cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sukiati
Contact Email
sukiati@uinsu.ac.id
Phone
+62895404181600
Journal Mail Official
jurnalahlana@uinsu.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Willem Iskandar, Pasar V, Medan Estate, Medan, Provinsi Sumatera Utara, 20371
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
ISSN : 30892716     EISSN : 30325242     DOI : http://doi.org/10.30821/jhki
Core Subject : Religion, Education, Social,
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam emphasizes the study of Islamic family law and Islamic law in Islamic countries in general and specifically in Indonesia by emphasizing the theories of Islamic family law and Islamic law and its practices in the Islamic worlds that developed in attendance through publications of articles and book reviews. This Journal specializes in studying the theories and practices of Law and Islamic family law in Islamic countries and intends to express original research and current issues. This journal welcomes the contributions of scholars from related fields warmly that consider the following general topics: Law Islamic Law Family Law Islamic Family Law Family Study Islamic Criminal Law Customary Law Sharia Economic Law Islamic Constitutional Law Islamic Comparative law Anthropological Law Sociological Law Marriage and Gender Issues History of Islamic Family Law and Islamic Law Social Sciences (Miscellaneous)
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (semua kategori) - Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (Lain-Lain)
Articles 30 Documents
 1   2   3 
Cash Waqf as an Instrument of Islamic Philanthropy: A Juridical Review and Its Implementation in Indonesia and Singapore Ghazali bin Ahmad Sinin
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 2, No 2 (2025): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v2i2.31274

Abstract

Cash waqf has become a form of contemporary waqf that is increasingly being discussed, both within the body of Islamic law and in the practice of social philanthropy. This paper seeks to examine cash waqf from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, covering its conceptual framework, legal validity, normative foundations, historical development, and its application in Indonesia. The analysis reveals that although early jurists disagreed regarding cash waqf particularly concerning the requirement for the preservation of the waqf asset (baqā’ al-‘ayn) the Hanafi school, along with contemporary scholars, validates it by emphasizing the continuity of benefits and the public interest. The normative foundation of cash waqf rests on the general principles of the Qur’an, the Prophet’s guidance regarding ongoing charity (ṣadaqah jāriyah), ijma’ (consensus), and qiyas (analogy), in addition to rational arguments and socio-economic considerations. Historically, cash waqf was effectively implemented during the Ottoman Caliphate era, serving as clear evidence of its effectiveness. In Indonesia itself, cash waqf is legally enshrined in Law No. 41 of 2004 on Waqf and is supported by the Indonesian Waqf Board and Islamic financial institutions. Although hampered by a number of issues, such as a lack of public understanding and limited professionalism among managers, cash waqf holds great potential as a means of strengthening the economy and fostering sustainable social development. 
Diferensiasi Fasakh, Khulu', dan Pembatalan Perkawinan dalam Fikih Mazhab dan Hukum Positif Indonesia Zamzam Alfathoni Fillah; Muhammad Amar Adly; Heri Firmansyah
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 2 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v3i2.30495

Abstract

This study seeks to examine, in a thorough manner, how the institutions of fasakh and marriage annulment operate when viewed through both Islamic jurisprudence and Indonesia’s positive law. Its central concern lies in the various grounds that justify fasakh, namely concealed physical defects, deception (tadlis), the disappearance of a spouse (mafqud), and sexual incapacity. Beyond that, the article traces the differing positions held by the four principal schools of jurisprudence (madzhab) concerning the juridical placement of fasakh, khulu’, and talak, while also reviewing how annulment is applied under Law Number 1 of 1974 together with the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Methodologically, the work adopts a juridical-normative design carried out through library research. Findings reveal that fasakh and annulment alike operate as protective mechanisms intended to spare the wronged party from harm (mudharat). What distinguishes the two is the moment at which the defect emerges: annulment rests on flaws that taint the contract from its inception, whereas fasakh responds to circumstances that surface, or only become known, once the contract has been concluded. Within the Indonesian framework, annulment additionally safeguards children’s legal standing, treating them as legitimate even after their parents’ marriage has been set aside.
Toleransi Masyarakat terhadap Pungli: Antara Terpaksa dan Terbiasa Muhammad Rifqi Maulana Saom; Hadinda Safira
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 2 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v3i2.31052

Abstract

Illegal levies, commonly known as pungli, remain a persistent social phenomenon in Indonesian public services despite decades of legal prohibition and repeated government crackdowns. This study examines why such practices continue to be tolerated by society, focusing on the dual dynamics of economic compulsion and social habituation. This research is normative-doctrinal legal research employing a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and an analytical approach, and it is therefore situated within the sociology of law only at the level of theoretical framework rather than field data collection. The sociological propositions advanced here are derived from secondary empirical findings reported in prior published studies, official reports of the Saber Pungli Task Force, and national survey data, not from primary interviews or observation conducted by the authors. The study analyzes pungli through legal effectiveness theory, legal culture theory, and the living law concept, and reviews the legal basis for its eradication under the Corruption Crime Law and Presidential Regulation Number 87 of 2016. The findings show that public tolerance toward pungli is not merely a matter of legal ignorance but a product of entrenched bureaucratic culture, weak consistency in law enforcement, deficiencies in the substance of the norms themselves, limited service infrastructure, and a cost-benefit calculation among ordinary citizens who perceive paying a small illegal fee as more efficient than pursuing a lengthy formal complaint. The study further develops the Islamic legal dimension of the problem through the concepts of amanah, riswah, and maqashid syariah, particularly the protection of property (hifz al-mal) and the protection of lineage and social order. This study concludes that eradicating pungli requires not only punitive legal measures but also structural bureaucratic reform, service digitalization, and a shift in legal culture supported by religious-ethical internalization, so that compliance with the law is no longer seen as more burdensome than circumventing it. Pungutan liar (pungli) merupakan fenomena sosial yang terus bertahan dalam praktik pelayanan publik di Indonesia, meskipun telah berpuluh-puluh tahun dilarang secara hukum dan berulang kali menjadi sasaran operasi pemberantasan oleh pemerintah. Penelitian ini mengkaji mengapa praktik tersebut tetap ditoleransi oleh masyarakat, dengan menitikberatkan pada dua dinamika utama, yaitu keterpaksaan ekonomi dan kebiasaan sosial. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif-doktrinal dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan analitis, sehingga posisinya terhadap sosiologi hukum berada pada tataran kerangka teoretis dan bukan pada pengumpulan data lapangan. Proposisi sosiologis yang diajukan dalam tulisan ini bersumber dari temuan empiris sekunder yang telah dipublikasikan dalam penelitian terdahulu, laporan resmi Satuan Tugas Sapu Bersih Pungutan Liar, serta data survei nasional, bukan dari wawancara atau observasi primer yang dilakukan penulis. Kajian ini menganalisis pungli melalui teori efektivitas hukum, teori budaya hukum, dan konsep living law, sekaligus meninjau dasar hukum pemberantasannya dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 87 Tahun 2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa toleransi masyarakat terhadap pungli bukan semata soal ketidaktahuan hukum, melainkan produk dari budaya birokrasi yang mengakar, lemahnya konsistensi penegakan hukum, kelemahan pada substansi norma, keterbatasan sarana pelayanan, serta kalkulasi untung-rugi masyarakat yang menganggap membayar pungutan kecil lebih efisien ketimbang menempuh jalur pengaduan formal yang panjang. Penelitian ini juga mengembangkan dimensi hukum Islam atas persoalan tersebut melalui konsep amanah, riswah, dan maqashid syariah, khususnya perlindungan harta (hifz al-mal) dan pemeliharaan tatanan sosial. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemberantasan pungli tidak cukup hanya mengandalkan langkah hukum represif, tetapi juga memerlukan reformasi struktur birokrasi, digitalisasi pelayanan, dan perubahan budaya hukum yang ditopang internalisasi nilai keagamaan.
Cyber Infidelity Dalam Persepektif Hukum Keluarga Islam: Analisis Kriteria Nusyuz Dalam Relasi Perkawinan Digital Chilyatun Nafis
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 2 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v3i2.30020

Abstract

The advancement of digital communication technology has transformed patterns of interaction within marital relationships and introduced new challenges, one of which is cyber infidelity. This phenomenon raises questions regarding its legal status within Islamic family law, particularly in relation to the concept of nusyuz. This study aims to analyze cyber infidelity based on the criteria of nusyuz in digital marital relationships. Employing a normative legal research method with a literature review approach, this study examines various sources related to cyber infidelity, nusyuz, marital rights and obligations, and the objectives of marriage in Islam. The findings identify four criteria of nusyuz: violation of marital obligations, neglect of spousal rights, creation of domestic disharmony, and contradiction with the objectives of Islamic marriage. Based on these criteria, online flirting, sexting, and emotional infidelity are found to fulfill the elements of nusyuz because they potentially undermine marital commitment, reduce mutual trust, trigger domestic conflict, and hinder the realization of a family characterized by sakinah, mawaddah, and rahmah. This study contributes to Islamic family law scholarship by formulating normative criteria of nusyuz that can be used as an analytical framework for assessing various forms of cyber infidelity in digital marital relationships. These findings demonstrate that cyber infidelity should not be viewed merely as an ethical issue in digital interactions but also as a form of marital misconduct that can be analyzed through the concept of nusyuz within the framework of Islamic family law.Perkembangan teknologi komunikasi digital telah mengubah pola interaksi dalam hubungan perkawinan dan melahirkan berbagai tantangan baru, salah satunya adalah cyber infidelity. Fenomena ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai kedudukan hukumnya dalam perspektif hukum keluarga Islam, khususnya terkait konsep nusyuz. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis cyber infidelity berdasarkan kriteria nusyuz dalam relasi perkawinan digital. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan studi kepustakaan melalui analisis berbagai literatur yang berkaitan dengan cyber infidelity, nusyuz, hak dan kewajiban suami istri, serta tujuan perkawinan dalam Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa suatu perilaku dapat dikategorikan sebagai nusyuz apabila memenuhi empat kriteria, yaitu pelanggaran terhadap kewajiban perkawinan, pengabaian hak pasangan, timbulnya disharmoni rumah tangga, serta pertentangan dengan tujuan perkawinan Islam. Berdasarkan kriteria tersebut, bentuk-bentuk cyber infidelity berupa flirting online, sexting, dan perselingkuhan emosional memenuhi unsur-unsur nusyuz karena berpotensi melanggar komitmen perkawinan, mengurangi kepercayaan pasangan, menimbulkan konflik rumah tangga, serta menghambat terwujudnya keluarga yang sakinah, mawaddah, dan rahmah. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan kajian hukum keluarga Islam melalui perumusan kriteria normatif nusyuz yang dapat digunakan sebagai kerangka analisis untuk menilai berbagai bentuk cyber infidelity dalam relasi perkawinan digital. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa cyber infidelity tidak hanya merupakan persoalan etika dalam ruang digital, tetapi juga dapat dipahami sebagai bentuk pelanggaran komitmen perkawinan yang relevan dianalisis melalui konsep nusyuz dalam hukum keluarga Islam.
Dinamika Syarat Pemisahan Tempat Tinggal 6 Bulan dalam Perceraian: Analisis SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 dan Implementasi Maqashid Syariah Abdul Kodir Alhamdani; Mumu Fahmudin; Uus Kusmayadi; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 2 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/ahlana.v3i2.28935

Abstract

The high divorce rate under the pretext of continuous disputes and quarrels’ has led to the desacralization of marriage and triggered disparities in Religious Court decisions. In response, the Supreme Court issued Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 3 of 2023, mandating a minimum 6-month separation period as an objective standard for a broken marriage, with a specific exception for cases indicating Domestic Violence (KDRT). This normative legal research aims to analyze the ratio legis and the implementation of this regulation using statutory and conceptual approaches based on Maqashid Syariah. The findings indicate that the 6-month separation requirement serves as an instrument of sadd adz-dzari'ah to minimize impulsive divorces, ensure legal certainty, and protect family integrity (hifz al-nasl). Conversely, the exception for KDRT victims represents the harmony and flexibility of Islamic law, which prioritizes the safety of human life (hifz al-nafs) over the formal administrative procedures of marriage. In conclusion, SEMA 3/2023 has normatively succeeded in harmonizing legal certainty with gender justice. However, on an empirical implementation level, this regulation demands the courage of Religious Court Judges to conduct progressive legal discovery (rechtvinding) when evaluating non-formal KDRT evidence to prevent the secondary victimization of women. The high divorce rate, citing persistent disputes and quarrels, has created a phenomenon of the desacralization of marriage and triggered disparities in decisions in the Religious Courts. Responding to this, the Supreme Court issued SEMA Number 3 of 2023, which requires a minimum of 6 (six) months of separation as an objective standard for broken marriages, with special exceptions for cases indicating Domestic Violence (KDRT). This normative legal research aims to analyze the legislative ratio and implementation of this regulation using a statutory and conceptual approach based on Maqashid Sharia. The results of the study indicate that the 6-month separation period requirement is a sadd adz-dzari'ah instrument to minimize impulsive divorce, ensure legal certainty, and protect family integrity (hifz al-nasl). On the other hand, the exception for victims of domestic violence represents the harmony and flexibility of Islamic law that prioritizes the safety of human life (hifz al-nafs) above the formalities of marriage administration procedures. In conclusion, SEMA 3/2023 has normatively succeeded in establishing a dialogue between legal certainty and gender justice. However, in its empirical implementation, this regulation demands courage from Religious Court Judges in conducting progressive legal discovery (rechtvinding) when assessing non-formal evidence of domestic violence to prevent secondary victimization of women.
The Narrative of Support and Opposition Among Social Media Users Towards Polygamy Content: An Exegetical Analysis of QS. An-Nisā' Verse 3 Widia Usada; Muhammad Zikri
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 2, No 2 (2025): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v2i2.30779

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the meaning and law of polygamy from the perspective of the Qur'an, based on the interpretation of QS. An-Nisa verse 3. The issues examined in this study concern how the concept of polygamy is understood in Islam and how the principle of justice is applied in practice in accordance with sharia guidance. This study uses a qualitative method with a library research approach and a thematic tafsir method, with the main sources being the Qur'an and various classical and contemporary tafsir works such as Tafsir Al-Maraghi, Tafsir Al-Manar, Tafsir Al-Mishbah, and Tafsir Ibn Kathir. The results of the study show that QS. An-Nisa verse 3 does not encourage polygamy, but merely permits it under certain conditions, with the main requirement being the ability to act justly, both physically and spiritually. The discussion shows that polygamy in Islam is a form of concession aimed at safeguarding social and moral welfare, not at satisfying carnal desire. In conclusion, polygamy in Islam is permitted to a limited extent, accompanied by a great responsibility to uphold justice and avoid harm, in accordance with the principle of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah.
Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Islam dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional: Studi Implementasi Qanun Jinayat di Aceh Ardewifna Bakkara; Fauziah Lubis; Pagar Pagar; Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 1 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v3i1.30855

Abstract

Abstract:This study aims to examine the existence and application of Islamic criminal law in Indonesia within the framework of a pluralistic national legal system, as well as to analyze its relevance in responding to the dynamics of modern societal development. This research employs a qualitative approach using a library research method, through the review of various classical and contemporary literatures related to fiqh jinayah and the legal system in Indonesia. The findings indicate that Islamic criminal law occupies a limited position within the national legal system; however, it is still accommodated in certain contexts, such as through regional policies that implement sharia-based principles. Furthermore, the implementation of Islamic criminal law requires contextual ijtihad to ensure its alignment with the values of justice, humanity, and human rights. In practice, the concepts of jarimah, including hudud, qisas, and ta’zir, serve as normative foundations, although their application is adjusted to the social, cultural, and legal conditions prevailing in Indonesia. In addition, efforts to harmonize Islamic criminal law with national law are essential in order to create a just and responsive legal system. Thus, Islamic criminal law in Indonesia demonstrates a degree of flexibility in its implementation while maintaining adherence to the fundamental principles of Islamic law in addressing the challenges of contemporary developments. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji eksistensi dan penerapan hukum pidana Islam di Indonesia dalam kerangka sistem hukum nasional yang bersifat pluralistik, serta menganalisis relevansinya dalam menjawab dinamika perkembangan masyarakat modern. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi pustaka (library research), melalui penelusuran berbagai literatur klasik dan kontemporer yang berkaitan dengan fiqh jinayah dan sistem hukum di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum pidana Islam memiliki kedudukan yang terbatas dalam sistem hukum nasional, namun tetap diakomodasi dalam konteks tertentu, seperti melalui kebijakan daerah yang menerapkan prinsip-prinsip syariat. Penerapan hukum pidana Islam juga memerlukan proses ijtihad yang kontekstual agar selaras dengan nilai-nilai keadilan, kemanusiaan, dan hak asasi manusia. Dalam praktiknya, konsep jarimah seperti hudud, qisas, dan ta’zir menjadi landasan normatif, namun implementasinya disesuaikan dengan kondisi sosial, budaya, dan hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Selain itu, upaya harmonisasi antara hukum pidana Islam dan hukum nasional menjadi hal penting guna menciptakan sistem hukum yang adil dan responsif. Dengan demikian, hukum pidana Islam di Indonesia menunjukkan adanya fleksibilitas dalam penerapannya, sekaligus tetap berpegang pada prinsip-prinsip dasar syariat dalam menghadapi tantangan perkembangan zaman.
Modernisasi Pengelolaan Wakaf melalui Digitalisasi dalam Meningkatkan Transparansi dan Kepercayaan Publik Edi Sahputra Siregar; Multajimah Multajimah
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 1 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v3i1.31109

Abstract

Waqf holds substantial strategic potential in Indonesia, with more than 400,000 registered waqf land sites, yet its contribution to public welfare remains far below expectation. The core obstacle is weak transparency and accountability: manual recording, unstandardised reporting, and the public's inability to monitor waqf assets have eroded public trust and suppressed the collection of waqf funds. This study analyses how waqf digitalisation is implemented, which digital features strengthen transparency, how digitalisation affects public trust, and what challenges accompany its adoption. It employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach, taking as its objects Indonesian waqf institutions that have adopted digital systems. Data were gathered through interviews, observation of digital platforms, and document analysis, then examined to identify patterns and causal relationships between digitalisation and the strengthening of transparency and trust. The results show that digitalisation proceeds through planned stages, from online waqf platforms and integrated digital databases to mobile applications and digital accounting, with a small number of institutions adopting blockchain. Transparency is supported by real-time dashboards, program tracking, automated reporting, audit trails, and public dashboards. These features significantly increase public trust, reflected in the growth of waqf donors and funds collected, greater donor loyalty, and reduced information asymmetry. Implementation nevertheless faces financial constraints, low digital literacy, infrastructure gaps, data security risks, and a regulatory vacuum. The study concludes that digitalisation is an effective strategy for strengthening transparency and public trust in waqf institutions, provided it is supported by adequate regulation and sustained institutional commitment.Wakaf memiliki potensi strategis yang sangat besar di Indonesia dengan lebih dari 400.000 lokasi tanah wakaf terdaftar, namun kontribusinya bagi kesejahteraan umat masih jauh dari harapan. Persoalan mendasarnya terletak pada lemahnya transparansi dan akuntabilitas: pencatatan manual, pelaporan yang belum terstandar, dan sulitnya masyarakat memantau penggunaan harta wakaf telah menggerus kepercayaan publik, yang pada gilirannya menghambat penghimpunan dana wakaf. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana digitalisasi wakaf diimplementasikan, fitur digital apa saja yang digunakan untuk meningkatkan transparansi, bagaimana dampaknya terhadap kepercayaan publik, serta tantangan apa yang menyertai penerapannya. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis pada lembaga wakaf di Indonesia yang telah menerapkan sistem digital. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara, observasi platform digital, dan analisis dokumen, yang selanjutnya ditelaah untuk mengidentifikasi pola dan hubungan kausal antara digitalisasi dengan penguatan transparansi dan kepercayaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa digitalisasi berlangsung melalui tahapan terencana, mulai dari pengembangan platform wakaf online, basis data digital terintegrasi, aplikasi mobile, hingga sistem akuntansi digital, dengan sebagian kecil lembaga telah mengadopsi blockchain. Transparansi ditopang oleh dashboard real-time, pelacakan program, pelaporan otomatis, audit trail, dan public dashboard. Fitur-fitur tersebut secara signifikan meningkatkan kepercayaan publik, tercermin dari bertambahnya jumlah wakif dan dana terhimpun, menguatnya loyalitas wakif, serta berkurangnya asimetri informasi. Implementasinya tetap menghadapi keterbatasan finansial, rendahnya literasi digital, kesenjangan infrastruktur, risiko keamanan data, dan kekosongan regulasi. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa digitalisasi merupakan strategi efektif untuk memperkuat transparansi dan kepercayaan publik terhadap lembaga wakaf, sepanjang didukung regulasi memadai dan komitmen kelembagaan yang berkelanjutan.
Implikasi Yuridis dan Dampak Psikologis Perkawinan Beda Agama Terhadap Tumbuh Kembang Anak Wike Sundari; Heri Firmansyah
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 1 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v1i1.30447

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications and psychological impacts of interfaith marriage on children’s growth and development in Indonesia. Interfaith marriage is a phenomenon that emerges within a plural society as a result of increasing cross-religious social interactions. However, its regulation within Indonesian positive law remains debatable, particularly after the issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023, which significantly restricts the legal recognition of interfaith marriages. This situation creates a tension between legal certainty and social reality, and it also affects the legal status of children, who may be categorized as children born out of wedlock, thereby limiting their civil rights protection. From a psychological perspective, children raised in interfaith families face challenges in identity formation, especially in understanding differing religious values received from both parents. Based on Cognitive Dissonance Theory and Erik Erikson’s psychosocial development theory, value differences within the family, along with social pressure from the surrounding environment, may lead to internal conflict, spiritual identity crisis, anxiety, and feelings of alienation. Different parenting styles and social stigma further intensify the psychological burden experienced by children during their developmental process. The research employs a normative-empirical legal method using statutory, conceptual, and sociological approaches. Data were collected through literature review and interviews with relevant informants, and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that although interfaith marriage generates complex legal and psychological consequences, these impacts can be minimized when effective family communication, mutual respect, and supportive social environments are present. This study emphasizes the importance of a legal approach that not only prioritizes legal certainty but also considers humanitarian aspects and the protection of the best interests of the child.
Ambivalensi Efektivitas Hukum Kekerasan Seksual Transnasional di Institusi Keagamaan melalui Red Notice Interpol: Studi Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Syekh Ahmad Al Misry (SAM) Aorta Abdillah Alaa; Lu'Lu Salamah; Al Hafidh Muhammad Sobri; Miftahus Sholehudin
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 2 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/ahlana.v3i2.30796

Abstract

This article examines the ambivalence of legal effectiveness in addressing alleged transnational sexual violence involving Syekh Ahmad Al Misry (SAM) through the INTERPOL Red Notice mechanism. The central problem lies in the gap between the availability of domestic legal instruments and the practical limitations of law enforcement when the alleged perpetrator is located outside Indonesian jurisdiction, while victims remain exposed to religious power relations, stigma, a culture of silence, and the risk of suppression. This study aims to analyze how the law operates at the procedural level and to assess the limitations of its substantive effectiveness in ensuring victim protection and facilitating cross-border legal cooperation. It employs normative legal research informed by a socio-legal perspective and a qualitative single-case study design. The data were drawn from legislation, institutional documents, academic literature, and publicly accessible factual information, verified through source triangulation and analyzed using Soerjono Soekanto’s five factors of legal effectiveness. The findings indicate that reporting, investigation, victim protection, suspect designation, and the submission of a Red Notice demonstrate that the law has formally been activated. Its effectiveness nevertheless remains ambivalent because a Red Notice does not constitute an automatic international arrest warrant, the enforcement capacity of domestic law depends on the response of foreign authorities, and victim protection continues to be shaped by social structures and institutional culture. The study concludes that legal effectiveness in such cases should be assessed by the system’s capacity to ensure victims’ safety and recovery, establish institutional accountability, and achieve concrete cross-border legal coordination. Artikel ini mengkaji ambivalensi efektivitas hukum dalam penanganan dugaan kekerasan seksual transnasional yang melibatkan Syekh Ahmad Al Misry (SAM) melalui mekanisme Red Notice Interpol. Persoalan utama penelitian terletak pada kesenjangan antara tersedianya instrumen hukum nasional dan keterbatasan penegakannya ketika terduga pelaku berada di luar yurisdiksi Indonesia, sementara korban menghadapi relasi kuasa keagamaan, stigma, budaya diam, dan risiko pembungkaman. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis cara hukum bekerja secara prosedural sekaligus menilai batas efektivitas substantifnya dalam perlindungan korban dan kerja sama lintas negara. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan perspektif sosio-legal dan desain studi kasus tunggal yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Data diperoleh dari peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen kelembagaan, literatur akademik, serta data faktual terbuka yang diverifikasi melalui triangulasi sumber, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan lima faktor efektivitas hukum Soerjono Soekanto. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses pelaporan, penyidikan, perlindungan korban, penetapan tersangka, dan pengajuan Red Notice membuktikan hukum telah bergerak secara formal. Namun, efektivitasnya tetap ambivalen karena Red Notice bukan perintah penangkapan otomatis, daya paksa hukum nasional bergantung pada respons negara lain, dan perlindungan korban masih dipengaruhi struktur sosial serta budaya institusional. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa efektivitas hukum dalam perkara semacam ini harus diukur dari kemampuan sistem menjamin keamanan dan pemulihan korban, membangun akuntabilitas kelembagaan, serta mewujudkan koordinasi hukum lintas negara yang konkret.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 30

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3, No 2 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 1 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 2, No 2 (2025): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 1, No 1 (2024): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam