive fair payments from the liquidation of debtor assets. These two decisions emphasize the application of the pari passu prorata parte principle, the creditorium principle, and the business continuity principle to maintain a balance between creditor rights and debtor business continuity.

Page 366 of 387 | Total Record : 3862

 364   365   366   367   368 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue