cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Tri Imam Munandar
Contact Email
imamtri@unja.ac.id
Phone
+6285266101878
Journal Mail Official
pjc@unja.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Lintas Jambi - Ma. Bulian KM. 15, Mendalo Darat, Jambi Luar Kota, Muaro Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia 36122
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law
Published by Universitas Jambi
ISSN : 27217205     EISSN : 27218325     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v3i1
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law (ISSN Print 2721-7205 ISSN Online 2721-8325) is a periodical scientific publication in the field of Criminal Law. The word Pampas comes from the Malay language which means Compensation, Pampas is a traditional Jambi sanction as a law to injure people. This journal is published by the Faculty of Law, Jambi University as a medium for discussing Criminal Law. First published in February 2020, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law is published three times a year, namely in February, June and October. In each of its publications, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law publishes 8-10 articles on the results of research or research on criminal law. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law publishes articles on the results of research or studies of criminal law, including: (1) criminal law (2) criminal procedural law (3) criminology (4) victimology (5) special crimes (6) criminal law enforcement (7) criminal law reform (8) penal policy (9) comparative criminal law (10) criminal law and punishment (11) international criminal law (12) criminal customary law (13) criminal justice system (14) Islamic Criminal Law (15) military crime and the study of Indonesian criminal law which is global in nature in accordance with the latest developments in the dynamics of criminal law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)" : 10 Documents clear
Criminological Aspects on Gender-Based Exploitation: The Existence of Female Objectification in Online Gambling Promotions Julianti, Shinta; Nurhadiyanto, Lucky Nurhadiyanto; Gustiman, Jepri; Nurrahma Masturi, Frida; Rostikawati, Rin
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.37254

Abstract

This research analyzes from a criminological perspective the issue of gender-based exploitation, specifically the role of the objectification of women in promoting online gambling to achieve the existence of online gambling. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, with data collection techniques through literature study, observation, and interviews. This research also employs a legislative and sociological approach. The results of the research found that online gambling promotion systematically uses narratives and visuals that reduce women to sexual attractions or means to achieve false pleasure. This objectification is carried out through vulgar advertisements, representing the female body that attracts sexual desire. From a criminological perspective, this practice is a form of gender-based exploitation because it exploits the social and economic vulnerabilities of women, reinforces negative stereotypes, and indirectly contributes to the normalization of symbolic violence. From the perspective of positive law, the act violates several regulations, including the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act, CEDAW, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Pornography Law, and the Sexual Violence Crime Law. Abstrak Penelitian ini menganalisis secara kriminologis terkait eksploitasi berbasis gender, khususnya peran objektifikasi perempuan dalam promosi perjudian online untuk mencapai eksistensi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi pustaka, observasi dan wawancara. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan pendekatan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan sosiologis.  Hasil dari penelitian ditemukan bahwa promosi perjudian online secara sistematis menggunakan narasi dan visual yang mereduksi perempuan sebagai simbol daya tarik seksual menjadi sarana untuk mencapai kesenangan semu. Objektifikasi ini dilakukan melalui iklan yang vulgar, merepresentasi kebertubuhan perempuan yang menarik hasrat seksualitas. Secara kriminologis, praktik ini merupakan bentuk eksploitasi berbasis gender karena memanfaatkan kerentanan sosial dan ekonomi perempuan, memperkuat stereotip negatif, dan secara tidak langsung berkontribusi pada normalisasi kekerasan simbolik. Dalam perspektif hukum positif, perbuatan tersebut melanggar sejumlah regulasi diantaranya UU TPPO, CEDAW, UU ITE, UU Pornografi dan UU TPKS.
Mengurai Pola Pembinaan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Terhadap Napi Anak Sebagai Bandar Narkotika: Tepatkah? Arfa, Nys; Imam, Tri; Usman, Usman; Adamy, Zulham
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.37937

Abstract

This article aims to find out and analyze the pattern of developing child prisoners as narcotics dealers as well as the obstacles in fulfilling the rights of prisoners at the Muara Bulian Class II Special Children's Correctional Institution. Children as criminals, especially narcotics abusers, are not only users for themselves but also as narcotics dealers. The threat of punishment for narcotics dealers is certainly different from that for self-abusers due to the normative aspect of actions carried out by carrying out activities of distributing, circulating or abusing narcotics in large quantities. Therefore, it is necessary to study the pattern of developing children as narcotics dealers in the special correctional institution for class II children in Muara Bulian. As empirical juridical research, this article refers to looking at the operation of law in society. The results of this research show that the development of child prisoners at the Muara Bulian Class II Special Children's Penitentiary receives guidance, supervision, mentoring, education and training as well as other rights in accordance with statutory provisions that apply to all types of criminal acts, except for criminal convicts. terrorism. The mixing of child prisoners with youth prisoners is an obstacle in the development of prisoners, apart from affecting the fulfillment of the rights of children assisted, this will also affect the ongoing development activities which are vulnerable to intimidation by youth prisoners. Therefore, looking at the types of crimes and the effects of crimes committed by children, of course the crimes of children as narcotics dealers must receive serious attention regarding appropriate training patterns. It is necessary to carry out special coaching patterns such as separating special cells between children as dealers and children as other abusers, seen from the crime aspect in order to maximize the coaching carried out, including the coaching pattern for children and youth, which in practice still occurs. Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pola pembinaan narapidana anak sebagai bandar Narkotika serta kendala dalam pemenuhan hak narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Khusus Anak Kelas II Muara Bulian. Anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan khususnya penyalahguna narkotika bukan hanya sebegai pengguna untuk diri sendiri namun juga sebagai bandar narkotika. Ancaman hukuman bagi bandar Narkotika tentu berbeda dengan penyalahguna bagi diri sendiri dikarnakan aspek norma perbuatan yang dilakukan dengan melakukan kegiatan peredaran, pengedaran, atau penyalahgunaan narkotika dalam jumlah besar. Oleh karna itu perlu dikaji bagaimana pola pembinaan anak sebagai bandar narkotika di lembaga pemasyarakatan khusus anak kelas II Muara bulian. Sebagai penelitian yuridis empiris, artikel ini mengacu kepada melihat bekerjanya hukum di dalam masyarakat. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pembinaan narapidana anak di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Khusus Anak Kelas II Muara Bulian mendapatkan bimbingan, pengawasan, pendampingan, pendidikan, dan pelatihan serta hak lain sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan yang berlaku untuk semua jenis tindak pidana, dikecualikan bagi narapidana tindak pidana terorisme. Bercampurnya narapidana anak dengan narapidana pemuda menjadi hambatan dalam pembinaan narapidana, selain mempengaruhi pemenuhan hak anak binaan hal ini juga akan berpengaruh pada kegiatan pembinaan yang berlangsung yang rentan intimidasi oleh narapidana pemuda. Oleh karna itu dilihat dari jenis kejahatan serta efek dari kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh anak, tentunya kejahatan anak sebagai bandar narkotika harus mendapatkan perhatian serius bagaimana pola pembinaan yang tepat. Perlu dilakukannya pola pembinaan khusus seperti pemisahan sel khusus antara anak sebagai bandar dengan anak sebagai penyalaguna lainnya dilihat dari aspek kejahatan guna memaksimalkan pembinaan yang dilakukan termasuk pola pembinaan anak serta pemuda yang secara praktek masih terjadi khususnya di LPKA Muara Bulian.
Pemenuhan Kewajiban Adat dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Siregar, Elizabeth; Davega Prasna, Adeb; Rakhmawati, Dessy
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.38122

Abstract

One of the progressiveness of the New Criminal Code that reflects harmonization and adaptation is the recognition of customary law values ​​by including sanctions for fulfilling local customary obligations as additional criminal penalties (Article 66 paragraph 1 letter f). Fulfillment of customary obligations correlates with Article 597 Paragraph 1: In relation to the meaning of "local customary obligations", the author tries to relate it to the customary law of Jambi City, which is connected to the crime of sexual violence. In general, sexual violence is regulated as an act prohibited by law, but are the acts regulated in the law also immediately regulated in detail as in customary law. In relation to the discussion of this topic, the next question is whether the crime of sexual violence can be given a sanction for fulfilling customary law. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the fulfillment of customary obligations (Jambi Customary Law) in the crime of sexual violence. The method used is empirical legal research. Fulfillment of customary obligations regulated in the New Criminal Code is a customary obligation based on local customary law rules. Regarding the crime of sexual violence, the Jambi customary institution has never received such a case. Regarding the criteria that can be classified as unlawful acts that exist in society, there are currently no rules. There are no restrictions on what acts are included in the group of these acts. If related to acts of sexual violence, acts that have not been regulated by law, but are considered reprehensible, can be grouped as unlawful acts that exist in society. To support the implementation of the New Criminal Code, guidelines for government and regional regulations and local customary courts are needed Abstrak Berlakunya KUHP Baru pada tahun 2026 nanti, memberikan ruang bagi hukum adat di Indonesia, untuk mengakselerasikan nilai hukum pidana adat dalam KUHP. Hal ini dibuktikan dalam KUHP Baru Pasal 66 Angka 1 huruf F, yang menyatakan salah satu sanksi pidana tambahan  adalah pemenuhan kewajiban adat setempat. Hal ini dimaknai bahwa dari pasal tersebut hukum pidana mengakui adanya penerapan sanksi pidana adat setempat (dalam topik penelitian khususnya adat Jambi). Urgensi dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk menggali nilai hukum  adat Jambi yang dapat diterapkan sebagai sanksi pemenuhan kewajiban adat setempat dalam KUHP Baru. Tujuan penelitian ini, untuk mengetahui perbuatan pidana apa saja yang dapat diberikan sanksi pemenuhan kewajiban adat, relevansi penerapannya terhadap tindak pidana kekerasan seksual. Selain itu juga tujuan yang dicapai adalah, apa yang menjadi pedoman hakim dalam memberikan sanksi pemenuhan kewajiban adat, serta bagaimana persepsi hakim dan tokoh Lembaga Adat Melayu Jambi saat ini, terhadap sanksi pemenuhan kewajiban adat setempat.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Korban Penyalahgunaan Artificial Intelligence (Ai) Terhadap Serangan Malware dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Nurjanah, Afifah Ayu; Liyus, Herry
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.39732

Abstract

The aim of this research is 1) The purpose of this study was to determine the regulation regarding legal protection for victims of Artificial Intelligence (AI) abuse against Malvare attacks from the perspective of current applicable laws and regulations, as well as to determine the legal policy regarding the regulation for victims of Artificial Intelligence (AI) abuse in the future. With the formulation of the problem, namely: 1) what is the form of legal protection for victims of Artificial Intelligence (AI) abuse against Malvare attacks based on laws and regulations; 2) what is the legal policy regarding the regulation for victims of Artificial Intelligence (AI) abuse in the future. This type of research is normative juridical. The results of the study indicate that legal protection for victims of AI abuse, especially in cases of Malware attacks, is still ineffective in Indonesia. Although there are existing regulations, such as Article 28 D Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which guarantees the right to legal protection. However, its implementation is not yet clear and comprehensive. Furthermore, the implementation of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law classifies AI as an Electronic Agent, so that AI has not been grammatically mentioned in the regulation. The criminal law policy on protection for victims of AI abuse against Malware attacks in Indonesia is not yet concrete and firm in making improvements or making special regulations regarding AI which regulate provisions regarding clear and binding limitations in the processing of this artificial intelligence work system. The policy regarding AI must be strictly regulated regarding criminal sanctions for Malware attacks that utilize artificial intelligence, and provide an explanation in the rules related to protection for victims of AI abuse in the form of Malvare attacks to prevent and overcome these crimes, as well as provide the rights that victims must obtain from AI abuse. Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaturan mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi korban penyalahgunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) terhadap serangan Malware dalam perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang berlaku saat ini, serta untuk mengetahui mengenai kebijakan hukum terhadap pengaturan bagi korban penyalahgunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) di masa mendatang. Dengan rumusan masalah yakni : 1) bagaimana bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi korban penyalahgunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) terhadap serangan Malware berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undanga; 2) bagaimana kebijakan hukum terhadap pengaturan bagi korban penyalahgunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) di masa mendatang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis normative. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Perlindungan hukum bagi korban penyalahgunaan AI khususnya pada kasus serangan Malware masih belum efektif di Indonesia. Meskipun terdapat regulasi yang ada, seperti Pasal 28 D Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 yang menjamin hak atas perlindungan hukum. Akan tetapi, penerapannya belum jelas dan komperhensif. Selanjutnya, implementasi Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik menggolongkan AI sebagai Agen Elektronik, sehingga AI belum disebutkan secara gramatikal pada aturan tersebut. Kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap perlindungan bagi korban penyalahgunaan AI terhadap serangan Malware di Indonesia belum bersifat konkrit dan tegas dalam melakukan suatu perbaikan atau pembuatan peraturan khusus mengenai AI yang didalamnya mengatur tentang ketentuan mengenai batasan-batasan secara jelas dan mengikat dalam pengolahan system kerja kecerdasan buatan ini. Kebijakan mengenai AI harus diatur secara tegas mengenai sanksi pidana pada serangan Malware yang memanfaatkan kecerdasan buatan, dan memberikan penjelasan dalam aturan terkait perlindungan terhadap korban penyalahgunaan AI berupa serangan Malware untuk mencegah dan menanggulangi tindak pidana tersebut, serta memberikan hak-hak yang harus didapatkan korban dari penyalahgunaan AI.
Implementasi Sistem Penilaian Pembinaan Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan kelas IIA Kota Jambi Deswita, Triana; Sudarti, Elly; Wahyudi, Dheny
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.40924

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine and analyze how the Prisoner Guidance Assessment System is regulated in the decree of the Director General of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights No. PAS-10.OT.02.02 of 2021 concerning the prisoner guidance assessment system and how it is implemented in the Class IIA Correctional Institution in Jambi City. This study uses an empirical legal method and the results of this study indicate that the Class IIA Prison in Jambi City, which is designated as a maximum security type prison, applies four guidance assessment variables, namely personality, independence, attitude, and mental condition, where in the regulations on the Revitalization of Correctional Services only three variables should be used for this type. This can happen because there was no data collection between inmates (WBP) sorted according to the level of risk of inmates (WBP), so that the Class IIA Prison in Jambi City implements the four guidance variables. In addition, several inhibiting factors were also found, such as excess capacity, limited facilities and infrastructure, and the number of officers that is not comparable to the number of inmates. Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana Sistem Penilaian Pembinaan Narapidana yang di atur dalam keputusan direktur jendral KEMENKUMHAM No. PAS-10.OT.02.02 Tahun 2021 tentang sistem penilaian pembinaan narapidana dan bagaimana implementasinya di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Kota Jambi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dan hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Lapas Kelas IIA Kota Jambi, yang ditetapkan sebagai lapas dengan tipe maximum security, menerapkan keempat variabel penilaian pembinaan, yaitu kepribadian, kemandirian, sikap, dan kondisi mental, yang mana pada peraturan tentang Revitalisai penyelenggaraan pemasyarakatan seharusnya tiga variabel saja yang digunakan untuk tipe ini. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena tidak ditemukan adanya pendataan antara warga binaan pemasyarakatan (WBP) yang diurut berdasarkan tingkat resiko warga binaan pemasyarakatan (WBP), sehingga membuat Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Kota Jambi menjalankan keempat variabel pembinaan. Selain itu, ditemukan juga beberapa faktor penghambat seperti kelebihan kapasitas, keterbatasan sarana prasarana, dan jumlah petugas yang tidak sebanding dengan jumlah narapidana. 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Salah Tangkap Dalam Konteks Hukum Acara Pidana Khoiru Ummah, Padillah Kuntum; Lasmadi, Sahuri; Najemi, Andi
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.41041

Abstract

This research is conducted with theaim of analyzing how the rules and forms of legal protection for wrongful arrest victims are viewed from the context of criminal procedural law. The occurrence of wrongful arrest is an act that greatly harms the victim and violates Human Rights. Of course, as a result of this wrongful arrest, the victim suffers many material and immaterial losses. Using the normative juridical research method, this study examines the legal provisions regarding the rules of legal protection for victims of wrongful arrest. Legal protection for victims of wrongful arrest has been regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and how the protection is provided to victims of wrongful arrest. In this case, the rules for protecting victims of wrongful arrest have actually been regulated in Law Number 8 of 1981, which states that victims of wrongful arrest are entitled to compensation and rehabilitation due to procedural errors in the arrest. Furthermore, the issue of compensation is regulated in Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015, which stipulates that compensation should be provided within 14 days after it is submitted. However, in the provision of compensation, there are still several matters that require more attention and oversight, namely the deadline for providing compensation, which should be given within 14 days after the compensation claim is submitted. This is evidenced by the fact that many wrongfully arrested victims do not receive compensation within the time frame stipulated in the regulations. Therefore, there is a need for reaffirmation and renewed attention to this regulation because there is no certainty about the sanctions that can be imposed on officials who provide compensation if it is given more than 14 days later. Abstrak Penelitian ini berfokus pada  bagaimana undang-undang dan metode perlindungan hukum bagi korban salah tangkap dipandang dari sudut pandang hukum acara pidana. Salah tangkap adalah tindakan yang merugikan korban dan melanggar Hak Asasi Manusia. Korban mengalami banyak kerugian material dan immaterial sebagai akibat dari tindakan salah tangkap ini. Penelitian ini menyelidiki ketentuan hukum mengenai bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi korban salah tangkap dengan menggunakan pendekatan penelitian yuridis normatif. Hukum KUHAP mengatur perlindungan korban salah tangkap dengan menyediakan ganti kerugian dan rehabilitasi. Namun, ganti kerugian memerlukan perhatian dan pengawasan tambahan. Salah satunya adalah tenggat waktu pemberian ganti kerugian, yang harus diberikan selama 14 hari setelah diajukannya.
Penguatan Kapasitas Jaksa Melalui Koordinasi dalam Proses Penyidikan dan Penuntutan dalam RUU KUHAP: Studi Perbandingan Amerika Serikat, Belanda dan Indonesia Sofian, Ahmad
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.42540

Abstract

This study discusses and critically evaluates the application of the principle of functional differentiation of investigation and prosecution and the principle of dominus litis in the Criminal Procedure Code and how it should be regulated in the future Criminal Procedure Code. This study uses a normative legal method with a comparative legal approach, namely comparing the application of investigation and prosecution in the United States and the Netherlands. The importance of this study is to analyze the differences between the stages of investigation and prosecution between Indonesia, the United States and Indonesia, so that it can emphasize whether the principle of functional differentiation of investigation must still be maintained in the R-KUHAP or eliminated, or maintained with improvements. The study aims to compare the application of investigation and prosecution in the United States and the Netherlands in the application of the principle of functional differentiation and relate it to the principle of dominus litis in the R-KUHAP. The research questions include: (1) How is the critical evaluation of the application of the principle of functional differentiation of investigation and prosecution in the Criminal Procedure Code? (2) How do investigations and prosecutions compare in the United States and the Netherlands? (3) How should investigation and prosecution be regulated in the R-KUHAP by linking it to the principle of dominus litis? This study concludes that the principle of functional differentiation in the KUHAP in practice experiences problems with limited coordination, the role of prosecutors is not optimal and has not fully realized prosecutors as dominus litis (case controllers) so that there are obstacles in several prosecution and evidence processes in court. When compared to the United States, prosecutors have a very strong role in determining whether a case will be continued to court or not. Meanwhile, in the Netherlands, the investigation function is held by the police and the prosecutor's office, law enforcement agencies are under one ministry, namely the Ministry of Justice, so that coordination between institutions is smoother. The principle of dominus litis places prosecutors as controllers of the case process from the investigation stage to the execution of the verdict. The R-KUHAP, by strengthening the role of prosecutors in investigation and prosecution, is expected to be able to realize this principle in the Indonesian criminal justice system. This study recommends: 1) The need for better coordination between investigators and public prosecutors; 2) Strengthening the role of prosecutors in investigations, but still paying attention to the principle of independence of investigations; 3) Clearer regulations regarding the time period for resolving cases; 4) The need for a change in legal culture among law enforcement officers to support the implementation of the R-KUHAP; 5) Encouraging a shift in the paradigm of law enforcement towards restorative justice. ABSTRAK Penerapan asas differensiasi fungsional penyidikan dan penuntutan di Indonesia ditandai dengan terbatasnya penerapan asas dominus litis. Studi ini membahas, membandingkan dan mengevaluasi secara kritis penerapan asas differensiasi fungsional penyidikan dan penuntutan dan asas dominus litis di Indonesia dalam KUHAP dan bagaimana sebaiknya pengaturan dalam KUHAP di masa depan. Studi ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum yaitu membandingkan penerapan penyidikan dan penuntutan di Amerika Serikat (AS) dan Belanda.  Pentingnya kajian ini dilakukan mengingat penerapan asas differensiasi fungsional di Indonesia yang cenderung membatasi Kejaksaan sebagai pengendali perkara. Studi ini bertujuan untuk  membandingkan penerapan penyidikan dan penuntutan di AS dan Belanda dalam penerapan asas differensiasi fungsional dan mengaitkannya dengan  asas dominus litis dalam R-KUHAP. Studi ini menyimpulkan, asas diferensiasi fungsional dalam KUHAP pada praktiknya membatasi peran jaksa sebagai dominus litis (pengendali perkara) sehingga mengalami hambatan dalam beberapa proses penuntutan dan pembuktian di pengadilan. Berbeda dengan Amerika Serikat, Jaksa memiliki peran yang sangat kuat dalam menentukan apakah suatu kasus akan dilanjutkan ke pengadilan atau tidak. Di Belanda, fungsi penyidikan dimiliki oleh kepolisian dan kejaksaan, lembaga-lembaga penegak hukum berada di bawah satu kementerian, yaitu Kementerian Kehakiman, sehingga koordinasi antar lembaga lebih lancar. Kajian ini merekomendasikan: 1) Perlunya koordinasi yang lebih baik antara penyidik dan penuntut umum; 2) Penguatan peran jaksa dalam penyidikan, namun tetap memperhatikan prinsip independensi penyidikan; 3) Pengaturan yang lebih jelas mengenai jangka waktu penyelesaian perkara; 4) Perlunya perubahan budaya hukum di kalangan aparat penegak hukum untuk mendukung penerapan R-KUHAP; 5) Mendorong pergeseran paradigma penegakan hukum ke arah keadilan restoratif.
Problematika Pidana Peringatan Sebagai Pidana Ringan Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Trilestari, Dheliya; Rahayu, Sri; Erwin, Erwin
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.42712

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the warning penalty applied in Indonesian courts. In this study, the author analyzes the judge's considerations in imposing penalties in decision Number 12 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2023 / PN Sgn and decision Number 14 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2022 / PN Bks. In this study, the researcher will discuss how the application of warning penalties in Indonesia, whether its implementation is good with the limitations of implementing regulations and guidelines for this warning penalty. This study uses a normative legal research method where this research is based on applicable laws and regulations that are relevant to the legal problems that are the focus of the study. The results of this study are that the judge's considerations between the two decisions have different results, where the decision should have the same decision. This is due to the absence of additional regulations or explanatory regulations from Article 72 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, so that law enforcers need implementing regulations so that warning penalties can be more optimally imposed on children in conflict with the law. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pidana peringatan yang diterapkan di pengadilan Indonesia. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana pada putusan Nomor 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Sgn dan putusan Nomor 14/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Bks. Dalam penelitian ini peniliti akan membahas bagaimana penerapan pidana peringatan di Indonesia, apakah penerapannya sudah baik dengan keterbatasannya peraturan pelaksana maupun pedoman dari pidana peringatan ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dimana penelitian ini berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan relevan dengan permasalahan hukum yang menjadi fokus penelitian. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pertimbangan hakim diantara kedua putusan memiliki hasil yang berbeda, dimana seharusnya dalam putusan tersebut bisa memilki putusan yang sama. Hal ini disebabkan dari tidak adanya peraturan tambahan atau peraturan penjelas dari Pasal 72 Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, sehingga penegak hukum memerlukan peraturan pelaksana supaya pidana peringatan bisa lebih maksimal lagi untuk dijatuhkan ke anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum.
From Administrative Irregularities to Criminal Acts: Uncovering Corruption in State Procurement Systems Adhi, Surya; Arifin, Ridwan; Sani, Tajudeen
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.43759

Abstract

The procurement of goods and services within the public sector is a crucial function that supports the operation of government institutions and the delivery of public services. However, this process is often vulnerable to corruption, including bribery, collusion, and abuse of authority. This paper examines the criminal law aspects related to government procurement by analyzing various cases of corruption in Indonesia. Through a review of legal frameworks, including the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption, this study explores how these regulations are applied in practice. Case studies highlight recurring issues such as inflated project costs, fictitious procurement, and favoritism in awarding contracts. The paper also evaluates the role of law enforcement agencies, particularly the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), in investigating and prosecuting procurement-related offenses. While significant progress has been made in combating corruption, challenges remain in the consistent application of the law, limited resources, and political interference. This analysis emphasizes the need for stronger preventive mechanisms, greater transparency, and capacity-building among procurement officials to reduce legal violations. By examining real-world cases and their legal outcomes, this study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the intersection between criminal law and public procurement, and to support the development of more effective anti-corruption strategies within the public sector. ABSTRAK Pengadaan barang dan jasa di sektor publik merupakan fungsi penting yang mendukung operasional lembaga pemerintahan serta pelayanan kepada masyarakat. Namun, proses ini sering kali rentan terhadap praktik korupsi, seperti suap, kolusi, dan penyalahgunaan wewenang. Artikel ini membahas aspek hukum pidana yang terkait dengan pengadaan pemerintah melalui analisis berbagai kasus tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Dengan mengkaji kerangka hukum, termasuk Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 junto Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, studi ini mengevaluasi penerapan hukum dalam praktik. Studi kasus menunjukkan berbagai permasalahan yang berulang, seperti penggelembungan anggaran, pengadaan fiktif, dan praktik nepotisme dalam pemberian kontrak. Artikel ini juga menyoroti peran lembaga penegak hukum, khususnya Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), dalam mengusut dan menindak pelanggaran terkait pengadaan. Meskipun telah ada kemajuan dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi, masih terdapat tantangan dalam konsistensi penegakan hukum, keterbatasan sumber daya, serta intervensi politik. Analisis ini menekankan pentingnya mekanisme pencegahan yang lebih kuat, transparansi yang lebih tinggi, serta peningkatan kapasitas aparatur pengadaan untuk meminimalisir pelanggaran hukum. Dengan menelaah kasus-kasus nyata dan hasil hukumnya, studi ini bertujuan memberikan pemahaman yang lebih dalam mengenai hubungan antara hukum pidana dan pengadaan publik, serta mendukung pengembangan strategi anti-korupsi yang lebih efektif di sektor pemerintahan.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ransomware dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Wahyuning Robbi, Suci; Hafrida, Hafrida; Monita, Yulia
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.43967

Abstract

Criminal liability for perpetrators of ransomware crimes is to determine whether or not a person who commits the crime can be held accountable for his actions. Perpetrators of ransomware crimes must fulfill the elements of criminal liability. Regulations on criminal liability for perpetrators of ransomware crimes can be guided by Article 27B paragraph (1) of the ITE Law, Article 30 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law, Article 32 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law, Article 368 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, and Article 67 paragraph (1) of the Personal Data Protection Law by imposing criminal sanctions as a form of criminal liability for ransomware crimes, but in the regulation of these articles there is still a lack of norms, where there are elements of ransomware that have not been fulfilled in these articles so that there are no articles that clearly regulate ransomware crimes. So it is difficult for perpetrators of ransomware crimes to be held criminally accountable, and there is no affirmation in these regulations so that this case is difficult to prove. Therefore, the form of criminal liability for perpetrators of criminal acts from the perspective of statutory regulations has not been realized. So that in imposing criminal sanctions on perpetrators of ransomware crimes, there is no article that is used clearly, making it difficult for perpetrators to be subject to this article in criminal responsibility. Abstrak Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana ransomware adalah untuk menentukan apakah seseorang yang melakukan perbuatan pidana tersebut dapat diminta pertanggungjawaban atau tidak atas tindakannya. Pelaku tindak pidana ransomware harus memenuhi unsur-unsur pertanggungjawaban pidana. Pengaturan tentang pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana ramsomware dapat berpedoman pada Pasal 27B ayat (1) UU ITE, Pasal 30 ayat (2) UU ITE, Pasal 32 ayat (1) UU ITE, Pasal 368 ayat (1) KUHP, dan Pasal 67 ayat (1) UU perlindungan data pribadi dengan menjatuhkan sanksi pidana sebagai bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana atas tindak pidana ransomware, tetapi pada pengaturan pasal tersebut masih mengalami kekaburan norma , yang dimana terdapat unsur-unsur ransomware yang belum terpenuhi dalam pasal tersebutsehingga belum ada pasal yang mengatur secara jelas mengenai tindak pidana ransomware. Maka pelaku tindak pidana ransomware sulit untuk diminta pertanggungjawaban pidana, serta tidak ada penegasan dakam aturan tersebut sehingga kasus ini sulit di buktikan. Oleh karena itu, bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana dalam perspektif peraturan perundang- undangan belum terwujud.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020) More Issue