cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Yuda Syahputra
Contact Email
info@eloracenter.org
Phone
+628116601212
Journal Mail Official
info@eloracenter.org
Editorial Address
Bumi Mutiara Serang, Cluster Symphony, Blok C2 No.18, Serang - Banten - Indonesia 42122
Location
Kota serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Published by Elora Center For Research & Innovation
ISSN : 2502079X     EISSN : 25031619     DOI : 10.29210/30036820000
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) ISSN: 2502-079X (Print), ISSN: 2503-1619 (Electronic) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes research and practice-based research across multidisciplinary fields of knowledge. The journal adopts an integrative and transdisciplinary perspective, welcoming scholarly works that employ systematic cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection to address real-world challenges and generate measurable improvements in diverse professional and community contexts. JRTI is committed to bridging theory and practice by disseminating actionable knowledge that contributes to institutional development, community empowerment, policy implementation, technological innovation, and sustainable social transformation at local, national, and international levels. The journal embraces contributions from a wide range of scientific clusters, including education and human development; social sciences and humanities; psychology and mental health; public health and well-being; science, technology, engineering, and applied innovation; environmental and sustainability studies; governance, public administration, and policy reform; economic development and entrepreneurship; agriculture and rural advancement; disaster mitigation and resilience; as well as creative and cultural industries. JRTI particularly values studies conducted in authentic field settings such as schools, universities, government institutions, non-governmental organizations, community groups, healthcare facilities, industries, and multi-sector collaborative networks. JRTI welcomes various forms of action-oriented inquiry, including classroom action research, participatory and collaborative action research, community-based interventions, practitioner-led research, institutional improvement projects, organizational development initiatives, and multi-sector transformative programs. Submissions are expected not only to report contextual findings but also to present methodological refinement, innovative intervention models, best-practice frameworks, or scalable solutions that can be adapted and replicated across regions. Through interdisciplinary dialogue and cross-institutional collaboration, JRTI aims to strengthen Indonesia’s capacity for evidence-based decision-making, enhance professional practice across disciplines, and contribute to sustainable development aligned with national priorities and global development goals.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 427 Documents
 39   40   41   42   43 
Effects of physical and mental fatigue on competitive fencing performance: a systematic review Ade Zalindro; Ifdil Ifdil; Rudyanto Rudyanto
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036961000

Abstract

Fencing is an open-skill combat sport in which rapid perception, decision-making, and precise motor execution are performed under intermittent high-intensity demands. Fatigue may therefore affect performance through both neuromuscular and cognitive pathways. This systematic review examined how physical and mental fatigue manifest in competitive fencing, how fatigue influences performance, and which countermeasures have been investigated. Following PRISMA 2020, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect were searched, yielding 295 records. After removal of 15 duplicates and screening, 44 reports were assessed for eligibility and 14 primary empirical studies were included. The included evidence comprised four randomized studies, six non-randomized quantitative studies, three quantitative descriptive studies, and one qualitative study. MMAT quality scores ranged from 3.5 to 5.0/5.0; 11 studies were rated high and three medium. Because of substantial heterogeneity in study design, fatigue-induction protocols, and outcome measures, findings were synthesized narratively using thematic synthesis rather than meta-analysis. Across the included evidence, simulated or competitive fencing was associated with increasing perceived and/or mental fatigue and with modest neuromuscular fatigability, while reaction time showed the most consistent performance decrement. Higher expertise appeared to buffer movement-precision loss. Nutritional, thermal, and cognitive countermeasures showed preliminary benefits, but objective fencing-performance effects remain uncertain. The evidence supports integrated monitoring of physical and mental fatigue and larger, adequately powered, ecologically valid trials.
Cognitive-motor coupling in beach volleyball: a systematic review of attention, anticipation, decision-making, and psychological-affective correlates of performance Rudyanto Rudyanto; M. Arie Desman
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036962000

Abstract

Beach volleyball is a physically demanding dyadic Olympic sport in which performance depends on interacting physical, technical, perceptual-cognitive, and psychological factors. This systematic review synthesised evidence on visual attention, anticipation, decision-making, cognitive load, and psychological-affective states in beach volleyball. Following PRISMA 2020 guidance, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect were searched during the review period; the database search reported in the manuscript yielded 982 records, of which 16 duplicates were removed and 966 were screened. Sixty-four reports were sought for full-text assessment, 59 were assessed for eligibility, and 22 studies met the prespecified inclusion criteria and entered the qualitative synthesis. Eligibility was structured using PICOS: beach volleyball participants or expertise comparators; perceptual-cognitive and/or psychological-affective constructs; performance- or expertise-related outcomes; and empirical peer-reviewed designs. Study quality was appraised with a transparent four-domain FICO rubric (Focus, Information, Context, Outcome), with scores of 7–8 classified as high quality and 5–6 as moderate; 19 of 22 studies were rated high quality and the median score was 7/8. The synthesis identified three interconnected themes: action-coupled attention and anticipation, cue- and heuristic-based decision-making under cognitive load, and psychological-affective regulation. Explicit participant samples ranged from 1 to 82 in studies reporting participant counts, while some studies used match-level datasets. Evidence was geographically concentrated: 8 studies were attributed to Germany and 8 to Brazil, with 3 from Estonia, 2 from Switzerland, and 1 from the Netherlands. The heterogeneity of designs and outcomes precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Overall, the evidence supports a cognitive-motor model in which perceptual expertise, decision processes, mental fatigue, and affective states jointly shape performance.
Psychological health in gymnastics: a systematic review of disordered eating, body image, mental well-being, and psychological resources Anisa Sholiha Mia; Ifdil Ifdil
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036963000

Abstract

Competitive and developmental gymnastics involve intensive training, performance evaluation, and, in several disciplines, explicit body-shape and weight expectations. These conditions may create psychological risks, but evidence is dispersed across disordered eating, body image, mental health, and psychological-skills research. This systematic review synthesised empirical evidence on psychological health in gymnasts across competitive, recreational, developmental, and post-competitive contexts published between 2021 and 2026. The review followed PRISMA 2020 and used Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed empirical investigations involving gymnasts and reporting at least one psychological or mental-health outcome. From 398 records identified, 11 duplicates were removed; 387 records were screened, 47 full texts were assessed, and 20 studies were included. Methodological quality was appraised using the MMAT 2018, with domain-level ratings retained for transparency and no study excluded solely because of quality. The synthesis identified three analytical themes: (1) disordered eating, body image, and weight pressure; (2) mental health and psychological consequences; and (3) psychological skills and regulatory resources. The evidence indicates that disordered eating and body-image concerns are concentrated in higher-pressure contexts, whereas adaptive self-talk, task-involving motivational climates, supportive coach relationships, and regulated perfectionism are potential protective resources. Because most studies were cross-sectional and heterogeneous, the findings should not be interpreted causally and no meta-analysis was conducted. Prospective longitudinal, intervention, and multi-method studies are needed, particularly in under-represented disciplines and among male gymnasts.
Mental dynamics of performance in racket sports: a systematic review of attention, emotion, cognitive load, and decision-making in tennis and table tennis Andre Igoresky; Ifdil Ifdil; Rudyanto Rudyanto
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036971000

Abstract

Performance in racket sports is shaped by attentional control, perceptual-cognitive processing, emotion regulation, and the availability of cognitive resources. This systematic review examined how attention and perceptual-cognitive processing, emotion and competitive pressure, and cognitive load and mental fatigue relate to performance in tennis and table tennis. Following PRISMA 2020, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect were searched for peer-reviewed empirical studies published within the 2020–2025 search window. The search identified 283 records; 19 duplicates were removed, 264 records were screened, 58 reports were sought for retrieval, 4 were not retrieved, and 54 were assessed for eligibility. Twenty-nine full-text reports were excluded, leaving 25 studies for qualitative synthesis. Methodological quality was appraised with the MMAT 2018. Because the included evidence differed substantially in study design, constructs, measures, and performance outcomes, no pooled effect size or meta-analysis was conducted; findings were synthesised through deductive thematic analysis. Reviewer-level screening/appraisal decisions were not preserved in the source record in a form that permits valid retrospective calculation of Cohen’s kappa, so no coefficient is imputed. Three themes emerged: attention and perceptual-cognitive processing; emotion, anxiety, and pressure; and cognitive load, mental fatigue, and regulation. Overall, external/holistic attentional strategies, perceptual-cognitive training, and selected self-regulation interventions were associated with improved performance, whereas anxiety, pressure, and mental fatigue were commonly associated with performance decrements.
From laboratory to field: accuracy constraints and methodological considerations in markerless pose estimation for sport performance analysis: a systematic review Ardo Okilanda; Rudyanto Rudyanto
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036972000

Abstract

Computer-vision-based markerless pose estimation is increasingly used to quantify sport movement outside laboratory settings, but its validity is not uniform across tasks, joints, anatomical planes, or environmental conditions. This systematic review synthesised peer-reviewed evidence published from 2020 to 2025 using PRISMA 2020 procedures and a PICO-based search across Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. Eighteen studies met the final eligibility criteria, including 17 empirical studies and one narrative review. A narrative thematic synthesis was combined with methodological appraisal and an operational validity framework linking target variables, reference standards, and intended use. Across validation studies, lower-limb sagittal-plane agreement reached CMC > .90 in the Pose2Sim study, whereas real-competition OpenPose validation reported CMD about .73 for knee-angle waveforms and weaker agreement for hip and ankle measures. A review-level estimate included in the corpus placed markerless sagittal-plane error at approximately 3–15°, with larger errors in the transverse plane. The synthesis therefore supports markerless systems most strongly for spatiotemporal, gross-displacement, and selected sagittal-plane variables when task-specific validation demonstrates small systematic bias. Transverse-plane, rotational, occlusion-prone, and high-speed measures remain conditional and require additional validation. Practitioners should select systems according to the target variable and intended decision, rather than treating markerless capture as a single accuracy class. Future research should standardise validation metrics, report absolute error and bias alongside agreement statistics, and test systems under genuine competition conditions.
Effects of AI-generated feedback on l2 writing: a PRISMA 2020 systematic review of performance, revision, and engagement outcomes Kristian Burhan
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036973000

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools can provide immediate feedback during second-language (L2) writing, but evidence on their effects across writing outcomes remains fragmented. This PRISMA 2020 systematic review synthesized peer-reviewed empirical studies published from 2023 to 2025 that examined GenAI-generated feedback for English writing in EFL/ESL contexts. Searches of Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect identified 1,106 records; after 12 duplicates were removed, 1,094 records were screened, 71 full texts were assessed, and 20 studies met the eligibility criteria. Eligible studies were experimental, quasi-experimental, mixed-methods, qualitative, or design-based investigations reporting writing performance, revision, feedback engagement/literacy, or AI-feedback accuracy. Because study designs, writing tasks, outcome measures, and reported statistics were heterogeneous, statistical meta-analysis and pooled effect-size estimation were not conducted; findings were synthesized thematically and by effect direction. The evidence indicates that GenAI feedback most consistently supports local accuracy, lexical development, revision activity, and learner engagement, whereas effects on syntactic complexity, higher-order composing, and long-term retention are mixed or conditional. Comparative evidence generally supports a complementary model in which AI provides rapid, high-volume local feedback and teachers address global structure, disciplinary expectations, contextual appropriateness, and affective support. Key limitations of the evidence base include short intervention periods, small samples, heterogeneous measurement, limited longitudinal evidence, and uneven geographic representation. Future research should preregister screening procedures, use independent double screening with agreement statistics, report extractable effect sizes and delayed post-tests, and examine equity, transfer, and hybrid AI-human feedback models.
Generative AI in second-language writing: a systematic review of learning, feedback, and literacy outcomes Kristian Burhan
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036974000

Abstract

The diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has challenged assumptions about how English L2 writing is taught, supported, and assessed. This systematic literature review synthesised peer-reviewed empirical evidence on generative AI in English L2 writing, focusing on pedagogical transformation, feedback and assessment, and academic literacy. Following PRISMA 2020, searches of Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect identified 912 records. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, 18 empirical studies published between 2023 and 2025 were included, although the search window covered 2020-2025. The eligible studies were appraised with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT 2018), with 14 meeting at least 4 of 5 criteria under the manuscript's descriptive appraisal rubric and four scoring 3.0-3.5; none was excluded solely on quality. Owing to substantial heterogeneity in designs and outcomes, findings were synthesised narratively and no quantitative meta-analysis was attempted. Evidence indicates that generative AI can improve surface-level accuracy, revision activity, and selected language or self-regulatory outcomes, while effects on higher-order rhetorical and critical competencies remain inconsistent. AI is most defensible as a teacher-guided complement, with continuing concerns about academic integrity, over-reliance, assessment validity, and equity. The review identifies priorities for longitudinal, multi-model, and multi-site research.

Page 43 of 43 | Total Record : 427

 39   40   41   42   43 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 4 (2024): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2022): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) More Issue