cover
Contact Name
Hendratno
Contact Email
hendratno@unesa.ac.id
Phone
+6282234206376
Journal Mail Official
S2pendidikandasar@unesa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung CPD Kampus Lidah Wetan Universitas Negeri Surabaya 60231
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian
ISSN : -     EISSN : 24608475     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jrpd
Core Subject : Education,
The Journal focus and scope: Research in the field of scientific concept of basic education includes mathematics, science, social studies, civics and Indonesian.
Articles 584 Documents
The Effectiveness of Pair Programming in Enhancing Elementary School Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in Coding Lessons Sasmita, Febriarsita Eka; Khairiyah, Ummu; Mariati, Pance
Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No.1 Februari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpd.v12n1.p18-31

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of pair programming in coding lessons on enhancing elementary school students’ creative thinking skills. The research employed a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent control group design involving 44 elementary school students participating in a coding learning program. The subjects were divided into two groups: an experimental group learning through pair programming and a control group learning using the conventional direct instruction method. The research instrument used the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) Figural A to measure three indicators of creative thinking: fluency, originality, and elaboration. Data analysis was conducted using paired sample t-tests and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The results showed a significant improvement in creative thinking skills in the experimental group compared to the control group, particularly in the fluency and originality indicators. However, the improvement in the elaboration indicator was not significant. These findings indicate that pair programming is an effective learning strategy to stimulate creative thinking in coding lessons at the elementary school level, especially in terms of idea fluency and originali.ty.
Implementation of Augmented Reality-Based Learning Media on The Material of Grouping Animals Based on Their Food Types for Class III Students Silviah, Rossa Ilma; Jannah, Novaria; Mufidah, Lailatul
Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No.1 Februari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpd.v12n1.p1-17

Abstract

This study aims to test the results of the development of Augmented Reality-based learning media using the Assmblr Edu platform on the material of grouping animals based on their food types, namely herbivores, carnivores, and omnivores, for third-grade elementary school students. The background of this study is based on the low interest of students in learning science material due to the limited learning media that can provide an interesting and enjoyable learning experience. The development model used in this study is the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The subjects of this study consisted of 16 third-grade students of SDN Kedensari 1. The instruments used included validation by material experts and media experts, teacher response questionnaires, student response questionnaires, and student evaluation tests. The results of this validation indicate that the AR-based learning media developed is included in the category of very valid and feasible to use. In addition, this media also received positive responses from teachers and was proven to improv
Integration of Computational Thinking in Natural and Social Science Learning in Elementary Schools to Improve Problem-Solving Skills Anna Roosyanti; Diyas Age Larasati
Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No.1 Februari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpd.v12n1.p59-68

Abstract

Mastery of 21st century skills is very necessary in facing the development of the industrial revolution 4.0 era, one of which is computational thinking. Computational thinking is the ability to think systematically, logically, and structured to solve problems. This is very relevant to the learning of Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) in Elementary Schools. This study aims to explain computational thinking, its integration in IPAS learning, its benefits in improving problem-solving skills of Elementary School students, identify its implementation strategies, and analyze challenges and opportunities in its application. The research method used is a literature study with a descriptive approach through the analysis of various national and international journal articles indexed by Sinta and Scopus. The results of the literature review indicate that the integration of computational thinking in IPAS learning in Elementary Schools makes a real contribution to improving students' problem-solving skills. Through a hybrid approach that combines plugged and unplugged approaches, it is the most appropriate strategy to be implemented in Elementary Schools in Indonesia. However, there are still challenges in its implementation including limited teacher understanding of computational thinking, limited technological infrastructure, and contextual and problem-based learning design. Kata kunci: Computational thinking, IPAS, Sekolah Dasar, Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah
Concrete-to-Abstract Transitions and Affective Factors in Fourth-Grade Mathematics: A Systematic Review of Pedagogical Challenges and Merdeka Curriculum Implementation Setianingsih, Setianingsih; Arofah, Fitrika Asrofatul; Suyono, Suyono; Pristiani, Riska
Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No.1 Februari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpd.v12n1.p32-58

Abstract

Fourth grade represents a critical transition period in elementary mathematics education where students encounter increasingly abstract concepts requiring sophisticated pedagogical approaches. This systematic literature review synthesizes 32 empirical studies (2021-2025) examining concrete-representational-abstract (CRA) instructional sequences, affective dimensions, and Merdeka Curriculum implementation challenges in fourth-grade mathematics learning. Analysis reveals three primary findings: First, systematic CRA/CPA progressions significantly enhance conceptual understanding across fractions, geometry, and algebraic thinking, yet classroom implementation frequently exhibits problematic practices including premature abstraction or prolonged concrete manipulation, with the critical pictorial bridging phase often omitted. Second, mathematical self-efficacy, mathematics anxiety, and achievement demonstrate consistent bidirectional relationships, with fourth grade constituting a consequential period for mathematical identity formation. Third, Merdeka Curriculum's numeracy literacy emphasis confronts substantial implementation obstacles including conceptual misconceptions, inadequate professional development, resource limitations, structural constraints, and policy misalignments. Findings indicate that effective fourth-grade mathematics pedagogy requires integrated frameworks simultaneously addressing cognitive-developmental progressions, affective support, contextual meaning-making, and differentiated instruction, supported by systemic reforms encompassing sustained teacher professional development, coherent policy alignment, and adequate resource allocation. This review provides evidence-based recommendations for elementary educators and policymakers designing more effective mathematics learning experiences.

Filter by Year

2015 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No.1 Februari 2026 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Vol. 11 No.1 Februari 2025 Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): Vol. 10 No. 3 September 2024 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Vol. 10 No. 2 Mei 2024 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Vol. 10 No. 1 Januari 2024 Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): Vol. 9 No. 3 September 2023 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Vol. 9 No. 2 Mei 2023 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Vol. 9 No. 1 Januari 2023 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): Vol. 8 No. 3 September 2022 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): Vol. 8 No. 2 Mei 2022 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): Vol. 8 No. 1 Januari 2022 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Vol. 7 No. 1 Januari 2021 Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021): Vol. 7 No. 3 September 2021 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Vol. 7 No. 2 Mei 2021 Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Vol. 7 No. 2 Mei 2021 Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Vol. 7 No. 1 Januari 2021 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020): Vol. 6 No. 3 September 2020 Vol 6, No 3 (2020): Vol. 6 No. 3 September 2020 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): Vol. 6 No. 2 Mei 2020 Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Vol. 6 No. 2 Mei 2020 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Vol. 6 No. 1 Januari 2020 Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Vol. 6 No. 1 Januari 2020 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2019): Vol. 5 No. 3 September 2019 Vol 5, No 3 (2019): Vol. 5 No. 3 September 2019 Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Vol. 5 No. 2 Mei 2019 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Vol. 5 No. 2 Mei 2019 Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2019 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2019 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018): Vol. 4 No. 3 September 2018 Vol 4, No 3 (2018): Vol. 4 No. 3 September 2018 Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Vol. 4 No. 2 Mei 2018 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Vol. 4 No. 2 Mei 2018 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Vol. 4 No. 1 Januari 2018 Vol 4, No 1 (2018): Vol. 4 No. 1 Januari 2018 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2017): Vol. 3 No. 3 September 2017 Vol 3, No 3 (2017): Vol. 3 No. 3 September 2017 Vol 3, No 2 (2017): Vol. 3 No. 2 Mei 2017 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Vol. 3 No. 2 Mei 2017 Vol 3, No 1 (2017): Vol. 3 No. 1 Januari 2017 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): Vol. 3 No. 1 Januari 2017 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2016): Vol. 2 No. 3 September 2016 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): Vol. 2 No. 2 Mei 2016 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Vol. 2 No. 1 Januari 2016 Vol 2, No 3 (2016): Vol. 2 No. 3 September 2016 Vol 2, No 2 (2016): Vol. 2 No. 2 Mei 2016 Vol 2, No 1 (2016): Vol. 2 No. 1 Januari 2016 Vol 1, No 1 (2015): Vol. 1 No. 1 September 2015 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): Vol. 1 No. 1 September 2015 More Issue