cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
judgehukum@gmail.com
Phone
+6285359150140
Journal Mail Official
judgehukum@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna (CDF) Marindal 1, Pasar IV Jl. Karya Gg. Anugerah Kecamatan. Patumbak, Medan - Sumatera Utara
Location
Kab. deli serdang,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27754170     DOI : https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v2i02.122
Core Subject : Social,
Judge : Journal of Law on Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna is accepts related writings: Prinsip Dasar Yurisprudensi Hukum Pribadi Hukum Kriminal Hukum Acara hukum Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Administratif Hukum dan Masyarakat Ilmu Pemerintahan Judge : Journal of Law also accepts all writings in various disciplines in accordance with the above rules
Articles 757 Documents
Upaya Hukum Pidana dalam Menangani Pedagang Rokok Tanpa Pita Cukai Michael Stefanus Subnafeu; I Putu Edi Rusmana; I Made Wirya Darma; I Gusti Ayu Eviani Yuliantri
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 08 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i08.1776

Abstract

This study analyzes criminal law enforcement in handling cigarette traders without excise stamps, a crucial issue in protecting state revenue and promoting economic justice. Selling cigarettes without excise stamps violates Law Number 39 of 2007 on Excise, which prescribes imprisonment and/or fines for offenders. Such practices harm the state fiscally, distort fair competition, and lower public compliance with the law. The research applies a normative legal method focusing on positive legal norms (law in the book), using statute, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively by interpreting relevant laws, legal theories, and case studies. Findings show that criminal sanctions, as stipulated in Article 54 of Law Number 39 of 2007, are essential in curbing the illegal cigarette trade. Law enforcement agencies namely the Directorate General of Customs and Excise, the Police, and the Prosecutor’s Office play a vital role in supervision, investigation, and prosecution. However, effectiveness remains limited due to resource constraints, weak inter-agency coordination, low legal awareness, and economic motives among small traders. Improving enforcement requires stronger institutional cooperation, digital surveillance, continuous legal education, and economic empowerment for traders to transition to legal products. Consistent and fair enforcement is expected to enhance deterrence, increase compliance, and support state fiscal protection.
THE DIALECTIC OF POSITIVISM AND SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE: THE PANCASILA RULE OF LAW PARADIGM Elviandri; Muhammad Amin; Demitha selvira amellia; Ricky Indrawan safutra; Andi Wibowo
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1777

Abstract

This study examines the dialectic between legal positivism and substantive justice within the framework of the Pancasila legal state paradigm as an effort to find a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice. The background of this study stems from the hegemony of legal positivism in Indonesia, which emphasizes formal and procedural legality, often neglecting the aspect of substantive justice that is at the core of the Pancasila legal ideal. In practice, law tends to stop at normative certainty (law in books), without touching on the values of humanity and justice that exist in society (law in action). The urgency of this study lies in the need to reposition Pancasila as a grundnorm and ethical foundation to return the orientation of Indonesian law to substantive justice, not merely formal justice. The research method used is juridical-normative with a legal philosophy and conceptual hermeneutics approach, which interprets law as das sollen (what should be). The results of the study show that rigid legal positivism has created a gap between legal certainty and substantive justice. The Pancasila legal paradigm presents itself as an integrative model that unites legal certainty and moral justice, positioning law not merely as an instrument of power, but as an ethical and spiritual means to uphold civilized justice. Thus, the Pancasila legal state offers a philosophical foundation for harmonizing positive norms and substantive values of justice in the national legal system.
PHILOSOPHICAL EXAMINATION OF DECISION NO. 916/PDT.P/2022/PN SBY: THE PARADIGM OF TRANSCENDENTAL LAW AND MAQĀṢID AL-SYARĪ‘AH Elviandri; Sutag Harsie; Muhammad Hanafi; Iranda Nadya Febianty; Munir Anshory
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1778

Abstract

This study is a philosophical examination of Surabaya District Court Decision Number 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN Sby through the approach of Transcendental Law and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah. The issue of interfaith marriage in the context of Indonesian law reflects the epistemological tension between legal positivism and the divine values that exist in society. The absence of explicit norms regarding the legality of interfaith marriage has encouraged judges to interpret the law formalistically, thereby depriving the law of its ethical and spiritual dimensions. The urgency of this study lies in the pressing need to present a transcendental legal paradigm, namely a law that combines legal rationality with moral values, maqāṣid, and divine justice. This study uses a normative-philosophical legal approach through analysis of court decisions, Islamic legal doctrine, and the principles of modern and prophetic legal philosophy. The methods of analysis include descriptive, hermeneutic, and heuristic approaches to explore the transcendental meaning behind the legal arguments of the decisions. The novelty of this research lies in the formulation of an epistemological synthesis between transcendental law and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as an alternative paradigm in jurisprudential examination. The findings of this study show that the judges' considerations in this case are still trapped in procedural legalism, without regard to the principles of ḥifẓ al-dīn (protection of religion) and ḥifẓ al-nasl (protection of offspring), which are the basic objectives of Islamic law. Transcendental analysis reveals that law is not merely legally valid, but must achieve substantive justice that links legal certainty with moral and spiritual benefits. Thus, this study offers a conceptual model of “transcendental maqāṣid-based law” as a new direction for national legal reform based on Pancasila.
Analysis of the Principle of Utilitarianism in Judicial Decision-Making: A Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Regarding the Separation of National and Regional Elections Siti Aisyah; Dina Fitriani Wulandari
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1780

Abstract

This research analyzes the application of the principle of utilitarianism in the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024, which stipulates the separation of the organization of National Elections and Regional Elections starting in 2029. The simultaneous five-box election system implemented since 2019 has created a systemic burden for voters and organizers, increased the number of invalid votes, and resulted in the deaths of election officials due to extreme fatigue. This decision is a constitutional response to the complexity of simultaneous elections, which are considered to contradict the principles of popular sovereignty and the principles of honest and fair elections. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach, which is analyzed qualitatively based on the theoretical framework of utilitarianism by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The research results show that the Constitutional Court's considerations in this decision reflect the application of the principle of "the greatest happiness for the greatest number" thru efforts to maximize collective happiness while minimizing excessive electoral burdens. Separating national and regional elections by a two-year gap has the potential to improve the quality of democratic participation, reduce systemic fatigue for organizers, strengthen the institutionalization of political parties, and increase political accountability at every level of government. From a utilitarian perspective, this decision demonstrates a long-term consideration for the sustainability of Indonesia's democratic system by prioritizing broader social utility over immediate interests, although its implementation requires a comprehensive legal transition design to avoid office vacancies and uphold the principle of power periodicity.
Dinamika Hukum Konstitusi dan Tantangan Praktik Demokrasi di Indonesia: Studi Kritis terhadap Oligarki Politik dan Reformasi Sistem Pemilu Denis Irwin; Muhammad Dwi Erwiansyah; Dayyah Khairullah; Ade Fartini
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1782

Abstract

The trajectory of Indonesia’s constitutional law following the 1998 reform era demonstrates a profound legal evolution driven by amendments to the 1945 Constitution, which were intended to reinforce democratic governance, the supremacy of law, and state transparency. Yet, the implementation of substantial constitutional democracy continues to face numerous obstacles. These include the persistence of political oligarchies, the partiality of electoral institutions, weak inter-institutional oversight, the prevalence of money politics, and the high presidential threshold that restricts equal political competition. This study seeks to examine the current dynamics of Indonesia’s constitutional framework, identify the underlying issues within democratic practice, and formulate an ideal model for reconstructing constitutional law to promote justice and strengthen the rule of law. Employing a normative-juridical approach complemented by limited empirical insights, the research analyzes relevant legal instruments and compares them with constitutional mechanisms applied in other democratic nations. The study concludes that advancing Indonesia’s constitutional order requires reforms in the electoral system, enhancement of independent election management bodies, and stronger law-enforcement mechanisms. In response, the paper recommends a reconstruction of constitutional law that is adaptive to modern political realities by emphasizing constitutional supremacy, institutional transparency, and accountability in governance. The contribution of this research lies in its integrative critique of post-reform constitutional weaknesses and in offering strategic directions for achieving a more substantive and equitable democratic order in Indonesia.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (Studi Putusan Nomor 006/SPut/IX/2025/BPSK.Mdn) Rahmat Rahmat Tri Andika Debataraja; Martono Martono Anggusti
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1783

Abstract

Consumer disputes hold significant importance in Indonesia due to the large number of business actors, which necessitates the establishment of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) as stipulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. This study examines the relevant legal provisions and their alignment with the BPSK Decision No. 006/SPut/IX/2025/BPSK.Mdn, covering both fundamental regulations and consumer protection aspects. Using a normative juridical approach and referring to primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, the research findings indicate that BPSK operates in accordance with existing legal frameworks and upholds the principles of justice, legal certainty, and balance between consumers and business actors. Consequently, the implementation of the law and its decisions are consistent with the foundational principles of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency.
PERAN BADAN NARKOTIKA NASIONAL DALAM KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA MENANGANI KASUS NARKOTIKA ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR Ica Ica lanye enjelina Sitohang; Nurmaya Nurmaya R A Simanjuntak
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1790

Abstract

Drug abuse (narcotics) among minors is a form of crime that has a serious impact on the future of the nation's generation. The purpose of this study is to analyze how the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) implements criminal law policies related to narcotics transaction cases involving minors and also to find out the factors that cause narcotics abuse among them. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a legal and conceptual approach. The findings of the study show that BNN has an important role in three main aspects, namely prevention, law enforcement, and rehabilitation. However, the effectiveness of the implementation of the policy still encounters various challenges, such as limited human resources, lack of rehabilitation places for adolescents, and weak cooperation between the institutions involved. Efforts to overcome this problem are carried out with promotional, preventive, curative, rehabilitative, and repressive approaches that are carried out continuously. In order for the implementation of criminal law policies to be more effective, it is necessary to increase cross-sector cooperation and strengthen the education and rehabilitation function for children who use narcotics.
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Penghentian Penuntutan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan Berdasarkan Peraturan Kejaksaan No.15 tahun 2020 Meliana Hutabarat Meliana Hutabarat; Janpatar Janpatar Simamora
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1794

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of the termination of prosecution for minor criminal cases based on Public Prosecutor Regulation Number 15 of 2020 using a restorative justice approach. The issuance of this regulation is a response to the weaknesses of the formal criminal justice system, which often results in case backlogs, budget inefficiencies, and minimal redress for victims. The methodology used in this paper is a normative juridical legal approach, which includes a review of laws and regulations, doctrines, and related literature. The results of the study indicate that the mechanism of termination of prosecution through restorative justice offers a more humane, fast, simple, and affordable case resolution option. Substantively, this approach has proven effective in restoring relationships between perpetrators, victims, and the community, as well as reducing the potential for recidivism. However, the effectiveness of its implementation is still affected by several obstacles, such as limited technical regulations, resistance from law enforcement officials, and a lack of public understanding. Therefore, strengthening implementation guidelines, increasing prosecutorial capacity, and synergy between law enforcement agencies are essential. Overall, Public Prosecutor Regulation Number 15 of 2020 represents a significant innovation in the effort to realize a more adaptive, efficient, and effective criminal justice system.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan Pada Media Sosial Yuni Yuni Kristania Purba; Roida Roida Nababan
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1795

Abstract

The rapid advancement of information technology has profoundly influenced many aspects of human life, including the dynamics of crime. Among the various types of offenses, one of the most common is classified as white-collar crime, typically committed by individuals who possess the knowledge and technical capability to exploit digital systems. The techniques employed are increasingly complex and varied, such as the use of false identities or the creation of deceptive social media accounts to manipulate and mislead potential victims. Consequently, a growing number of individuals suffer both material and non-material losses. A major issue that arises concerns the difficulty victims face in obtaining adequate legal protection. This challenge stems from inconsistencies in legal interpretation between the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law Number 1 of 2024, which amends Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law). The KUHP primarily emphasizes the criminalization of perpetrators and the elements of the offense, whereas the ITE Law provides a broader framework for victim protection and the restoration of victims’ rights, including compensation. This study aims to analyze the legal protection afforded to victims of fraud on social media and to examine the forms of cyber fraud that occur through these platforms. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and historical methods. The findings reveal that legal protection for victims of online fraud is formally provided under several legal instruments, including the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Law on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, and Law Number 1 of 2024 on Electronic Information and Transactions. However, implementation remains ineffective, hindered by weak law enforcement and low public digital literacy. Moreover, the forms of social media fraud continue to evolve, encompassing schemes such as online marketplace scams, fake job postings, and phishing activities. Although Article 378 of the Criminal Code still serves as the legal basis for prosecuting fraud, the application of the ITE Law as lex specialis is deemed necessary to effectively address and sanction perpetrators of digital crimes.
UPAYA ADVOKAT DALAM MELAKUKAN PENDAMPINGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Tracy Abeliana Sitinjak; Herlina Manullang
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1796

Abstract

Pendampingan hukum oleh advokat dalam kasus korupsi merupakan aspek krusial dalam menegakkan supremasi hukum dan memastikan keadilan dalam proses peradilan pidana. Advokat memiliki peran strategis dalam memberikan bantuan hukum kepada klien, baik tersangka, terdakwa, maupun saksi, dengan memastikan hak-hak mereka terlindungi sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis upaya advokat dalam pendampingan hukum, strategi yang diterapkan, serta problematika yang dihadapi dalam menangani perkara korupsi. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka dengan mengkaji literatur terkait peran advokat, etika profesi, dan tantangan dalam pendampingan hukum kasus korupsi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa advokat tidak hanya berperan sebagai pendamping hukum, tetapi juga sebagai penasihat yang memberikan strategi hukum untuk meminimalkan risiko hukum bagi klien, meskipun sering kali menghadapi dilema etika dan tekanan eksternal. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan kapasitas advokat melalui pelatihan dan penyuluhan hukum untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pendampingan dalam kasus korupsi.