cover
Contact Name
Yuda Syahputra
Contact Email
info@eloracenter.org
Phone
+628116601212
Journal Mail Official
info@eloracenter.org
Editorial Address
Bumi Mutiara Serang, Cluster Symphony, Blok C2 No.18, Serang - Banten - Indonesia 42122
Location
Kota serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
ISSN : 2502079X     EISSN : 25031619     DOI : 10.29210/30036820000
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) ISSN: 2502-079X (Print), ISSN: 2503-1619 (Electronic) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes research and practice-based research across multidisciplinary fields of knowledge. The journal adopts an integrative and transdisciplinary perspective, welcoming scholarly works that employ systematic cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection to address real-world challenges and generate measurable improvements in diverse professional and community contexts. JRTI is committed to bridging theory and practice by disseminating actionable knowledge that contributes to institutional development, community empowerment, policy implementation, technological innovation, and sustainable social transformation at local, national, and international levels. The journal embraces contributions from a wide range of scientific clusters, including education and human development; social sciences and humanities; psychology and mental health; public health and well-being; science, technology, engineering, and applied innovation; environmental and sustainability studies; governance, public administration, and policy reform; economic development and entrepreneurship; agriculture and rural advancement; disaster mitigation and resilience; as well as creative and cultural industries. JRTI particularly values studies conducted in authentic field settings such as schools, universities, government institutions, non-governmental organizations, community groups, healthcare facilities, industries, and multi-sector collaborative networks. JRTI welcomes various forms of action-oriented inquiry, including classroom action research, participatory and collaborative action research, community-based interventions, practitioner-led research, institutional improvement projects, organizational development initiatives, and multi-sector transformative programs. Submissions are expected not only to report contextual findings but also to present methodological refinement, innovative intervention models, best-practice frameworks, or scalable solutions that can be adapted and replicated across regions. Through interdisciplinary dialogue and cross-institutional collaboration, JRTI aims to strengthen Indonesia’s capacity for evidence-based decision-making, enhance professional practice across disciplines, and contribute to sustainable development aligned with national priorities and global development goals.
Articles 382 Documents
Return-to-play testing and functional assessment following upper extremity injury in athletes: a systematic literature review Mario Febrian; Andre Igoresky; Ifdil Ifdil
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036906000

Abstract

One of the toughest challenges in sports medicine is figuring out when an athlete can safely return to play after an upper extremity injury. Functional performance tests, isokinetic strength assessments, and patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used, but there is still no widely accepted, evidence-based RTP framework for shoulder, elbow, or wrist injuries. This systematic review pulled together the latest evidence on RTP assessment, pinpointed criteria backed by research, evaluated the tools available, and pointed out where studies are still lacking. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and searched the Scopus database for English-language studies published between 2021 and 2026. Two independent reviewers handled study selection and data extraction, with strong agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.87). Methodological quality was checked using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Out of 633 records, only 10 studies made the cut. Four main themes came out of the analysis. First, criteria-based RTP protocols led to fewer reinjuries compared with time-based clearance, even when some functional deficits remained. Second, isokinetic rotational strength and limb symmetry turned out to be the strongest predictors of successful RTP. Third, functional tests like the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test and Unilateral Seated Shot-Put Test showed real clinical value, but they need population-specific normative data to be more useful. Fourth, psychological readiness played its own role in RTP decisions, independent of physical measures. Wearable sensors and artificial intelligence show potential for continuous monitoring, but stronger prospective evidence is still needed. Overall, the current evidence supports a multidimensional RTP framework that combines objective strength, functional performance, and psychological readiness. At the same time, it highlights the need for standardized, pathology-specific criteria through future multicenter prospective studies.
Digital coaching systems in sport: a systematic review of emerging technologies and research gaps for evidence-based coaching Mario Febrian; Andre Igoresky; Ifdil Ifdil
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036907000

Abstract

Sports coaching has been getting a major overhaul from digital technologies. Things like continuous athlete monitoring, computer vision movement analysis, wearable sensors, and intelligent decision-support systems are all part of it. But even with all this rapid progress, the evidence is still scattered across different fields, sport science, engineering, AI, human-computer interaction. That makes it hard to get a clear picture of how well these tools actually work in real coaching. This systematic review pulled together the current evidence on digital coaching systems. We wanted to see what technological approaches are dominant, how solid the research methods are, and where things should go next. The review stuck to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We ran a structured Boolean search in Scopus, looking at TITLE-ABS-KEY fields for studies from 2021 to 2025. Only English-language peer-reviewed journal articles that met predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were kept. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts; any disagreements got sorted out in discussion. Methodological quality got rated using the FICO framework, Focus, Information, Context, Outcome. Then we synthesized the findings through inductive thematic analysis. Out of 986 records initially identified, just 15 studies made it through all the eligibility and quality checks. Four major themes came up: wearable sensing and athlete monitoring, computer vision and markerless motion tracking, intelligent and immersive coaching systems, and analytics-driven decision-support. One thing was clear: technical accuracy is consistently high across these studies. But when it comes to long-term coaching effectiveness, usability, implementation, and ethical governance, the evidence is still thin. That points to a clear need for future research, longitudinal, multi-site, and centered on what coaches actually need.

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 4 (2024): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2022): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) More Issue