cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ardan Moris
Contact Email
ardan@iblam.ac.id
Phone
+6285215345871
Journal Mail Official
ardan@iblam.ac.id
Editorial Address
Raya Jl. Poltangan Raya No.6, RT.3/RW.5, Tj. Bar., Kec. Jagakarsa, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12530
Location
Kab. bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law
Published by Neolectura
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29866693     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37010
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Postulat adalah jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Neolectura, Divisi Publikasi Buku dan Jurnal Ilmiah PT Naraya Elaborium Optima yang bekerja sama dengan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM, diterbitkan dua kali dalam satu tahun. Postulat adalah media publikasi ilmiah dalam bentuk makalah konseptual dan penelitian lapangan yang terkait dengan bidang kajian ilmu hukum dan relevansinya. Diharapkan Postulat dapat menjadi media bagi akademisi dan peneliti untuk menerbitkan karya ilmiah mereka dan menjadi sumber referensi untuk pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan. Postulat merupakan jurnal yang berada dibawah naungan PT Naraya Elaborium Optima
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 79 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
Kewenangan Penyelenggaraan dan Pertanggungjawaban Ibu Kota Negara Berdasarkan Uud No. 3 Tahun 2022 Tentang Ibu Kota Negara Ihza Mahendra, Yusril; Harvelian, Agnes; Mulyana, Momon
Postulat Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): POSTULAT: Journal of Law
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i2.2109

Abstract

The relocation of Indonesia’s new capital city (IKN) demands significant funding, raising concerns about inefficiency in the State Budget (APBN) and issues in the drafting of Law Number 3 of 2022 on the State Capital. This study analyzes the authority and accountability of the Nusantara Capital City Authority within Indonesia’s constitutional system. Using a normative juridical method, the research finds that Article 12 paragraph (1) of Law No. 3/2022 grants the Authority the status of a special regional government, distinguishing it from general regional administrations. Furthermore, Article 13 specifies that elections in IKN are limited to the President and Vice President, DPR, and DPD members, with no local elections or DPRD. This centralized appointment of the Head of the Authority by the President challenges democratic values and decentralization principles. Therefore, transparent selection, strong oversight, and balanced investment policies are crucial to ensure accountable governance that safeguards national interests.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata-Pidana dalam Kasus Penipuan Berbasis Investasi Bodong Aris, Umar; Dewanto, Wishnu; Hasan, Bob
Postulat Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): POSTULAT: Journal of Law
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i2.2138

Abstract

Investment fraud, commonly referred to as investasi bodong, has become a major issue in Indonesia, causing significant financial losses and weakening public confidence in the financial sector. The rapid growth of digital technology has expanded and complicated fraudulent schemes, posing new challenges for law enforcement and regulatory institutions. This study aims to analyze civil and criminal dispute resolution mechanisms in investment fraud cases, assess their effectiveness, and identify key challenges and reforms needed. Using a qualitative approach within a normative legal framework, the research examines relevant laws—including the Criminal Code, Civil Code, ITE Law, Capital Market Law, Banking Law, Consumer Protection Law, Anti-Money Laundering Law, and OJK regulations—supported by secondary data and case studies. Findings reveal that, despite established legal frameworks, practical enforcement remains weak due to complex digital evidence, jurisdictional barriers, and limited resources. A holistic reform integrating regulatory adaptation, institutional coordination, and digital literacy is urgently required.
Tindak Pidana Penipuan Multi-Level Marketing (MLM): Studi Komparatif KUHP dan UU Perlindungan Konsumen Sudawan, Muhammad Yuda; Mukti, Robby Teja; Al-Huda , Mukhlis
Postulat Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): POSTULAT: Journal of Law
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i2.2139

Abstract

This research analyzes the criminal act of fraud within Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) schemes through a comparative study between the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK). MLM as a modern marketing strategy is often misused by pyramid scheme practices that focus on recruiting new members and harming the public. The criminal law framework through the KUHP and consumer protection through the UUPK play roles in addressing MLM-related fraud but face implementation challenges. This research also highlights weaknesses in the Trade Law regarding the definition of pyramid schemes that can be exploited. This study employs a qualitative approach with a normative legal framework, analyzing primary data (laws and regulations) and secondary data (legal literature). Qualitative analysis indicates that the KUHP (Article 378) is effective in prosecuting individual perpetrators by proving fraudulent intent, while the UUPK provides broader protection against misleading business practices and advertising by business actors, as well as providing compensation mechanisms for consumers. The KUHP and UUPK are complementary, but the structural eradication of pyramid schemes is hampered by definitional loopholes in the Trade Law. Revisions to trade regulations and enhanced coordination in law enforcement and public literacy are needed to comprehensively address this issue.
Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Bisnis Kripto: Analisis terhadap Celah Regulasi dan Pengawasan Syahputra, Harry; Qomarudin, Heri; Suvinah, Suvinah
Postulat Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): POSTULAT: Journal of Law
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i2.2140

Abstract

Crypto assets present a dualism as a financial technology innovation promising efficiency and economic potential, yet simultaneously opening new vulnerabilities to money laundering (ML) due to their decentralized and pseudo-anonymous nature. This phenomenon urges an analysis of the legal and supervisory framework in Indonesia. This study employs a qualitative approach with a normative juridical method, analyzing primary and secondary legislation as well as relevant literature. Primary data includes official government documents, while secondary data comprises books and scientific journals. The results indicate that ML modus operandi involving crypto in Indonesia includes techniques such as the use of nominees, unregulated VASPs, and potential exploitation of P2P transactions, as evidenced in actual cases. Although Indonesia has an AML/CFT legal framework (Law No. 8/2010) and updated sectoral regulations (POJK 27/2024) mandating KYC/CDD and the Travel Rule, the analysis identifies significant gaps. These gaps include limitations of primary laws in accommodating crypto specifics, challenges in implementing secondary regulations (Travel Rule, CDD effectiveness), technical difficulties in supervision and law enforcement (tracking anonymity, seizing digital assets), and gaps in implementing FATF international standards. The main conclusion is that the effectiveness of preventing and combating crypto ML requires strengthening adaptive regulations, enhancing institutional capacity, optimizing supervisory technology, and reinforcing domestic and international cooperation. Recommendations include regulatory harmonization, revision of relevant laws, continuous evaluation of POJK 27/2024, enhancement of technical and human resource capacities, strengthening inter-agency coordination, and developing risk mitigation strategies for P2P and unhosted wallets.
Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU): Analisis Yuridis terhadap Peran Korporasi dalam Kejahatan Keuangan Wijayanti, Fatimah Ratna; Zulfkifi, Effi; Pasaribu, August H.
Postulat Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): POSTULAT: Journal of Law
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i2.2141

Abstract

Money laundering poses a global threat to the integrity of financial systems, and corporations often play a central role in this crime. This research aims to juridically analyze the role of corporations in money laundering in Indonesia, focusing on the prevailing legal framework and challenges in its enforcement. The research method employed is qualitative normative law, analyzing Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering and relevant literature. The results indicate that although Indonesian law recognizes corporate criminal liability in money laundering cases, there are significant challenges in its implementation and enforcement. This study concludes that there is a need for regulatory strengthening, enhanced oversight, and closer inter-agency cooperation to combat money laundering involving corporations more effectively.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Penerapan Pasal-Pasal KUHP dalam Cybercrime: Studi Kasus Unauthorized Transfer Payment Juwita, Juwita; Suriyanto, Suriyanto
Postulat Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): POSTULAT: Journal of Law
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i2.2142

Abstract

This study examines the application of the provisions of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) in cybercrime, specifically focusing on the case of unauthorized transfer payment. With the rapid development of technology, traditional criminal law faces significant challenges in addressing cybercrime effectively. This research identifies the gaps in existing regulations and highlights the need for more adaptive and comprehensive legal frameworks to combat cybercrime. The study also discusses the role of the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE) in dealing with cyber offenses in Indonesia.The research employs a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, relying on primary and secondary legal materials for data collection. The analysis is based on a detailed literature review, including legal documents, court decisions, and previous research. The results show that current provisions in the Penal Code, such as Article 362 and Article 378, are inadequate for addressing the unique aspects of cybercrime, as they do not fully encompass the technological and non-physical nature of such crimes. The UU ITE, though more relevant, still faces challenges in enforcement, particularly in terms of coordination between law enforcement agencies. Moreover, the study emphasizes the need for continuous legal updates to address evolving technological developments and the increasing complexity of cybercrimes. The research concludes that strengthening the enforcement capacity of law enforcement agencies and enhancing international cooperation is essential to effectively combat cybercrime.
Peran Regulasi dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Konsumen yang Efektif Pratista, Bunga Nuraini
Postulat Vol 3 No 1 (2025): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i1.1882

Abstract

Consumer protection is one of the important aspects in creating a fair and sustainable market. In Indonesia, regulations related to consumer protection are regulated through Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, which aims to ensure that consumer rights are protected from detrimental business practices. However, even though this regulation already exists, its effectiveness still faces various challenges, such as weak supervision, lack of legal awareness among consumers, and rapid technological developments, especially in the e-commerce sector. The formulation of the problem is 1) How effective is the existing regulation in protecting consumer rights in Indonesia? 2) What is the role of supervisory institutions and law enforcement officers in implementing existing consumer protection regulations? The approach method used in this legal research is to use the normative legal approach method. The overall results of the research are that consumer protection regulations in Indonesia, especially those stated in Law Number 8 of 1999, have provided a good legal basis for protecting consumer rights. However, its effectiveness is still limited by various challenges, such as weak supervision, lack of understanding from consumers, and the rapid dynamics of the digital market and supervisory institutions and law enforcement officers have a very vital role in implementing consumer protection regulations in Indonesia. They are responsible for ensuring that consumer rights are effectively protected through supervision, law enforcement, and dispute resolution
Analisis Efektivitas Penerapan Pasal 36 Ayat 3 Undang Undang No 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Penyiaran Terhadap Pemirsa Anak Hadi, Adi Moh Kurnia; Heliany, Ina
Postulat Vol 3 No 1 (2025): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i1.1906

Abstract

Television remains one of the main media for entertainment and information in Indonesia, even though digital media and streaming platforms are now increasingly developing. Watching television is a common activity among families, especially as a moment of togetherness after activities. However, along with the variety of shows provided by television stations, concerns have arisen regarding content that is not suitable for children. Shows that contain elements of violence, lies, slander, harassment, and even sensitive issues such as SARA and LGBT have the potential to damage children's psychological and social development. Therefore, it is important for parents to be more selective in controlling the shows their children consume. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of Article 36 paragraph 3 of Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting in protecting children's broadcasts and how supervision and sanctions are applied to television stations that violate these provisions. This research uses qualitative normative legal research methods, with a focus on literature study and visual documentation analysis that utilizes primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that there are gaps in supervision and law enforcement regarding the broadcasting of children's shows in accordance with existing regulations. It is hoped that this research can provide input in developing broadcasting policies that are more effective and fairer for child protection in Indonesia.
Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum Anti Monopoli Antara Kepentingan Pasar dengan Kepentingan Publik dalam UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Muta’ali, Abdul Yazid; Hendrawarman, Hendrawarman
Postulat Vol 3 No 1 (2025): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i1.1917

Abstract

This article discusses the evaluation of law enforcement in Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning The prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, with a focus on the balance between market interests and public interests. Law enforcement in Indonesia is faced with various challenges, including limited resources, lack of accurate data, and political influence that hinder the effectiveness of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in supervising monopolistic practices. This article analyzes the effectiveness of law enforcement based on the existing regulatory framework and highlights the dilemma faced between promoting market efficiency and consumer protection. The evaluation results show that law enforcement often prioritizes market interests, which can potentially harm the public interest. The obstacles faced, including legal uncertainty and the influence of large business actors, are also identified as obstacles in achieving the desired balance. Therefore, this article suggests the need to increase the capacity of the KPPU, educate the public, and adjust regulations to optimize fair and effective law enforcement. These findings are expected to provide recommendations for improving the supervision system for monopolistic practices in Indonesia.

Page 8 of 8 | Total Record : 79

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): POSTULAT: Journal of Law Vol 3 No 1 (2025): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2024): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2024): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 2 (2023): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2023): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum