cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Rizky Mahaputra
Contact Email
greenation.info@gmail.com
Phone
+6281210467572
Journal Mail Official
greenation.info@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Kapten. A. Hasan, Telanaipura, Kota Jambi, Jambi 36361, Indonesia
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Published by Greenation Research
ISSN : 29863856     EISSN : 29863155     DOI : https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) is a journal that uses a blind peer-review model that can be accessed online. GIJLSS aims to publish a journal containing quality articles that will be able to contribute thoughts from theoretical and empirical perspectives for the advancement of technology and education. The writings on GIJLSS will make a significant contribution to critical thinking in the scientific field in general, particularly in the fields of Law and Social Sciences.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 135 Documents
 10   11   12   13   14 
Indonesia's Geopolitical Calculation as a Middle Power in the Board of Peace Membership Muhammad Syahdan Aprillianza; Dedy Pribadi Uang
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.812

Abstract

Indonesia’s decision to join the US-led Board of Peace (BoP) on January 22, 2026, raised significant debate regarding its consistency with the nation’s bebas aktif (independent and active) foreign policy principle. However, existing literature has not systematically analyzed Indonesia’s geopolitical calculation as a middle power in this specific case. This study aims to unpack the strategic logic behind Indonesia’s BoP membership. Using a qualitative single case study design, it integrates Middle Power Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis through deductive content analysis of official documents, bilateral agreements, and think-tank reports. Three main findings emerge. First, a strong temporal correlation exists between BoP membership and the finalization of the Indonesia-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) signed on the same day, revealing a diplomatic-economic nexus. Second, Indonesia’s choice to contribute military capabilities rather than financial fees reflects niche diplomacy logic. Third, BoP membership signals a shift from traditional non-alignment toward pragmatic multi-alignment, with the independent-active principle retained as a rhetorical frame. This study contributes to middle power literature by demonstrating that emerging middle powers prioritize strategic pragmatism over normative commitments.
Power-Dependence Relations for Policy Formulation Gender Responsive Budgeting Case in West Sumatera Indonesia Rozidateno Putri Hanida; Roy Valiant Salomo; Achmad Lutfi
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.828

Abstract

While gender-responsive budgeting (GRB) aims to empower women, its execution often overlooks complex cultural landscapes. Addressing a critical research gap, this study moves beyond standard structural GRB assessments by examining its implementation within West Sumatra’s matrilineal society a unique context where women hold customary legitimacy but lack formal political influence. The novelty of this research lies in integrating policy network analysis with indigenous cultural paradigms to expose the exact disjuncture between symbolic gender authority and actual bureaucratic power. Through document analysis, interviews, and participatory observation, the study maps regional planning actors, revealing a narrow, hierarchical network. Power remains heavily concentrated among male bureaucrats and local parliaments, while women's organizations and civil society languish at the margins. This empirically confirms the "matrilineal paradox": customary female custodianship over lineage does not translate into formal political control, rendering local GRB merely administrative rather than transformative. The study makes a key theoretical contribution to feminist institutionalism and policy network theory by demonstrating how entrenched socio-cultural paradoxes can neutralize progressive fiscal policies. Ultimately, advancing GRB requires expanding policy networks to substantively integrate women’s and customary institutions, transforming budgeting from a performative task into genuine empowerment.
The Techno-Oligarchic Communication Paradox: Corporate Media Effects and Democratic Deficit in Indonesian Political Parties Rachmat Hidayat; Pritha Ayodya; Mochamad Husni; Ressa Uli Patrissia; Prasetya Yoga Santoso
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.842

Abstract

Indonesian political parties exhibit a persistent democratic contradiction: electoral turnout above 79% coexists with party trust at only 35%, while algorithmic media ecology has simultaneously enabled civic mobilization and reinforced oligarchic entrenchment. Drawing on a qualitative constructivist design integrating PRISMA-guided systematic literature review (N = 44 studies, 2019–2025), single-case study of the Perindo Party, and systematic social media content analysis (N = 400 posts, κ = 0.81), this study extends Aeron Davis's (2019) four-phase media effects model through the proposed Techno-Oligarchic Communication Paradox (TOCP) framework. TOCP formalizes three structural mechanisms—Funding Corporatocracy, Digital Personalization Without Participation, and Algorithmic Legitimation Substitution—that explain how Phase 4 digital communication technologies paradoxically deepen democratic deficits within oligarchic institutional logics. Perindo's deployment of MNC Group infrastructure (68% corporate content), figure-centric microtargeting (79% HT-branded), and high algorithmic reach (34% youth) produced comprehension failure (72% unable to identify party platform) and legitimacy decline (−21 points in trust; electability at 4.1%). TOCP advances Davis's framework by centering corporate media ownership as an organizing structural variable applicable to emerging democracies in which media–party fusion is constitutive of the political communication landscape.
A Reconstruction of Justice in Natural Resource Governance Based on the Rights of Nature: The Restitution of the UNESA Reservoir in Surabaya Berliana Ayu Kusumawardani; Abdul Aziz Nasihudin; Sri Wahyu Handayani
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.853

Abstract

The control of natural resources within the Indonesian legal system to date continues to reflect the dominance of an anthropocentric paradigm, positioning nature primarily as an object of exploitation. Consequently, the conception of justice that emerges remains largely confined to the distributional dimension of benefits for human interests. This condition has resulted in inadequate protection of ecological functions and the failure to realize substantive justice encompassing environmental sustainability. This study aims to analyze the construction of justice in the control of natural resources, to examine the concept of the Rights of Nature from the perspective of natural philosophy and its relevance to legal reform, and to formulate a model for reconstructing justice based on the Rights of Nature in the case of the restitution of the UNESA Reservoir in Surabaya. The research employs a normative legal method, utilizing conceptual, statutory, and case-based approaches. The findings indicate that justice in the control of natural resources has not fully integrated the ecological dimension, whereas the Rights of Nature concept provides a foundational basis for expanding the meaning of justice through the recognition of the intrinsic value of nature. The reconstruction of justice is carried out through the strengthening of normative, institutional, and governance aspects, positioning ecosystem sustainability as an integral component of justice itself.
The Use of Artificial Intelligence by Judges in Adjudicating Cases Andreas Eno Tirtakusuma; Eleazar Josiah Tirtakusuma
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.870

Abstract

The increasingly massive development of artificial intelligence has touched the judicial sphere and raised fundamental questions about how the law should respond. This article examines the relationship among judges, the law, and artificial intelligence through normative studies, using statutory and conceptual approaches, combined with a sociolegal approach grounded in Social Construction Theory, especially the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT). The study's results indicate that artificial intelligence technology is not a neutral, stand-alone entity, but rather is shaped by the values, norms, and interests of the social actors interacting within it. In the judicial context, judges, as social actors, have an active role in shaping how technology is adopted and used, rather than simply being passive recipients of technological innovation. The Indonesian legal system still faces a significant gap in norms governing artificial intelligence in the judicial environment, necessitating a legal construction grounded in constitutional values ​​while being sensitive to the dynamics of the social construction of technology. Artificial intelligence should be positioned as an instrument that supports judges' capacity, not a substitute for judicial authority, accompanied by ethical oversight mechanisms, algorithmic accountability, and strengthened technological literacy for all judicial officials.

Page 14 of 14 | Total Record : 135

 10   11   12   13   14 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (March - A Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (March 202 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (June 2024 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (March 202 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (June 2023 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (March 202 Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September More Issue